Continuing my COMPLAINT regarding TOILET CAMS in UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY 1st floor women's bathroom-----
I discussed with the two security and police employees sent by Chief Carey to address my complaint why I knew those bathroom light fixtures were VULNERABLE to computer camera hacking-----easy peasy.
I described to SECURITY employee HOLLOWELL------and to the police detective details about how lighting fixtures are hacked and how I am sure it happens to 1st floor women's bathroom. Again, when a LIGHT BULB is exposed from the LIGHT WELL FIXTURE anything visible to LIGHT BULB is vulnerable to CAMERA-CAPTURE. I spoke about the distance one can be with a computer to make those TOILET CAM HACKS. For example, 1st floor computer space one could be within distance to hack ------lot's of personal computer use at these public computers for example maybe having all those SPY CAMERA APPS.
I know that the police are able to take the University of Maryland Science Library surveillance feed both camera and microphone to do a search for these kinds of activities. It can KEY words phrases like SHE KNOWS WHAT I AM DOING------and voila, the search would lead to that 2nd floor computer area and the 1st floor person or persons saying that phrase.
I described how the 1st floor women's bathroom was VULNERABLE to hacking from 2nd floor computer area close enough to that 2nd floor bathroom area. Because the 1st floor lighting fixture and LIGHT BULBS are built into the CEILING-----that CEILING LIGHT is very close to those 2nd floor computers----ergo, easy peasy to HACK. I cannot put date on hearing 1st floor SHE KNOWS WHAT I AM DOING---but, I can place a date on hearing that phrase on 2nd floor----that would the I was investigating 2nd floor women's bathroom after that 2/7/2018 TOILET CAM awareness. Simply searching for that phrase in university surveillance videos will capture that man at the computer doing that hacking and the second man saying SHE KNOWS WHAT WE ARE DOING.
Not knowing a specific date-----I was aware of a 1ST FLOOR BATHROOM renovation I would estimate about 4 months ago-----at the time the university was addressing policies of having to have UNISEX bathrooms for TRANSEXUAL/gender-blending issues surrounding male/female toilet use. Looking for date of building UNISEX BATHROOM on 1st floor will allow an investigation of what renovations happened to all those 1st floor bathrooms---men's and women's ----as well as that UNISEX.
I noticed that the wall having water fountains was torn out with lots of work done on say water pipes and wiring going up through that central access. I know that UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE with a director ROBERT RIESNER would have ordered those renovations. Then there are those management tied to ordering the supplies used in this renovation----and then there are the work control assigning workers who install that water piping/wiring tied to this bathroom renovation. I would expect an investigation to look at the records tied to this 1st floor bathroom renovation to attain an idea of what kinds of wiring et al replaced the old. I would wonder if those requisitions may not be accurate, so opens minds on what was installed as wiring. A police officer who says ----the 1st floor bathroom is not computer/wired because it has manual light switches does not understand that a bathroom being wired does not have to have sensor switches.
Upon experiencing this TOILET CAM exposure at University of Maryland LIBRARY I wanted to check what was done at other universities---so, I looked at all of JOHNS HOPKINS EISENHOWER LIBRARY women's bathrooms. Those bathrooms have lighting that can be SENSOR ---OFF/ON SWITCHES and are indeed WIRED-----microphone and camera capture. What EISENHOWER LIBRARY does differently then U OF M Baltimore campus is this: The number of light wells are fewer------those light wells are installed into walls NOT CEILINGS------and those light fixtures are BLOCKED by wooden shade making sure those LIGHT BULBS cannot be hacked and uses as cameras----as well, there was no fixture over toilet giving visual access to a person inside toilet stall---especially SITTING ON TOILET. So, it appears that while EISENHOWER has very likely WIRED those bathrooms to capture images and voices----they had FACILITIES MAINTENANCE install renovations in ways that would PROTECT HOPKINS' STUDENTS FROM VULNERABILITY from hacked LIGHT BULBS used as TOILET CAMS.
I spoke in detail to University of Maryland Security HOLLOWELL about my desire to not only tour the women's bathrooms in U OF M LIBRARY so I could explain how these TOILET CAM hacks are being done---but, I expressed a desire to do an EXPANDED tour of campus women's bathrooms looking for these same VULNERABILITIES. Remember, our MENS' BATHROOMS are equally VULNERABLE----there are people wanting images of MEN as well as women in TOILET CAM PORNOGRAPHY. This is not only a case SEXUAL ASSAULT ON WOMEN in these TOILET CAM PORNOGRAPHY.
I returned to University of Maryland campus Police and Security office 2/12/2019 to follow up on what police detective created as a final draft of my COMPLAINT since I was wanting MY EDITS to anything created from that POLICE INTERROGATION. I made clear I wanted MY WORDS on this COMPLAINT ----I asked if there was a form to assure that MY WORDS were on that COMPLAINT------I also made clear there would be an INTERROGATION VIDEO of all the points made during that COMPLAINT INTERVIEW. I was told my only recourse was to do a REQUEST FOR A REPORT -----given online email----online sights ----telling me how to request a REPORT -------with me saying over and over-----this will not get me a COMPLAINT in MY WORDS. I would expect a review of that encounter keeping in mind----I might appear a bit aggressive because I KNEW this COMPLAINT process was not working---I wanted to get this COMPLAINT PROCESS RIGHT.
I left that encounter being told to go online to request whatever COMPLAINT that original INTERROGATING OFFICER created---that was my ONLY RECOURSE. Not as important, but a civil injustice is this continuous requirement that citizens PAY FEES to attain ordinary PUBLIC POLICE DOCUMENTS so, I was told not only would not have a COMPLAINT IN MY WORDS----but, I would have to pay $20 to attain a copy of a police-written COMPLAINT.
As well, try as I might to reach SECURITY EMPLOYEE HOLLOWELL to discuss how light fixtures are HACKED for TOILET CAMS and to tour campus-wide women's bathrooms for VULNERABILITY-----I have yet to be able to reach HOLLOWELL. I tried on 2/7/2019 to schedule a time convenient to his schedule-----I tried 2/12/2019 by phone to reach his office to schedule that tour. I passed HOLLOWELL on street heading for a meeting on 2/12/2019 being told he did not have time to talk----I repeated PLEASE CALL with a scheduled time. My phone taken------so far, no attempt to address these WOMENS' BATHROOM VULNERABILITIES either in U of M Library 1st floor---or across campus.
KEEP IN MIND----THE KNOWLEDGE OF SPY CAMERA HACKING OF THESE LIGHT FIXTURES IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE----THERE IS NO MYSTERY GOING ON.
I discussed with the two security and police employees sent by Chief Carey to address my complaint why I knew those bathroom light fixtures were VULNERABLE to computer camera hacking-----easy peasy.
I described to SECURITY employee HOLLOWELL------and to the police detective details about how lighting fixtures are hacked and how I am sure it happens to 1st floor women's bathroom. Again, when a LIGHT BULB is exposed from the LIGHT WELL FIXTURE anything visible to LIGHT BULB is vulnerable to CAMERA-CAPTURE. I spoke about the distance one can be with a computer to make those TOILET CAM HACKS. For example, 1st floor computer space one could be within distance to hack ------lot's of personal computer use at these public computers for example maybe having all those SPY CAMERA APPS.
I know that the police are able to take the University of Maryland Science Library surveillance feed both camera and microphone to do a search for these kinds of activities. It can KEY words phrases like SHE KNOWS WHAT I AM DOING------and voila, the search would lead to that 2nd floor computer area and the 1st floor person or persons saying that phrase.
I described how the 1st floor women's bathroom was VULNERABLE to hacking from 2nd floor computer area close enough to that 2nd floor bathroom area. Because the 1st floor lighting fixture and LIGHT BULBS are built into the CEILING-----that CEILING LIGHT is very close to those 2nd floor computers----ergo, easy peasy to HACK. I cannot put date on hearing 1st floor SHE KNOWS WHAT I AM DOING---but, I can place a date on hearing that phrase on 2nd floor----that would the I was investigating 2nd floor women's bathroom after that 2/7/2018 TOILET CAM awareness. Simply searching for that phrase in university surveillance videos will capture that man at the computer doing that hacking and the second man saying SHE KNOWS WHAT WE ARE DOING.
Not knowing a specific date-----I was aware of a 1ST FLOOR BATHROOM renovation I would estimate about 4 months ago-----at the time the university was addressing policies of having to have UNISEX bathrooms for TRANSEXUAL/gender-blending issues surrounding male/female toilet use. Looking for date of building UNISEX BATHROOM on 1st floor will allow an investigation of what renovations happened to all those 1st floor bathrooms---men's and women's ----as well as that UNISEX.
I noticed that the wall having water fountains was torn out with lots of work done on say water pipes and wiring going up through that central access. I know that UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE with a director ROBERT RIESNER would have ordered those renovations. Then there are those management tied to ordering the supplies used in this renovation----and then there are the work control assigning workers who install that water piping/wiring tied to this bathroom renovation. I would expect an investigation to look at the records tied to this 1st floor bathroom renovation to attain an idea of what kinds of wiring et al replaced the old. I would wonder if those requisitions may not be accurate, so opens minds on what was installed as wiring. A police officer who says ----the 1st floor bathroom is not computer/wired because it has manual light switches does not understand that a bathroom being wired does not have to have sensor switches.
Upon experiencing this TOILET CAM exposure at University of Maryland LIBRARY I wanted to check what was done at other universities---so, I looked at all of JOHNS HOPKINS EISENHOWER LIBRARY women's bathrooms. Those bathrooms have lighting that can be SENSOR ---OFF/ON SWITCHES and are indeed WIRED-----microphone and camera capture. What EISENHOWER LIBRARY does differently then U OF M Baltimore campus is this: The number of light wells are fewer------those light wells are installed into walls NOT CEILINGS------and those light fixtures are BLOCKED by wooden shade making sure those LIGHT BULBS cannot be hacked and uses as cameras----as well, there was no fixture over toilet giving visual access to a person inside toilet stall---especially SITTING ON TOILET. So, it appears that while EISENHOWER has very likely WIRED those bathrooms to capture images and voices----they had FACILITIES MAINTENANCE install renovations in ways that would PROTECT HOPKINS' STUDENTS FROM VULNERABILITY from hacked LIGHT BULBS used as TOILET CAMS.
I spoke in detail to University of Maryland Security HOLLOWELL about my desire to not only tour the women's bathrooms in U OF M LIBRARY so I could explain how these TOILET CAM hacks are being done---but, I expressed a desire to do an EXPANDED tour of campus women's bathrooms looking for these same VULNERABILITIES. Remember, our MENS' BATHROOMS are equally VULNERABLE----there are people wanting images of MEN as well as women in TOILET CAM PORNOGRAPHY. This is not only a case SEXUAL ASSAULT ON WOMEN in these TOILET CAM PORNOGRAPHY.
I returned to University of Maryland campus Police and Security office 2/12/2019 to follow up on what police detective created as a final draft of my COMPLAINT since I was wanting MY EDITS to anything created from that POLICE INTERROGATION. I made clear I wanted MY WORDS on this COMPLAINT ----I asked if there was a form to assure that MY WORDS were on that COMPLAINT------I also made clear there would be an INTERROGATION VIDEO of all the points made during that COMPLAINT INTERVIEW. I was told my only recourse was to do a REQUEST FOR A REPORT -----given online email----online sights ----telling me how to request a REPORT -------with me saying over and over-----this will not get me a COMPLAINT in MY WORDS. I would expect a review of that encounter keeping in mind----I might appear a bit aggressive because I KNEW this COMPLAINT process was not working---I wanted to get this COMPLAINT PROCESS RIGHT.
I left that encounter being told to go online to request whatever COMPLAINT that original INTERROGATING OFFICER created---that was my ONLY RECOURSE. Not as important, but a civil injustice is this continuous requirement that citizens PAY FEES to attain ordinary PUBLIC POLICE DOCUMENTS so, I was told not only would not have a COMPLAINT IN MY WORDS----but, I would have to pay $20 to attain a copy of a police-written COMPLAINT.
As well, try as I might to reach SECURITY EMPLOYEE HOLLOWELL to discuss how light fixtures are HACKED for TOILET CAMS and to tour campus-wide women's bathrooms for VULNERABILITY-----I have yet to be able to reach HOLLOWELL. I tried on 2/7/2019 to schedule a time convenient to his schedule-----I tried 2/12/2019 by phone to reach his office to schedule that tour. I passed HOLLOWELL on street heading for a meeting on 2/12/2019 being told he did not have time to talk----I repeated PLEASE CALL with a scheduled time. My phone taken------so far, no attempt to address these WOMENS' BATHROOM VULNERABILITIES either in U of M Library 1st floor---or across campus.
KEEP IN MIND----THE KNOWLEDGE OF SPY CAMERA HACKING OF THESE LIGHT FIXTURES IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE----THERE IS NO MYSTERY GOING ON.
RSS Feed
