First, let's take a look at how our US PUBLIC K-12 strongly PUBLIC and working to educate our US 99% of WE THE PEOPLE to know what their RIGHTS AS CITIZENS AND WORKERS are under our US CONSTITUTION. The HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES is supposed to be THE PEOPLE'S CONGRESSIONAL CHAMBER. Below we see THE HOUSE has the SUBCOMMITTEES et al regarding EDUCATION public policy. Below we see STATE ASSEMBLY for MARYLAND places EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEES in SENATE-----no education in DELEGATE which is supposed to be THE PEOPLE'S CHAMBER.
The MARYLAND SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE is composed of------4 people----THE GANG OF 4.
EDUCATION, HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
Appointed by Chair, Education, Health & Environmental Affairs Committee:
Paul G. Pinsky, Chair (410) 841-3155, (301) 858-3155
John D. (Jack) Bailey
Our GANG OF 4 MARYLAND SENATE education subcommittee installs policy written by UNITED NATIONS/WORLD BANK----global corporate SUSTAINABILITY for ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE.
The US CONGRESSIONAL HOUSE EDUCATION COMMITTEE has several subcommittees which focus on K-12----higher education-----workplace training. What education is today-----is WORKPLACE TRAINING thanks to those DASTARDLY CLINTON/OBAMA NEO-LIBERALS having controlled DEMOCRATIC PARTY---which WAS the PEOPLE'S PARTY.
'United States House Committee on Education and Labor
The committee and its five subcommittees oversee education and workforce programs that affect all Americans, from early learning through secondary education, from job training through retirement'.
Who does the MARYLAND ASSEMBLY GANG OF 4 on SENATE education subcommittee work for? They work for the GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL-----who writes education policy for all FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----now including US.
Here is just one example of our MARYLAND economic WINNERS so to speak----DORSEY is a founding father family of Maryland ---this is why he was handed TWITTER---which is a global private MILITARY internet corporation like FACEBOOK and GOOGLE.
JACK DORSEY doesn't know about EDUCATION----but TWITTER has a goal of making TWITTS of our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE attacking our educational and media formats.
LIFELONG LEARNING HAS ALWAYS BEEN A US REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION POLICY.
TWITTER TIME FOR PEOPLE-----AS LIFELONG LEARNING----IS GLOBAL NEO-LIBERAL EDUCATION POLICY.
'Jack Dorsey - Forbes
Tattooed entrepreneur Jack Dorsey has been CEO of popular social media firm Twitter since June 2015, his second time in that job. A self-taught coder, Dorsey dropped out of NYU, became a certified masseur and dabbled in fashion design before gravitating fully to tech. He cofounded Twitter in 2006 with Ev Williams, Biz Stone and Noah Glass,...'
'Chairman & CEO
Currently chairman and CEO of Merritt Properties, Scott Dorsey has occupied nearly every position in the company since joining in 1972. With a primary focus on strategic planning and the long-term goals of the company, Scott remains involved with the day-to-day operations of the business while serving as the point person for Merritt’s interface with financial institutions, government agencies, economic development organizations and industry groups. In addition to his service as Chairman of the Board for the Maryland Economic Development Corporation and Maryland Business for Responsive Government, Scott also sits on the Board and Executive Committee for the Economic Alliance of Greater Baltimore, the Young Life-Urban Baltimore Board of Directors, M&T Bank Greater Baltimore/Washington Directors Advisory Council, the Baltimore County Economic Development Commission, and the Board of Trustees for Junior Achievement of Central Maryland. Scott is also an active member with the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP), the Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM) and the Urban Land Institute (ULI). Scott received a Bachelor of Arts from Cornell University and an MBA from Loyola University in Maryland'.
FAKE POLLS like this saying 94% of US parents want their employer to provide EDUCATION -----is setting the stage for GLOBAL CORPORATE SCHOOLS.....global banking 1% are only doing what those 94% of WE THE PEOPLE want.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM---WORLD BANK/IMF---UNITED NATIONS
The 4 things business leaders can do to build a sustainable workforce
According to research, 94% of employees say they’d stay at a company longer if it invests in helping them learn
Workforce and Employment
- Businesses must advocate for a modernized education system to boost the hard and soft skills employees need in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning will change the future of work but also provide new ways to train and reskill staff.
- A top-down approach to learning led by executives and more flexible approaches to training will be necessary.
For years, the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum has provided an opportunity for industry leaders to discuss the rise and impact of emerging technologies. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI), automation and machine learning within business practices and how these technologies will affect and influence our workforce has become a common theme of discussion.
But the time for talk has passed; now we must act.
As business leaders, we understand that implementing these technologies is crucial to remaining competitive. There is no “if” – only “when” and “how much”. Today, we all agree that AI, automation, and machine learning bring tremendous value, in terms of efficiency, speed and flexibility, and we must ensure that our companies implement these technologies to remain ahead of the curve and the competition.
As we integrate these tools into our businesses, it is our duty – and, I might argue, our moral obligation – to also provide our employees with the new skills they need to adapt.
This month, as we approach the 50th Annual Meeting in Davos and a new decade, we find ourselves – business leaders from different industries and countries alike – charged with a significant challenge: in the face of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, how do we build a sustainable workplace that marries this adoption of technology with the changing roles of our employees?
I propose we start here – the four areas in which business leaders must focus their attention in order to build a more sustainable workforce:
1. Become advocates for a modernized education system.
I’ve previously said – and I strongly believe – that our education system itself needs to evolve to embrace not only traditional four-year universities but also vocational schools and apprenticeships. By properly investing in educational frameworks that allow for new avenues of learning and skills-gathering, we can make flexible education systems an intrinsic part of the cultural norm and arm employees with the complementary skillsets they’ll inevitably need for sustainable careers.
Today, many colleges are focused on honing one’s hard tech skills, but in this digitally native culture, success is built on possessing myriad talents. It’s therefore critical we advocate for curriculums that include both hard and soft skills, such as emotional intelligence, and self-efficacy. We must work to dispel long-held cultural beliefs that education ends at a person’s commencement ceremony.
Consider LinkedIn’s 2019 Workforce Learning Report, in which 94% of employees said they’d stay at a company longer if that company invested in helping them learn. If today’s workforce values continuous, multi-faceted learning, our education system must too.
What skills will be in demand and which will be in decline by 2022?
2. Implement fluid and seamless learning opportunities.
The modern workplace will continuously require us to learn new solutions for a variety of fresh challenges and successful businesses will be those that both recognize and cater to employee hunger for lifelong learning. But we need to go beyond simply making education and training available. Gone are the days of large group day-long sessions and lengthy instructional videos; instead, employers must meet employees on the platforms that best align with their habits – encouraging them to pursue skills development programmes that are right for them, at their own pace, and through mediums that are best suited to their learning style. Whether it is webinars, online games, or in-person mentor programmes, we must find ways to seamlessly integrate organic reskilling moments at work, so it does not feel like a “chore,” but rather becomes a fluid and natural aspect of the holistic work experience.
The number of days of extra learning required
3. Instil a top-down approach to learning.
Executives need to “walk the walk” when it comes to reskilling employees whose roles are destined to change – laying the groundwork for a culture of curiosity and continuous learning. The best way to accomplish this is to instil change from the top down. Leaders themselves should show they are not immune to change and should participate in training alongside their direct reports. In fact, data suggests that the number one way learners discover the skills they need to improve in their roles is when their manager provides specific direction or hands-on guidance. At the same time, CEOs can’t be afraid to ask questions or learn from those around them. It is in being vulnerable and curious that we can create a larger company culture wherein workers are encouraged to exhibit more trainable and curious mindsets. Participating in regular skill development and retraining programmes allows all of us to feel more aptly prepared to embrace the workplace of tomorrow.
4. Take advantage of AI and machine learning to optimize reskilling.
In the age of AI, success in business will increasingly be linked to the relationship between people and machines, and employee reskilling is no different. Our research suggests that workers are highly receptive to AI-related training, with 80% willing to learn new skills to take advantage of AI in their current jobs. So as AI and machine learning technologies change the types of jobs employees will have, these same technologies can be used to power the training systems and tools that can efficiently reskill employees. Reskilling tools powered by these technologies are scalable, available 24/7 and extremely cost-effective.
Rate of automation in the workforce
This is not simply about prioritizing digital technologies to gain a competitive edge – there will always be tasks that simply cannot be accomplished without a human touch. It relates instead to our inherent duty as industry leaders and global stakeholders to better invest in education systems wherein our employees can augment skills for sustainable careers and business leaders can develop a more enriched internal talent pool.
The talking points of WORLD BANK/UNITED NATIONS are below---the same talking points in KIRWAN COMMISSION and in Baltimore all global banking 1% EDUCATION NON-PROFITS---use these same talking points----saying they are LEFTIST---SOCIAL BENEFIT-----what our 99% of people want.
INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING starting at 2-3 years old with STANDARDIZED TESTING having global corporate committee decide VOCATIONAL CAREER path for that child---is what WORLD BANK calls-----skills development that are RIGHT FOR THEM.
'2. Implement fluid and seamless learning opportunities.
encouraging them to pursue skills development programmes that are right for them,
Participating in regular skill development and retraining programmes'
If we look at WORLD BANK/UN GLOBAL CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY for WORKPLACE----we see industrial divisions and at VERY BOTTOM of these divisions---global corporate TRIBUNALS-----is HUMAN CAPITAL----LAW.
This is the TOTALITY of white collar workers ----where our blue collar workers head for the AI TRAINING.
Professional Services–Accounting–Consulting–Human capital–Law'
OUR REVOLUTION FOR ONLY THE GLOBAL 1%-----SANDERS/WARREN/STEIN ET ALL use this phrase to pretend this is POPULIST 99% WE THE PEOPLE-----when the collective is that WORLD BANK/UN list of INDUSTRIAL DIVISIONS.
'Embracing the power of collective action'
Each World Economic Forum Industry community comprises select Partner companies that are shaping and transforming their industries in strategic and socially responsible ways.
So, who does KIRWAN/DORSEY/OR CITY HALL work for in EDUCATION PUBLIC POLICY? The US has 300 years of government structure which makes us think of SOVEREIGN STATES----when we discuss GOVERNORS COMMUNITY.
This is the WORLD BANK/UN GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL-----OF GOVERNORS.
The Industry Governors community comprises chief executives and chairpersons who provide leadership, define the industry agenda and drive change.
The industry communities provide a platform for chief executives and senior executives with strategic, business or regional responsibilities to shape the industry and develop insights through Forum-hosted platforms and communities'.
So, who is MARYLAND GOVERNOR------HOGAN? He is working to install the same WORLD BANK/UN education policies as O'MALLEY/KIRWAN/DORSEY=====and our Baltimore City Hall.
HOGAN IS NOT A SOVEREIGN STATE GOVERNOR---HE REPORTS TO THESE GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL GOVERNORS.
So, HOGAN is pretending to not agree with KIRWAN---because HOGAN is pretending to be a right wing REPUBLICAN----which would be working for a global WORLD BANK/UN.
KIRWAN is tied to OPEN SOCIETY--------ZOROS -----WORLD BANK-----not MARYLAND or BALTIMORE.
'Hogan Declines to Address Kirwan ... - Maryland Matters
www.marylandmatters.org/2019/10/31/hogan... Oct 31, 2019 ·
Republican Gov. Lawrence J. Hogan Jr. won’t accept an invitation to address a state commission proposing far-reaching education reforms. William E. “Brit” Kirwan sent a letter to Hogan late last week inviting the governor to address the full commission “to find common ground” on the policy recommendations and a new education funding formula to pay […]'
These two men we call global banking 5% freemason/Greek players---neo-liberal work for those GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL GOVERNORS.
PLEASE GLANCE THROUGH A LONG BORING LIST
Charter of the Governors of the World Economic Forum
1. Role of Governors
The Forum has formed communities of Governors to provide informal and efficient platforms for an exchange of opinion on global strategic issues of common concern to the specific industry sectors. The Governors are actively involved in guiding the Forum’s industry partnership programme. This includes defining and preparing issues to be brought before the Forum community on the occasion of the Annual Meeting or at regional meetings around the world. The Steering Committee of each industry-specific Governors community oversees the process and consists of a chairperson as well as a director-level representative of the World Economic Forum.
2. Composition of Governors Community
The Governors community in each industry sector is composed of the global chair/chief executive from the leading companies shaping the global future of the industry. Participation is limited to leaders whose companies have joined the Forum’s Industry Partnership programme.
3. Governors Meeting
The Governors of each industry sector meet once a year at the Governors Meeting in an informal atmosphere, usually on the occasion of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting.
4. Interaction with Governors of other Industry Sectors and Communities
The Governors may undertake initiatives under the patronage of the World Economic Forum, commission research or take any other action appropriate to prepare and to follow up on specific issues.The combination of increasingly intertwined industrial sectors (“under one roof”) facilitates a high degree of cross-sectorial interaction. See Annex 1 for more detailed information on composition of Industry Partner communities.
Governorship is a privilege of the Industry Partnership Programme.
Any Governor may recommend/suggest suitable candidates for governorship, provided the company they represent fulfils the criteria set by the World Economic Forum for Industry Partnership. In consultation with the Steering Committee of each industry, the Forum Executive Committee decides who will be invited.A Governor who has participated in the Annual Meeting several times as chairperson and chief executive and relinquishes the position of chief executive officer to a designated successor is welcome to introduce the successor to the Governors community on the occasion of the subsequent Governors Meeting (provided she/he is the second representative from the company in the framework of the Industry Partnership at the Annual Meeting).
6. Alternate Participation in the Governors Meeting is strictly reserved for Governors.
The deliberations are confidential. No public statements are made, except with general consent from the Governors. Even though governorship is linked to professional status, Governors speak for themselves and not for their organizations. They are encouraged to share their opinion and experience. The issues on the agenda of the Governors Meeting are chosen on the basis of suggestions from the Governors. They must be:–on industry-relevant topics –of global interest, including macroeconomic issues and how they impact the global economy–of common interest - challenges of a general, administrative or logistical nature.The following guidelines on competition and antitrust laws have been developed to preserve the informal nature for this exchange of opinion and experience and to ensure that deliberations do not interfere with the competitive relations of companies. They apply to formal Forum meetings, Forum staff and Governors, who are obliged to ensure strict compliance.
Insist that any meeting has a list of discussion topics known and notified in advance; object if they see anything on the agenda that risks violating any of the prohibitions set out below–Terminate a discussion or leave a meeting if they consider there is a risk of violating any of the prohibitions set out below–Seek independent legal advice if they are at any time unsure of how to apply these rules
Governors are encouraged not to discuss or agree to, or recommend to other Governors on the following:
–Actual purchasing or selling prices, price trends, price changes and their implementation, methods of calculation, discounts, rebates or margins–Uniform action or the elimination or restriction of competition, for example in relation to prices, capacity, inputs or outputs–Confidential or sensitive business information–Costs, including input costs, staff costs or trend data–Terms and conditions of purchase or sale or choice of suppliers and supplier categories–Current or future levels of production and specific technological developments or changes that could have a competitive impact–Division or allocation of geographies or customer groups, sales volumes or market shares–Limitations on business methods or practices including those based on ethical or “fair” business practices–Refusing to deal with customers or suppliers or agreeing to deal on specified terms or policies
Composition of Industry Partner Communities
Basic & Infrastructure
Chemicals–Inorganics and fertilizers
–Paints, dyestuffs and pigments–Petrochemicals and polymers–Specialty chemicals–Other commodity chemicals–Biomaterials, biotechnology and biorefineries–Nanotechnology and Emerging Technologies–Advanced Materials (including for water treatment, the solar industry, construction industries, organic electronics, for energy storage, etc. as a B2B Industry Ecosphere working with many sectors)Infrastructure & Urban Development–Engineering, construction and procurement–Construction management–Facility services–General building–Engineering and architecture–Building materials–Site and property development–General and specialty contracting–Waste management–Heavy equipment–Oilfield services and equipment–Infrastructure investors and investment asset managers–Urban Development–Real estate institutional and private investors–Real estate investment asset managers–Real estate investment trusts (REIT) and other public real estate investment vehicles–Real estate advisory and consultancy–Developers–Property managers–Brokers and appraisersMining & Metals–Mineral exploration–Ore and coal mining–Milling and smelting–Steel industry–Mining machinery –Mining and Metals support services–Non-agricultural commodity trading
Agriculture, Food & Beverage–Agricultural support activities and products–Beverage manufacturers–Crop and feedstock production–Food manufacturers–Food wholesale distributors–FoodserviceRetail & Consumer Goods–Fast-moving consumer goods manufacturers and retailers–Fashion goods manufacturers and retailers–Hardlines and leisure goods manufacturers and retailers–Diversified retailersEnergyEnergy Utilities & Technology–Electric utilities –Gas utilities–Independent power producers –Energy technology providers (software, middleware and hardware) –Energy resource & power project developers –Grid operators–Energy efficient technologies (grid-level efficiency technologies) –Diversified energy service providersOil & Gas–Oil and gas producing companies–Oil and gas service providers–Oil and gas independents–Oil and Gas refining and marketing companies (mid- and downstream)Renewable Energy Shapers–Renewable energy manufacturers (centralized and distributed) –Renewable energy technology suppliers –Renewable energy developers–Renewable energy financiers –Energy efficient technologies (consumer-level efficiency technologies)–Energy storage for power
Banking & Capital Markets–Commercial banks–Credit card companies–Investment banks–Brokerage firms–Settlement and clearing organizations–Rating agencies–Stock exchanges–Retail banks–Other diversified financial service providers
Insurance & Asset Management–Property and casualty insurance companies–Life insurance, pensions and savings companies–Health insurance companies–Asset management companies and wealth managers–Reinsurance companies–Insurance brokers and risk advisers–Credit rating agencies and financial analytics companies–Payment systems
Global Health & Healthcare –Biotechnology–Medical devices–Health insurance–Health product distributers–Hospital and service providers–Personal healthcare products–Pharmaceuticals–Diagnostics–Health ITTC and information providers –Health product benefit managers and retailers Information and Communication Technologies Information Technology–Computer accessories–Computer manufacturing–Consumer electronics–Electronic commerce–Internet content providers–Peripherals data processing–Semiconductors–Software development and production–Technology outsourcing–Technology services
–Telecom operators/service providers: Public and private companies providing telecoms services over:–wired (copper, cable, fibre optics, etc.) –wireless (3GPP/GSM standards, 3GP2/CDMA standards, wireless broadband, mesh, etc.) –satellite –Internet (VoIP, data networks, ISPs, info-services, etc.) systems–Telecom equipment manufacturers: Manufacturers of products or components supporting the provision of telecoms services, including:–network equipment providers (NEPs) for mobile, fixed, and enterprise networks, and Internet infrastructure–mobile handset manufacturers–additional telecom equipment manufacturers (e.g. chipset manufacturers, OEMs, etc.)–Other related organizations: Additional telecoms-related organizations, including, but not limited to:–software vendors (e.g. billing solutions, mobile security, etc.) –logistics and supply chain management–communication service providers –tower/cell site businesses–telecoms associations (professional, not-for-profit, standards, etc.)
Private Investors–Venture capital–Private equity (including buyout and growth capital)–Hedge funds –Alternative investment departments of major banks and insurersInstitutional Investors, Sovereign Funds, Family Offices–Institutional investors (including pension funds, endowments and foundations)–Family offices–Sovereign wealth fundsMedia, Entertainment & Information–Broadcasting–Communications and advertising–Digital media, including gaming and social networks–Education and training–Filmed entertainment–Information and services–Music–Other entertainment–Other media–Printing and publishing–Professional sportsMobilityAutomotive–Automotive/Commercial Vehicle Manufacturers–Component suppliers–Retail/distributionAviation & Travel –Passenger transportation manufacturers (aircraft, train, ship)–Mainframe–Systems–Components–Passenger Carriers–Airlines–Cruise lines–Passenger rail operators–Bus lines–Other passenger transportation operators (public transport)–Car rental services–Travel services–Travel agencies–Distribution systems–Connectivity services–Ancillary services–Tour operators–Travel & hospitality conglomerates–Hospitality–Hotels–Recreation–Resolution
Supply Chain & Transportation–Warehousing
–Bulk shipping –Port operators–Container shipping–Recycling/reverse logistics–Airport operators–Cargo airlines–Postal/express–Sourcing & distribution–Road & rail operators–Cargo rail–Freight forwarding–Supply chain management–Equipment Suppliers–Heavy logistics–Packaging–Traders
Professional Services–Accounting–Consulting–Human capital–Law
The US was brought down to colonial status as a result of ROBBER BARON few decades thanks to an agency said to be created by US for US INTERESTS. The US FED is not American---it has always been global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS-----KNIGHTS OF MALTA--TRIBE OF JUDAH who could care less about a sovereign US.
This same connection is made with UNITED NATIONS/WORLD BANK/IMF---we are told IMF is US-------WORKING FOR OUR INTERESTS.
THAT WOULD BE FAKE NEWS.
Below we see TRUMP pretending to be right wing REPUBLICAN ---he could not support these global institutions. TRUMP like MARYLAND GOV HOGAN ---both Republican both global banking 1% neo-liberals----like KIRWAN and PELOSI.
'Ceding Influence in the IMF and Hurting U.S. Interests
December 20, 2018
David Malpass, the Treasury under secretary for international affairs, stated in recent congressional testimony that the Trump administration would not support an increase in permanent financial resources to the International Monetary Fund (IMF or Fund)—what are known as “quotas.” The international community has long agreed that negotiations on quotas should reach a deal toward the end of 2019.
I believe the administration’s position is mistaken and will harm U.S. national interests.
The IMF is of tremendous value to the United States.
Created by the United States to avoid a repetition of the ruinous policies of the Great Depression, the Fund has supported our national security interests from day one'.
So, below we see another BOARD OF GOVERNORS-------this IMF BOARD OF GOVERNORS is who our US Congress----Maryland Assembly and governor----and our Baltimore City council and mayor -----WORK FOR.
If we look at this IMF GOVERNORSHIP and that UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GOVERNORSHIP we see the ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE-----where these global corporate tribunals replace our US city/county councils----replace our state assemblies/governor----replace our US federal Congress.
There are NAMES to these GLOBAL CORPORATE GOVERNORS who we call the upper-5% freemason/Greek players -----they are STILL NOT THE GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL----they only work for those GOVERNORS who are ----the global 2% of OLD WORLD KINGS ----EUROPEAN---ASIAN-----ARABIC.
US CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA are tired of pretending to be US politicians-----republican and democrat------that is why they are MORPHING into global banking 1% extreme wealth extreme poverty LIBERTARIAN MARXISTS.....NOT ALL-AMERICAN.
One GOVERNOR on IMF for each global nation is like having ONE PRESIDENT as executive of US.
IMF Members' Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors
Last Updated: January 15, 2020
The Board of Governors, the highest decision-making body of the IMF, consists of one governor and one alternate governor for each member country. The governor is appointed by the member country and is usually the minister of finance or the governor of the central bank. All powers of the IMF are vested in the Board of Governors. The Board of Governors may delegate to the Executive Board all except certain reserved powers. The Board of Governors normally meets once a year.
The table below shows quota and voting shares for IMF members. Following the entry into force of the Board Reform Amendment on January 26, 2016, members who have consented to their quota increases can pay their quota increases under the 14th General Review of Quotas. Quota and voting shares will change as members pay their quota increases. During this process, this table will be updated regularly (see here for more details on the Quota and Governance reforms agreed in 2010.)
TRUMP is being impeached for NOT ACTING like an AMERICAN PRESIDENT------as MOVING FORWARD breaks down all our sovereign government structures---FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL. TRUMP would do better to be on a GOVERNING BOARD for UNITED NATIONS/IMF.
EDUCATION PUBLIC POLICY in US has always been tied to several centuries of REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM-----where PUBLIC SCHOOLS ----were controlled by our local school boards-----our local state department of education.
We can look very hard on this UN GLOBAL CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY TRIBUNAL structure and we will not find the words ----EDUCATION-----we will see WORKPLACE TRAINING---VOCATIONAL TRAINING.
MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE for only the global 1% is 3000BC HINDI BRAHMIN----and those global 1% really HATE the poor who will be all 99.9% of WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown-----99% of REAL Jewish, Protestant, Catholic, Muslim---HINDI---BUDDHISTS.
We will not find anyone RELIGIOUS in the global 1% or 2%.
Hmmmmm, seems like US STATES are erasing those few decades of ROBBER BARON CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA------as all public agencies from city to state are removing PUBLIC RECORDS from any OPEN GOVERNMENT public posting.
This is happening because the US as a colonial entity-----control by a global corporate tribunal will have NO ACCESS to any government function because it is all PROPRIETARY CORPORATE INFORMATION.
Now, here in Baltimore to try to access OPEN GOVERNMENT thinking global banking NEO-LIBERALS were talking about open to PUBLIC ------when OPEN GOVERNMENT was simply giving public mega-data to global corporations making it harder and harder and harder for local citizens to hold public agencies operated by global corporations ACCOUNTABLE.
THAT IS WHY CALIFORNIA AGENCIES ARE MAKING IT HARDER TO ACCESS PUBLIC RECORDS---AS IS MARYLAND.
Only that GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL may apply for OPEN ACCESS of US state and local government records.
This includes all that MEGA DATA being collected on our US PUBLIC SCHOOLS----teachers, students, parents, testing------and those global corporate charter schools.
Second California Agency Removes Public Records From State Website
First High Speed Rail Authority removed docs, now the Department of Corrections joins the anti-transparency club
By Katy Grimes, August 2, 2019 6:05 pm
Last week California Globe reported that thousands of pages of public records were removed from the highly controversial California High Speed Rail Authority website in June. Now, members of the media and anyone seeking information about rail authority spending will only be able to access previously posted documents like detailed information on every project change order, board meeting materials and historical business plans, through a time consuming and unreliable California Public Records Act request according to the Rail Authority website.
Friday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that a second California state agency has removed public records, and these records are just as controversial, if not more so. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has posted information about Kamala Harris’s entire career as California Attorney General, 2011 to 2017. The reports on incarceration in the state, including when presidential candidate Kamala Harris (D.) was California’s attorney general. Twice a year, the CDCR releases information about the number of new individuals incarcerated in the California prison system as part of its “Offender Data Points” series. These reports provide important information on demographics, sentence length, offense type, and other figures relevant to criminal justice and incarceration, the Free Beacon reported.
“The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation website will make it harder for voters to inspect Sen. Kamala Harris’s controversial record as the state’s top cop,” the Free Beacon reported. “The department removed public access to a number of reports on incarceration in the state, including when presidential candidate Kamala Harris (D.) was California’s attorney general.”
Earlier this week during the second of two Democratic Presidential Candidates’ debates, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard took on Sen. Kamala Harris over her prosecutorial record as a District Attorney and Attorney General in California, and her poor record on criminal justice reform, the war on drugs, and prosecutorial misconduct during the second Democratic presidential debate in Detroit, California Globe reported.
Gabbard said: “I want to bring the conversation back to the broken criminal justice system that is disproportionately negatively impacting black and brown people all across this country today. Now Senator Harris says she’s proud of her record as a prosecutor and that she’ll be a prosecutor president.
But I’m deeply concerned about this record. There are too many examples to cite but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.
She blocked evidence — she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California.”
Washington Free Beacon continues:
“Until recently, these reports were publicly available at the CDCR’s website. A search using archive.org’s Wayback Machine reveals that as of April 25, 2019—the most recent indexed date—ODP reports were available dating back to the spring of 2009. As of August 2019, the same web page now serves only a single ODP report, the one for Spring 2019. The pre-2019 reports have been removed.”
The California High Speed Rail Authority has also pulled down important background information as well as board meetings minutes and change orders.
Just as the HSRA claimed, CDCR said they pulled the information down because of a previously authored bill, AB 434, requiring all state agencies to make their websites accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act. But few are buying this excuse.
Now, just as with the High Speed Rail Authority, CDCR is now requiring anyone seeking documents to go through a time consuming and unreliable California Public Records Act request, according to the CDCR website. The Free Beacon said documents are still available upon request via email to email@example.com.