The ICC and International Human Rights sprang from abuses of WW2----including SEXUAL ABUSES/ENSLAVEMENT always tied to global military actions.
I deliberately reach for those very WAR ZONE activities of PSYCHO-SEXUAL warfare knowing that our US cities are being tied to global private military security and policing bringing lots of war zone covert actions home to our US communities. NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG as a illegal surveillance and pornography network stems from these same war zone activities and I feel these actions very similar to those atrocities committed during WW2----from which INTERNATIONAL HUMANS RIGHTS /ICC was created.
I will show today how all these INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS/ICC legal standing were derived from Western OLD WORLD EUROPEAN COMMON LAW-----installed in our US FEDERAL court and Constitutional laws, ergo these human rights have 300 years of Federal court precedence. Because our US Federal and Constitutional law enshrined COMMON LAW from Western Europe---these humans rights including SEXUAL ASSAULT reflect today's Federal, state, and local statutes and court history as well as civil society acceptance-----
'Three generations of international human rights law
Human rights activism can be described as a struggle to ensure that the gap between human rights and human rights law is narrowed down in order to ensure the full legal recognition and actual realization of human rights. History shows that governments do not generally grant rights willingly but that rights gains are only secured through a successful challenge to absolutist authority. Following on the Magna Carta, which set limits on the powers of royal Government in thirteenth century England, the 1776 American Declaration of Independence and the 1789 French Declaration des droits de l'Homme et de du citoyen (Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen) were landmarks of how revolutionary visions could be transformed into national law and made into justiciable guarantees against future abuse'.
The evolution of COMMON LAW surrounding SEXUAL ASSAULT began with WOMEN being physically penetrated sexually unable to bring to court charges of crime---women were property of husband/man so, husband/man legally brought criminal charges for rape of wife/daughter. RAPE several centuries ago was legally defined as physical, but the 20th century broadened those legal definitions of SEXUAL ASSAULT-----ergo, sexual assault does not have to be physical----women can now make that legal charge------and degrees of SEXUAL from FELONIES to MISDEMEANORS have FEDERAL COURT precedence and also many state court precedence.
The WLP has worked for more than ten years to improve law enforcement response to sex crimes in
The WLP testified before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime & Drugs in September, 2010 about the chronic and systemic failure of police to investigate sex crimes throughout the United States.
Law enforcement, however, may not be aware of the latest research in sexual assault. And decades- (sometimes centuries-) old definitions of rape certainly do not take such findings into consideration. Until 2012, the FBI's definition of rape had remained unchanged since 1927, and bore a striking resemblance to the definition of rape in medieval English common law. American law is heavily indebted to English common law: Much of what we understand does and does not constitute a crime comes from the Middle Ages.
In colonial Massachusetts, where sexual assault laws were based on English common law, rape was called "ravishment" and defined as "carnal knowledge of any woman above the age of ten years against her will and of a woman child under the age of 10 years with or against her will."
(This is still almost word for word the legal definition of rape in Georgia.)
SEX CRIME law reforms hit hard in 1960s whether crimes against women, men, or children. Now, women are not property men----have separate legal rights to file SEXUAL ASSAULT charges----and at this time SEXUAL ASSAULT moved from being only physical penetration to being non-physical with several defining characteristics.
Sweeping sex crime law reform began in the 1970s.
Feminists rejected the notion that women are the property of men without independent legal status or rights
For example, conduct defined as “rape” in one jurisdiction may be termed “sexual assault,” “sexual abuse,” or “sexual battery” in other jurisdictions.
By focusing on the elements rather than the terms, similarities and distinctions become apparent.
Notwithstanding the complexity of this analysis, jurisdictions can be grouped and analyzed based on the following elements:
The range of covered conduct, specifically penetration, contact (non
penetration), or exposure,
The use of force,
The absence of consent,
e victim’s capacity to consent, and
Whether the conduct was for the purpose of sexual arousal or degradation.
When creating a DEPOSITION I thought broadly in how NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG illegal surveillance pornography captured digitally and transferred online to pornography sites could be defined.
Below we see NON-PENETRATION CRIMES ----VS PHYSICAL RAPE
We also see variations of pornography------I use those terms-----intimidation/humiliation/below DEGRADATION. As well, I recognize NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG while working as SUBCONTRACTORS for a larger criminal pornography corporation-------THE NETWORK as described likely national ----brings in the concept of THIRD PARTY described below. This is RACKETEERING where the targets/victims can be assigned by a third person with a community NOSY NEIGHBOR actually committing these illegal surveillance and pornography crimes.
THIS CASE NOT ONLY ADDRESSES A NOSY NEIGHBOR AS ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE OF MY LIVING SPACE TO INCLUDE PORNOGRAPHY---BUT AS WELL ADDRESSES THE FACT THAT THERE IS A HIERARCHY TO THESE NATIONAL PORNOGRAPHY NETWORKS FOR WHICH NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG WORK.
My case is not one of CONTACT sexual assault---
Now, I must delineate between CONTACT vs NON-CONTACT SEXUAL ASSAULT.
Contact Sexual contact crimes involve touching or fondling, direct and indirect, of sexual or other intimate parts of a person. In some jurisdictions, they also include contact with third parties.
One jurisdiction, New Mexico, requires the contact to be skin-‐to-‐skin but most include touching that occurs over clothing. Significantly, contact crimes are graded as misdemeanors in every jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, these crimes can also include conduct such as urinating or defecating on a person for sexual arousal, gratification, or degradation.
Sexual exposure crimes may include forced viewing of a body part or of sexual activity. Typically dismissed as “morals crimes,” exposure crimes involve conduct
commonly used by perpetrators to groom their victims.
These crimes involve sexual acts in public or exposure of genitals in a public place or where other persons are present for the purpose of offending, alarming, or arousing others. These statutes may also include conduct in which the offender causes someone else to expose him/herself.
Remember, exposure to pornography is different if in your own home vs exposure in public spaces-----which can be businesses or institutions with TOILET CAMS.
The next distinction needing to be made is SEVERITY of SEXUAL ASSAULT. RAPE as a FELONY while soft porn a MISDEMEANOR------shows there is a criminal distinction with plenty of FEDERAL COURT PRECEDENCE. My case involves my own targeting------but will become a FELONY since my images were posted via THE NETWORK. People doing a CLASS-ACTION or RICO RACKETEERING LAWSUIT-----would automatically be deemed FELONY-----not misdemeanor.
Good schematic of felony vs misdemeanor/force vs without consent
Please GOOGLE as these schematics could not be copied.
This visual is intended to provide a big picture understanding of the types of rape and sexual assault crimes, their gradation, and the conduct prohibited.
As a victim of SEXUAL ASSAULT via NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG----illegal surveillance pornography I was required to FILE A POLICE COMPLAINT---I did so with THE BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT making sure to VIDEO that interaction-----and will request POLICE VIDEO CAM of that complaint report. Complaint report made for University of Maryland campus Medical Library for TOILET CAM pornography.
The statutes of limitation are different FEDERAL COURT----STATE COURT-----city/county courts-----below we see what is standard for state statutes on limitations for SEXUAL ASSAULTS-------TWO YEARS to file that police complaint. Some states TEN YEARS to file that police complaint.
PLEASE---GET THESE NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG POLICE REPORTS AND COURT CASES GOING NOW-----AS MILLIONS OF US 99% WE THE PEOPLE AND NEW IMMIGRANTS ARE BEING MADE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.
'Under the existing law, the statute of limitations for a civil action for sexual assault is two years, as sexual assault currently falls under the same limitations as assault and battery. Similarly, a survivor of domestic violence has three years from the date of the last act of domestic violence to bring a civil action against the person accused.
The change from two years to 10 years is significant, since survivors of sexual assault and harassment often have difficulty coming forward to report the crime for a variety of reasons'.
My case involves CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT AND WIRE DISTRIBUTION FOR PROFIT pornographic images-----so, there is another distinction which must be made----
Whereas I do feel my case is tied to REVENGE PORN-----ie, political retaliation-------I also recognize my case is same as any random target in any community in Baltimore and other US cities/counties. The term REVENGE PORN does relate but is not the direction of writing these national network criminal pornography crimes. Revenge porn is normally SMALL TIME----a person at school captures image of student undressing for gym and sends around to some friends in community. What REVENGE PORN LAWS do for my case is recognize ONLINE TRANSMISSION OF PORNOGRAPHY as a SEXUAL ASSAULT crime.
Revenge porn often does not not have a FINANCIAL/PROFIT motive-----but it does meet the LACK OF INDIVIDUAL'S CONSENT----it specifically calls this distribution CRIMINAL -----
SOME NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG CRIMES CAN BE REVENGE----IF SOMEONE FINDS A NEIGHBOR OR A BUILDING OWNER GUILTY OF ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE PORNOGRAPHY, THAT VICTIM MAY REVENGE LIKEWISE.
REVENGE PORN LAWS
'Laws treating sexual assault, harassment, and abuse continue to progress. Thirty-eight states, including Arkansas, have enacted revenge porn laws, criminalizing the distribution of sexually explicit images or videos without the individual’s consent. What is clear is that continued progress can only be achieved by keeping sexual assault and harassment relevant in the national dialogue. As stories continue to emerge, and as more and more men join this dialogue, lawmakers may enact legislation addressing these problems head-on'.
Below I show FTC-------FCC -----both FEDERAL AGENCIES tied to filing Federal complaints because these NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG pornography THE NETWORK is transmitted by WIRE. As well, bringing in US FEDERAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT---CIVIL RIGHTS are actions to move forwards these FEDERAL LAWSUITS.
'If you experienced non-consensual pornography, need help or advice, and you live in the U.S., call the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative’s crisis hotline: 844-878-CCRI (2274).
If you are the victim of non-consensual pornography, take the steps above – and then tell the Federal Trade Commission if a company posts your image without your consent and won’t take it down. In fact, the FTC recently announced a lawsuit against MyEx.com and its principals for, according to the FTC, promoting revenge porn and then demanding money to take the images down'.
While I am a single individual seeking justice with charges aimed at personal harm----I want to see victims of illegal surveillance PORNOGRAPHY as HOMEOWNERS-----as FAMILIES having parents and children EXPOSED TO SEXUAL ASSAULT ----as BUILDING OWNERS being captured by surround NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG invading that building's sovereign space----taking that building to being UNSAFE/PORNOGRAPHY CAMERAS tied to apartments/buildings not owned or inhabited by NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG.
BELOW WE SEE THE MODUS OPERANDUS OF NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG----using sexual nature to harass, frighten, intimidate, threaten, and abuse tenets and or homeowners during the course of PSYCHO-SEXUAL illegal surveillance by camera and microphone an apartment and/or building not owned or occupied by NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG.
Whereas this specific statute addresses FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD MEMBER-----while my case or the case of another HOMEOWNER/BUILDING OWNERS may not meet the standard of FAMILY MEMBER---this bill sets a precedence the CRIMINALITY OF THESE PORNOGRAPHIC VIDEO PHOTO transactions. Doesn't have to be a FAMILY-MEMBER.
AN ACT TO CRIMINALIZE THE DISTRIBUTION OF AN IMAGE, PICTURE, VIDEO, OR VOICE OR AUDIO RECORDING OF A SEXUAL NATURE TO HARASS, FRIGHTEN, INTIMIDATE,
THREATEN, OR ABUSE A FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD MEMBER
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law
Act 304 of the Regular Session
State of Arkansas
As Engrossed: S2/17/15
90th General Assembly
Regular Session, 2015
SENATE BILL 156
For An Act To Be Entitled
AN ACT TO CRIMINALIZE THE DISTRIBUTION OF AN IMAGE,
PICTURE, VIDEO, OR VOICE OR AUDIO RECORDING OF A
SEXUAL NATURE TO
HARASS, FRIGHTEN, INTIMIDATE,
THREATEN, OR ABUSE A FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD MEMBER OR A PERSON IN A CURRENT OR FORMER DATING RELATIONSHIP; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
TO CRIMINALIZE THE DISTRIBUTION OF IMAGES
OR RECORDINGS OF A SEXUAL NATURE TO
HARASS, FRIGHTEN, INTIMIDATE, THREATEN,
OR ABUSE A FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD MEMBER OR
PERSON FROM A DATING RELATIONSHIP
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. Arkansas Code § 5
302 is amended to read as follows:
As used in this subchapter:
(1)(A) “Dating relationship” means a
romantic or intimate social
relationship between two (2) individuals that is determined by examining the
(i) The length of the relationship;
(ii) The type of the relationship; and
(iii) The frequency of interaction betw
een the two
As Engrossed: S2/17/15
201-28-2015 12:31:27 DLP027
(2) individuals involved in the relationship.
(B) “Dating relationship” does not include a casual
relationship or ordinary fraternization between two (2) individuals in a
business or social context;
(2) “Family or household member” me
(A) A spouse;
(B) A former spouse;
(C) A parent;
(D) A child, including any minor residing in the household;
(E)(i) Persons related by blood within the fourth degree of
(ii) The degree of consanguinity is compu
to § 28
(F) Persons who presently or in the past have resided or
(G) Persons who have or have had a child in common; or
(H) Persons who are presently or in the past have been in a
(3) "Harass" means an act of harassment as prohibited by § 5
(4) "Intimidate" means to force into or deter from an action by
(5) "Sexual nature" means that an image, picture, video, or
voice or audio recording de
picts actual or simulated:
(A) Sexual intercourse;
(B) Deviate sexual activity;
(E) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual
(F) Lewd exhibition of the:
Genitals or pubic area of any person; or
(ii) Breast of a female; and
(6) "State of nudity" means:
(A) The appearance of a human anus, human genitals, or a
female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola; or
As Engrossed: S2/17/15
2015 12:31:27 DLP027
(B) A st
ate of dress that fails to opaquely cover a human
anus, human genitals, or a female breast below a point immediately above the
top of the areola.
SECTION 2. Arkansas Code Title 5, Chapter 26, Subchapter 3, is amended
to add an additional section to read
314. Unlawful distribution of sexual images or recordings.
(a) A person commits the offense of unlawful distribution of sexual
images or recordings if, being eighteen (18) years of age or older, with the
purpose to harass, frighten, i
ntimidate, threaten, or abuse another person,
the actor distributes an image, picture, video, or voice or audio recording
of the other person to a third person by any means if the image, picture,
video, or voice or audio recording:
(1) Is of a sexual na
ture or depicts the other person in a state
of nudity; and
(2) The other person is a family or household member of the
actor or another person with whom the actor is in a current or former dating
(b) The fact that an image, picture, vid
eo, or voice or audio
recording was created with the knowledge or consent of the other person or
that the image, picture, video, or voice or audio recording is the property
of a person charged under this section is not a defense to prosecution under
(c) Unlawful distribution of sexual images or recordings is a Class A
(d)(1) Upon the pretrial release of a person charged under this
section, the court shall enter an order consistent with Rules 9.3 and 9.4 of
the Arkansas Rules o
f Criminal Procedure and shall give notice to the person
charged under this section of the penalties contained in Rule 9.5 of the
Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(2) An order under subdivision (d)(1) of this section remains in
effect during the
pendency of any appeal of a conviction under this section.
2015 12:31:27 DLP027
Here we see STATE OF MARYLAND using REVENGE PORN stating the conditions of my case----protecting from ridicule, humiliation, personal destruction -------aka IDENTITY THEFT
'a bill that “balances the need to protect men and women from ridicule, humiliation, and personal destruction'
'State delegates approved revenge porn legislation in early March 2014. Source
Revenge porn is officially a misdemeanor in Maryland as of May 2014. Source
Grace's Law: House Bill 396'
Maryland delegates approve ‘revenge porn’ legislation
By Jenna Johnson
March 1, 2014
The Maryland House of Delegates has approved legislation that would make it a crime to disseminate “revenge porn” — using private, intimate photos or videos to harass or embarrass someone, often once a relationship ends.
The bill, which passed in a 130 to 0 vote Friday morning, sets penalties for those who cause “serious emotional distress to another by intentionally placing” an identifiable pornographic image, video or recording online. Those found guilty of the crime would face up to two years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000.
The Maryland Senate has yet to take action on the measure.
Several states have contemplated similar legislation, while navigating tricky questions about First Amendment rights. California and New Jersey have made such actions a crime, and Virginia is close to making the malicious distribution of pornographic material a Class 1 misdemeanor.
In Maryland, there have been several competing versions of revenge porn legislation, but lawmakers ultimately settled on one drafted by Del. Luiz R.S. Simmons (D-Montgomery).
In a statement Friday, Simmons said it was not easy to craft a bill that “balances the need to protect men and women from ridicule, humiliation, and personal destruction while still respecting the boundaries of the First Amendment.”
He said he hopes the legislation will “become a model for legislatures across the nation.”