Cindy Walsh for Mayor of Baltimore
- Mayoral Election violations
Questionnaires from Community
- Education Questionnaire
- Baltimore Housing Questionnaire
- Emerging Youth Questionnaire
- Health Care policy for Baltimore
- Environmental Questionnaires
- Livable Baltimore questionnaire
- Labor Questionnnaire
- Ending Food Deserts Questionnaire
- Maryland Out of School Time Network
- LBGTQ Questionnaire
- Citizen Artist Baltimore Mayoral Forum on Arts & Culture Questionnaire
- Baltimore Transit Choices Questionnaire
- Baltimore Activating Solidarity Economies (BASE)
- Downtown Partnership Questionnaire
- The Northeast Baltimore Communities Of BelAir Edison Community Association (BECCA )and Frankford Improvement Association, Inc. (FIA)
- Streets and Transportation/Neighbood Questionnaire
- African American Tourism and business questionnaire
- Baltimore Sun Questionnaire
- City Paper Mayoral Questionnaire
- Baltimore Technology Com Questionnaire
- Baltimore Biker's Questionnair
- Homewood Friends Meeting Questionnaire
- Baltimore Historical Collaboration---Anthem Project
- Tubman City News Mayoral Questionnaire
- Maryland Public Policy Institute Questionnaire
- AFRO questionnaire
- WBAL Candidate's Survey
- Trans Pacific Pact (TPP)
- Progressive vs. Third Way Corporate Democrats
Financial Reform/Wall Street Fraud
- Federal Healthcare Reform
- Social Security and Entitlement Reform
- Federal Education Reform
- Government Schedules
State and Local Government
- Maryland Committee Actions
- Maryland and Baltimore Development Organizations
- Maryland State Department of Education
- Baltimore City School Board
Building Strong Media
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
- "Talk About It" Radio - WFBR 1590AM Baltimore
- Promethius Radio Project
- Clearing the Fog
- Democracy Now
- Black Agenda Radio
- World Truth. TV Your Alternative News Network.
- Daily Censured
- Bill Moyers Journal
- Center for Public Integrity
- Public Radio International
- Baltimore Brew
- Free Press
- Far Left/Socialist Media
- Media with a Third Way Agenda >
- Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!) >
- Progressive Actions
- Maryland/Baltimore Voting Districts - your politicians and their votes
- Petitions, Complaints, and Freedom of Information Requests
- State of the Democratic Party
- Misc 2
- Misc 3
- Misc 4
- Standard of Review
WALSH FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE INFORMATION AND PLATFORM
- Campaign Finance/Campaign donations
- Speaking Events
- Why Heather Mizeur is NOT a progressive
- Campaign responses to Community Organization Questionnaires
Cindy Walsh vs Maryland Board of Elections
- Leniency from court for self-representing plaintiffs
- Amended Complaint
- Plaintiff request for expedited trial date
- Response to Motion to Dismiss--Brown, Gansler, Mackie, and Lamone
- Injunction and Mandamus
DECISION/APPEAL TO SPECIAL COURT OF APPEALS---Baltimore City Circuit Court response to Cindy Walsh complaint
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
- Cover Page ---yellow
- Table of Contents
- Table of Authorities
- Leniency for Pro Se Representation
- Statement of Case
- Questions Presented
- Statement of Facts
- Conclusion/Font and Type Size
- Record Extract
- Motion for Reconsideration
- Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss
- Motion to Reconsider Dismissal
- Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals >
- General Election fraud and recount complaints
Cindy Walsh goes to Federal Court for Maryland election violations
- Complaints filed with the FCC, the IRS, and the FBI
- Zapple Doctrine---Media Time for Major Party candidates
- Complaint filed with the US Justice Department for election fraud and court irregularities.
- US Attorney General, Maryland Attorney General, and Maryland Board of Elections are charged with enforcing election law
- Private media has a responsibility to allow access to all candidates in an election race. >
- Polling should not determine a candidate's viability especially if the polling is arbitrary
- Viability of a candidate
- Public media violates election law regarding do no damage to candidate's campaign
- 501c3 Organizations violate election law in doing no damage to a candidate in a race >
- Voter apathy increases when elections are not free and fair
- Maryland Board of Elections certifies election on July 10, 2014
- Maryland Elections ---2016
Ethics board scores a near miss Our view: The call for more transparency in the mayor's use of free tickets is welcome, but her proposed policy includes a glaring loophole
12:37 p.m. EST, December 13, 2012 Baltimore Sun
The Baltimore ethics board came close to showing some real backbone this week in seeking higher standards for the mayor's use of free tickets she gets to the city's sports stadiums and 1st Mariner Arena. The board is demanding better record keeping and that each ticket be used for a legitimate city purpose. Unfortunately, the mayor's administration is proposing to define "legitimate city purpose" so broadly as to make the restriction meaningless, and the board appears inclined to go along with her.
There is no indication that Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has used the tickets differently than her predecessors. Mayors have been getting free tickets to the city's arena since it was built in the 1960s, and the deal that led to the construction of Baltimore's baseball and football stadiums included the provision of a skybox for the mayor in each. From the beginning, mayors have been using the boxes as they see fit — sometimes passing tickets along to community groups or as rewards for exceptional city employees, but also often using them for their own entertainment or to reward friends and allies.
The ethics board, admirably, did not view precedent as a sufficient justification for treating a public asset as a private perk. After The Sun reported on Mayor Rawlings-Blake's use of the 1st Mariner tickets — she and her family and friends took advantage of them to go to some of the hottest shows in town — the board decided to launch an investigation. But it discovered that the city's record keeping was so poor that it could not properly evaluate whether any ethics violations had occurred. Nor was the city able to produce a current copy of its contract with 1st Mariner to verify the terms by which the tickets are provided.
The logs of tickets would indicate, for example, that the mayor distributed 10 tickets but would not say to whom or for what reason. That's not good enough, and the board is now asking for detailed logs to be kept that list the names and titles of the recipients and a justification for each. The mayor has agreed to do so and to publish them. These tickets are public assets just as much as taxpayer dollars are, and the public deserves to know exactly how they are being used.
The board said it would violate the ethics code for the city to solicit or accept more tickets than called for in the contract (about 35 per show), and it said the mayor should develop a list of "legitimate city purposes" for which these tickets can be used. A spokesman for Ms. Rawlings-Blake says the city's law department has already done so, and they will go into effect Jan 1. That's where the trouble lies.
The purposes the new policy outlines include: to thank community leaders; as part of economic development efforts; to reward city employees or officials for good work; and to provide the mayor and her friends and family with a "reasonable opportunity" to attend events to support the venue.
How exactly does it "support the venue" for the mayor to attend a Jay-Z concert, or for her family to snag tickets for Rihanna? Is this the Roman coliseum, and is she the emperor waving down to the masses?
Though the situation is not completely comparable, it's worth thinking about the mayor's use of these tickets in the context of what would be acceptable for an executive in the private sector to consider a valid business expense. The IRS provides extensive guidance on this issue (Publication 463, for those following along at home).
Business entertainment expenses are deductible, the IRS says, if the main purpose of the entertainment was the active conduct of business, you engage in business during event, and you have an expectation that the event will lead to a specific business benefit. They can also be deducted if they are "associated" with business — that is, the event is designed to help you get new business or cement an existing relationship, and the business discussion took place directly before or after the event.
Under that rubric, using tickets to a show to wine and dine a business owner considering expanding in Baltimore would make sense. Going to a show with friends would not.
Unfortunately, Ethics Board Chairwoman Linda B. "Lu" Pierson has accepted the mayor's contention that such use of free tickets is acceptable. She should think again. If such a broad interpretation of "legitimate city business" is allowed to stand, then nothing will change.
DLLR head Sanchez to become chief of staff for Rawlings-Blake Posted: 11:13 am Mon, May 7, 2012
By Alexander Pyles
Daily Record Business Writer
The head of the state labor department is leaving his post to become Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake’s third chief of staff in as many years. Alexander M. Sanchez, who has been secretary of the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation since 2009, will join Rawlings-Blake’s administration on May 16. In a statement Monday, Rawlings-Blake cited Sanchez’s “knowledge ...
Why would the Secretary of DLLR for Maryland become a Baltimore City Mayor Chief of Staff? Well, it is DLLR that is responsible for just about every agency and policy that I decry as corrupt and non-functioning. Labor laws and wages, banking, business, and non-profit regulation and oversight; all the areas that we are shouting out as having fraud and no oversight begins and ends with Mr. Sanchez. Why is Governor O'Malley's brother leaving now.....will investigations into corruption and fraud lead to Governor O'Malley and his term as Mayor..............ABSOLUTELY. As hispanic workers encouraged to come to Maryland to work find that they are going to be kept working at poverty wages, will it help to have a hispanic spokesman for the Mayor ....maybe.
Mikulski wrong to oppose prevailing wage rule
9:00 a.m. EST, November 14, 2011 Baltimore Sun Opinions Page
Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich is spot-on ("Inequality, unemployment and unresponsive government," Nov. 9). In Baltimore, 10.4 percent of people are out of work and struggling to find jobs with decent pay. Our own Sen. Barbara Mikulski has attacked a new U.S. Department of Labor rule that would raise the prevailing local wage in certain jobs in industries like seafood, landscaping, and construction. Under the existing rule, employers must offer local and migrant landscaping workers $9.12/hour. The new rule would raise that wage to $12.80/hour. Workers and their advocates have called on the senator to stop attacking decent wages for migrants' and Maryland's working families. In this economy, local and migrant workers need Senator Mikulski's support for the prevailing wage.
Kristin Love, Baltimore
The writer is a policy attorney for Centro de los Derechos del Migrante.
THIS NEW RULE SCHEDULED TO GIVE WORKERS A RAISE IN WAGES HAS NOW BEEN SENT OFF TO STUDY ITS IMPACT ON BUSINESS.......WE WON'T SEE THAT ANYTIME SOON SAYS MIKULSKI. DID YOU HEAR YOUR DEMOCRATIC POLITICIAN SHOUT LOUDLY AGAINST THIS? THAT'S RIGHT ---CORPORATE DEMOCRATS PREVAIL IN MARYLAND.
This election vote the incumbants out!