IF YOUR POLITICAL PUNDITS AND MEDIA ARE NOT SHOUTING OUT ABOUT THE RECOVERY OF MASSIVE FRAUD----THEY ARE NOT WORKING FOR YOU AND ME!!!! REMEMBER, WHEN A GOVERNMENT SUSPENDS RULE OF LAW, IT SUSPENDS STATUTES OF LIMITATION!
If your incumbent is not shouting all of the issues below, they are neo-liberals or they are not effective as our representative. Please make these issues central to any campaign and if your candidates are not shouting loudly-----RUN IN ALL PRIMARIES YOURSELVES! We need Mr and Ms Smith going to Washington, the state house, and city hall! If you go with a neo-liberal then you are saying bring on TPP and take citizenship away from all Americans. Your children will not be the middle-class you are today!
I will be enjoying the holiday tomorrow and hope your family is enjoying the season. The New Year needs to see millions of Americans making resolutions to become active-----shouting loudly and strongly-----and working for justice and a return to democracy and first world status in America!!!
REgarding Americans impoverished by corporate fraud:
Corporate NPR and WYPR does a great job making the prevalence of impoverishment apparent as the US moves from democratic to autocratic with the suspension of Rule of Law. They make sure to report citizens in the sorriest of states. Do you hear citizens who are enraged and demanding change? NO.....NOT ON CORPORATE MEDIA. We are thankful to all of the public media that are filling the place of a once public NPR/APM and they are not showing sadness and hardship, they are showing people enraged by the stealing of public wealth by VISIGOTHS.
Indeed, Americans have never been richer because when the 1% steal public money and treat it as their own.......you know the investment of our money will reap profits! That is what has happened these Obama years. As I showed earlier, government watchdogs have calculated that each and every American citizen is owed a few hundreds of thousands of dollars from these massive corporate frauds, plus the damages and pain and suffering. Corporate NPR does a great job documenting the pain and suffering. Tens of trillions coming back to government coffers, public Trusts, and individual pockets over the next decade will go far in rebuilding the US middle-class and create again a healthy domestic economy!
Below you see what these families losing their homes and jobs and as a result their wealth are due -------because all of this happened as a result of the massive corporate frauds of last decade. Think spilling a cup of hot coffee brought a large settlement------we are talking tens of trillions of dollars in just damages and pain and suffering!
IF YOUR MEDIA OUTLET AND POLITICAL PUNDIT IS NOT SHOUTING LOUDLY AND STRONGLY THAT AMERICANS ARE WEALTHIER NOW THAN EVER BEFORE------IF THEY ARE NOT SHOUTING ABOUT THIS MASSIVE MOVEMENT OF WEALTH AS CRIMINAL AND NEEDING JUSTICE-----THEY ARE NEO-LIBERALS WORKING FOR WEALTH AND PROFIT!
All we need to do is run and vote for labor and justice to reinstate Rule of Law and get this recovery under way!!!
Pain and suffering
Pain and suffering is the legal term for the physical and emotional stress caused from an injury (see also pain and suffering).
Some damages that might be under this category would be: aches, temporary and permanent limitations on activity, potential shortening of life, depression or scarring. When filing a lawsuit as a result of an injury, it is common for someone to seek money both in compensation for actual money that is lost and for the pain and stress associated with virtually any injury. In a suit, pain and suffering is part of the "general damages" section of the claimant's claim, or, alternatively, it is an element of "compensatory" non-economic damages that allows recovery for the mental anguish and/or physical pain endured by the claimant as a result of injury for which the plaintiff seeks redress.
Apart from money damages awarded in trial, money damages are also given informally outside the judicial system in mediations, arbitration (both of which may be court annexed or non litigated claims) as well as in routine insurance settlements. Individual claimants or those represented by lawyers often present demands to insurers to settle for money. These demand for bodily injury compensation monies often set out damages that are similarly used in the court litigated pleadings. Demands are usually written summaries of a claimant's medical care and the facts which resulted in the injury.
Damages will be all of the national debt of $17 trillion dollars and all of the losses to retirements, pensions, public Trusts, and government coffers from lost revenue and the gains that could have been made had the money been with the victims of these crimes. This will be tens of trillions of dollars as the wealth accumulated from the BEAR to BULL Wall Street stock market was mostly from these ill-gotten gains. WE STRUCK IT BIG WHEN WALL STREET ACTED AS IF OUR MONEY WAS ITS OWN!!!!
In law, damages are an award, typically of money, to be paid to a person as compensation for loss or injury. The rules for damages can and frequently do vary based on the type of claim which is presented (e.g., breach of contract versus a tort claim) and the jurisdiction.
At common law, damages are categorized into compensatory damages and punitive damages. Compensatory damages are further categorized into special damages, which are economic losses such as loss of earnings, property damage and medical expenses, and general damages, which are noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering and emotional distress.
As I have shown, government watchdogs place the amount of corporate fraud at tens of trillions and we have international investigative journalists following the fraud and off-shoring of illegal gains in preparation of Rule of Law being reinstated in the US. Everyone can be an investigative journalist in your own communities by finding and recording the movement of money lost to government coffers through fraud. In Maryland, that keeps organizations like mine very busy. I thank all that work on this with me!
In criminal law, fraud is intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual; the related adjective is fraudulent, and verb is defraud. Fraud is a crime and a civil tort at common law, though the specific criminal law definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Defrauding people or entities of money or valuables is a common purpose of fraud.
How do you settle public malfeasance like the FED and failure to work within its stated mission? Well, first we need to recognize that the inaction of our public officials are indeed an obvious and deliberate act against the interest of the public. That is easy for the FED as we have shown Greenspan and Geithner deliberately allowed massive fraud in the mortgage industry to continue because the goal was not only movement of public wealth to the top earners, but a seizing of private property in real estate from the middle-working class to the top so control of real estate is lost to most of American citizens. Obama has pretended that none of these massive frauds occurred as has his Attorney General Holder. This holds true down to the state and local level as Executives in office are responsible for protecting public interests.
So, we not only need to prosecute these public officials, we need to seize their wealth for the failure to protect and for deliberately aiding and abetting fraud. Obama and Holder------O'Malley and Gansler-----Rawlings-Blake and Bernstein------
ALL OF THESE PUBLIC OFFICIALS CHARGED WITH PROTECTING THE PUBLIC WILL BE GUILTY OF PUBLIC MALFEASANCE AND THEIR WEALTH WILL BE MADE PUBLIC.
Misfeasance in public office
Misfeasance in public office is a cause of action in the civil courts of England and Wales and certain Commonwealth countries. It is an action against the holder of a public office, alleging in essence that the office-holder has misused or abused his power. The tort can be traced back to 1703 when Chief Justice Sir John Holt decided that a landowner could sue a police Constable who deprived him of his right to vote (Ashby v White). The tort was revived in 1985 when it was used so that French Turkey producers could sue the Ministry of Agriculture over a dispute that harmed their sales.
Generally, a civil defendant will be liable for misfeasance if the defendant owed a duty of care toward the plaintiff, the defendant breached that duty of care by improperly performing a legal act, and the improper performance resulted in harm to the plaintiff.