ARISTO the artist with his CURTAINS covering much of our WESTERN civil society, like the NORTH AMERICAN NEBULA disappearing behind that gaseous cloud------are all allegory for the end of US civilization and the covering represents the colonial status as LIBERTARIAN MARXIST FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE.
ARISTO'S CURTAIN is the IRON CURTAIN------and the BERLIN WALL is the TRUMP US BORDER WALL-----installed to keep RUSSIAN and Eastern European 99% WE THE PEOPLE from escaping the brutality of LIBERTARIAN MARXISM.
'The Iron Curtain
The Iron Curtain. The Soviet Union took the old principle of “la guerre doit nourrir la guerre” [‘the war must feed the war’] seriously, and the Red Army lived off the land. Besides carrying the legal burden of the armistice obligations,
Hungary suffered through illegal seizure and large-scale looting.
By the late 1940s, most of eastern Europe was cloaked behind what became known as the Iron Curtain.
By the start of 1946, the process of ‘sovietisation’ was well underway in these countries, which collectively became known as the Eastern Bloc or Soviet Bloc. Access to the Eastern Bloc was tightly restricted; there were no foreign journalists permitted and diplomatic access was minimal. Despite this, Allied governments had some information about what was transpiring there.
LIBERTARIAN MARXISM COMES WITH THE CULTURE OF PRISON---AUTHORITARIAN MILITARISTIC SOCIETY-----YOU KNOW, LIKE HOSTING SERVER NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG illegal surveillance and 24/7 VIDEO PORN.
Global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH----created HOLLYWOOD freemason STAR movies leading into the REAGAN/CLINTON era ROBBER BARON few decades as surveillance society with goals of installing LIBERTARIAN MARXISM was set in motion. Below we see the remake today 2019.
'The original 'Planet of the Apes' came out in 1968 film and the remake came out in 2001'.
ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE ONE FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE SOCIETY will be a PRISON PLANET EARTH.
'Human Exile On Earth – Earth Is A Prison Planet! - Earth And ...earthandbeyond.net/human-exile-on-earth-earth-is... Jun 16, 2019 ·
The theory of human exile states Earth is a prison planet, created when our ancestors were imprisoned on Earth approximately 50-60,000 years ago. The reason was to isolate the intergalactic spread of mental illness, crime and murder. The same criminal behavior and mental illness that humans still exhibit today'.
We identify TELEMEDICINE as a global banking 1% military ploy to bring SMART CITIES inside our private homes making it seem ordinary to be surveilled 24/7 for GOOD HEALTH----CHINESE SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE as FAKE utopian society.
REMEMBER, the LIBERTARIANS are those global .00014% of extremely rich after these few decades of ROBBER BARON CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA. They are MOVING FORWARD the extreme poverty and military authoritarianism with MARXISM for our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE and new to US immigrants.
'21st Century Marxism
In certain respects the situation of Marxism in the early 21st century has much in common with that in the late 19th century. In both cases Marxism is faced with a world in which the capitalist mode of production dominates. During what Hobsbawm called the ‘shorter20th century’, the period from 1914 to 1990, world politics centered round the epochal struggle between capitalist and socialist economic systems, and that reality gave to Marxism a quite different character than in its first period 1948-1914. In historical terms then, we are some 17 years into the 21st century.In each period Marxism has had to address itself to the theoretical and political challenges of the moment. The 19th century addressed two main problems:
1)The constitution of the proletariat as a class and thus as a political party - (TheManifesto of the Communist Party 1848)
2)The critique of bourgeois political economy and the establishment of a political economy of labour - (Capital 1867) Certain questions were only touched on the form of a future communist society (Critique of the Gotha Program) and the political form of the rule of the working class (The Civil War in France)'.
TRUMP is MOVING FORWARD US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE as LIBERTARIAN MARXIST just as HITLER/STALIN. His wall is meant to keep people in ---not out as well as the BERLIN WALL.
Trump’s Wall vs the Berlin Wall: how much would it really cost?
(Hint: more than you think)
By winterSmith on January 15, 2019 • ( 5 Comments )
[UPDATED] All the estimates you’re seeing on the cost of Das Trumpenwand are leaving something out. Something important. And really, really expensive.
NOTE: I figured out the flaw in my math and have readjusted, using some better numbers suggested by Kristen Kerns Wheeler in the comments.
On Friday my colleague Otherwise suggested we give Trump his wall. This perspective wasn’t received with universal acclaim. But in reflecting on his argument, I found myself focusing on a point that I’m not sure I think is entirely accurate:
Nor did the Berlin Wall keep democracy and capitalism out of the Soviet bloc. It didn’t even do that great a job at keeping people in.
This is both true and false, I think, depending on how you want to define terms. In the long run the Berlin Wall failed, but for 28 years or so it proved fairly effective at keeping people in. Estimates say 5,000 or so escaped, and at least 138 (and perhaps 200) were killed trying. Roughly 100,000 attempted to escape, which means the wall was 95% successful.
Success or failure?
You make the call. But one thing seems really clear: whatever success the Berlin Wall had at keeping East Germans in wasn’t about the wall – it was about the shoot-to-kill orders.
Border guards were under strict orders: “Don’t hesitate to use your weapon even when border breaches happen with women and children,” one East German secret service file from 1973 read.
And here’s where I think the story of Trump’s wall hits the epic phase of its unraveling.
The Berlin Wall was 96 miles long (but only 27 of those miles divided Berlin). There were 302 watchtowers – approximately one every 559 yards. (The concentration was a lot higher in Berlin proper, I suspect.)
So there was the wall, but most of the wall was monitored by armed guards. With standing orders to shoot anything that moved.
Let’s compare the Berlin Wall with Trump’s wall.
The projected cost of the Trump’s wall ranges from $12-70 billion. For fun, let’s start with the Washington Post estimate of $25B (because it’s probably the least partisan).
The total length of the border is 1,954 miles. We’ll assume that the wall by itself will be utterly useless because that’s what history tells us, and also because a Mexican congressman already climbed an existing section. Which means for it to be effective watchtowers will be required. Using the Berlin interval of 559 yards per, that would mean Das Trumpenwand would require 6,152 towers (I assume towers because elevation increases visibility – ground-level stations are going to significantly bump the number of watch facilities). I don’t know how much a tower costs, but let’s assume it’s built into the cost of the wall.
Now, you’d need these towers to be manned (or womaned), and you’d probably need three per shift. Three shifts per day. Let’s say you can hire a guard for $50k/year (Federal employee or contractor – according to Salary.com a patrol officer in El Paso earns a median salary of $47,000, and the cost would be higher overall since that’s the cost of the lowest ranking member of the force – sergeants, lieutenants, captains and so on cost a lot more). Add another 50% for benefits – which is standard.
Check my math here, because this can’t possibly be right, can it?
That’s over 4 billion bucks a year in salary alone?
You could spread the towers out more, you say? That gives the Brown Horde® a lot more potential openings.
You can have two people per tower. Cool – now the cost is down to $2.76 billion a year.
You could use drones instead of people. Oh, really? If you’re doing that, remind me again why we need a wall?
Oh, and by the way – even this approach only works if your guards are willing to shoot to kill on sight (and that only works if we somehow or another decide it’s legal for them to do so). Why? Well, in Berlin more than 3,500 people per year tried to escape knowing they might be shot. And one assumes the fear of getting shot is a deterrent, yes?
Make of this what you will (and by all means correct my math if I’m wrong). But from where I sit, even partisan opposition to Trump’s wall is barely scratching the surface of its problems.
What do TRUMP, HITLER, STALIN, AND DON BLACK OF KKK have in common? They are all LIBERTARIAN MARXISTS working for global banking 1%-----just as pre-Weimar Germany and pre-USSR RUSSIAN CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA.
We use the term global banking 5% freemason/Greek player as ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT CIVIL UNREST CIVIL WAR players-----because they are paid to do the DEMOLITION work of ROBBER BARON sacking and looting of civil societies.
'Black was asked to obtain a copy of the NSRP membership list by Robert Lloyd, a leader of the National Socialist White People's Party, formerly known as the American Nazi Party. At the time, Black was a member of the Party's youth branch, the National Socialist Youth Movement'.
'Don Black (middle) standing with his son Derek (right) and American politician Ron Paul in 2007'.
DON BLACK as DAVID DUKE of KKK white supremacy are BFF with RON PAUL a global banking 1% TRIBE OF JUDAH while pretending they are ANTI-SEMETIC.
LIBERTARIANS like RON PAUL----made extremely rich during ROBBER BARON few decades----as too KOCH BROTHERS------as too ZOROS billionaire OPEN SOCIETY via LAISSEZ FAIRE NEO-LIBERALISM love MARXISM.
Below we see what is a post from a so-called white supremacy group------looking at the 5Ws of global banking 1% TRIBE OF JUDAH-----sounding HATEFUL.
We discuss NEO-CONS and NEO-LIBERALS as well----only we include KNIGHTS OF MALTA as well and both are NOT RELIGIOUS---they simply USE RELIGION to become NERO/CATO/SENECA after which they can become CALIGULA------LIBERTARIAN MARXIST.
When discussing NEO-LIBERAL ECONOMICS and MARXIST societal structures for labor et al----we are discussing philosophy from JEWISH ------not religious--- philosophers this is why we must discuss TRIBE OF JUDAH as well as KNIGHTS OF MALTA.
JESUITS have been the MARXIST REBELS as KNIGHTS OF MALTA throughout last century's continuous wars
'New Marxist phase of the Jesuits - Tradition in Action
New Marxist phase of the Jesuits
It is well known that for more than four decades the Jesuits have aligned themselves with the so-called 'preferential option for the poor' and Liberation Theology. Now, they seem to be entering a more clearly defined Marxist phase'.
The difference bewteen Soros Jews and Zionist Jews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: The difference bewteen Soros Jews and Zionist Jews
This is a extremely important distinction you make. It is critical that people understand the point you have made. I have also written about this...
There are two globalist camps, both led by Jews -- each camp competes with the other for global power:
1) THE LIBERAL CAMP
2) THE NEOCON CAMP
The liberal Jew camp is composed of Trotskyite Jews (or just very left leaning Jews + their gentile followers) who want a borderless world with a global government based on the United Nations concept (or even the UN itself). These are the "do-gooders" who naively dream of a John Lennon "Imagine" type world. They feel they can "love" their way to global power (though they can become violent against anyone who opposes their worldview). In the 1960's they were called the "New Left" (e.g., Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Lee Weiner, Saul Alinsky, etc).
The NEOCON Jew camp (+ their gentile followers) also wants a borderless world but with a global government revolving around a NYC-DC-LONDON-JERUSALEM axis. These are the enslaving type Jews who want 99% of global wealth in their hands, and the rest of humanity in a "global plantation" type condition. They feel they can bomb their way to global power. FYI: The cold war gentile warriors (e.g., Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., etc) and their Jewish globalist handlers (e.g., Henry Kissinger, Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Milton Friedman, etc) fall into this camp.
Pick almost any wicked Jew and they'll rather neatly fit into either the liberal camp or the NEOCON camp. But sometimes you'll find a Jew who is primarily in the liberal camp but with one foot in the ZIONIST camp (out of tribal loyalty to Israel).
The following are some globalist Jews*, organizations, publications, etc showing which camp they fit in:
*Some people on this list are not Jews. However, they are what we call "Jew-think" gentiles, i.e., they subscribe to, support, and advance the globalist Jewish agenda (knowingly or unknowingly).
LIBERAL JEW GLOBALIST CAMP
The radical elements of the Democratic Party (e.g. Dennis Kucinich)
Open Society Institute
The Rockefeller Foundation
Any "Green" political party
Any Socialist or Communist political party (obviously)
Any radical "Progressive" organization
International Committee Against Racism (and any anti-racist organization)
Any anti-Fascist organization
Any anti-Nationalist organization
All Hollywood film and television studios
Organizations fighting Global Warming (but generally only the higher ups in these organizations)
Greenpeace (but generally only the higher ups in this organization)
Sierra Club (but generally only the higher ups in this organization)
Carnegie Endowment For International Peace
HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)
Human Rights Watch (and just about any human rights organization)
The Pope & much of the Vatican
The entire MSNBC lineup
ANSWER Coalition (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) - American Trotskyite organization
UAF (Unite Against Fascism) - British Trotskyite organization funded in part by George Soros
J-Street (with a foot in the ZIONIST camp but not in a militant "Likud-type" way)
L.A. Jews for Peace (and each large city has a similar group)
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Foreign Policy (a journal/magazine)
Los Angeles Times
Tides Foundation (funded in part by Teresa Heinz Kerry)
NEOCON JEW GLOBALIST CAMP
Most (or at least many) Clear Channel AM talk radio hosts
The radical elements of the Republican Party (e.g. Newt Gingrich)
The Weekly Standard (a magazine)
The Wall Street Journal
The Washington Times
Any publication by Rupert Murdoch
Foreign Affairs (a journal/magazine)
AJC (American Jewish Committee)
JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs)
European Jewish Congress
Chaim Weizmann (key historical figure)
David Ben-Gurion (key historical figure)
AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)
Council on Foreign Relations
The Trilateral Commission
The CATO Institute
WTO (World Trade Organization) - the WTO facilitates tarrif free trade, thus allowing for the use of wage-slave labor in the third world
NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA and all other "free" trade pacts (also called "Neoliberal" trade policies)
IMF (International Monetary Fund)
AEI (American Enterprise Institute)
WJC (World Jewish Congress)
Simon Wiesenthal Center
The entire FOX News lineup
Yesterday we shared the creation of a NEW THINK TANK-----this one called QUINCEY THINK TANK corrupting what was a FOUNDING FATHER and his political views by tying them to ONE WORLD LIBERTARIAN MARXISM------of KOCH AND SOROS.
JOHN QUINCEY ADAMS was tied to OLD WORLD UK royalty but came to US governance from a REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL CAPITALISM------the opposite of what KOCH/SOROS have in mind in wanting to be the global banking 1% who REWRITE OUR US CONSTITUTION.
KOCH is EXTREMELY WEALTHY from OIL/GAS/MINING----and SOROS is EXTREMELY wealthy because like KOCH both families were enriched by HITLER/STALIN WW2 and both are TRIBE OF JUDAH.
'Tuesday, July 2, 2019
Koch and Soros Join Forces in New Think Tank
An unlikely pair of billionaires are joining forces to start a new anti-war think tank called the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. Here is more from The Boston Globe, which broke the news:
In one of the most remarkable partnerships in modern American political history, [George] Soros and Charles Koch, the more active of the two [Koch] brothers, are joining to finance a new foreign policy think tank in Washington. It will promote an approach to the world based on diplomacy and restraint rather than threats, sanctions, and bombings. This is a radical notion in Washington, where every major think tank promotes some variant of neocon militarism or liberal interventionism'.
What we want to do this week is define the difference between MARXISM of last century-----and MARXISM for the 21st century MOVING FORWARD.
ROBBER BARON ROARING 20s lead to HITLER/STALIN WW2-----and 5% freemason/Greek players created the environment of civil tensions between population groups which normally co-existed.
WINNERS are those coming out merely rich or having a job after all that ROBBER BARON sacking looting, raping and pillaging.
Global banking 1% in HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF has always allowed for criminal and corrupt activities while looting sovereign treasuries and people's pockets.
WHAT WILL BE DIFFERENT IN FINAL SOLUTION-----US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES AS LIBERTARIAN MARXISM?
21st century LIBERTARIAN MARXISM will not be attractive even to those liking all that BOOM AND BUST of finance and wars.
The future of money: digital currency
Eswar Prasad Wednesday, July 18, 2018
On Wednesday, July 18, Eswar Prasad delivered a testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade. View his full testimony and learn more about the hearing.
In my remarks, I will focus on the implications of the evolution of new financial technologies, including but not limited to cryptocurrencies, for central banking. This testimony will accord particular attention to issues surrounding (i) the implementation and transmission of monetary policy and (ii) financial stability. I will also discuss the pros and cons of central bank digital currencies (CBDC).
While the advent of decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin has dominated the headlines, a broader set of changes wrought by advances in technology are likely to eventually have a more profound and lasting impact on central banks. It is premature to speak of disruption of traditional concepts of central banking, but it is worth considering if the looming changes to money, financial markets, and payments systems will have significant repercussions for the operation of central banks and their ability to deliver on key objectives such as low inflation and financial stability.
Eswar PrasadSenior Fellow - Global Economy and Development EswarSPrasad
- There are many potential advantages to switching from physical to digital versions of central bank money, in terms of easing some constraints on traditional monetary policy and providing an official electronic payments system. The basic mechanics of monetary policy implementation will not be affected by a switch from physical currency to CBDCs. However, other technological changes that are likely to affect financial markets and institutions could have significant effects on monetary policy implementation and transmission.
- New financial technologies—including those underpinning nonofficial cryptocurrencies—herald broader access to the financial system, quicker and more easily verifiable settlement of transactions and payments, and lower transaction costs. Domestic and cross-border payment systems are on the threshold of major transformation, with significant gains in speed and lowering of transaction costs on the horizon. The efficiency gains in normal times from having decentralized payment and settlement systems needs to be balanced against their potential technological vulnerabilities and the repercussions of loss of confidence during periods of financial stress.
- Multiple payment systems could improve the stability of the overall payments mechanism in the economy and reduce the possibility of counterparty risk associated with the payment hubs themselves. However, multiple systems without official backing could be severely tested in times of crisis of confidence and serve as channels for risk transmission. Decentralized electronic payment systems are also exposed to technological vulnerabilities that could entail significant economic as well as financial damage. CBDCs could function as payment mechanisms that provide stability without necessarily limiting private fintech innovations.
- Financial institutions, especially banks, could face challenges to their business models, as new technologies facilitate the entry of institutions (or decentralized mechanisms) that can undertake financial intermediation and overcome information asymmetries. Banks will find it difficult to continue collecting economic rents on some activities that cross-subsidize other activities. The emergence of new institutions and mechanisms could improve financial intermediation but will pose significant challenges in terms of regulation and financial stability.
- New forms of money and new channels for moving funds within and between economies could also have implications for international capital flows and exchange rates. The proliferation of channels for cross-border capital flows will make it increasingly difficult for national authorities to control these flows. Emerging market economies will face particular challenges in managing the volatility of capital flows and exchange rates, and could be subject to greater monetary policy spillovers and contagion effects. These channels are also susceptible to exploitation for money laundering, illegal activities, and evasion of controls and reporting requirements related to cross-border capital flows.
REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVES keep shouting that FAKE CIVIL UNREST CIVIL WAR---HATING is often much to do with promoting the next WW ---CIVIL WAR ----by players pretending to be someone they are not.
RON PAUL is LIBERTARIAN. DAVID DUKE is LIBERTARIAN supporting RON PAUL who is TRIBE OF JUDAH---while pretending to be ANTI-SEMETIC.
The reason DAVID DUKE---KKK----does this is to get our 99% WE THE RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE MEN to vote LIBERTARIAN. REAGAN was LIBERTARIAN but was sold as RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE.
This media outlet is FAKE NEWS.
ZOROS AND KOCH----both TRIBE OF JUDAH wanting to be QUINCEY THINK TANK are corrupting yet another REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE history. Remember, FDR was LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE while the ROOSEVELT THINK TANK is WORLD BANK -----EXTREME WEALTH LIBERTARIAN.
Yeah, Ron Paul Is Racist After All, Sorry
This week probably marks the moment that schadenfreude finally left the Ron Paul campaign.
by Mobutu Sese Seko
Feb 3 2012, 4:10pm
This week probably marks the moment that schadenfreude finally left the Ron Paul campaign.
There's always been a kind of awful element of fun to listening to rabid Paul defense, given that much of it was reality-optional. But, hey, at least his fans believed in something. And no true believer deserves this week. In the last seven days, some of Paul's former staffers admitted to deliberately courting racists, with his blessing. Then, adding insult to injury, Paul's current ties to American white supremacist groups surfaced courtesy of Anonymous.
As outlined before, there were only a limited number of explanations for Paul's racist, conspiracy-oriented newsletters, and none of them were good. Either he believed the things he printed, merely capitalized on the things he printed, or was unaware of the things he printed. It was a spectrum ranging from monstrous to cynical to incompetent.
Apparently, it's the second option, at least according to the Washington Post:
"[People] close to Paul’s operations said he was deeply involved in the company that produced the [racist] newsletters, Ron Paul & Associates, and closely monitored its operations, signing off on articles and speaking to staff members virtually every day.
"It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product. . . . He would proof it,’’ said Renae Hathway, a former secretary in Paul’s company and a supporter of the Texas congressman.
"... A person involved in Paul’s businesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid criticizing a former employer, said Paul and his associates decided in the late 1980s to try to increase sales by making the newsletters more provocative. They discussed adding controversial material, including racial statements, to help the business, the person said.
“It was playing on a growing racial tension, economic tension, fear of government,’’ said the person, who supports Paul’s economic policies but is not backing him for president. “I’m not saying Ron believed this stuff. It was good copy. Ron Paul is a shrewd businessman.’’
The story matches one broken by Julian Sanchez and David Weigel in 2008, in the libertarian magazine Reason.
Not only was it an "open secret" in libertarian circles that Lew Rockwell ghost-wrote many of Paul's newsletters, but the racial and paranoid tone was part of his and Murray Rothbard's attempt to create a "paleo-libertarian" movement, which is basically libertarianism without all that fun stuff about legalizing drugs and prostitution. Rockwell was trying to court southern conservatives who thought the Civil Rights Act, the Great Society, and the Democratic Party were all enemy combatants in a Civil War that had just transitioned from active shooting to economics and "politically correct" social engineering.
All of this just confirms what strenuous opponents of the newsletters have been saying since their publication. And as much as it sucks for Ron Paul fans to confront staffers and aides confirming critics' arguments, it's tough not to say, "We told you so," because, well, practically everybody did.
The natural response to this news, if you’re still a true believer, is that it's from 16 years in the past. This is a newsletter operation divorced from the Ron Paul 2012 campaign. Unfortunately, that's not what the hacktivist group Anonymous discovered.
As part of an ongoing online effort against white supremacists, Anonymous hacked the website of the American Third Position (A3P), a white nationalist group tracked by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Like the SPLC, Anonymous found ties to skinhead groups, Nazis and David Duke's flunkey Jamie Kelso. Unlike the SPLC, they also found significant ties to the Ron Paul 2012 campaign:
"In addition to finding the usual racist rants and interactions with other white power groups, we also found a disturbingly high amount of members who are also involved in campaigning for Ron Paul. According to these messages, Ron Paul has regularly met with many A3P members, even engaging in conference calls with their board of directors."
In addition, someone who appears to be close to Paul expressed dismay that Kelso was shut out of the Conservative Political Action Conference and said he would speak to Paul about Kelso's organizational value.
None of this should be surprising. In 2008, Paul accepted donations from and was endorsed by Stormfront.org, America's leading white supremacist site; he even had a campaign coordinator from the KKK.
Of course, the quickest and easiest dismissal is that the A3P stuff comes from Anonymous, not exactly the most credible of sources. But they parade around in the same Guy Fawkes masks as Paul supporters, tend to skew libertarian, and in 2008 many of their members supported Paul's candidacy. At this point, there's too much stuff to try to handwave away. In addition to years of "we told you so!" material that mainstream outlets have urged Paul supporters to confront, there are now the words of his aides and managers, as well as his own appointment book.
And while "we told you so!" is tempting to say, it's just sad. It's sad to see people energized by politics being disappointed by the first thing they may have really believed in. It's sad to see tens of thousands of Americans donate millions of dollars to someone who hid such grossly prejudicial and politically fatal connections from them.
Really, the only amusing thing is that an independent group of political privateers took their own letters of marque to bring down a campaign. And they mostly came from a message board known for lolcats, camwhores, hentai, and decentralized anarchy. There's some cosmic justice in there, but even it's not all that funny.