As all our US ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT 5% freemason/Greek players KNOW especially those FAKE 5% religious leaders marching in Washington DC pretending to be protecting the poor, immigrants, seniors, women, MUSLIMS and everybody that they are in fact THROWING UNDER THE BUS------THE CABAL has always meant global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. The statement below sounding as if it addresses the future CIVIL DISASTER AND BRUTALITY of space mining slave colonies-----actually describes what CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA built these few decades as global slave trade to all Foreign Economic Zones being installed now in US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES as US national media pretends this is TRUMP madness.
'Galactic Human Slave Trade & AI threat to End with Full Disclosure of ET Life
Written by Dr Michael Salla on May 31, 2015. Posted in exonews, Space Programs'
'Q12. You have referred to the Cabal “trading millions of kidnapped civilians from the surface (per year) to off world beings in exchange for technology.” Can you explain how this is done? Does it involve kidnapping street children in impoverished areas of countries like Brazil, India, etc., and/or children in developed countries like the US; and/or civilians in war zones; or is there another source of these kidnapped civilians'?
What happens as all those global 2% of Asian, Arabic, Latin American players pushed by their global 1% from their own nations to be REMITTANCE MEN AND WOMEN coming to US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES where our US 5% freemason/Greek players are ready to sack and loot their wealth in US cities? What happens when those global 2% from Europe, US, and Canada pushed to Foreign Economic Zones overseas have Asian, Arabic, Latin American global 1% do the same to our Western newly merely rich and upper middle class?
THIS IS WHY 3000BC GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS' LAISSEZ FAIRE IS NOT 'CAPITALISM'. IT IS BASED SOLELY ON THE GLOBAL 1% SACKING AND LOOTING ANY SOVEREIGN 99% OF CITIZENS BY CAPTURING, CORRUPTING, AND CREATING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES--AS THESE FEW DECADES OF CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA----NOW TRUMP.
This is why global banking 1% labelled global LAISSEZ FAIRE with another name----NEO-LIBERALISM as REAGAN/CLINTON captured both our US major Democratic and Republican Parties.
Below we see that global banking 1% FORTUNE MAGAZINE pretending LAISSEZ FAIRE is capitalism but what we have had these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA was not. KNOW WHAT? There is no way to eliminate all Rule of Law, all morals and ethics in business, all pragmatism which is what LAISSEZ FAIRE has as a goal----and not end with CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA SACKING AND LOOTING.
Why today’s capitalism is no longer laissez-faire
By Dov Seidman FORTUNE MAGAZINE
October 15, 2015
If ever we needed any evidence that we are undergoing a huge shift in the very nature of capitalism, how our economy is organized and what business fundamentally is, we need only look to how and how much new business language is being invented. While business often gets accused of being jargony, of creating unintelligible phrases, I think much more is going on with this flowering of ethically-minded language.
I believe, in fact, that we’re seeing a shift in the very underpinnings of the business world. We’ve arrived at a moment in time where those in business want “doing business” to mean much more than “It’s not personal. It’s strictly business” (to quote the Godfather.)
Today, by contrast, we are seeing the very human desire for an elevated purpose in all walks of life becoming prevalent in business, too. It’s a change that’s particularly well-timed to the evolution of the economy, fueled by revolutionary technology that makes unethical or irresponsible behavior increasingly difficult to hide. In fact, in today’s hyper-transparent, interdependent and fast-paced world, one of the best ways (sometimes the only way) to distinguish yourself from the competition is to be a force for social good. As a result, many business leaders have come to realize that to outbehave is also to outperform.
And so, leaders have been inventing more and more of what I call “transitional language” – new phrases that force us to look at traditional concepts, like “leadership” and “capitalism”, with fresh eyes — by adding on a specific “transitional” idea (usually as an adjective) like “ethical” or “conscious.” Think for example of ethical leadership, mindful leadership, sustainable development, ethical capitalism. The resulting concepts may be entirely new. But very often, we’re just rediscovering and focusing on something in a core concept’s essence from which we have become disconnected or to which we are no longer committed.
Consider two very popular new business phrases: “inclusive capitalism” and “conscious capitalism.” In the original construction of capitalism described by the late Scottish professor of moral philosophy Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations, great attention was given to the problems of poverty, the injustice of “masters” colluding to suppress the wages of workers, and other moral issues. So I’d argue that Smith’s classic concept of capitalism was already inherently inclusive, conscious, ethical and even moral.
Given the many abuses that have been associated with capitalism over the decades, deploying new transitional language to highlight the “inclusive” and “conscious” elements of the original idea gives a boost to those who want to encourage elevated business behavior.
It’s been a long journey from Smith’s idea of capitalism to “market capitalism,” “laissez faire capitalism,” “crony capitalism” and, lately, “patrimonial capitalism” – language that the economist Thomas Picketty has recently made well known in his critique of the system. At every turn, transitional language was deployed to re-shape our perception of the underlying concept of “capitalism,” for better or worse.
Ludwig Wittgenstein once famously wrote: “The limits of my language are the limits of my mind. All I know is what I have words for.” Transitional language pushes and pulls, extracting and inserting meaning, fighting for the limits of our imagination.
Since transitional language trains or re-trains our thinking, we should be careful in deciding when adopting it whether we really want our thinking to be reframed. Think about how the popularity of the concept “laissez faire capitalism” has changed how we all think about the nature of capitalism. It’s been a powerful idea, powerful enough to overshadow important aspects of Adam Smith’s original concepts of capitalism.
If the meaning of a concept drifts and our minds adapt to the new meaning, our collective consciousness tilts just a bit off its axis. In the case of “capitalism,” for example, I believe it’s a real loss that we’ve re-oriented our thinking and now associate capitalism with bad or amoral behavior. And that’s why the creation of new transitional language that corrects its course, like “inclusive capitalism,” can be so valuable.
Today, “fair trade,” “socially responsible” and “sustainable development” are business concepts that have become common in our everyday conversations. Will these examples of transitional language eventually become so widely accepted that they become almost beyond question as required business practices? It seems more and more likely. And the smart use of language helps explains why.
NOT IF THESE ADAM SMITH REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE TERMS ARE AS CORRUPTED AS THESE FEW DECADES OF ROBBER BARON GLOBAL BANKING 1% LAISSEZ FAIRE........AND IN US NATIONAL MEDIA ---THEY ARE CORRUPTED.
When we broaden our vocabulary, we have access to a bigger world with more options. The people who will thrive and excel in our interconnected, interdependent and fast-paced world will be the ones who embrace transitional language and unlock its transformative power.
Look at the many big corporation that have already attached themselves to this idea: Human Energy (Chevron); The Human Element (Dow); The Human Network (Cisco); We Speak Human (Ally Bank); Bank Human (TD Bank); Designed for Humans (Samsung); Be More Human (Reebok). Of course a slogan doesn’t always translate to real behavior. But as transitional language, at the very least it’s hopeful, helping to set the expectations of employees, customers and the community.
Transitional language is at once an indictment of the past (e.g., leaders who need to be reminded to be mindful) and a statement of hope for the future (e.g., leaders who embrace being mindful).
Once we realize that we can use transition language this way, our minds can be more creative and alert to newly-minted transitional phrases to help persuade people to change how they think. Of course, the ultimate mark of success for transitional language might be if it disappears, its refocused meaning now just part of the main concept.
If the business zeitgeist demonstrated by all this transitional language is elevated behavior, it follows that an emerging business strategy is emphasizing our shared humanity. After all, what is business anyway?
I can’t think of a better definition of business than human endeavor animated by a shared ethos. Humanity has always been at the core of business both in terms of who’s engaged in it and who it benefits. Isn’t it interesting, then, that the word “human” is gaining so much currency in the form of transitional phrases?
As we segue to financial public policy next week we look at today's US 5% PLAYER REMITTANCE MEN AND WOMEN below we see global banking 1% freemason STAR of movie FADS------CAMERON taking his wealth of tens of millions to buy that REAL ESTATE in Australia.
This tells our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens and our 99% new immigrant citizens that the global ECONOMIC COLLAPSE manufactured these few decades by ROBBER BARONS CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA 5% freemason/Greek pols and players is approaching.
'The Associated Press reported that Cameron successfully applied to buy 2,500 acres of farmland and he “intend[s] to reside indefinitely in New Zealand and [is] acquiring the property to reside on and operate as a working farm.” Slavo is skeptical in light of Cameron’s lack of need to be working at all, having made in excess of $250 million last year, according to Salon magazine'.
THAT'S A LOT OF FARMLAND MR CAMERON!
Now, Australia like Africa and Arabia will be DARK CONTINENTS as Climate Change advances-----Australia is being taken back to being that prison/slave colony upon which it was founded filling with FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES and global corporate factories, mining, reaping of all natural resources from beautiful New Zealand and what is left of fresh water on the continent of AUSTRALIA.
The investment in real estate CAMERON as that 5% global banking player is making will be worthless land in only a few decades. No family wealth to be transferred for those 5% global banking players.
Australia is transitioning into the same global 99% foreign remittance men and women working class and poor----with those same Asian remittance men and women being those 5% global banking players pushed out of their own nations.
The goals of planting forests in deserts is GREEN propaganda just as was draining our US mid-west and western fresh water aquifers to make farms out of deserts-----now that US fresh water is gone and so too are all that US food belt farming soon to be gone. We will find tons of global banking media telling us Australia is no longer in threat of desertification----in no danger of expanding ozone atmospheric damage when it totally is MOVING FORWARD to those environmental disaster states
'Australia drying caused by greenhouse gases and ozone
July 13, 2014, NOAA Headquarters
Southern Australia's decline in rainfall began around 1970 and has increased over the last four decades. The model projects a continued decline in winter rainfall throughout the rest of the 21st century, with significant implications for regional water resources. The drying is most severe over southwest Australia where the model forecasts a 40 percent decline in average rainfall by the late 21st century'.
- May 1 2016 at 12:45 PM
- Updated May 1 2016 at 12:45 PM
Special economic zones may be used to breath new life into the long running talks on a free trade agreement between Australia and Indonesia with negotiators meeting this week under pressure from new ministers in each country to produce some early results.
Business groups from both countries have been separately discussing whether liberalisation measures could be tried out in limited geographic areas to test their value and public impact before being extended to the entire countries.
The business groups have been inspired by the way China has tested liberalisation measures in special economic zones, especially the Shanghai Free Trade zone where some parts of the China Australia trade agreement are being implemented first.
Business representatives from Australia and Indonesia met in Perth last week to revive the Business Partnership Group which was established four years ago when the trade negotiations started with the idea of giving business a greater role in setting negotiating priorities than is the case in most other trade talks.
The trade negotiators are looking for new areas of bilateral cooperation. Jefri Tarigan
The original members – the Australia Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry – have brought some other groups into the latest discussions with the intention of delivering a new set of priorities to the government trade negotiators by mid year.
The Indonesia-Australia Closer Economic Partnership Agreement is not expected to be concluded until next year although Trade minister Steve Ciobo and his Indonesian counterpart Thomas Lembong said after a meeting in March that they were looking for early breakthroughs to inject some new life into the bilateral business relationship.
In most trade negotiations nothing is formally agreed until the entire package is settled, but the economic partnership focus in the Indonesian talks means they are proceeding on the basis that new co-operation measures can be adopted early.
The business discussions last week looked at the prospects for early co-operation agreements in the cattle trade, skills development and financial services as part of this "early harvest" approach.
But the Indonesian discussions have come under pressure from the parallel moves in Perth last week to speed up the implementation of the 16 country Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) which is seen an Asia-wide alternative to the Trans-Pacific Partnership by some participants. The bilateral Indonesian talks will be largely redundant if they don't go beyond the RCEP with new liberalisation or cooperation measures.
The Indonesian discussions were put on hold during diplomatic tensions between the two countries in recent years but have been revived since the meeting between Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and President Joko Widodo last November and the Indonesian government's new focus on economic reform.
Indonesia has expressed a desire to embrace special economic zones to boost economic growth and the business groups discussed how these could be linked to the trade deal to test proposals for freer worker movement between the countries or smoother access to for Indonesian products under Australia's tight quarantine rules.
While the 99% of citizens of Australia black, white, and brown citizens are being made working class poor remittance men and women as Australia global banking neo-liberals have captured and made Australia's national economy stagnant and crippled with massive frauds and corruption-----we are seeing TURNBULL made to sound a boon for those 99% of INDONESIAN citizens captured these few decades in some of the most brutal of Foreign Economic Zone slave labor.
So, Malcolm Turnbull is simply the CLINTON/BUSH global banking 5% player enriched the same way our US ROBBER BARON pols were enriched. He is being 'CHARITABLE' in donating all that sacking and looting criminal wealth back to Australia's 99% of citizens.
'Malcolm Turnbull is donating his entire $528,000 salary to charity
MALCOLM Turnbull is donating his entire $528,000 annual salary to charity. But it was one deal that made the PM his millions'.
Our 99% of US WE THE PEOPLE understand this propaganda imagery back and forth all too well-----this is the point as regards our future US labor public policy no matter for a 5% or a 99% of citizens. As global banking 1% MOVES FORWARD DARK AGES extreme wealth extreme poverty LIBERTARIAN MARXISM---these smiling faces will be under the bus. Neither of these two 5% global banking players are sons of global 1% families.
MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD FOR ONLY THE GLOBAL 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS does not include these newly rich winners from these few decades of ROBBER BARON sacking and looting sovereign nations.......OUR REVOLUTION for only the global 1% goes back to OLD WORLD SPICE AND SILK ROUTE and it is the consolidation of those hundreds of trillions of dollars to these global 1 % first families we will see as ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE for only the global 1% SMART CITIES DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE moves forward. These are the newly rich REMITTANCE MEN------going under the bus in MOVING FORWARD.
Thai King Given $30 Billion for Being Born Into Royal Family
By Cristina Silva On 6/16/18 at 5:17 PM
'King Vajiralongkorn, his father’s only son, will not be able to use all his family money. The announcement noted the previously tax exempt fortune would not be subject to taxation "in line with His Majesty's wishes."'
Many people dream of a family member leaving them some kind of inheritance, enough cash to perhaps pay for a vacation or to invest in a property or a small business. Then there's King Maha Vajiralongkorn of Thailand, who was given roughly $30 billion this week because he had the luck of being born into a royal family loaded with cash.
The royal leader received the good news when the official agency that managed the fortune belonging to Thailand's royal family announced Saturday that the king, who assumed the throne after his father died in 2016, would now oversee the family assets however he saw fit, The Associated Press reported.
The late King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who held the throne for seven decades, was estimated to be worth more than $30 billion, according to Forbes magazine's 2011 rankings of the world's richest people. It's one of the world's largest fortunes, Agence France-Presse reported. The family's assets likely include various properties and financial investments. The monarchy has not officially announced its net worth and it is protected from public scrutiny under law.
King Vajiralongkorn, his father’s only son, will not be able to use all his family money. The announcement noted the previously tax exempt fortune would not be subject to taxation "in line with His Majesty's wishes."
We end this week discussing labor public policy looking at our high-income 5% and global 2% freemason/Greek players for those global banking OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS by reminding our US 99% of WE THE PEOPLE who may think allowing OLD WORLD EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS is better than allowing OLD WORLD ASIAN/ARABIC KINGS AND QUEENS have those hundreds of trillions of dollars looted from sovereign nations by ROBBER BARON CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA here in US. Our local and national CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE---which are the agencies being the tools of global banking 1% in capturing our nations' political and economic structure are telling our US 99% black, white, and brown citizens that it is OK for all that wealth to be swept into the hands of global banking 1%---THEY KNOW BETTER and will rebuild US cities deemed FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES for the SOCIAL BENEFIT of all US 99% of citizens and our new immigrant citizens.
When we KNOW MOVING FORWARD has all economic and monetary spending geared towards the goals of planetary mining slave colonies----SMART CITIES being built these few decades will decay in several decades to be useless to any citizen. What will be the cost of building these colonies and all infrastructure needed -----all that hundreds of trillions of dollars. This doesn't even take into account the technologies global banking 1% needs to develop and get functioning is even a reality.
So, the 21st century in MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE will guarantee SMART CITIES as DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE----it will guarantee our US CITIES DEEMED FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES will be made into far-right wing, authoritarian, militaristic extreme wealth extreme poverty global corporate campus LIBERTARIAN MARXIST states. What is not guaranteed is ANY part of these planetary mining slave colonies-----asteroid mining sold as bringing great wealth and natural ores and minerals being COMPLETELY DEPLETED in trying to build these global technology/energy grids WILL MATERIALIZE IN ANY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT.
BOY, WE HOPE THOSE EUROPEAN OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS WIN BECAUSE WE ARE WHITE=====FORGET ABOUT THAT 99% WE THE WHITE CITIZENS. THOSE SHIP OF FOOLS ARE WORKING ON 3000BC DNA.
What will it take to set up colonies in space?
An ambitious idea for creating giant orbiting homes in space is being resurrected by a think tank. If you think this sounds absurd, it’s worth noting this group predicted travelling to Moon 30 years before it happened.
- By Richard Hollingham
Imagine a pristine landscape of fertile fields and forests nudging up against the foothills of towering mountains. Rivers meander between prosperous towns dotted across the countryside. You can hear the sound of children playing in parks and gardens. Above them, in a clear blue sky, the Sun catches the wing tips of gliders circling in the thermals.
It sounds perfect, but something is not quite right. The scene is unnaturally idyllic, the sky slightly too blue and the horizon more curved than normal. That’s because this world is only 16 miles long, four miles wide and contained in a giant cylinder floating in space.
It’s a space colony concept, drawn up by the late Princeton physicist Gerard O’Neill in the mid-1970s, but his ambitious plan is now being revived by the space think tank British Interplanetary Society (Bis). The organisation has form in championing ideas that are not necessarily as wildly eccentric as they first appear. In the 1930s it came up with a detailed plan for a multi-stage rocket and a manned lunar lander, which looks remarkably like the mission that 30 years later successfully delivered Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the Moon.
“Back in the 1930s, the major work of the British Interplanetary Society was explaining to the public that exploring space was not a ridiculous idea,” says Jerry Stone, leader of the Study Project Advancing Colony Engineering (see what they did there?). “And what I’m trying to do with the space colonies project is something similar, to show that building a very large space colony is technically feasible.”
O’Neill’s original space colony proposal started out as an exercise for a group of students at Princeton. “Is a planetary surface the right place for an expanding technological civilisation?” he asked them. After a few months, and a great many calculations, the answer came back a resounding “No”. This got him interested in alternative human habitats beyond the Earth, and he conceived giant rotating spaceships containing landscaped biospheres housing up to 10 million people.
“There are two big advantages of constructing a colony in space rather than on a planet,” explains Stone. “You have the Sun’s energy 24 hours a day, so you can concentrate that energy to melt materials or use it to generate power, and you can rotate the habitat to create whatever gravity you want.”
These solar-powered colonies would be positioned at Lagrange points, stable areas in space where gravitational forces effectively balance each other out. They therefore wouldn’t need their own propulsion systems. Travelling to them would take weeks, compared to the months required to get to Mars.
O’Neill’s detailed plans for his colonies appeared in the journal Physics Today, where he thought through many of the practical considerations. The basic structure of the habitats, for instance, is designed around a hollow tube made of metal and glass. Within, a plant-rich landscape stretches around the walls, broken up with giant windows into space.
There would be a semi-natural water cycle including clouds, and oxygen would be recycled by plants. These climate-controlled living spaces would be like the most beautiful areas of Earth, with a rich mix of disease-free flora and fauna. Maybe even a selection of endangered species.
Rather than living on the outside of a sphere as we do on Earth, colonists would settle around the inside. With the cylinder rotating, they would experience an artificial gravity effect. Only if they moved away from the cylinder’s walls, towards its central axis would they feel weightless. In this way, the inhabitants of Earth 2.0 really would be able to fly.
O’Neill deliberately designed the structure using existing 1970s technology, materials and construction techniques, rather than adopting futuristic inventions. The hollow cylinder, for instance, was based on steel and aluminium. After detailed calculations, he claimed his concept was feasible at the time he published it.
Stone is bringing these plans up to date using today’s technologies. Rather than building the shell from aluminium, for example, Stone argues tougher and lighter carbon composites could be used instead. Advances in solar cell and climate control technologies could also be used to make life easier and more comfortable in human space colonies.
One of the biggest theoretical challenges O’Neill faced was the effort and cost of construction. That, says Stone, will be solved when a new generation of much cheaper rocket launchers and spaceplanes has been developed, such as the UK-built Skylon. Using robot builders could also help.
“Ninety per cent of the material to build the colonies would come from the Moon,” says Stone. “We know from Apollo there’s silicon for the windows, and aluminium, iron and magnesium for the main structure. There’s even oxygen in the lunar soil.”
Designs for life
Let’s assume it is doable, what would be the cost of such a vast human undertaking? “Good question,” admits Stone. “The likelihood is that it would be started off by a consortium of companies and we hope that would become an international group.” Alternatively multi-billionaires with an interest in space such as Jeff Bezos of Amazon or SpaceX’s Elon Musk might take the lead.
But the practicalities of building a colony in space are only part of the story. Perhaps even more important and complex, are the societal considerations. What sort of laws and government should it have? A democracy or a billionaire’s fiefdom? Perhaps it would be the ultimate offshore tax haven. At first the colonists may model their political, legal, economic and social structures on those back home, but eventually they are likely to be adapted to the new environment. Stone has drawn up a three-page list of fundamental questions of this kind that his study group plans to address.
There is indeed a lot to think about and it’s easy to knock these sorts of big, visionary ideas. However, I’m not alone in believing that if humanity is to survive we will one day have to leave the Earth. A giant space habitat might be just the stepping-stone to the stars that we need.