We showed yesterday where GEEK WISE as a global banking 1% media outlet tried to sell that BRAHMIN is not BIRTH----it is talent. That is of course FALSE---we want to look globally to see the same policies being installed by OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH here in US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----are being installed in ALL FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----this article tied to EAST INDIA----
THERE IS NO INTENTION OF SMASHING BRAHMINICAL PATRIARCHY--ESPECIALLY WITH SOMEONE LIKE D'ARCY OR ZUCKERBERG AT FACEBOOK.
D'ARCY is of course who owns TWITTER------CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA now TRUMP work for D'ARCY. The family name of DARCY/DORSEY often tied to these capture of our sovereign US CORPORATIONS to OLD WORLD KINGS-----are simply 5% freemason/Greek players. Here in Maryland we have a family DORSEY simply a colonial government staff---not OLD WORLD KINGS D'ARCY.
There are lots of East Indian 99% global labor pool being sent as EX-PATS from India to US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES as MOVING FORWARD has goals of making all labor FREE LABOR---ENSLAVING LABOR. The difference between BRAHMIN last century in India made public health ---public communications---public postal service ----public schools----is this: BRAHMIN in India in modern times was hidden as here in US--- but now India is rebuilding its 3000BC----HINDI BRAHMIN. OLD WORLD KINGS may apply only for wealth and corporate power.
Court admits petition by Brahmin body against Twitter CEO
November 22, 2018
Author: CanIndia New Wire Service
Jodhpur, Nov 22 (IANS) A local court on Thursday admitted a petition filed by a Brahmin organization against Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey who was recently shown holding a placard reading “Smash Brahminical Patriarchy.”
D'ARCY like MODI are far-right wing global corporate FASCISTS-------same ONE WORLD team
'Dorsey had also met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist, during his India trip'.
Activists call apology over Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's photo holding a sign critical of patriarchy 'disappointing'.
by Zeenat Saberin
21 Nov 2018
A group of Indian journalists and activists has accused Twitter and CEO Jack Dorsey of 'misrepresentation and half-truths' [Anushree Fadnavis/Reuters]
New Delhi, India - Women journalists and activists in India have hit back after Twitter apologised for a photo of its top official holding a placard that criticised the patriarchy propped up by India's caste system.
The placard that read "smash Brahminical patriarchy" referred to the highest Hindu caste and its alleged sanction for patriarchal oppression of women.
Many Twitter users branded Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's holding the sign as "hate-mongering".
The controversial photograph was taken during Dorsey's recent India trip when Twitter hosted a closed-door discussion with a group of women journalists and activists.
The poster was handed to Dorsey by Sanghapali Aruna, a Dalit activist. Dalits fall at the bottom of India's complex, and often brutal, caste hierarchy.
On Monday, Vijaya Gadde, a top Twitter official, apologised on behalf of the company following a massive backlash from mostly upper caste Indians, who were incensed by what they read as "hate speech" against Brahmins.
On Wednesday, a group of journalists and activists who were at the meeting with Dorsey accused Twitter of "misrepresentation and half-truths".
A statement issued by a group of women journalists and activists said the apology came as a "disappointment to all of us dealing with abuse, harassment and legal threats".
"This is also in sharp contrast to Twitter's strong stand in favour of women and marginalised communities in other countries," it said.
"We call on Twitter to step up and not capitulate to bigotry, disinformation and bullying and to address in serious terms the problem of trolls threatening the life and liberty of scores of women and marginalised communities online," the statement added.
Divided over a placard
Frequent instances of so-called "honour killings", where young inter-caste couples are killed, most often by irate upper caste families, are a reflection of just how tightly caste holds India in its grip.
A recent Reuters poll said India is the world’s most dangerous country for women while Dalits have suffered thousands of years of exclusion and extreme poverty.
"Traditionally, Brahmins have had power and privilege over others and had control over knowledge, resources and women’s sexuality. That power hierarchy is still intact," Aruna, founder of rights group Project Mukti and who gave the placard to Dorsey, told Al Jazeera.
"Lower-caste women and those from minority communities are vulnerable to injustice and oppression from upper caste men in positions of authority," she said.
On the other hand, Indians sympathetic to Hindu nationalists, like journalist Chitra Subramaniam, said the Twitter CEO's photo with the placard was "an incitement to violence".
A government official said the placard was "a fit case for registration of a criminal case for attempt to destabilise the nation".
T V Mohandas Pai, former finance chief at software company Infosys, accused Dorsey of "hate-mongering" against Brahmins.
Religion and caste often clash violently with women's rights in India.
In recent weeks, conservative Hindu groups have prevented women from entering an ancient Hindu temple in southern India, defying a Supreme Court order that lifted a centuries-old ban on women devotees
Social media and far-right groups
Twitter's apology has sparked outrage over the perceived inability of social media giants to stand-up to far-right bullying in India.
"Jack wasn't advocating any campaign. The poster wasn't trying to create animosity between groups. Twitter had no reason to apologise, except they feared a backlash from the right-wing and the government," Tejas Harad, editor at the Economic and Political Weekly, told Al Jazeera from Mumbai.
Dorsey had also met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist, during his India trip.
"The poster upset many because upper castes in India don't like to publicly acknowledge the caste system. It embarrasses them," said Harad.
Meanwhile, Twitter said it is committed to remaining "apolitical".
"We are proud of the fact that Twitter is a platform where marginalised voices can be seen and heard, but we also have a public commitment to being apolitical. We realize that the photo may not accurately represent that commitment and we apologise for any offence caused," a Twitter spokesperson told Al Jazeera.
But Twitter's apology and its distancing itself from the anti-caste placard, has left many disappointed.
"These platforms back movements against oppressive structures if it benefits them. Take the case of feminism. Twitter had introduced special emojis for the #metoo hashtag. Is the feminist movement not political?" asked Harad.
Analysts point out that social media channels have given its users a platform to be heard and a role in catalysing democratic voices in many parts of the world.
"Twitter's apology itself is a political stand," said Aruna.
"Our communities need to be protected from any kind of hate speech and bullying that can translate into physical violence, including lynching. We don’t want India to be the next Rakhine state."
Earlier this year in the US, Twitter faced criticism for "verifying" and handing out "blue ticks" to several hate groups and white supremacists.
Twitter, like other social media platforms, is struggling to curb online hate in countries like India, home to its fastest-growing user base.
According to networking giant Cisco, India's internet market will exceed 800 million by 2021.
Meanwhile, online hate against critics of the government or right-wing groups has reached unprecedented levels in the past few years.
"Twitter accounts which repeatedly spew hate, post death threats - no action is taken against them. So many anti-Muslim, anti-Dalit messages go unpunished. Criticise upper-caste oppressive systems, and you are swiftly apologising for it. This is worrying," said Harad.
We want to be clear---no one is a bigger HINDI-BRAHMIN then D'ARCY as too MODI----MOVING FORWARD OUR REVOLUTION for only the global 1% of men---simply needs WOMEN behind them since they are 50% of population.
When our 99% of global labor pool immigrants from East India come to US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----they need to know the goals have nothing to do with last century's Indian 'LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE' capitalism......the goal is taking US to 3000BC HINDI BRAHMIN-----only the global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS having money and power.
TWITTER is not SMASHING HINDIS in INDIA-----TWITTER AND MODI are smashing INDIA'S public communications structure killing all access to communications in India as here in US.
TWITTER WILL COME AND GO AS ONE WORLD ENERGY TECHNOLOGY GRID IS BUILT.
TWITTER trying to corner some 5% HILLARY NASTY LADIES to MOVE FORWARD these DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE communications policies in INDIA as too US.
Brahmin 'Darcy' Croc Embossed Leather Backpack | Nordstrom
Free shipping and returns on Brahmin 'Darcy' Croc Embossed Leather Backpack at Nordstrom.com.
Twitter CEO kicks up storm in India, offending some Hindus
November 20, 2018, 10:44:00 AM EDT By Reuters
By Krishna N. Das
NEW DELHI, Nov 20 (Reuters) - Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has kicked up a social media storm in India after a picture of him holding a poster saying "smash Brahminical patriarchy", referring to the highest Hindu caste, went viral.
Twitter has apologised and expressed regret over the incident, which some Indians have called "hate-mongering".
"The sentiments expressed on the poster do not reflect the views of Twitter as a company or Jack as the CEO, and we regret that this picture has detracted from an otherwise insightful trip to India," a Twitter spokeswoman told Reuters via email on Tuesday.
She said Twitter had hosted a closed-door discussion and one of the participants had shared her experience as a low-caste Dalit woman. At the conclusion of the session she gifted the poster to the Twitter CEO.
Several prominent Indians, including T.V. Mohandas Pai, a former finance chief of software exporter Infosys, accused Dorsey of "hate-mongering" against Brahmins.
"Tomorrow if @jack is given a poster with anti Semitic messages in a meeting, will his team allow him to hold it up?," Pai tweeted. "Why is that any different? Inciting hate against any community is wrong."
Twitter India said on Monday the poster had been handed to Dorsey by a Dalit activist when it hosted the discussion with a group of women to know more about their experience using Twitter.
It added the poster was a "tangible reflection of our company's efforts to see, hear, and understand all sides of important public conversations that happen on our service around the world".
Late on Monday, Vijaya Gadde, legal, policy and trust and safety lead at Twitter, who accompanied Dorsey to India, apologised.
"I'm very sorry for this. It's not reflective of our views. We took a private photo with a gift just given to us - we should have been more thoughtful," she said in a tweet.
"Twitter strives to be an impartial platform for all. We failed to do that here & we must do better to serve our customers in India."
Twitter, whose monthly active users globally averaged 326 million in the July-September quarter, does not disclose the number of its users in India but its executives say the country is one of its fastest-growing areas.
Its use is expected to increase further in coming months as political parties in the country of 1.3 billion try to expand their reach to voters ahead of a general election due by May.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with 44.4 million followers, is aTwitter enthusiast.
"I enjoy being on this medium, where I've made great friends and see everyday the creativity of people," Modi tweeted last week after meeting Dorsey in New Delhi.
Our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE understand the difference between HATING global banking 1% KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH tied to these ROBBER BARON few decades filling our US government with criminality, corruption, while sacking and looting----and HATING all of any population group. BRAHMIN in INDIA are the same global banking 1% having sacked and looted their own 99% of WE THE INDIAN CITIZENS ---so, yes those 99% of East Indians are ANGRY and HATE those global banking 1% INDIAN KINGS AND QUEENS.
What we call BEOWULFS ---those global banking 2% players having been figureheads to these global corporations these few decades----in India are what are called UPPER CASTE NON-BRAHMINS. It's the same MAGNA CARTA fight in India between billionaires and OLD WORLD KINGS----with both having a goal of killing the 99% of WE THE INDIAN CITIZENS.
Why is there so much hatred for Brahmins in India?
I have ...www.quora.com/Why-is-there-so-much-hatred-for...
Those who hate Brahmins most ferociously are the castes in South India that are upper caste non-Brahmins - even more than Dalits I would say. Anti-Brahmin sentiment is rather weak in North India, comparatively.
What global banking FAKE NEWS media outlets sell-----is GROWING HATE IN INDIA------leading to CIVIL UNREST CIVIL WAR----setting the stage for EAST INDIA to be involved in WW3-------across all of Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and Asia.
THAT IS ALL THIS PUBLIC POLICY TIED TO TWITTER IN INDIA----AS HERE IN US-----HAS AS A GOAL.
East Indian 99% are fighting the return of DARK AGES BRAHMIN OLD WORLD KINGS as hard as our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE.
Meanwhile, those 99% global labor pool immigrants from INDIA being brought to US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES are facing the same enslavement here as in southeast Asia.
Why are Brahmins hated by other castes in India
By Niche, 2nd Aug 2015 | Follow this author | RSS Feed |
Analyzing the reason why Brahmins are openly hated in India by many citizens, their power, greed, hypocrisy, dishonesty and lack of humanity
- Hatred of brahmins
- Life of a brilliant obc engineer destroyed due to defamation and lies
- No effort by brahmins to improve their behavior
Hatred of brahmins
On quora there are questions which has few honest answers on that website " Why are Brahmins hated by other castes in India", so an attempt has been made to answer the question taking into account factual evidence of the dishonesty, hypocrisy, cruelty and lack of humanity of the mainly brahmin officials in India in 2015. While not all brahmins are hypocrites, devoid of humanity, honesty, it appears that a majority of Brahmin officials who hold important government jobs, share these qualities. There are many other castes and religions in India, few are hated so intensely and openly.
Though Brahmins are relatively few in number, less than 10% of the indian population, studies indicate that they hold more than 50% of the top government jobs in the country. While this can be attributed to some extent to the higher levels of education, now it slowly appears that there is some kind of hidden reservation for Brahmins in the government, which only allows them to succeed. Online a few people have commented that, when other caste people get 25-30% of the jobs, these officials start protesting. Though India is officially a democracy, the real rulers of the country are the government officials especially the intelligence agencies, politicians if they do not perform are usually voted out within 5 years
Allegedly indian intelligence agencies like R&AW and CBI consist of mainly brahmin officials though to avoid to accusations of casteism, they may hire mediocre obc puppets like the inexperienced lazy greedy goan bsc call girl sunaina, who sleeps with them falsely claiming that she has the impressive resume of a brilliant obc engineer these officials hated. Indian intelligence agencies are extremely powerful because unlike other democracies like UK and USA, they cannot be held accountable by the citizens of India for abuse of power or any mistake they make.
Life of a brilliant obc engineer destroyed due to defamation and lies
Other castes hate the brahmins because they make it very difficult for a person of any other caste, however talented, brilliant or hardworking to succeed in India, In case of a brilliant single woman obc engineer, who studied in a top engineering college, who was earning a large amount through Paypal because of her large investment, these fraud brahmin officials falsely accused her of having black money , money laundering and being a security threat without any proof to destroy her life and reputation. These shameless greedy officials also stole her retiremnet savings without a court order or legally valid reason to waste her time and money.
Then these fraud officials started sexually harassing and blackmailing her to give up her resume for their mediocre lazy greedy cheater friends and relatives , call girls like the obc slut sunaina who sleeps with them, Every fraud who cheated the brilliant harmless obc engineer was rewarded with a top job in intelligence agencies stealing the resume of the obc engineer, like the goan gsb fraud siddhi mandrekar who commited corporate espionage, bengaluru shivalli brahmin cheater nayanshree hathwar who looted the obc engineer of more than $1800.
The bengaluru cybercrime refused to take action against the brahmin cheater nayanshree hathwar though the obc engineer provided all proof. Additionally the brahmin officials are giving the lazy greedy brahmin cheater nayanshree credit for the the revenues of the obc engineer, though the contribution of the brahmin cheater nayanshree is zero. Why is the fraud brahmin nayanshree who has already looted the obc engineer of her hard earned money, getting credit for her revenues? After cheating the obc engineer, brahmin cheater nayanshree did not bother to reply to her, why is brahmin cheater nayanshree getting credit to further humiliate, and exploit the obc engineer
Now these shameless brahmin officials falsely claim that at least 8 fraud women including gsb cheaters riddhi siddhi, shivalli brahmin fraud nayanshree, obc call girl sunaina, own the Paypal account of the obc engineer, when their lies can be easily proved. All these fraud women have allegedly got jobs in R&AW with great powers, salary and pension for the rest of their life, while the real Paypal account holder has got nothing. It is obviously unfair that lazy greedy frauds promoted by the brahmin officials who do no work, are getting a salary at the expense of the hardworking obc engineer, yet the greedy fraud brahmin officials do not have any conscience and will try to exploit the obc engineer indefinitely.
Not satisfied with stealing the resume of the brilliant obc engineer for lazy greedy goan and other frauds, these shameless brahmin officials are also defaming the obc engineer that she is doing no work and falsely claiming that the websites, Paypal account are owned by the lazy goan obc call girl sunaina who bribes them with free sex , gsb cheaters riddhi siddhi, brahmin nayanshree. Additionaly these officials are attacking the obc engineer daily causing great pain. Why does the obc engineer have to waste so much time and money daily to expose the fraud of the brahmin officials and defend herself against defamation?
When their darling obc callgirl sunaina and other cheaters are not doing any work at all, why do the brahmin officials want to waste indian tax payer money paying them a salary? Why do CBI and R&AW not officially declare that they want a salary for call girls and cheaters? These officials were ruthless in harassing the obc engineer without proof, when brahmin women like nayanshree hathwar, siddhi mandrekar are cheating openly why is no action taken against brahmin cheaters. Why the hypocrisy, double standards regarding honesty and treatment of cheaters.
Additionally the brilliant obc engineer finds that her mainly brahmin classmates are falsely claiming that the lazy greedy goan call girls and other cheaters like nayanshree, riddhi, have her impressive resume including her Btech 1993 EE degree to justify the lucrative job which these call girls and cheaters have got. Why did the cheater brahmin and other call girl, cheaters not work for their engineering degree, experience, what right do the powerful brahmin officials have to falsely claim that the cheater brahmin women like gsb frauds riddhi siddhi, brahmin BBM nayanshree and other puppets have a Btech 1993 EE degree.
Due to the defamation , resume theft the brilliant obc engineer finds that her correspondence is being diverted and stolen without a legally valid reason . None of these powerful brahmin officials have the honesty or courage to openly defend their action in an open debate, while the obc engineer has never been given a chance to defend herself or find out how her resume has been misused . It is very clear that the brilliant obc engineer is being ruthlessly exploited by the shameless greedy brahmin officials and it is difficult to get justice. Though it has become obvious that the brilliant obc engineer was falsely accused no attempt has been made to compensate her for the trauma or losses,
No effort by brahmins to improve their behavior
Like the brilliant obc engineer, there may be many other brilliant indian citizens who have found their life destroyed due to the cunning hypocrite brahmin officials who often treat non brahmins like animals. A century ago,the british prime minister, Winston Churchill commented on this attitude of brahmin officials towards non brahmins, treating fellow indians like animals , and unfortunately education, science and technology has not changed the attitude of many of these brahmin officials, who ruthlessly exploit anyone they find vulnerable. No one likes to be cheated, and when the brahmin cheater will be rewarded instead of being punished, it increases the resentment towards brahmins.
Though the mainstream media remains controlled largely by brahmins in India, websites with user generated content like Quora, Yahoo answers have a number of comments where people are openly expressing their hatred for brahmins. When the fraud of brahmin cheaters like nayanshree and siddhi are exposed on social media, the post will be deleted as most of the officials in the indian internet sector are brahmins. Till these brahmin officials make an effort to introspect and review their own behaviour , treat others fairly, they will continue to be disliked and hated.
No bigger global banking 1% media outlet then PSYCHOLOGY TODAY.
The East Indian BRAHMINS----AKA global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS wanting to take INDIA back to 3000BC HINDI BRAHMIN are using the CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA global labor distribution system-----slave trade -----to make EX-PATS out of all these few decades of ROBBER BARON 5% freemason/Greek INDIAN players pretending those arriving in US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES are making big money when indeed they are not-----and they will soon lose any wealth they came with or accumulated these few decades.
This same thing is happening to our US global banking 5% freemason/Greek players being thrown into global labor pool heading to overseas FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES to lose all their wealth and become enslaved.
WHETHER INDIAN SEIKS, MUSLIMS, OR HINDI/BUDDHIST----OUR REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVES WANT OUR NEW IMMIGRANTS TO EXPERIENCE REAL AMERICAN FREEDOM, LIBERTY, JUSTICE---NOT WHAT IS MOVING FORWARD---ONE WORLD FOR ONLY THE OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS.
Please don't flee injustice in India only to partner with the same global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS ------BRAHMINS having captured our US economics and politics.
This smiling 5% freemason/Greek Indian immigrant player-----is lying, cheating, and stealing opportunity from our new to US 99% of Indian citizens
'Utpal Dholakia Ph.D.
The Science Behind Behavior
Utpal M. Dholakia, Ph.D., is the George R. Brown Professor of Marketing at Rice University'.
Why Do Indians Succeed More in the U.S. Than in India?
The answer lies in three levels of selection in immigration.Posted Oct 15, 2018
Isn’t it interesting that countless immigrants and their children have prospered in our country while they barely eked out a living in their homelands?"
- Dr. Thomas Stanley.
Source: Flag Waving/ Rawpixel/ Unsplash/ Licensed Under CC BY 2.0
Recently, I participated in a roundtable event with high-ranking educators from India and successful Indian-American business leaders. The topic we discussed was, “Why are Indians who immigrate to the United States more successful professionally than those who remain?”
The question makes two significant assumptions. First, it assumes that Indian immigrants are more successful than those who don’t immigrate. And second, relevant to this blog, at least part of the explanation is believed to be psychological (which is why I was invited to participate in the event).
In this post, I want to unpack this question. To make the discussion manageable, I’ll focus only on Indian immigrants to the United States, even though the total Indian diaspora is far greater and widespread, and other US immigrant groups are bigger.
Are Indian immigrants to the US successful?
The answer is clearly “yes” no matter which benchmark we use. More than 75 percent of current first-generation Indian-Americans have immigrated to the United States since the 1990s. They make up only about 1 percent of the US population (3.9 million as of 2017) but have disproportionate numbers of professionals such as physicians, corporate executives, and successful entrepreneurs. Their median annual household income is $100,000, which is significantly higher than other immigrant groups or the US population as a whole.
If we compare these numbers to Indian non-immigrants, the income differences are even larger. As an example, college-educated Indians in India have a household income that is a small fraction of $100,000. Based on these statistics, it seems fair to say that as a group, Indian immigrants to the US are financially successful.
(Note that financial success does not mean success in other life domains. Do Indian immigrants have more fulfilling social lives? Are they more content? Or to drop the H-word, are they happier? These questions are equally important. I’ll address them in future blog posts).
Why are they successful?
They came to America’s shores with only the clothes on their backs and hope welling in their hearts. They slogged away for decades in obscurity and misery, grasping every sliver of opportunity. They lifted themselves up by their bootstraps out of American gutters. Time passed, watered by the sweat streaming off their backs. They scrimped, they saved, penny after penny. After decades of blinding toil, they were earning six-figure incomes. America transformed the huddled unwashed masses of Indians who reached its shores into prosperous business leaders and yuppies who shone as “model immigrants.”
Alas, riveting and uplifting as such a narrative sounds, it is false. The fact is the success of Indian immigrants can be attributed to a three-level selection process. The first level is education. According to the Immigration Policy Institute, 77 percent of Indian American adults have a college degree. In comparison, only 29 percent of all immigrants and 31 percent of native-born Americans are college graduates. Very few uneducated Indians make it to the US. Organizational psychologists even have a name for this type of immigrants, they are called “qualified immigrants.”
The second level of selection is the arduous and lengthy immigration process. Most first-generation Indian-Americans come to the US as students, go on to get a job with an H1-B visa (which involves a lottery), and eventually, after many years, become permanent residents and then US citizens. The entire process is fraught with uncertainty. It vets aspiring immigrants. The people who hang in there from beginning to end are optimistic and gritty. What’s more, because they come as students, they have more opportunities to interact with native-born Americans and consume American culture from their very first day on American soil than other immigrants. This helps them to assimilate and build social capital along the way (if they want to).
The third and perhaps the most significant selection is in who the immigrants are. As authors Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld point out, “the great majority of Indian immigrants in America come from the upper echelons of India’s social hierarchy.” Most of them are from higher castes, which means they have access to influential social networks both in India and in the US. These are the people likely to succeed financially no matter whether they stay in India or immigrate. Because of these three selection processes, the typical Indian-American is starkly different from the typical Indian or native-born American.
What should we conclude?
Only that we shouldn’t read too much into the financial success of Indian-Americans. Nor should we belittle the Indians who couldn’t or chose not to immigrate to the United States, or elsewhere, or the other immigrant and native-born US groups who have lower incomes. As psychologists have found, a significant chunk of a person’s success in any domain, including financial success, is dictated by their luck. This includes the fortune of their birth.
What we see in today's global banking 1% media-----and of course those global banking 1% freemason CULTURAL ARTS STARS------is the luring of our 99% of Asian citizens to US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES-----especially those HAVING A MERELY RICH WEALTH to end fleeced and enslaved ------at the same time our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE are being lured to overseas FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES both merely rich and poor-----our US national FAKE NEWS MEDIA----as global MEDIA CORPORATIONS are acting as SIRENS------CALLING SAILORS TO SHORE PROMISING A GRAIL---ENDING SHIPWRECKED.
In order to block sovereign citizens from reporting REAL INFORMATION in India----as too here in US-----what are historically OPEN AND FREE speech, press, highly educated academic sharing ----is morphing into CHINESE-STYLE CENSORING-----FACEBOOK MORPHS TO TWITTER THEN NO COMMUNICATIONS OUTLETS AT ALL ----except these global banking 1% FAKE NEWS and these SIREN CALLS.
Siren Call(SONG) Lyrics
Published on Jul 11, 2011
Song about Siren which calling sailor's in sea then drown them
ARE the US and the world turning hostile to Indian workers? Of course not. Our 99% US WE THE PEOPLE are not hostile to our 99% of immigrants---we are angry at those same global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS---KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH----just as those 99% of East Indian immigrants are angry at their BRAHMIN OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS.
We encourage our 99% in any nation to fight to stay in that nation having your sovereign rights and cultural history -----our US 99% being sent overseas whether as small business STARTUPS or white collar professionals will end up as most of our East Indian professionals-----full of wage theft----full of FAKE labor agreements---full of spending to open businesses only to lose all investments.
EAST INDIAN 99% HAVING LAST CENTURY REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM -----LOT'S OF PUBLIC COMMONS----ARE SEEING ALL THAT DISAPPEAR AS TOO HERE IN US.
So, the global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS always behind encouraging EMIGRATION-----know these global labor pool workers will end up being LOSERS----those 5% freemason/Greek players once called WINNERS.
Of course our East Indian 99% as too our 99% LATINO are simply being replaced by those 99% of Asian and Arabic immigrants.
Why the US and the world are turning hostile to Indian workers
Updated: Apr 02, 2018, 09.39 PM IST
NEW DELHI: Increasingly, the world wants to shut the door on Indian professionals, especially the tech workers, who want to work in foreign countries. From today, the US has tightened the process to award H1-B visas. Given to highly skilled professionals to work in the US, the H1-B visas fuelled the growth of India's information technology companies over more than a decade. Now the visas will turn precious, with unprecedented scrutiny and zero tolerance for even minor errors. In addition to this ..
Earlier in March, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services had announced that it would temporarily suspend the premium processing for the H-1B visa. The Donald Trump administration recently announced a new measure, making the approval of H-1B visa tougher. Any company will have to make one more clarification to prove that its H-1B employee at a third-party worksite has specific and non-qualifying speculative assignments in a speciality occupation.
As the globalisation project shrivels due to protectionist tendencies emerging across the world in developed economies, the future abroad for highly skilled Indians is likely to turn bleak.
The US is not the only country averse to Indian tech workers. The UK too had revised its immigration laws. In November 2016, the UK announced its new visa rules which set a higher salary threshold for anyone applying under the Tier 2 intra-company transfer (ICT) category under which Indian tech comp ..
Indian students once flocked to the UK but now the number has been going down due to concerns over Brexit and protectionist policies. December 2017 statistics for international students from the UK Council for International Student Affairs showed Indian students to the country fell a whopping 44% in the last five years. Despite the blip of a 10% increase in visas to Indian students in the year ending September 2017 from a year ago, the declining numbers is still causing concern. The increase in ..
Recently, the Australian government blocked the most popular route Indians took to Australia — the subclass 457 visa category for skilled overseas workers. Instead, a new Temporary Skill Shortage visa has been introduced from March 18. The abolished visa was a big attraction for Indians who wanted to work in Australia. Of the 90,000-odd holders of this type of visa, 22% were Indians. New visa norms are restrictive and would certainly make it difficult for Indians to find work in Australia. Earli ..
The visa restrictions will hit career dreams of a large number of Indians. There was a time in India when studying abroad was considered a mark of privilege. But rise of the middle class in has turned that privilege into a common aspiration. More and more parents now want their children to study abroad. The number of Indian parents wanting their children to study abroad jumped from 47% in 2016 to 62% in 2017, according to an HSBC report on education. A world becoming increasingly hostile to Indi ..
Indian parents' top three university destinations for their children are the USA, Australia and the UK — the very countries now trying to block immigrant workers.
Though local economic pressures, rising unemployment and cultural issues related to immigrants have led developed countries to tighten visa norms, one reason is perception of Indian professionals as a threat to local jobs.
The world is increasingly resisting Indian tech workers whose hard work for frugal salaries has ..
With the industrial revolution in the west, India became a big importer of textiles from being a leader in textile exports in a matter of decades — due to cheap mass-manufacture technology. England's cheap machine-made textile goods ruined India's superior but costlier textile industry and a sophisticated banking system that financed it.
Indian tech companies are the new textile mills of Manchester and Lancashire, churning out cheap services with which the local IT services industry in ..
Now, Indian IT companies are seeking to overcome the visa-related challenges by setting up new centres in the US, a market that accounts for about 60 per cent of India's IT export basket. Infosys plans to set up four technology and innovation hubs in the US and hire about 10,000 locals there. Wipro has set up a technology centre in Plano, Texas, and plans to ramp up its headcount in the American state to 2,000 over the next few years.
We will end today's look at TWITTER D'ARCHY expanding ONE WORLD ONE TECHNOLOGY GRID using same lying, cheating, and corruption of journalism/academic writing/media as here in US---to all overseas FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES by reminding our global 99% of citizens no matter the sovereign nation----we are discussing INDIA for example. Here we see global banking 1% INDIAN OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS having global corporations that expanded by same ROBBER BARON FRAUDS from their 99% of Indian citizens. When our national FAKE NEWS MEDIA pretends that EAST INDIANS are gaining wealth in US----it is simply the installation of global foreign corporations inside US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Same Indian BRAHMINS with extreme wealth in India---are the one's expanding into US being those same extremely rich. Meanwhile our 99% of Indian immigrants to these US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----MOVING FORWARD to enslavement and DEEP DEEP REALLY DEEP STATE ---
WHO WAS THE EAST INDIA CORPORATION DURING AMERICAN COLONIAL PERIOD? THE EUROPEAN OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS PARTNERED WITH INDIAN OLD WORLD KINGS.
15 Indian companies that are most global
15 Indian companies that are most global
Last updated on: July 17, 2013 12:11 IST
Established in 1907, it is among the top ten global steel companies in the world with an annual crude steel capacity of 28 million tonnes per annum (mtpa).
The company is now one of the world's most geographically-diversified steel producers, with operations in 26 countries and a commercial presence in over 50 countries.
Its $12.98 billion acquisition of Anglo-Dutch steelmaker Corus in 2006 was one of the biggest acquisitions abroad by an Indian company.
Transnationality Index: 63 per cent
Total revenues: Rs 132,900 crore (Rs 1,329 billion)
Revenues from foreign operations: Rs 97,700 crore (Rs 977 billion)
Total assets: Rs 125,800 crore (Rs 1,258 billion)
Assets abroad: Rs 75,700 crore (Rs 757 billion)
Total employees: 81,622
Employees abroad: 45,829
Image: Tata Steel's Managing Director Hemant Nerurkar (L) and Tata Steel Europe's Managing Director Karl-Ulrich Koehler.
Photographs: Vivek Prakash/Reuters
We can see why in East India-----the 99% of WE THE INDIAN CITIZENS are hating all those HINDI BRAHMINS!
Meanwhile, BREXIT is final stage of making UK simply ONE WORLD FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE-----no longer a sovereign nation ergo, it is indeed being COLONIZED.
East India Company returns after 135-year absence
- 13 August 2010
An Indian entrepreneur is relaunching the famous East India Company with the opening of a luxury food store in London on Saturday.
The event takes place on the same day that - more than 135 years ago - the company was dissolved.
At the height of its power, the East India Company controlled large parts of India with its own armed forces.
But it was disbanded after soldiers of the company's own army rose in revolt against the British in 1857.
A tiny rump of the company lived on, however, consisting of its trading name and a small tea and coffee concern.
This shadow of what was once a global trading power was acquired in 2005 by Indian businessman Sanjiv Mehta, who has turned it into a consumer brand focused on luxury foodstuffs.
He told the BBC that the project was not simply a commercial venture - there was an emotional connection too.
The East India Company's early activities focused on trading in tea, cotton and silk "It is a dream come true to build a business like this and to acquire a brand like this to own the company," he said.
Mr Mehta dismissed fears that the reappearance of a company long associated with colonialism would open old wounds, insisting he had been inundated with messages of support from his compatriots.
"It's a disproportionate joy, [I have received] more than 15,000 e-mails [of support] from various Indians across India, even from Barbados to Fiji to Canada to Boston."
The entrepreneur, who moved to Britain around 20 years ago, says that he has acquired a 400-year-old brand already known to millions of people around the world.
At its peak, the company employed a third of the British workforce and was responsible for a huge tranche of global trade.
Mr Mehta hopes eventually to make a return to India to tap the market for luxury goods in one of the world's fastest expanding economies.
The company was created by the granting of a charter from Queen Elizabeth I in 1600 and given a monopoly on English trade to Asia. Its early business activities focused on cotton, silk and tea.
Mr Mehta's shop in London is stocked with 350 luxury products, including 100 varieties of tea, chocolates, spices and mustards developed by the company from across the world.
Many of our US 99% WE THE 5% FREEMASON/GREEK PLAYERS wax romantic over OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS---especially BRITISH. We keep educating how all Western European OLD WORLD KINGS are going EAST----to EASTERN EUROPE----there will be no sovereign Western European nation---our UK----BREXIT is a global banking 1% policy being sold in national FAKE NEWS media as restoring BRITISH sovereignty when in fact the goal MOVING FORWARD is the opposite. An East India corporation is simply one of many FOREIGN GLOBAL CORPORATIONS taking UK's sovereign economy. Same goals with CALEXIT----TEXEXIT------none of these policies have goals of bringing back state sovereignty ---they are MOVING FORWARD making that US state an independent FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE controlled by a GLOBAL MILITARY JUNTA AND TRIBUNAL.
So, while our US 5% freemason/Greek players thinking they are working for OLD WORLD BRITISH KINGS AND QUEENS are sold the idea that these EAST INDIA CORPORATIONS of today are those same from MEDIEVAL TIMES----you would be absolutely WRONG. These are 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMINS----no Western Europe around in them thar days.
We encourage all of our new to US 99% of immigrants who were fighting against global banking % in their own nations to remember, our Western Europe, UK, US, Canada are no longer SOVEREIGN NATIONS MOVING FORWARD.
Dreaming of sovereignty
Talk of taking back power may be delusional, but more democracy is not
Britain THE ECONOMIST
Mar 19th 2016
“TAKE control” is the main slogan of the Vote Leave campaign. Indeed, the argument that Britain has lost sovereignty, and even its democracy, by being in the European Union is at the heart of the case for Brexit. Michael Gove, the justice secretary, complains that “our membership of the EU stops us being able to choose who makes critical decisions which affect all our lives”. Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, says that EU membership is incompatible with parliamentary sovereignty. Many of their fellow Brexiteers claim that, even if leaving has a price, it is worth paying to regain control.
Despite fighting to stay in, David Cameron shares some of these concerns. The prime minister is proud of the European Union Act of 2011, which makes any treaty passing new powers to the EU subject to a referendum. He fought hard last month to win a British exemption from the European goal of “ever closer union”. The government says it is still working on a bill to assert Parliament’s supremacy.
There are three strands to the sovereignty argument. The first is the pure concept of parliamentary supremacy. Before the 1972 European Communities Act, the then Tory prime minister, Edward Heath, insisted that “there is no question of any erosion of essential national sovereignty”. Yet this was true only in the sense that Parliament can repeal the act (a right confirmed by the very holding of a referendum).
What Heath’s phrase skated over was the second strand: that EU membership means that European law trumps national law. This was established in the Factortame cases in the early 1990s, when a British parliamentary act on ship registration was voided by the European Court of Justice after complaints by Spanish fishermen. Vernon Bogdanor, a constitutional historian, says EU membership (along with devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) means parliamentary sovereignty has in practice been eroded. This is true even if Britain copies the sovereignty claims of the German constitutional court, since these have never been tested.
Many talk of being sovereign as if it were like being pregnant: one either is or is not. The truth is more complex. A country can be wholly sovereign yet have little influence. Britain has signed some 700 international treaties that impinge on sovereignty. Although the EU has the biggest impact, others count a lot: membership of NATO, for example, creates an obligation to go to war if another member country is attacked. It can be worth ceding this independence to gain influence. Mr Cameron has warned Brexiteers against pursuing what he calls the “illusion” of sovereignty.
They may do better pursuing the third strand: democracy, or rather the lack of it. It is wrong to argue, as some do, that EU laws are imposed by unelected bureaucrats in the European Commission. In fact, although the commission proposes draft legislation, it is adopted by the Council of Ministers, consisting of elected national governments, and the elected European Parliament. Moreover, the commission may be unelected, but the choice of Jean-Claude Juncker of Luxembourg as its president was made after he was chosen as the centre-right’s “lead candidate” before the 2014 European elections.
Despite this, there is undeniably a democratic deficit in the EU. It is supranational, but elections (including European ones) are fought on national issues. There is no Europe-wide demos. Voters cannot throw out the EU’s collective leadership. Both the council and the parliament are remote and unaccountable, with decisions often agreed on by shifting alliances. This may partly explain why voter turnout in European elections is so much lower than in national ones (see chart).
As Simon Hix of the London School of Economics notes, this matters especially to Britons, who are not used to coalition government. The demise in the 1980s of the Luxembourg compromise, which gave EU members a form of veto, and the spread of majority voting have also led to Britain being outvoted more often. This is where another of Mr Cameron’s ideas may help: more say for national parliaments.
In 2013 Mr Cameron called national parliaments the “true source” of democratic legitimacy. Yet they have played only a marginal role in the EU. That is to be beefed up by a deal whereby if 55% of national parliaments object to a law it is withdrawn (a “red card”). There are also plans for parliaments to suggest laws (a “green card”).
There is an irony here for British Eurosceptics who like to trumpet parliamentary sovereignty. National parliaments in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands are far better at overseeing their governments’ EU policies. In Britain, moreover, the elected House of Commons is less effective than the unelected House of Lords. That is partly because MPs can be shamefully ignorant of EU affairs. But just now it is also because MPs are consumed by arguments over Brexit.
Whether TWITTER'S D'ARCY in global media overseas in EAST INDIA pretending to be fighting BRAHMIN----or our local DORSEYS pretending to be fighting GLOBAL CORPORATIONS AND return of colonial enslavement-----to FIX BALTIMORE we must leave these colonial government structures BEHIND
We visit all University of Maryland campuses --and all of them are tuned to CNN pretending it is REAL NEWS---
'Dorsey: Plank, Port Covington and Baltimore's history of white supremacy'
John W. Dorsey, UMBC chancellor
Frederick N. Rasmussen, The Baltimore Sun
John W. Dorsey, former chancellor of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County who later returned to the classroom where he taught economics, died Monday of respiratory failure at his Laurel home. He was 78.
"Many believe that he saved UMBC from several alternative fates, from absorption to closure, and set it onto the sound course that leads to today," said Joseph N. Tatarewicz, an associate professor of history at UMBC and director of the university's human context of science and technology program.
"Dr. Dorsey became chancellor of UMBC, which is equivalent to president today, in 1977 during a difficult period for the university," he said.
The son of John Wesley Dorsey Sr., a farmer, and Abbie Dorsey, a schoolteacher, John Wesley Dorsey was born in Hagerstown. He was raised at Sherrick House in Sharpsburg, the family farm located within the confines of the Antietam battlefield.
"Dr. Dorsey grew up helping his father on the farm and by bringing in hay and driving the tractor across the Burnside Bridge," said his son-in-law, Tim Small of Ashburn, Va.
After graduating from Boonsboro High School, he was a 1958 Phi Beta Kappa graduate of the University of Maryland, College Park, and also graduated from the London School of Economics. He earned his doctorate in economics in 1964 from Harvard University.
In 1963, he joined the economics faculty at the University of Maryland, College Park, and in 1965, took a one-year leave of absence to serve as a staff economist on President Lyndon B. Johnson's Council of Economic Advisors.
Dr. Dorsey returned to College Park in 1966, where he served as director of the Bureau of Business and Economic Research for four years. He was vice chancellor of administrative affairs from 1970 to 1977 and acting chancellor of the College Park campus from 1974 to 1975.
In 1977, Dr. Dorsey was named chancellor of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, which was the university's newest campus. During his tenure at UMBC, enrollment went from 5,200 to 8,150 students. Average SAT scores of incoming students increased nearly 100 points, and the faculty grew to 400. UMBC's annual budget expanded from $18.6 million to $46.2 million.
With UMBC's birth coinciding with the "major crest of the baby boom," said Dr. Tatarewicz, and with that subsiding, the "university needed to take its place within Maryland higher education's changed landscape and circumstances."
"The University of Maryland, Baltimore County is but 13 years old; yet it is difficult to identify more than four other major public university campuses in the nation that have progressed as well in the development of excellence in a comparable period," Dr. Dorsey wrote in a 1979 article in The Baltimore Sun.
"Already it has established an extraordinary record for placing its graduates in medical, dental and law schools, in graduate schools of business and in graduate programs ranging in content from ancient studies to biochemistry," he wrote.
'William English "Brit" Kirwan (born April 14, 1938) is the Chancellor Emeritus of the University System of Maryland (USM). He served in the position from August 2002 through June 30, 2015'.
First, we want to say this as a citizen with roots all the way back to colonial Maryland and Virginia---and this goes with the discussions we have often about STOP CLANNING AROUND----our colonial ancestors were these same colonial governing families-----yes, they gained an advantage over the growing population these 300 years.
When we look at why last century around the nation our US public K-UNIVERSITY was filled with LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE I AM MAN AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT teachers HOLDING POWER ACCOUNTABLE----creating PUBLIC INTEREST public policy and academics writing REAL INFORMATION-----as opposed to those US states that maintained a colonial economy---retained all these colonial families who AMAZINGLY still work for those GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS.
When we REBUILD our local public universities, media, and academic writing so it actually WORKS for our 99% WE THE PEOPLE---this is how we FIX BALTIMORE---FIX BALTIMORE COUNTY. These 15th generation twice removed on mother's side 5% freemason/Greek players need to WAKE UP----because the TRIBES OF GALWAY were not related to OLD WORLD KINGS D'ARCY and MOVING FORWARD eliminates all that thousands of years of ARISTOCRACY------
'Tribes of Galway - Galway City
The Tribes of Galway were fourteen merchant families who dominated the political, commercial, and social life of the city of Galway in Western Ireland between the 13th and 16th centuries.
'Richard Kirwan (1733-1812), president of the Royal Irish Academy from 1791, was awarded the Copley Medal for contributions to analytical chemistry'.
'William English "Brit" Kirwan (born April 14, 1938) is the Chancellor Emeritus of the University System of Maryland (USM). He served in the position from August 2002 through June 30, 2015. Before that, Kirwan was the 26th President of the University of Maryland, College Park and the 12th President of Ohio State University. He was also a member of the faculty at the University of Maryland for 34 years. '
If our STATE OF MARYLAND is home of global banking 1% FAKE NEWS-----MYTH-MAKING AND PROPAGANDA----then this is happening in your neck of the woods----let's SHAKE SHAKE SHAKE that colonialism OUT of our local government and public K-UNIVERSITY to get REAL INFORMATION.
William English "Brit" Kirwan (born April 14, 1938) is the Chancellor Emeritus of the University System of Maryland (USM).
He served in the position from August 2002 through June 30, 2015. Before that, Kirwan was the 26th President of the University of Maryland, College Park and the 12th President of Ohio State University. He was also a member of the faculty at the University of Maryland for 34 years.
Kirwan started at the University of Maryland, College Park as an assistant professor in the mathematics department, before going on to become a department chair, provost and ultimately university president. He helped lay the framework for the University System of Maryland in 1988 and was named university president in 1989.
At Ohio State, Kirwan focused his attention on improving the academic standings during his tenure. He left Ohio State in 2002 to become chancellor of the University System of Maryland.
Kirwan is a member of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics and became its chair in May 2000. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation; chairs the College Board's Commission on Access, Admissions, and Success in Higher Education; and is a member of the Business-Higher Education Forum. He was also appointed by President George W. Bush to the Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities. In April 2007, Kirwan was appointed to the editorial board of the newly announced Journal of Diversity in Higher Education.
Kirwan is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Greater Baltimore Committee, the Economic Alliance of Greater Baltimore, and the Maryland Business Roundtable for Education. On February 15, 2007, he became the 16th recipient of the Maryland House of Delegates Speaker's Medallion, which recognizes Maryland citizens who have demonstrated exemplary service to the House and to the State of Maryland.