Do the American 99% of WE THE PEOPLE know they are being SACKED AND LOOTED---BROUGHT TO COLONIAL STATUS? That is what we have educated over these few decades. When I watch global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS fill our US cities deemed FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES with global private military corporations partnered with global militarized MEDICINE -----this case can be taken to court as both a US SOVEREIGN CITIZEN seeking rights via US FEDERAL law and US Constitutional law----and/or can go to court seeking a jurisdiction status as ALIEN since this OCCUPATION leading to COLONIALISM-----will leave all US 99% WE THE PEOPLE with no sovereign RIGHTS AS CITIZENS.
"A nation is not conquered until the hearts of its women are on the ground. Then it is done, no matter how strong the weapons, or how brave the warriors."
What happens as global banking 1% take our US sovereign nation to colonial status------women are the first to be relegated to RAPE AND PILLAGE. That is the primary goal of these few decades of NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG. The 'HITTING' is arbitrary------anyone passing through can be HIT-----anyone not 'USEFUL' can be relegated to being 'HIT'.
OUR US 99% OF MEN BLACK, WHITE, AND BROWN HAVE SURRENDERED THEIR POSITION OF CULTURAL PROTECTOR -----AND SIMPLY ALLOWED THEMSELVES TO BE ENFOLDED INTO PRAETORIAN ARMY----HANDS UP----SURRENDER.
Our 99% of US men trying to pretend all this NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG illegal surveillance and pornography has them empowered over women do not understand that these constant contact with PORN AND SEXUAL PREDATOR status is -----DEMASCULATING our US 99% of men.
Because THE NETWORK tied to NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG work hard to make this sacking and looting and attacks on our US 99% of WOMEN seem to be tied to WINNING THE WAR-----SEXUAL PREDATORS-------BUILDING GLOBAL SEX AND SLAVE TRADE-------designating US CITIES as FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES------pretending this is what ends all our US sovereign history of governance, court precedence-----COMMON LAW----US CONSTITUTIONAL laws.
THERE IS NO SLAVERY IN TODAY'S US-------WHAT WE SEE WITH NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG as a global black market criminal PORNOGRAPHY NETWORK is simply RICO RACKETEERING------same as DRUG TRADE. When a NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG are given a HOUSE to be that PORN MULE----it is the same as a DRUG MULE being given a HOUSE to make and distribute ILLEGAL DRUGS.
THERE IS NO STATUS FOR WHAT ARE SIMPLY COMMON CRIMINALS AS NOSY NEIGHBOR AND GANG ARE.
FEEDBACK SAYS------WE ARE GOING TO RAPE HER------WE ARE GOING TO GANG RAPE HER----WE ARE GOING TO MAKE HER A SEX SLAVE TO PERFORM FOR US.
When families travel and are victim of TOILET CAMS in rest stops like CHESAPEAKE BAY BRIDGE TUNNEL-----the men traveling with wives, girl friends, children have been DIMINISHED as not able to protect the women in their family. Albeit, all in that family being UNAWARE---UNCONSENTING.
'Deterring and Preventing Rape and Sexual
Slavery During Periods of Armed Conflict,
16 LAW & INEQ. 601 (1998) (discussing
the prevalence of rape and sexual slavery during times of armed conflict violence against women, including gang rape and the use of women as sexual slaves as part of a war strategy."'
The raping of women in a community is a declaration to the men of that community that they have been defeated, for they have failed at their most basic task: to ostensibly protect "their" women.
The first attempts to specifically outlaw rape in international law were not made until 1949.88 Article 27(2) of the Fourth Geneva Convention 89 states, in relevant part: "[w]omen shall be especially protected against any attack of their honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or any form of indecent assault.
During all these continuous wars overseas during CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA------as I show below, a deliberate system of attacking sovereign women in nations targeted by WORLD BANK/GLOBAL 1% OLD WORLD KINGS------was key to the DEFEAT of that CULTURE.
These are the goals of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA here in US using these NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG illegal surveillance structures to install that INITIAL STAGE OF occupation----where the women are brought from being ordinary family to being made
RUINED/GOOD WOMAN SAID TO BE BAD.
OUR US COMMUNITIES ARE INDEED DISINTEGRATING--------THAT IS GLOBAL BANKING 1% GOAL IN MOVING FORWARD US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
You were captured by illegal surveillance cameras in hotels or rest stops-------facial recognition will track you down----you are now HIT------and can be made a SEX SLAVE.
In~s Hernandez-Avila, In Praise of Insubordination, Or, What Makes a Good Woman Go Bad?
in TRANSFORMING A RAPE CULTURE 375, 375 (Emilie
Buchwald et al. eds., 1993).
When all of a community's women are attacked, the
community eventually disintegrates. The epidemic trauma and
violent victimization of rape go to the heart of the community and destroy its very unity. The strategic mass rape of women was a very powerful tool of war used to destroy the Bosnian people in the former Yugoslavia.
ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE MOVING FORWARD ONE GLOBAL ENERGY/TECHNOLOGY GRID----TIED TO A FINAL SOLUTION OF DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE WITH MASS DEPOPULATION ----ERGO, MY CASE OF STANFORD TOTAL PRISON MODEL AS NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG.
China Has Chosen Cultural Genocide in Xinjiang—For Now
It’s expensive to destroy a people without killing them, but Beijing is willing to pay the price.
By Kate Cronin-Furman
| September 19, 2018, 11:57 AM
The legal precedence in this and other lawsuits may not be total relevant but these cases do create PRECEDENCE tied to mass illegal surveillance camera/microphone PORNOGRAPHY leading to TELEMEDICINE as STANFORD TOTAL PRISON MODEL---which IS INDEED a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
Remember, our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE are today the INDIGENOUS PEOPLES------being treated just as our native people during last COLONIZATION.
Kadic v. Karadzic-Rape
as a Crime Against Women as a Class Rumna Chowdhury*
Most people are stunned when I tell them I have spent so much time working on a project surrounding the recognition of rape as genocide.
As early as 1944, lawyer Raphael Lemkin distinguished a cultural component of genocide, which since then has become known as "cultural genocide". The term has since acquired rhetorical value as a phrase that is used to protest against the destruction of cultural heritage. It is also often misused as a catchphrase to condemn any form of destruction which the speaker disapproves of, without regard for the criterion of intent to destroy an affected group as such.
The drafters of the 1948 Genocide Convention considered the use of the term, but later dropped it from their consideration. The legal definition of genocide is unspecific about the exact way in which genocide is committed, only stating that it is destruction with the intent to destroy a racial, religious, ethnic or national group as such.
Article 7 of a 1994 draft of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples used the phrase "cultural genocide" but did not define what it meant. The complete article in the draft read as follows:
Indigenous peoples have the collective and individual right not to be subjected to ethnocide and cultural genocide, including prevention of and redress for:
(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of assimilation or integration by other cultures or ways of life imposed on them by legislative, administrative or other measures;
(e) Any form of propaganda directed against them.
This wording only appeared in a draft. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly during its 62nd session at UN Headquarters in New York City on 13 September 2007, but only mentions "genocide, or any other act of violence" in Article 7 (the only reference to genocide in the document). The concept of "ethnocide" and "cultural genocide" was removed in the version adopted by the General Assembly, but the sub-points noted above from the draft were retained (with slightly expanded wording) in Article 8 that speaks to "the right not to be subject to forced assimilation".
While global banking 1% use NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG to sell this idea of RUINED WOMAN vs TRUE WOMAN which was a CULT cultural structure without much backing in early colonial America-----the goals of NOSY NEIGHBOR AND GANG illegal streaming PORNOGRAPHY is CULTURAL GENOCIDE-----killing all of what is our thousands of years WESTERN CULTURAL IDEALS.
So, MEN are being made to feel they are WINNING -----working hard for that HOLY GRAIL------being subjection of US women black, white, and brown-----when the goals of ONE WORLD DEEP STATE eliminates all societal structures tied to family, community, increasingly installing GMO---HUMANS/ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE to replace both 99% of WE THE MEN AND WOMEN------sorry, NO WINNERS.
Bringing Cultural Genocide in by the Back door:
Victim Participation at the ICC Kristina Marie Hon
In fact, no physical harm need ever befall a victim of cultural
That is because cultural genocide strips from humanity
all manner of cultural contributions by human groups,
through the destruction of those artifacts, documents,
books, monuments, or even languages that embody
the group's identity.
I want to bring into this discussion within my DEPOSITION this GRAIL of TRUE WOMAN being dangled in front our US 99% of MEN-----including new to US immigrant men-----what was a cultural norm for most third world nations regarding a woman's place being in THE HOME-----being PURE/being SUBMISSIVE will DISAPPEAR in MOVING FORWARD societal structures which have no 99% of men or women EMPOWERED
FOR GOODNESS SAKE. TRUE WOMEN IS SIMPLY A FAKE GRAIL BEING DANGLED BY GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS TO BRING CULTURAL GENOCIDE TO THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.
This TRUE WOMAN GRAIL hiding goals of cultural genocide killing all Western cultural structures as global banking 1% go back to 3000BC ---HINDI BRAHMIN.
Seems I am being HIT to pretend I am a BAD WOMAN-----while all women today in workplace are INFERIOR WOMEN as well
'Valuing women who fit into the Cult of True Womanhood led to a dichotomy between the "True Woman," who stayed in the private realm, and other, inferior women, who appeared publicly'.
The cardinal values that society used to judge a woman as a True Woman were piety, purity, submissiveness, and domesticity.
The ability of a woman to complete her work
unseen and in silence became an asset, an extension of the value of submissiveness, because it boosted the ego of the male breadwinner.
36 Valuing women who fit into the Cult of True Womanhood led to a dichotomy between the "True Woman," who stayed in the private realm, and other, inferior women, who appeared publicly.
A woman's proper place in society was as a
mother, daughter, sister, or wife. 37 Any woman assuming an alternate role, such as working outside the home, was considered neither a real woman nor a True Woman, because she presented herself in public and worked publicly, like a man.
A woman working in the public realm was essentially a prostitute, trading her Womanhood for money.
Domestic violence, rape, and sexual harassment are all
societal means of communicating to women that they do not belong in the public realm and that a woman's proper place is within the home.
As NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG and THE NETWORK pretend I am 'ruined'/'humiliated'-----as I have shouted since discovering I was being illegally surveilled and made PORN--------the people tied to processing images of innocent people as porn-----especially SCAT PORN TOILET CAMS filled with HUMAN WASTE-----are a group with membership in THE LOWEST CASTE of society which has identified this for thousands of years.
So, I go home to NOSY NEIGHBORS FEEDBACK/CHATTER filled with DELUSION/ILLUSION of my being made a PROSTITUTE by unknowing and unconsented surveillance-------listening to these PORN MULES telling me I 'work for them' that I will be 'TRACKED' if I try to escape-----as if I have ANY of that in mind. I am simply a US citizen surrounded by PORN MULES acting as PARASITES----and indeed, I am working/fighting to remove those PARASITES from my living space.
While REAL left social progressive citizens like myself do not accept this idea of CASTES----no thoughts of our US citizens working in contact with sewage/waste as being INFERIOR------global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS definitely see things THAT WAY.
India: 'Untouchable' Dalits Still Forced to Collect Human ...time.com/3172895 The practice of forcing low-caste people in Indian communities to remove accumulated human waste from latrines is continuing despite legal prohibitions and must be stopped, says a leading advocacy ...
NOTHING CLOSER TO UNTOUCHABLE THAN NOSY NEIGHBORS CONSTANTLY WITH THEIR NOSES IN MY POO.
So, global banking 1% are simply trying to install these 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMIN structure in US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES are are arbitrarily identifying people to 'HIT' bringing down our cultural societal norms.
I know who has their NOSES in MY POO! Those TOILET CAMMING NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG!
India's Untouchables are relegated to the lowest jobs, and live in constant fear of being publicly humiliated, paraded naked, beaten, and raped with impunity by upper-caste Hindus seeking to keep them in their place.
Thousands of pre-teen Dalit girls are forced into prostitution under cover of a religious practice known as devadasis, which means "female servant of god."
PRE-WEIMAR CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA say------they are working to make AMERICA GREAT AGAIN-------hmmmmm, TRUMP says he's working to make AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. Seems lots of US CONGRESSIONAL POLS on both side are fighting for our 300 years of US HISTORY ---------civil rights civil liberties.
Seems like THE OUR REVOLUTION crowd are shouting WE ARE FDR SOCIALISTS-----all of which seems to promote the idea that the US IS A SOVEREIGN NATION.
So, why are 350 million US 99% OF WE THE PEOPLE and new to US immigrants allowing a small group of global banking 1% tell us-----we are going back to 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMIN! Well, those 5% freemason/Greek players made ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT CIVIL UNREST CIVIL WAR are too busy consuming ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE BLACK MARKET CRIMINAL PORNOGRAPHY-------to CARE ABOUT IT.
This tells me my case will head to court as a lawsuit against RICO RACKETEERING BLACK MARKET ILLEGAL STREAMING VIDEO PORNOGRAPHY CARTEL.
Is America a 'sovereign' nation? A look at Trump's new favorite wordBy Adil Najam, opinion contributor — 09/23/17 09:00 AM EDT
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill
President Trump has a new favorite word: sovereignty. He used it at least 21 times during his debut speech to the United Nations. He used it determinedly, deliberately and deliberatively, knowing exactly what it would mean to his followers in the United States. But to those in that U.N. hall, and those listening around the world, it probably meant something very different. In fact, it probably meant something quite opposite.
For his fan base, and for U.S. domestic audiences in general, “sovereignty” turns out to be a quite clever word choice. One had wondered how President Trump would square the anti-global, nationalist and blatantly anti-U.N. content of his version of “make America great again” with now hobnobbing at an organization he has famously described as “not a friend of democracy ... not a friend to freedom ... not a friend even to the United States of America.” Sovereignty is how he squared it.
The speech gets rave acclaim from his supporters, in part, because to them this word reeks of strength and vigor. What, after all, can be more “America first” than a repeated refrain to sovereignty? All “power and authority” belongs always, and above all else, to the interests of my state, my nation and, ultimately, my people.
Also wrapped in the repeated use of this word was the defiant message that although he is now part of what he once called “just a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time,” President Trump is not one of them. Newt Gingrich, for example, heard exactly what the president wanted him to hear: a “strategy of a sovereignty-based patriotism” as a clear alternative to “globalist desire.”
Those gathered in at the U.N. this week, and not just the card-carrying “globalists” among them, do probably realize that President Trump is not one of them. But it is very unlikely that they heard anything remotely similar to what Gingrich did in the president’s insistent invocation of the idea of sovereignty.
In the context of such a gathering in that room and standing in front of those iconic green tiles that President Trump believes are “cheap” and should be replaced with “beautiful large marble slabs,” the word sovereignty has a long and particular history, one that stands in near contradiction to how the 45th president of the United States used it.
In global politics, and certainly at the U.N., sovereignty is usually a term invoked by countries who perceive themselves to be misunderstood, marginalized, victimized, stigmatized and, frankly, weak. Not always, but most often, it is used by those who think they are small and weak in order to defend themselves against an onslaught of unwanted norms, such as democracy and human rights, that they feel are being imposed on them by the big and strong.
In fact, it is a particularly favorite credo of nations that consider themselves being targeted by the United States, including all of those now included in President Trump’s new version of the “axis of evil.” North Korea, a nation the president threatens to “totally destroy” and whose leader he calls “rocket man,” is particularly fond of invoking sovereignty as its argument against U.N. sanctions. Characteristically, speaking at this very U.N. forum two years ago, the North Korean foreign minister argued that conducting nuclear tests was his country’s “legitimate right” as a “sovereign state.”
One particular leader who made sovereignty as central a plank to his view of the U.N. and of world affairs as Trump now has, was Fidel Castro. Of course, for Cuba, the sovereignty ideal was invoked nearly entirely to suggest that the United States did not respect it. For example, in his famous 1960 speech to the U.N. General Assembly denouncing what he called U.S. “imperialism and colonialism,” Castro used the word “sovereignty” eight times, including in proclaiming that “the United States government cannot be for the integrity and sovereignty of nations.” President Trump, with his impressive 21 mentions, obviously disagrees.
U.N. archives are full of despots and dictators using sovereignty as their justification for flaunting international norms. But much more than that, it is littered with small, vulnerable and weak nations invoking sovereignty as their safeguard against exploitation. What one does not find there, until now, is a major power, and particularly the United States, doing anything remotely similar.
The idea of sovereignty, and in fact, the notion that all nations can, should and do act in their own interests, is and has always been absolutely foundational to the theory as well as the practice of all international relations. Simply stating this again and again, even if it is by the American president, is neither new or interesting. It is merely a restatement of the obvious.
What was very new, very interesting, and certainly not obvious is how this American president invoked sovereignty and that he did so on the world stage. The reversal of language the United States has traditionally used in the U.N. was as stark as it was purposeful, from common interests to self-interest, from collective action to competition, from sovereign equality to sovereignty. The image, as many on social media commented, was not of a “United” Nations, but of every nation for itself.
It was a nice touch that President Trump reminded his U.N. audience of the first three words of the U.S. Constitution. He forgot to mention, or may not have known, that the first words of the U.N. Charter are the same, with a slight but important addition: “We the peoples of the United Nations.” That recognition might have made it a very different speech.
In the 72 years since the U.N. was first created, mostly by and largely in the image of the United States, there has been a consistent bipartisan consensus among all American presidents that the United States must be seen as its principal leader. Not always, and not by everyone, but at most times and in most ways, the United States has, in fact, held that role. But the language of sovereignty, so long associated in world affairs with weakness and vulnerability, is not the language of world leadership.
Yes, there was bellicose chest-beating targeting North Korea, Iran and Venezuela, but it was made cartoonish by schoolyard name-calling. No, a call to high moral principle and common purpose was noticeable only for its omission. The tone was rich in demands of what the world needed to do for America. Little was on offer about what America could do for the world. Not even a polite note of sympathy for Rohingya refugees or a minimal offer to assist Bangladesh in hosting them.
President Trump may or may not have intended to sound as if he was abandoning the long-held American ambition and assertion of world leadership. But to those listening to it with non-American ears, too much of the speech would have sounded too much like an anthem of abdication.