We want to shout how these medical atrocities over in Europe were indeed happening the US with MANHATTAN PROJECT et al doing the same to US 99% WE THE PEOPLE. Today, MOVING FORWARD BRAIN/BODY IMPLANT radiation exposure via 5G technology ----INTERNET OF EVERYTHING SMART CITIES-----would be deemed the same back in 1940s-50s. IMPLANTING and INJECTING radioactive chemicals were among the MEDICAL CRIMES tried at NUREMBERG.
Flash forward to BUSH/CHENEY/WOLFOWITZ ------OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH with ABU GHRAIB and psycho-sexual torture -----and the ending of GENEVA CONVENTION created from NUREMBURG trials. The American people were shouting against all these MILITARY CRIMES------what we didn't know was these MEDICAL MILITARY CRIMES were being waged here in AMERICA-------so, BRAIN/BODY IMPLANTS------radiation exposures------unwarranted psychiatric diagnosis HITTING our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE into this regime of medical atrocities-----GLOBAL PRIVATE MILITARY TELEMEDICINE FOR ALL.
'Paul Wolfowitz - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wolfowitz Paul Dundes Wolfowitz (/ ˈ w ʊ l f ə v ɪ t s /; born December 22, 1943) is an American political scientist and diplomat who served as the 10th President of the World Bank, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia, and former dean of Johns Hopkins SAIS'.
BUSH/CHENEY/WOLFOWITZ are the same global banking 1% today who were behind these FAR-RIGHT WING GLOBAL CORPORATE FASCIST medical atrocities from WW2.
What is different? Back in 1940s-50s we still had in Western Europe and North America REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE LIBERALISM----FILLED WITH MORALS AND ETHICS especially in our PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM. Today, we have allowed those MENDELES MEDICAL ATROCITY BARBER SURGEONS become our MAINSTREAM MEDICAL SYSTEM in US cities deemed FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE DONE VIA RELEASE OF PATENTED MEDICAL PRODUCTS UNTESTED IN HUMAN POPULATIONS ------MAKES FOR MEDICAL ATROCITIES.
The ETHNIC CLEANSING during WW2 was done by BOTH KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH and the EUGENICS behind this CLEANSING has nothing to do with RACE, CREED, ETHNICITY-----it only has to do with those GLOBAL .00014% of extreme wealth people thinking they are THE SUPERIOR people.
These HITLER/STALIN medical atrocities were done against SOLDIERS-----PRISONS OF WAR-----local citizens ----every population group as is true today.
The WORLD BANK/IMF back during WW2 is the source of all these medical atrocities---and they are the source of TRANSHUMANISM----indeed, they are only .00014% of global people
Nazi Medical Experiments
During World War II, a number of German physicians conducted painful and often deadly experiments on thousands of prisoners without their permission. Considering the inhumane conditions, lack of consent, and questionable research standards, modern scientists overwhelmingly reject the use of results from experiments in the camps.
Many German physicians and scientists supported racial hygiene ideas before the Nazi rise to power. From 1933 on, they embraced the new regime’s emphasis on biology and heredity, the new career opportunities, and the additional funding for research.
Experiments centered around three topics: survival of military personnel, testing of drugs and treatments, and the advancement of Nazi racial and ideological goals.
After the war, only a few of the biomedical experts who helped to implement and to legitimize Nazi racial hygiene policies were ever indicted or disciplined professionally. Many continued their careers.
From 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany carried out a campaign to "cleanse" German society of individuals viewed as biological threats to the nation's "health." The Nazis enlisted the help of physicians and medically trained geneticists, psychiatrists, and anthropologists to develop racial health policies. These policies began with the mass sterilization View This Term in the Glossary of many people in hospitals and other institutions and ended with the near annihilation of European Jewry.
Medical Experiments in the Third Reich
Nazi medical experiments, 1942-1945
- US Holocaust Memorial Museum
Unethical medical experimentation (without patient consent or any safeguards) carried out during the Third Reich may be divided into three categories.
1. Experiments dealing with the survival of military personnel
Many experiments in the camps intended to facilitate the survival of Axis military personnel in the field. For example, at Dachau, physicians from the German air force and from the German Experimental Institution for Aviation conducted high-altitude experiments on prisoners to determine the maximum altitude from which crews of damaged aircraft could parachute to safety. Scientists there also carried out so-called freezing experiments on prisoners to find an effective treatment for hypothermia. Prisoners were also used to test various methods of making seawater drinkable.
2. Experiments to test drugs and treatments
Photograph documenting medical experiments on a Polish prisoner in the Ravensbrück concentration camp
Clandestine photograph of a Polish political prisoner and medical experiment victim in the Ravensbrück concentration camp.
Prisoners in the Ravensbrück concentration camp took several clandestine photographs as evidence of the medical experiments conducted on them. The camp was the site of bone-grafting experiments and experiments to test newly developed sulfa drugs.
Pictured here, Bogumila Jasuik was chosen as one of the 74 "rabbits" for medical experimentation. German doctors experimented on her twice in November and December 1942, making four cuts on the muscles of her thigh.
The "rabbits" wanted to take photographs to document their mutilated legs. The photos were secretly taken behind the barracks and were processed after the war.
- US Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of Anna Hassa Jarosky
Other experiments aimed to develop and test drugs and treatment methods for injuries and illnesses which German military and occupation personnel encountered in the field. At the German concentration camps of Sachsenhausen, Dachau, Natzweiler, Buchenwald, and Neuengamme, scientists used camp inmates to test immunization compounds and antibodies for the prevention and treatment of contagious diseases, including malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis. Physicians at Ravensbrück conducted experiments in bone-grafting and tested newly developed sulfa (sulfanilamide) drugs. At Natzweiler and Sachsenhausen, prisoners were exposed to phosgene and mustard gas in order to test possible antidotes.
3. Experiments to advance Nazi racial and ideological goals
A third category of medical experimentation sought to advance the racial and ideological tenets of the Nazi worldview. The most infamous were the experiments of Josef Mengele on twins of all ages at Auschwitz. He also directed experiments on Roma (Gypsies), as did Werner Fischer at Sachsenhausen, to determine how different "races" withstood various contagious diseases. The research of August Hirt at Strasbourg University also intended to establish "Jewish racial inferiority." Additional gruesome experiments meant to further Nazi racial goals included a series of sterilization View This Term in the Glossary experiments, undertaken primarily at Auschwitz and Ravensbrück. Scientists tested a number of methods in an effort to develop an efficient and inexpensive procedure for the mass sterilization View This Term in the Glossary of Jews, Roma, and other groups Nazi leaders considered to be racially or genetically undesirable.
The Nuremberg Code
The Nuremberg Code was created In the aftermath of the discovery of the camp experiments and subsequent trials to address abuses committed by medical professionals during the Holocaust. The Nuremberg Code included the principle of informed consent and required standards for research.
This CATHOLIC NEWS AGENCY article tied to fighting FOR THE RIDER prohibiting genetic engineering and embryonic editing is saying the same thing WE ARE. Here is the problem--------this CONGRESSIONAL RIDER is indeed CRITICAL-----but the power of US FEDERAL AGENCIES has been undermined by US universities being allowed to have GLOBAL PRIVATE MEDICAL CORPORATIONS and GLOBAL HEDGE FUNDS build BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITIES funding by WORLD BANK. The need for US FEDERAL FUNDING is gone----
Anyone fighting against MOVING FORWARD TRANSHUMANISM----would be fighting to dismantle these GLOBAL PRIVATE MEDICAL CAMPUSES replacing our US public universities.
Here in Baltimore that is global hedge fund JOHNS HOPKINS with our local PUBLIC university campuses acting as TRANSHUMANIST research corporation SATELLITES.
Any REAL RELIGIOUS institution and leadership which MUST be against TRANSHUMANISM would be FIGHTING LOCALLY against US cities deemed FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES and SMART CITIES ----INTERNET OF EVERYTHING.
The statement below is TRUE======it is REAL NEWS.
“If we cede this framework of science and ethics to maverick bioengineers who are detached from larger societal considerations, the risks of harm are real, and we will divert these resources away from real, viable alternatives,” said Fortenberry'.
Fighting FOR that 2016 Congressional RIDER forbidding GENETIC ENGINEERING is good------but it is FAKE if not expanded to these privatized global banking MEDICAL CAMPUSES.
House committee debates ban on editing human genes
Gene editing in vitro genetic CRISPR genome engineering medical biotechnology health care concept with a fertilized human egg embryo and a group of dividing cells as a 3D illustration.
By Christine Rousselle
Washington D.C., Jun 4, 2019 / 03:16 pm (CNA).- The House Appropriations Committee has reinstated a condition in 2020 spending bills which prohibit embryonic gene editing. The amendment was passed in a vote of the full House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday afternoon.
Without the amendment, U.S. scientists would be able to approve and conduct clinical trials that would involve the creation or modification of human embryos.
Almost a week and a half after a congressional subcommittee passed a draft of the annual appropriations bill omitting the rider, an amendment to reinsert the ban passed with near unanimous consent Tuesday afternoon.
Since 2016, the appropriations bill has contained language that bans the Food and Drug Administration from performing research in clinical trials “in which a human embryo is intentionally created or modified to include a heritable genetic modification.”
On May 24, the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies subcommittee, which is chaired by Rep. Sanford Bishop, Jr. (D-GA), approved a version of the bill that omitted the ban on gene editing.
Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE), the ranking member of the subcommittee, spoke at the Tuesday meeting in favor of maintaining the prohibition on embryonic gene editing. Fortenberry said that human genetic experimentation is loaded with ethical questions largely unaddressed by researchers.
“If we cede this framework of science and ethics to maverick bioengineers who are detached from larger societal considerations, the risks of harm are real, and we will divert these resources away from real, viable alternatives,” said Fortenberry.
The Nebraska congressman said the issue is particularly close to home for him, as one of his own children is the beneficiary of intense medical interventions that have significantly lengthened her life.
Fortenberry explained that his daughter Kathryn was born with multiple congenital heart defects, and effectively lacked an aorta. At the time she was born, Fortenberry and his wife researched possible adult stem-cell therapies that could potentially cure her condition, before realizing “that particular innovation was premature” and would not be effective.
Instead, he said, their daughter had multiple surgeries and implants, and is now expected to have a full and healthy life, noting that had she been born 20 years earlier, said she would have not been expected to live past the age of 30.
“It was through this innovation and advancement in science that made that life extension possible for her,” said Fortenberry, adding “When we search passionately for answers, and align them with effective science, reason, and ethics, we have a holistic approach to compassionate care.”
Earlier in the hearing, Sanford Bishop had raised a doctor’s use of controversial mitochondrial replacement therapy in treating a child who with a mitochondrial illness. Fortenberry said the example showed the ethical problems of using untested science as medicine and accused the doctor of “skirting U.S. law.”
“[The doctor’s] own findings are showing that the disease is still present in that child. The child is also supposed to be tracked his entire life and the risk to the child may not be known for decades,” said Fortenberry.
Fortenberry quoted a comment made earlier this year by Dr. Fancis Collins, the Obama-appointed head of the National Institutes of Health. Collins has also expressed concern about the efficacy and ethics of human germline editing.
“Given the lack of compelling medical need, the safety concerns, and the profound societal and philosophical issues--NIH strongly agrees that an international moratorium on reproductive uses of human germline gene editing should be put into effect,” said Collins in March.
Fortenberry suggested that instead of gene editing clinical trials, that “we can innovate in order to authentically alleviate human suffering.”
In a voice vote on Tuesday, all members except Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) approved the amendment, adding the prohibition back into the 2020 appropriations bill.
'The headlong pursuit of genetic engineering therapies flies in the face of the American public’s views'.
Here is another global banking 1% MEDIA OUTLET-----the AMERICAN THINKER. This article written supporting THE END OF GENETIC ENGINEERING goals-----quotes global neo-liberal UNIV OF CHICAGO------and claims PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS are the problem.
'Christopher M. Reilly is a Christian bioethicist who manages the website HumanPreservation.org. He holds a Master’s degree in public affairs and is currently a graduate student in theology and bioethics at Holy Apostles College and Seminary'.
CHRISTIAN BIOETHICIST -------yet, he is connected to ALL THAT IS GLOBAL BANKING 1% NEO-LIBERALISM------HAYEK-----UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO----DAVID BROOKS tied to BROOKINGS INSTITUTION are all CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA.
We are sure HOLY APOSTLES COLLEGE is a FAKE RELIGIOUS institution and REILLY is a TRANSHUMANIST.
'But the middle class thrives in local communities. As Friedrich Hayek explained in “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” local governments best provide the services that their constituents need most, because local officials have the best information about those needs. And as David Brooks wrote one year ago, “Local power is personalistic, relational, affectionate, irregular, and based on a shared history of reciprocity and trust.” Brooks defined “localism” as “the belief that power should be wielded as much as possible at the neighborhood, city and state levels” (and he predicted the coming of a localist revolution)'.
THE COMING OF A 'LOCALIST REVOLUTION' after these few decades of filling our US cities with WORLD BANK---WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION---GLOBAL PRIVATE MILITARY CORPORATIONS------ergo, NOT ALL-AMERICAN or LOCAL.
Today's PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS are far-right wing global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS-----making the global rich EXTREMELY RICH-------NEO-LIBERALS ----like this FAKE CHRISTIAN BIOETHICIST.
Hmmm, this FAKE RELIGIOUS RIGHT not mentioning REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVES who have never stopped fighting all these MEDICAL ATROCITIES.
July 25, 2019
The Progressive Plot to Impose Genetic Enhancements
By Christopher M. Reilly
Despite clear public opinion to the contrary, progressives in Congress are eager to eliminate even the weak regulations that prevent a chaotic explosion of research into genetic engineering of human embryos. Hidden away in a House appropriations agriculture subcommittee, Democrats in May repealed the spending bill rider that prohibited the FDA from considering requests to approve any clinical trial “in which a human embryo is intentionally created or modified to include a heritable genetic modification.”
Republicans forced the rider to be reinstated on June 4 in the full Appropriations Committee, but its long-term fate remains uncertain.
The headlong pursuit of genetic engineering therapies flies in the face of the American public’s views.
An AP-NORC poll last year found that only around 10% of Americans, even without prior education about the potential dangers to individuals and future generations, favored genetically altering embryos to change physical characteristics or capabilities like intelligence or athletic ability. More dramatically, 88% felt it was likely that genetic engineering therapies on embryos, even for the removal of genetic diseases and abnormalities, will be used for unethical reasons.
The Democrats’ attempt to eliminate legal restrictions on genetic engineering experiments is a rare, but significant, public admission of an alliance between political progressives and research institutions. Our world is going to change dramatically – and soon.
We are going to have tiny computer chips and robots floating through our bloodstreams to monitor and even improve our health. Pigs will be grown with human organs for replacing human bodies’ damaged ones. Scientists are on the cusp of a cure for AIDS, robotic arms that respond to an individual’s thoughts without being wired to the brain, and human embryos that are manufactured from stem cells in a laboratory.
Where are we headed next?
If you want to know, you’ll need to ask a scientist. Not even the scientists, however, know what to make of an entire generation of “biohackers” who are undermining both government and institutional oversight of genetic engineering.
Josiah Zayner, owner of a biotech firm he runs out of his garage, found out in May that he is under investigation for practicing medicine without a license. Zayner gained the attention of a host of adoring fans as well as the ire of government regulators by publicly injecting himself with a gene editing solution and performing a fecal transplant on himself. The grounds for the investigation, however, seem shaky since Zayner performed the procedures on himself.
Such biohackers form a growing movement of hundreds of entrepreneurs and daredevils who justify their work with appeals to treasured American values. Zayner sees himself as a rebel against a bureaucratic government that “refuses to allow people access to cutting edge treatments or in some cases even basic healthcare, yet I am the one threatened with jail.” Biohacker David Ishee also reflects the suspicions of many innovative genetic researchers regarding an aggressive new stance by the FDA: “It’s regulation to control who can use these new technologies and how much money they need to have to use them, not regulation to mitigate any risks.”
Established scientists and research associations, however, express horror over the species-wide consequences of the worst of the rogue experiments. Genetic engineering is a rapidly growing and still uncertain science, and DNA edits that are inherited by future generations could hold some nasty, unexpected surprises. When Chinese researcher He Jiankui announced in late 2018 that he had not only edited the genes of twin embryos but then guided them to birth – an experiment that was risky and violated an array of ethical research guidelines – the condemnations by the international community of scientists were swift and harsh.
Scientific associations claim to be running to the rescue of a society threatened by premature genetic engineering experiments. A coalition of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, U.S. National Academy of Medicine, and U.K. Royal Society, with input from dozens of other associations, say they are developing an authoritative set of ethical criteria and standards for research into genetic engineering on human embryos. They follow the World Health Organization, which formed an expert panel on human genome editing in March that recommended all related experiments be entered into an international registry. International regulation of both the practices and ethics of researchers seems to be the order of the day.
Does such self-policing by worldwide scientists and researchers represent the values of American citizens? The scientific associations’ ethical deliberations show little respect for the wishes of non-scientists. Their ethics panels include experts in science, and only rarely do they tolerate professional bioethicists. They do not include religious scholars, philosophers, or social scientists who may have very different judgments.
At no point do the panels consider the fundamental concerns of religious groups about genetic procedures that destroy thousands of human embryos in research and will likely do the same when therapies are enacted. New persons manufactured through altering the DNA of embryos may have severe difficulties in relationships with achievement-expectant parents and a society that perceives a warrant for further discrimination against people with disabilities. Persons who are altered in such a way, especially if their abilities and physical characteristics are greatly enhanced, may grow up with significant identity, relational, and spiritual challenges that are rarely discussed by academics other than a few conservatives like Leon Kass.
The wealthy are more likely to afford any new genetic enhancement therapies, exacerbating inequality in our society. Progressives will then use the public’s demand for new genetic engineering therapies to promote dystopian regulations that enforce or fund genetic enhancement for all. On June 12 in STAT, Sen. Bill Cassidy penned an essay that called for solutions like Medicaid payments for genetic therapies and an international fund that would direct national contributions to support for genetic therapies desired by favored populations. A new generation of advocates of “liberal eugenics,” including Nicholas Agar, Jonathan Glover, Jeff McMahan, Ronald Green, Allen Buchanan, and Julian Savulescu, promote not only the use, but sometimes the obligation, of genetic engineering to enhance the inherited characteristics and abilities of human beings and eliminate supposedly unwanted disabilities from the population.
The scientific associations claiming to regulate genetic engineering research are well aware they have little authority to enforce their ethical guidelines; He Jiankui conducted his unauthorized experiments in a context of strict laws, institutional sanctions, and peers’ ethical standards. We have seen this scenario before in the 1970s, when scientists declared a moratorium on research into recombinant DNA research. The insincere moratorium was undermined in just a few years by independently operating researchers, and the technique is now the widely practiced basis for a profitable industry.
Religious and other critics of the new genetic engineering technologies will likely experience a barrage of dismissive, ideological taunts. Disability rights activist George Estreich recorded such labels as “fearful, uninformed, paranoid, Luddite, vociferous, loud, anti-science, anti-technology” in his book Fables and Futures. Even when Russian scientist Denis Rebrikov announced last month that he fully intended to bring more genetically engineered embryos to birth, there was no response in the media to his harshly anti-religious rhetoric. He said in an interview with Science, “these people who are opposed want to have all these things in their children but only by ‘divine providence,’ not by science. They are liars or stupid.”
Conservatives have an uphill battle in urging values-based judgments of the many possibilities that will tempt our technologically-obsessed society. Scientists like Rebrikov resort to an argument from inevitability: “We can’t stop progress with words on paper. So even if we say, let’s not do the nuclear physics, because it can make a bomb, a lot of scientists will still do this. We can’t stop it.”
The American public, if it responds soon, may yet have the last word.
Graphic credit: Public Domain Pictures
Christopher M. Reilly is a Christian bioethicist who manages the website HumanPreservation.org. He holds a Master’s degree in public affairs and is currently a graduate student in theology and bioethics at Holy Apostles College and Seminary.
The headquarters in US for GLOBAL BANKING 1% TRANSHUMANISM is HASTINGS CENTER in New York and below we see the leaders of TRANSHUMANISM claiming all voice in BIOETHICS tied to GENETIC ENGINEERING.
Notice global banking 1% TRIBE OF JUDAH---SOLOMON and global banking 1% KNIGHTS OF MALTA------CALLAHAN both NOT RELIGIOUS yet both claiming these religions as supporting TRANSHUMANISM----ergo,
JEWS FOR TRANSHUMANISM
CATHOLICS FOR TRANSHUMANISM
Both are ATHEIST/SATANISTS.
'SOLOMON - solomon meaning - Jewish Genealogy
Solomon Genealogy The vast majority of Argentine Jews are descended from immigrants who arrived from Europe. These ashkenazic Jews migrated from small towns or shtetels of Poland, Lithuania, Russia, Germany, Romania or Ukraine, leaving behind most of their Jewish relatives'
'The Hastings Center was founded in 1969 by Daniel Callahan'
From 1961 to 1968, Callahan worked as executive editor of Commonweal, a Catholic journal of opinion. Callahan became an influential writer and author within Catholic intellectual circles during this period, which was a tumultuous time in the Catholic Church. In addition to numerous articles in Commonweal, he wrote or edited nine books, including The Mind of the Catholic Layman, Honesty in the Church, and The Catholic Case for Contraception. The historian Rodger Van Allen once described Callahan as “perhaps the most influential Catholic layman of the 1960s.”'
Daniel John Callahan
July 19, 1930
DiedJuly 16, 2019 (aged 88)
Dobbs Ferry, New York
Harvard University (Ph.D.)
Georgetown University (M.A.)
Yale University (B.A.)Spouse(s)
Bioethics, philosophy, ethics, medical ethics, health policy
The Hastings Center addresses social and ethical issues in health care, science, and technology. Through our projects and publications, The Hastings Center shapes ideas that influence key opinion leaders, including health policy-makers, regulators, health care professionals, lawyers, legislators, and judges. Our analyses also influence professional practice: from end-of-life care to psychiatric practice to immigrant health care, we have helped to shape the standards of practice adopted by physicians, nurses, and lawyers. Founded in 1969 by philosopher Daniel Callahan and psychoanalyst Willard Gaylin, The Hastings Center is the oldest independent, nonpartisan, interdisciplinary research institute of its kind in the world.
The Hastings Center
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Hastings Center
Woodlawn, the center's headquarters
Type Bioethics research institute
Garrison, New York, United States
Mildred Z. Solomon
Expenses (2017) $3,501,119
Website www.thehastingscenter.org 
The Hastings Center is an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan bioethics research institute based in Garrison, New York. It was instrumental in establishing the field of bioethics.
Its mission is to address ethical issues in health care, science, and technology. Through its projects and publications, The Hastings Center shapes ideas that influence key opinion leaders, including health policy-makers, regulators, health care professionals, lawyers, journalists, and students. 
The Center is funded by grants, private donations and journal subscriptions.
The Hastings Center was founded in 1969 by Daniel Callahan and Willard Gaylin, originally as the Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences. It was first located in Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y., and is now in Garrison, N.Y., on the former Woodlawn estate designed by Richard Upjohn.
In the early years, the Center identified four core issues as its domain:
population control, including respect for procreative freedom; behavior control, which responded to early discoveries about the brain-behavior link and efforts to find ways to modify behaviors and prompted reassessment of what is "normal"; death and dying, including the ongoing controversy over defining death; and ethical issues in human genetics.  The Hastings Center continues to work on these issues and has expanded to other areas, including the human impact on nature, governance of emerging technologies such as Crispr gene editing, and wise and compassionate health care.
The video from CSPAN in 1995 claiming the creation of RAC------as oversight and accountability for genetic engineering was filled with TRANSHUMANISTS like LeROY WALTERS.
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY IS NOT RELIGIOUS---IT IS OLD WORLD KINGS---FREEMASONRY.
Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
'February 2, 2000 | Clip Of Safety of Gene Therapy This clip, title, and description were not created by C-SPAN.
User Clip: LeRoy WaltersUser-Created Clip
April 23, 2013
Recounting of 1995 RAC process and new post-Gelsinger recommendations'
Oral History of the Belmont Report and the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
LeRoy B. Walters, Ph.D.
Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr. Professor of Christian Ethics
Professor of Philosophy
Kennedy Institute of Ethics
September 24, 2004
Belmont Oral History Project
Interviewer: Bernard A. Schwetz, D.V.M., Ph.D., Director, Office for Human Research Protections.
INTERVIEWER: To get us started, would you tell us your name and your current position and your academic training?
DR. WALTERS: I'm LeRoy Walters. I am a senior research scholar at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics. And I'm also the Joseph P, Kennedy, Sr., Professor of Christian Ethics at Georgetown University. I did my Ph.D. work at Yale University and wrote my dissertation on the just war theory. I took no formal courses in medical ethics. At the time there weren't courses offered in this field.
INTERVIEWER: How did you come to be asked to be a consultant to the National Commission?
DR. WALTERS: I had written an article on the topic of fetal research, and I think that--as that topic became a topic for the National Commission, they turned to me, among several other people, and asked me to write a position paper on the topic.
Later, the Commission was looking at the general ethic principles underlying biomedical and behavioral research and asked a number of philosophers and theologians, including me, to write papers on that topic. Those were the backdrop for the Belmont Report.
INTERVIEWER: The concern or the interest in research in fetuses, was that driven by political concerns or medical concerns or societal concerns?
DR. WALTERS: I would say that shortly after the Roe v. Wade decision was handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, the issue of fetal research became a very lively topic in the United States. NIH denied that it was involved with the funding of any fetal research. However--do you want me to change something?
THE HASTINGS CENTER where this video of JOHNSON from New Zealand talks about mental health treatment is tied-------she is a HASTINGS CENTER TRANSHUMANIST-----we see HASTINGS CENTER is very close to the ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER where the medical atrocities tied to MANHATTAN PROJECT occurred.
We shared yesterday an article stating that ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER was held accountable LEGALLY for these ATROCITIES with CIVIL AWARDS for damages to family members made VICTIMS of these crimes.
'Strong Memorial Hospital (Teaching Hospital of the University of Rochester) in 1945 along with Colonel Hymer Friedell (also a M.D.). A top secret and constantly guarded clandestine facility, the “Manhattan Annex” was constructed across the street from the University of Rochester Medical School'.
When we're on the road, rather than always picking an airport that is close to our destination, we try to see if there might be another airport that would better fit our travel plans.<1> To help with your planning, the following list of airports is organized by type and proximity to Hastings Center.
Please keep in mind that these airports were chosen based on their air-distance from Hastings Center. You should check the map and see how accessible they are when considering one airport over another.
Of the airports that we know about, these are some of the closest to Hastings Center.
Greater Rochester Intl. (ROC/KROC) [Map]
77 miles [123.9 km] miles to the west of Hastings Center.
We also KNOW BILL CLINTON is related to OAKRIDGE HOSPITAL where EBB CABE one VICTIM was held captive by CLINTON ENGINEERING WORKS driving the MANHATTAN PROJECT plutonium injections. So, Bill Clinton cannot be given credit for OUTING all these crimes-------since REAL JUSTICE never occurred.
'Denise’s account was the first full treatment I had seen of the situation that occurred in the Clinton Engineer Works in 1945 here in the Oak Ridge hospital. As with other aspects of her research, Denise captured this unpleasant experiment in detail and concisely placed it in her coverage of the history of Oak Ridge.
Here is the result of Carolyn’s research from several sources of information:
On March 24, 1945, well before sunrise, Ebb Cade, 53',
This video is a TRANSHUMANIST touting mental health discussing the need for better treatments for mental health making a BIOETHICAL endorsement of BRAIN IMPLANTS for behavioral controls ------courtesy HASTING CENTER BRAIN/BODY IMPLANT public policy.
Controversies Surrounding the Pediatric Bipolar Diagnosis & Treatment (Bioethics Briefs)
•Apr 11, 2010
The Hastings Center
Josephine Johnston, research scholar at The Hastings Center, discusses the controvies surounding pediatric bipoloar disorder and the potential impact the proposed DSM V dianosis of temper dysregulation disorder with dysphoria (TDD).
We showed HASTING CENTER'S involvement with ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER in MANHATTAN PROJECT medical atrocities-----below we show Bill Clinton and his family's involvement tied to OAKRIDGE MEDICAL facility even as HAZEL O'LEARY pretends Bill Clinton is leading in PROVIDING JUSTICE.
'One of the best moments of the Clinton administration were the actions of Secretary of the Department of Energy, Hazel O’Leary, and her official response upon learning about “America’s Nuclear Shame” (term coined by CNN’s Bernard Shaw). Her integrity and leadership did not allow the government to resort to the, not infrequently practiced, Washington “damage control” protocol .man Experimentation, Plutonium, and Colonel Stafford Warren'
We often read in national FAKE NEWS media that these MANHATTAN PROJECT medical atrocities did not include MILITARY when in fact it did. MILITARY and CIVILIANS-----brought to these medical atrocities deemed by NUREMBURG TRIALS as CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY with those HITLER fascist doctors being EXECUTED/IMPRISONED.
HMMMMMM, WONDER IF ELIZABETH WARREN IS RELATED TO THIS COLONEL WARREN? SEEMS LIKELY.
Please note that WARREN the MENDELES OF US medical atrocities used these criminal medical research to create PATENTS for PRODUCTS that then HARMED AND KILLED military personnel------
WELL SAYS TRANSHUMANISTS-------WARREN DID MAKE MONEY-----SOME TENS OF MILLIONS.
In 1953 the Nuremberg Code was created as a result of atrocities committed in the guise of “medical research” during the second world war. In 1994 Eileen Welsome, a reporter for the Albuquerque Tribune, was awarded the Pulitzer Prize, for her investigative reporting of a dark episode in American History relating to secret medical experiments. Her subsequent book “The Plutonium Files: America’s Secret Medical Experiments In The Cold War” published by the Dial Press in 1999 is a fascinating, as well as riveting, narrative regarding this American experience. During the 1940s a leading participant in the performing of potentially lethal medical research on unsuspecting military personnel and hospitalized patients was Army Colonel Stafford Warren, a Professor of Radiology at the University of Rochester (New York) School of Medicine and Dentistry and Chief of the Manhattan Project Medical Section.
Col. Warren is shown to the right in the photograph above as he boards the hospital ship USS Haven in 1946 en route to Operation Crossroads at Bikini Atoll. The historical revelations regarding human experimentation atrocities committed by enemy physicians during WWII have focused on Dr. Shiro Ishii (Japanese Unit 731), and Dr. Josef Mengele (Auschwitz Concentration Camp). Less well known, but equally, depraved have been the activities of Dr. Fukujiro Ishiyama (Kyushu University Imperial Hospital), Dr. Sigmund Rasher (Dachau Concentration Camp) and Dr. Hiroshi Iwanami (Dublon Island, Truk).
The discovery that human experimentation had also been performed on unsuspecting hospital patients in the United States by American physicians during the war years, as well as recent times, has made it clear that some of these enemy physicians had American colleagues to share in their infamy in performing experimentation on captive human subjects.
Stafford Warren, in his capacities as a U.S. medical officer (radiologist) and medical faculty member at the University of Rochester appears to have had primary responsibility for the now infamous plutonium injections performed on innocent patients at Strong Memorial Hospital (Teaching Hospital of the University of Rochester) in 1945 along with Colonel Hymer Friedell (also a M.D.). A top secret and constantly guarded clandestine facility, the “Manhattan Annex” was constructed across the street from the University of Rochester Medical School.
This clandestine facility was connected by a tunnel to the medical school itself. This building was destroyed after WWII , and its activities were actively kept hidden from the public until over a half-century later. By 1977 only one survivor, Jeanne Connell remained, to tell the tale. That same year Connell, and the heirs of the other human subjects, each received $400,000 from the U.S. government with an official apology (O’Neill et al., Betrayal of Trust, People Magazine, May 5, 1997).
The Strong Memorial Hospital and the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry’s web site notes that in March 1943 President Valentine, of Strong Memorial Hospital, summoned Dr. Stafford Warren to a luncheon conference with Major General Leslie Groves and Colonel J. C. Marshall. At this meeting it was decided that Dr. Warren would be responsible for the medical care and protection, against health hazards of all individuals who were to be working on the Manhattan Project for the development of the atomic bomb.
The need for knowledge regarding the effects of plutonium on humans was information important to the needs of the United States during the 1940s. This was, however, no justification to commit crimes against humanity in order to gain this knowledge as many individuals would have willingly volunteered for such studies if they has been provided with informed consent and responsible overview.
Standing as a dramatic and proud antithesis to the actions of Col. Stafford Warren was Major Walter Reed who established the United States Army Yellow Fever Commission, in Havana in 1900. When Major Reed asked for volunteers to be bitten by mosquitoes laden with yellow fever full disclosure of risk, including possible death, was provided to those who volunteered.
Some of the first to step forward as volunteers to be bitten by infected mosquitoes were physicians Jesse Lazear and nurse Clara Maass who sadly did not survive from their self-inflicted yellow fever. The sacrifice of these medical professionals was groundbreaking in the annals of self-sacrifice and in the establishing a moral compass for informed consent by ethical health professionals.
It needs to be noted that, in contradistinction to the yellow fever volunteers, none of the physicians involved in the plutonium experiments ever used themselves as test subjects.
One of the best moments of the Clinton administration were the actions of Secretary of the Department of Energy, Hazel O’Leary, and her official response upon learning about “America’s Nuclear Shame” (term coined by CNN’s Bernard Shaw). Her integrity and leadership did not allow the government to resort to the, not infrequently practiced, Washington “damage control” protocol .
Welsome’s delving into the persona of Stafford Warren has allowed us to see him as an “opportunist” having “no ethical qualms” whose “bravado masked a cunning intelligence.” Her diligence and persistence resulted in the confrontation with the United States Department of Energy in 1993 as noted above.
In addition to wearing a cap as a Manhattan Project Officer Colonel Stafford Warren was, at the same time, also involved in the development of radiographic media at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. He, and his associates Strain and Plati, developed the myelographic oil-ester Pantopaque® for which they received U.S. Patent 2,348,231 . This was issued on May 9, 1944.
The Parisian Report chronicles the tale of this saga and the Burton Report documents the relationship
of Pantopaque® to the neuropathologic entity “adhesive arachnoiditis.” In one of medicines great mysteries
Pantopaque®, which was never shown to be “safe“, was initially introduced for use in small amount (1-2cc) for locating spinal tumors. It next (mysteriously) appeared on the world scene for high volume (12-15cc),routineuse, in diagnosing disc herniations.
A number of clinicians have published on the dangers of oil myelography. In 1942 Van Wagenen (a neurosurgical colleague of Warrens, at the University of Rochester) identified Pantopaque® as causing chemical meningitis in his own patients where “space-displacing masses within the spinal canal were suspected.” Despite this important information Pantopaque® was subsequently distributed to the United States military by Warren, under circumstances inconsistent with American Medical Association principles as well as Food and Drug Administration requirements.
In the 1940’s the myth was advanced that by removing all Pantopaque following myelography would avoid complications. This dictum led to multiple lumbar punctures being performed for the extraction process typically also then introducing blood products to the residual Pantopaque. The experimental studies performed by Jaeger in 1947 in dogs documented that the meningitic response produced by blood and Pantopaques mixed together was worse than that from Pantopaque alone.
Only minimal effort has ever been directed to documenting the numbers of military personnel who became disabled following oil myelography and subsequent spinal surgery during the period 1940-1985. How many military veterans experienced a Pantopaque® myelogram during this period is simply not known but, there are clearly many thousands of veterans whose lives were destroyed by this experience.
Should the United States Veteran’s Administration and the Surgeon General’s office ever initiate a inquiry into these particular events it would, most certainly, open up another important chapter in American medical history. Because we have not yet endeavored to learn from this particular past experience many unfortunate individuals in the present continue to suffer from similar problems and human experimentation on unsuspecting patients in the United States has continued unaccompanied by adequate disclosure.