We have on several occasions written to expose what are called VANITIES------you know, that BONFIRE OF THE VANITIES.
When we allow the US to be brought back to colonization and 99% of citizens having no rights, impoverished, and enslaved as with MOVING FORWARD we are returning to those DARK AGES days where incompetent 1% enriched through brute force create images of themselves to justify that position in SOCIETY. America is a MERITOCRACY---one would say---know, America has always been controlled by those same global 1%----but it felt as though the 99% were free to determine their destiny. Of course we never attained this freedom for all US citizens----we were on the way.
The American people were indeed free---we were indeed growing our own wealth and economic stability---THAT IS NOT FICTION. Meritocracy simply means people climb a ladder----whether social or income because they can compete and advance in an economic race WITH A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
Laissez faire economics were installed by REAGAN/CLINTON at this point in US history to end that level playing field. That global 1% were ready to come in and by force and FICTION take all the wealth of our growing nation and our families.
THIS DID NOT HAVE TO HAPPEN---SO INDEED---WE WERE FREE AND ABLE TO DETERMINE OUR DESTINY. WE ARE SIMPLY ALLOWING MOVING FORWARD TO END THIS FREEDOM AND STATUS AS CITIZEN.
Because a small group of 5% to the 1% having no particular talent----having no morals, ethics, or VIRTUE----were installed to power the global 1% must create FICTIONS as to why that 1% continue to garner all avenues to wealth and power. It is the same as the legends written 4 thousand years ago making HEROES----GODS AND GODDESSES----with the global 1% seeing themselves reflected in those images.
WHEN THE LEAST CAPABLE AND THE LEAST WORTHY RISE TO THE TOP BY BRUTE FORCE---THEY MUST CREATE FICTIONS TO SEEM EXCEPTIONAL.
Vanity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Vainglory" redirects here. For the Old English poem, see Vainglory (Old English poem). For the video game, see Vainglory (video game). For the style of artwork, see Vanitas. For other uses, see Vanity (disambiguation).
This painting represents the Dutch "Vanitas" (Latin for vanity) by Adam Bernaert,[1] The Walters Art Museum.Vanity is the excessive belief in one's own abilities or attractiveness to others. Prior to the 14th century it did not have such narcissistic undertones, and merely meant futility.[2] The related term vainglory is now often seen as an archaic synonym for vanity, but originally meant boasting in vain, i.e. unjustified boasting;[3] although glory is now seen as having an exclusively positive meaning, the Latin term gloria (from which it derives) roughly means boasting, and was often used as a negative criticism.[4]
If we have read WAR AND PEACE then we easily saw the FICTIONS created by our OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE GLOBAL 1% and their 5% to the 1% freemason/Greeks. When we refer MOVING FORWARD as back to the DARK AGES it is because these global Wall Street players are so attached to the mythology of KINGS AND QUEENS and that period of extreme wealth. If you haven't read it you should to know that mentality of extreme wealth and the FAKE SENSE OF VIRTUE AND HONOR.
What War and Peace did well is show how all that pomp and circumstance of royalty---of freemason VIRTUE was SMOKE AND MIRRORS. That is what today's CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA now Trump are trying so hard to paint for themselves-----THEY ARE EXCEPTIONAL when in fact they are not even as capable as you and I.
LEO TOLSTOY and FREEMASONRY
COUNT LYEV NIKOLAYEVICH TOLSTOY (1828-1910).
Russian novelist and moral philosopher comes from
a Russian landed gentry dating back 300 years.
His parents died by the time he was 9 yrs old.
Raised by female relatives, and educated by French tutors.
He lived a middle-gentry life of the last of the old serfdom period.
His "War and Peace" appeared in parts in 1865 and 1869.
He was 37 yrs old.
Freemasonry's presence in Tolstoy's War and Peace, which many consider Russia's greatest novel, is a reflection of the long existence (since 1771) of the Craft in Russia. Masonry was banned by Czar Alexander in 1821, a ban continued by the Communists in 1922. Masonry was only revived in 1993. There are now some 10 lodges meeting in Russia under Russia's Grand Lodge.
MoscowLotus
Alexander Pushkin
Harmony
Quatuor Coronati
Northern Lights (Armenian-speaking)
St.PetersburgNovaya Astra
VoronezhGamaioun
ArkhangelskPolar Star
ZvenigorodAurora (English-speaking)
VladivostokPacific Rim
Fraternal Love a Lodge meeting in Turkey, France, Lebanon and Russia
Such a renewal is not surprising when the long-time cultural influence of Masonry in Russia is considered. While Freemasonry's consideration in Count Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace is the most famous example, the masonic fraternity figures in "The Possessed" by Dostoevsky, and in the works of other master authors such as; V.I.Likin, N.M.Karamzin, M.M.Kheraskov, V.I.Maikov, A.N.Radishchev, A.A.Rzhevskii, A.P.Sumarokov, and M.M.Shcherbatov.
This literature compares with the works of Scotland's Robert Burns & Sir Walter Scott, England's Rudyard Kipling & Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, alongwith Germany's Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, and America's Edgar Allan Poe.
War and Peace is widely accepted as being autobiographical, and the figure of Pierre Bezukhov is as consumed as was Tolstoy with the great questions of life. There is no evidence that Tolstoy joined a Lodge, but he spent considerable time investigating masonic activities.
The masonic initiation scene in War and Peace is justly celebrated:
'Pierre gradually began to recover himself and looked about at the room and at the people in it. Round a long table covered with black sat some twelve brethren in garments like those he has already seen. Several of them Pierre had met in St. Petersburg society. In the president's chair sat a young man he did not know, with a peculiar cross hanging from his neck. On his right sat the Italian abbe whom Pierre had seen at Anna Pavlovna's two years before. There was also present a very distinguished dignitary, and a Swiss tutor who had formerly been tutor at the Kuragins. All maintained a solemn silence, listening to the words of the president, who held a mallet in his hand. Let into the wall was a star-shaped light. At one side of the table was a small carpet was various figures worked upon it; on the other was something resembling an altar on which by a (New) Testament and a skull."
Pierre seeks initiation as part of his quest for self-knowledge, a major theme in the book. He hopes that the secrets of the Masons will prove the Golden Fleece or Holy Grail. He is representative of a whole generation of Russian intellectuals who were trying to reconcile the Slavic East with the bewildering bonanza of ideas from the West. Of course, he expects too much. In Book Six, Chapter Seven, it is now 1808, and Pierre is busily arranging dining and funeral Lodges, donating for the erection of temples, helping with charities - and becoming disillusioned.
When he had joined the Freemasons he had experienced the feeling of one who confidently steps onto the smooth surface of a bog. When he put his foot down, it sank in. …. All the members of the Lodges were men Pierre knew in ordinary life, and it was difficult for him to regard them merely as Brothers in Freemasonry. … Under the Masonic aprons and insignia he saw the uniforms and decorations at which they aimed in ordinary life.
In questioning the purity of Masonry and the motives of its members, and in suggesting its misuse by its members for pedestrian old-boy networking, Tolstoy anticipates the sceptical observations about the Craft of another famous Russian, Leon Trotsky, who writes in Chapter Nine of his autobiography, "My Life":
"In the early years of this century, Russia was a vast laboratory of social thinking. My work on the history of freemasonry had fortified me in a realization of the subordinate place of ideas in the historical process. 'Ideas do not drop from the sky'.."
Pierre is an embodiment of a disillusioned Tolstoy who found Freemasonry to be far less than what he had expected. Pierre describes those like himself as one who are 'seeking and vacillating, who had not yet found in Freemasonry a straight and comprehensible path, but hoped to do so'. He decides that the fault is his own and that he needs to deepen his understanding of Masonry by further study. So he goes abroad to seek masonic knowledge in other countries. Upon returning to his Lodge a special meeting is called to hear of his travels. Pierre in desperation asks his Grand Master if what he has found will be implemented, and is told NO. He leaves his lodge.
In a letter of Tolstoy to his wife in 1866, he wrote:
"After drinking coffee I went to the Rumyantsev Museum and sat there till three o'clock read very interesting Masonic manuscripts. I can't describe to you why the reading produced on me a depression I have not been able to get rid of all day. What is distressing is that all those Masons were fools."
Hard words but maybe Pierre/Tolstoy had found that while Masons talk of problems and express such good deeds, they fail to study What is Freemasonry!!
______________________________________
We posted a year or so ago a lecture from a southern university with a professor whose job it was to CREATE THAT IMAGE OF VIRTUE ---that SMOKE AND MIRROR ----when talking about the history of ROBBER BARONS during the late 1800s early 1900s ROARING 20s-----that was a corporate university where professors are hired only if they create that IMAGE OF VIRTUE of those 1%. So, ROBBER BARONS like Rockefeller and Carnegie had all kinds of myths created to make them INEVITABLE ECONOMIC HEROES. They simply had family money from the OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE and they HIJACKED the talents of real inventors and genius.
IF WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% KEEP ALLOWING OLD ---REALLY, REALLY OLD MONEY COME IN AND FLEECE OUR ASSETS OVER AND OVER ----WE CANNOT BE FREE---WE CANNOT BE CITIZENS---STOP ALLOWING THESE POSERS TO BE LEADERS.
This is why we spend so much time breaking down these images of EXCEPTIONALISM being painted for those dastardly 5% AND THOSE 1%.
We shout over and again-----the 5% are not LEADERS----THEY ARE FOLLOWERS----simply doing anything they are told. AND THEY ARE. We make clear the stories in media created for a BILL GATES-----AN APPLE'S JOB------A FACEBOOK'S ZUCKERBERG ---------AN UNDERARMOUR'S PLANK----A SPACE X'S MUSK----are all FICTIONS.
THEIR FAMILIES SIMPLY HAD OLD WORLD WEALTH AND BOUGHT PATENTS FOR PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS DEVELOPED AND DESIGNED BY REAL TALENTED AND INTELLIGENT 99% OF WE THE PEOPLE.
'Elon Musk's heralded biography is dripping wet with being extraordinary and a visionary. If this is truly not the case, it will still be hard to convince others, so you may loose more in the audience, and thus thwart your own passions and desires in this war'.
Our response:
---that is a great description of these supposed EXCEPTIONAL 1%-----they are creating a FICTION to make themselves VIRTUOUS---HERALDED---it mirrors the DARK AGES----this is why we say the ideals of OLD WORLD FREEMASONRY are long gone and today we have LYING, CHEATING, AND STEALING held as virtuous. I have no fear of a disappearing audience----know what? If one is pushed to FICTION in order to attain attention -----THAT IS VANITY'.
A Lot Of People Think Elon Musk Is Already Greater Than Steve Jobs Ever Was
Steve Jobs was a marketing master who turned a near-bankrupt Apple into the most valuable company in the world.
But many people are starting to believe Elon Musk is better than Steve Jobs ever was.
There's an insatiable thirst for tech innovation right now, and Musk seems to be one of few people taking moonshots. He is the founder of SpaceX and electric car company Tesla. Musk is also the brains behind the Hyperloop, a hypothetical transportation system that could get people from New York to California in 30 minutes.
OH, REALLY????
Musk, like Jobs, has already had a massive consumer hit too. He co-founded PayPal in 1999, which completely transformed online transactions.
Tesla's soaring stock is just one example of Musk's wild popularity. Although it's only expected to deliver 20,000 cars in 2013, the stock has risen more than 400% in the past year to a $20 billion market cap.
Tesla's valuation is sky-high and its stock is up 400% since last year.CNBC
Another example can be found on question and answer site, Quora, where thousands of people are expressing their pro-Muskness.
The most upvoted answers are unanimous: Elon Musk isn't the next Steve Jobs. He's better.
Dolly Singh has worked with Musk for years. She joined him as Head of Talent Acquisition at SpaceX and calls Musk "brilliant, dynamic, charismatic" and "an exceptional freak of nature."
She also says this:
"In my humble opinion, Mr. Jobs in all his greatness has nothing on Elon. Elon is Wernher von Braun, Howard Hughes, Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and every other badass all rolled into one."
Her reasoning: Musk has taught himself everything from design to building rocket ships. He's read tons of literature plus he's an engineer. He's not just imaginative like Jobs was, but he also has the ability to build everything himself.
Currently, 1,200 people have upvoted her response.
Another answer with more than 3,000 up votes lists all the ways Musk is not Steve Jobs (such as, "Steve Jobs patented everything; Musk hates patents") and concludes:
"Elon Musk isn't the next Steve Jobs. He is far beyond and better than Steve Jobs ever was."
__________________________________________
Elon Musk is a spoiled child of a OLD WORLD MERCHANT OF VENICE MINING CORPORATION FAMILY---- below we see the same spoiled child of an OLD WORLD MERCHANT OF VENICE REAL ESTATE FAMILY.
All of the development of computer technology was done by Department of Defense-----by public and private universities using their STUDENTS AND FACILITY to design products that were then sold as patents. A meeting of DAVOS SWITZERLAND GLOBAL 1% says----WE NEED TO MINE PLANETS FOR MINERALS-----then the Department of Defense and our universities suddenly get funded for research and development-----NASA----source of all the space engineering used by SPACE X----was designed by WE THE PEOPLE--THE 99% -----so, all the R and D is done----all the plans and stages are developed BY WE THE PEOPLE THE 99%----and in walks MUSK and his money to buy patents making his family the one made extremely rich. MUSK had nothing to do with the idea of space mining---that came from the global 1%---MUSK was not tied to any research or development in TESLA--in SPACE X ----he probably does not even know space mechanics---he hires talented people to do everything.
Below we see the same done for PLANK AND UNDERARMOUR-----PLANK is simply that same son of an old wealth familty buying the PATENT for a new kind of fabric for sportswear. All the R and D was done by the 99% of WE THE PEOPLE in university----in Department of Defense et al ---and then that patent is sold to PLANK. If we believe the myth of a PLANK working his way up the ladder from selling out of his trunk to building third world global factories in Asia WE ARE ALWAYS GOING TO BE SERFS----NOT CITIZENS AND LEADERS.
PLEASE DON'T ALLOW THESE MYTHS ---TIED TO VIRTUE AND HONOR AND LIFTING ONESELF UP BY BOOTSTRAPS----BECAUSE NONE OF THIS IS TRUE FOR THOSE PESKY 5% AND THAT 1%.
As Tolstoy made clear in War and Peace----the royals could not manage their way out of a closet-----the people sent in as officers to become generals could not manage a war if their lives depended on it----as Tolstoy made clear wars just happen--they unroll with these so-called generals never having a hand on the cause of winning. At the same time----those Freemasons with that VIRTUOUS goal of honor and justice---are shown to be a group filled with all kinds of people having all kinds of goals for being in these groups----almost none of which is being VIRTUOUS OR JUST.
Under Armour Startup Story
Introduction
This startup story features Kevin Plank, a former Fork Union Military Academy Football player who turned sweat into a billion dollar business.
Under Armour Stats
As a 23 year old former captain of the University of Maryland Football team, Plank had noticed that compression shorts stayed dry during practice. He decided to take that same material to create moisture wicking gear. Under Armour’s original funding came from Planks personal savings and credit card debt. During college, Plank had saved about $20,000 by selling t-shirts at concerts. He ended up going about $40,000 in credit card debt spread across five cards. By 1997 (one year after founding the company), he was broke.
Then, he made his first sale to Georgia Tech for about $17,000. Two dozen NFL teams soon followed suit. At the end of his second year, he had sold $100,000 in product. Then, the product took off and major teams and retailers began carrying the product, creating a multi-million dollar business that now does nearly $2BB in sales and has over 5,900 employees.
Under Armour’s Funding
While Under Armour’s initial funding came from Plank himself, the company went public less than 10 years after it’s founding to raise $115 Million for expansion capital. The stock doubled in its first day of trading. The company has since sold additional shares of the company to help fuel it’s continued growth. Below, is a chart of the companies trailing five year growth rate compared to it’s competitors.
Important Under Armour Milestones:1995: Plank comes up with the idea for Under Armour while playing football at the University of Maryland.
1996: Plank uses $20k of his personal savings and $40k of credit card debt to launch the company. At the end of the year, he has sales totaling $17,000.
1997: Plank sells $100,000 worth of product to twelve NFL football teams.
1998: Under Armour is asked to create uniforms for Any Given Sunday.
2000: UA takes off with National advertising campaigns.
2002: The company becomes carried in 2,500 retail stores.
2013: Under Armour acquires MapMyFitness for $150 Million.
Kevin Plank Startup Advice: “You need to put your hands around the throat of your business, and you need to run it. There’s no other way.”
_____________________________________
The global 1% are creating MYTHS and our captured media and corporate universities teach myth and not fact ----this is the value of REAL PUBLIC EDUCATION----we had public schools over last century that held power accountable to these lies. This is why CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA work so hard to KILL OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS ---to install a COMMONER CORE----to assure 99% of WE THE PEOPLE will not know it is all myth and they are being USED FOR THEIR TALENT AND GETTING NOTHING.
Below we see just that progression. Here is global IVY LEAGUE STANFORD which like global IVY LEAGUE JOHNS HOPKINS attract the smartest of our citizens ----literally use their ideas and creations developed during 4 years-----or graduate positions---and patents them----that patent brings Stanford and Hopkins lots of wealth and power---those students ---not so much.
The Department of Defense is filled with WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% and all R and D is done by those talented people. Look at who is headlined as head of departments?
THEY ARE NOT THE ONES DOING THE WORK---THEY ARE THE ONES SIMPLY TIED TO GLOBAL 1% TAKING ALL THE GLORY.
This structure was super-sized during Obama as Clinton neo-liberals made global corporate R and D of all our public and private universities ----expanding from just a few global IVY LEAGUES.
NOW THE BEST OF THE BEST ARE BROUGHT TO GLOBAL IVY LEAGUES THAT PATENT ALL THEIR GREAT IDEAS TO MAKE THAT SAME OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE GLOBAL 1% EXTREMELY RICH.
Who controls the internet today? Global Google----and a few search engine corporations. We watch as we do SEARCHES for words or terms -----used to be we would see those searches getting the most action from 99% of citizens---today we searched the word VANITY to get to the history of its use----and we got 20 search pages of corporations selling the product BATHROOM VANITIES. This is all WE THE PEOPLE will access on our internet if we keep allowing MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL RULE.
Who invented the Internet?
Updated: 06/16/2017 by Computer Hope
A single person did not create the Internet that we know and use today. Below is a listing of different people who have helped contribute to and develop the Internet.
The idea
The initial idea of the Internet is credited to Leonard Kleinrock after he published his first paper entitled "Information Flow in Large Communication Nets" on May 31, 1961.
In 1962, J.C.R. Licklider became the first Director of IPTO and gave his vision of a galactic network. Also, with ideas from Licklider and Kleinrock, Robert Taylor helped create the idea of the network that later became ARPANET.
Initial creation
The Internet as we know it today first started being developed in the late 1960's in California in the United States.
In the summer of 1968, the Network Working Group (NWG) held its first meeting, chaired by Elmer Shapiro, at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI). Other attendees included Steve Carr, Steve Crocker, Jeff Rulifson, and Ron Stoughton. In the meeting, the group discussed solving issues related to getting hosts to communicate with each other.
In December 1968, Elmer Shapiro with SRI released a report "A Study of Computer Network Design Parameters." Based on this and earlier work by Paul Baran, Thomas Marill and others, Lawrence Roberts and Barry Wessler created the Interface Message Processor (IMP) specifications. Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc. (BBN) was later awarded the contract to design and build the IMP subnetwork.
General public learns about Internet
The UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) put out a press release introducing the public to the Internet on July 3, 1969.
First network equipment
On August 29, 1969, the first network switch and the first piece of network equipment called "IMP" (Interface Message Processor) is sent to UCLA.
On September 2, 1969, the first data moves from the UCLA host to the switch. The picture to the right is Leonard Kleinrock next to the IMP.
The first message and network crash
On Friday October 29, 1969 at 10:30 p.m., the first Internet message was sent from computer science Professor Leonard KleinRock's laboratory at UCLA, after the second piece of network equipment was installed at SRI. The connection not only enabled the first transmission to be made, but is also considered the first Internet backbone.
The first message to be distributed was "LO", which was an attempt at "LOGIN" by Charley S. Kline to log into the SRI computer from UCLA. However, the message was unable to be completed because the SRI system crashed. Shortly after the crash, the issue was resolved, and he was able to log into the computer.
E-mail is developed
Ray Tomlinson sends the first network e-mail in 1971. It's the first messaging system to send messages across a network to other users.
TCP is developed
Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn design TCP during 1973 and later publish it with the help of Yogen Dalal and Carl Sunshine in December of 1974 in RFC 675. Most people consider these two people the inventors of the Internet.
First commercial network
A commercial version of ARPANET, known as Telenet, is introduced in 1974 and considered to be the first Internet Service Provider (ISP).
Ethernet is conceivedBob Metcalfe develops the idea of Ethernet in 1973.
The Modem is introduced
Dennis Hayes and Dale Heatherington released the 80-103A Modem in 1977. The Modem and their subsequent modems become a popular choice for home users to connect to the Internet and get online.
TCP/IP is created
In 1978, TCP splits into TCP/IP, driven by Danny Cohen, David Reed, and John Shoch to support real-time traffic. The creation of TCP/IP help create UDP and is later standardized into ARPANET on January 1, 1983. Today, TCP/IP is still the primary protocol used on the Internet.
DNS is introduced
Paul Mockapetris and Jon Postel introduce DNS in 1984, which also introduces the domain name system. The first Internet domain name, symbolics.com, is registered on March 15, 1985 by Symbolics, a Massachusetts computer company.
First commercial dial-up ISPThe first commercial Internet Service Provider (ISP) in the US, known as "The World", is introduced in 1989. The World was the first ISP to be used on what we now consider to be the Internet.
HTMLIn 1990, Tim Berners-Lee develops HTML, which made a huge contribution to how we navigate and view the Internet today.
WWWTim Berners-Lee introduces WWW to the public on August 6, 1991 and becomes available for everyone August 23, 1991. The World Wide Web (WWW) is what most people today consider the "Internet" or a series of sites and pages that are connected with links. The Internet had hundreds of people who helped develop the standards and technologies used today, but without the WWW, the Internet would not be as popular as it is today.
First graphical Internet browser
Mosaic is the first widely used graphical World Wide Web browser developed and first released on April 22, 1993 by the NCSA with the help of Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina. A big competitor to Mosaic was Netscape, which was released a year later. Today's Internet browsers we use today, e.g. Internet Explorer, Chrome, Firefox, etc., got their inspiration from the Mosaic browser.
Java and JavaScript
Originally known as oak, Java is a programming language developed by James Gosling and others at Sun Microsystems in 1995. Today, Java is still used to create Internet applications and other software programs.
JavaScript was developed by Brendan Eich in 1995 and originally known as LiveScript. LiveScript was released with Netscape Navigator 2.0 and renamed to JavaScript with Netscape Navigator 2.0B3. JavaScript is an interpreted client-side scripting language that allows a web designer the ability to insert code into their web page.
Related Questions
That is a great overview, but who are the key inventors of the Internet?
If you had to isolate the key inventors of the Internet, it would have to be two people: Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn. The WWW, which is different from the Internet, but what most people think of as the "Internet", was invented later by Tim Berners-Lee.
But I thought Al Gore invented the Internet.
______________________________________
We posted an article this past week that told us our once strong academic IVY LEAGUES were now simply product factories and being admitted was tied more to who you know---is your family rich----can you be used as a DO ANYTHING WE ARE TOLD PLAYER?
When national media tells us that a CLINTON---BUSH---OBAMA---NOW TRUMP are exceptional----whether exception students with high academic achievement----or whether a successful business person---none of the above have any exceptional qualities----they are staged in positions to create MYTH---Clinton as a RHODES SCHOLAR we are told is quite the genius----OH, REALLY? Absolutely no one who talks with Clinton would ever say that. Obama was quite the constitutional scholar being placed as head of HARVARD LAW REVIEW----know what? That is simply a position ----and Obama is no more intelligent or capable than 99% of WE THE PEOPLE. He was identified as a TYPE---A PLAYER---HAD THE CONNECTIONS---
Trump as a great business man -----WOW WHAT A MYTH!
America did indeed have two centuries of great people as leaders-----the early founding fathers were indeed genius----our communities and public schools created real leaders----identified by MERITOCRACY the best and allowed them to excel. Today----if one of our citizens from a poor community is that gifted student---they are hustled to a global IVY LEAGUE where the are USED TO CREATE PATENTS AND PRODUCTS.
Please stop sending our truly gifted and exceptional citizens to work for GLORY AND HONOR for a FAKE GLOBAL 1% -----stealing our talent and intelligence for THEIR WEALTH at the expense of 99% of WE THE PEOPLE. The top priority to reverse MOVING FORWARD is rebuilding our local community economies and we need all EXCEPTIONAL 99% WE TEAM WE THE PEOPLE. Send those 5% to the 1% players to the benches!
Is the Ivy League’s Admission Bias a ‘Trade Secret’?
Princeton sues to block the government’s release of documents that could show discrimination.
By
Jason L. Riley
March 28, 2017 6:39 p.m. ET Shortly after the Supreme Court’s dispiriting decision last year in Fisher v. University of Texas, which upheld the use of racial preferences in college admissions, Gallup released some encouraging poll results. More than 6 out of 10 white, black and Hispanic respondents said they disagreed with the ruling. And 7 in 10 people—including 76% of ...............
Below we see just this----HOPKINS has a motto---there is no bad idea and they have everyone patenting ideas from citizens in Baltimore to students at all Baltimore university campuses-----we talked a few years ago about the SOARING PURCHASES OF PATENTS by the global 1%-----this is what HOPKINS AND MARYLAND IS DOING.
The people with the ideas are the 99% of WE THE PEOPLE patenting with those global 1% having absolutely NO ABILITY--TALENT---INTELLIGENCE simply buying those patented ideas. Keep in mind----patents of products cover broadly an inventor's intentions with his/her product to the point that NO ONE ELSE CAN PATENT ANYTHING LOOKING LIKE IT.
This is COMPLETE CAPTURE OF IDEAS FOREVER -----AND YES, MARYLAND AND HOPKINS LEADS IN THIS GOAL AND THE GLOBAL 1% TIED TO THESE INSTITUTIONS WILL TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN.
And again with that MYTH------the myth of IVY LEAGUEs being better than our once STRONG PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES-----CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA killed our public universities BECAUSE they graduated REAL talented leaders.
Hopkins, Maryland among top universities granted patents
By: Tim Curtis Daily Record Business Reporter June 8, 2017
The Hopkins dome. (File)
Johns Hopkins University and the University of Maryland rank among the top universities in the world at being granted utility patents, according to a list compiled by the National Academy of Inventors and the Intellectual Property Owners Association.
For the third straight year, Hopkins notched a top ten finish. The university finished seventh on the list, its highest finish ever on the list. Hopkins was granted 167 patents in 2016.
Maryland ranked 27th on the list for the second straight year, tying its highest appearance on the list. The university was granted 72 patents last year.
Both universities have been on the list every year in its five-year history.
The list compiles the top 100 universities worldwide who have been granted utility patents by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
________________________________
The global 1%----people with NO ABILITY-----are rounding up all ideas and patents so in the future NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO CREATE A PRODUCT not tied to them.
At the same time---the patenting process in place for 3 centuries----and several centuries over in old Europe is BEING CORRUPTED---SURPRISE! CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have changed the concept of what patenting is-----where legal protections lie----creating conditions for those global 1% to keep control of all ideas FOREVER.
Now, the Robber Baron period of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA was completely ILLEGAL ---completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL and all that was done whether laws, programs, societal structure changes can be VOIDED ---EASY PEASY. This will be one we need to VOID----and undue all the consolidation of patenting and products into the hands of a TALENTLESS GLOBAL 1%.
Please understand this process because it basically will make it illegal for anyone to manufacture any ordinary product----from shoes to brooms----from disability wheelchairs to can openers.
The global 1% trying to assure that the global 1% have absolutely no avenue towards patenting and manufacturing a product and this will be used to throw those NEWLY RICH thinking they were really MERCHANTS OF VENICE.
What is a Utility Patent?
By Gene Quinn
April 22, 2017
Black’s Law dictionary defines “utility patent” as “the customary type of patent issued to any novel, non-obvious, and useful machine, article of manufacture, composition of matter or process.” A utility patent is one of three separate types of patents that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can award inventors, with the other two types of patent being: (1) a design patent, which protects only the way a tangible product looks (see also Design Patents 101); and (2) a plant patent, which protects a new variety of asexually reproducible plant.
A patent for an invention is the grant of a property right to the inventor, issued by the Patent Office. The right granted by the Patent Office, in the language of the statute and of the grant itself, is “the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling” the invention in the U.S. or “importing” the invention into the U.S. When the patent obtained is a utility patent the rights obtained cover the way the invention is structured and functions, with exclusive rights being owned by the inventor even if the allegedly infringing product looks different.
Generally speaking, a utility patent will have a term that begins on the date the patent issues and ends on the date that is twenty years from the date the application for the utility patent was filed in the United States. If the patent application that ultimately issues contains a specific reference to an earlier filed U.S. or international application, the term ends twenty years from the filing date of that earlier patent application. This patent term for utility patents is referred to as the “twenty-year term.”
It is, however, possible that a utility patent will last longer than this twenty years. For example, if Patent Office interjects delay into the patent examination process the patent owner will receive additional patent term added. Further discussion of the topic of additional patent term, whether by patent term extension or patent term adjustment, is complex and goes beyond the scope of this article. See MPEP 2710 and MPEP 2733.
To obtain a utility patent a utility patent application must be filed at the U.S. Patent Office. Many inventors will choose to start the process toward obtaining a utility patent by filing a provisional patent application first and then within 12 months filing a non-provisional utility patent application. Whenever you hear the term “provisional patent application” you should generally be thinking about a utility patent application because you cannot file a provisional patent application for a design. In other words, design patent applications and provisional patent applications are unrelated. More specifically, you cannot claim priority to a provisional patent application when you file a design patent application.
In the previous paragraph the term “non-provisional utility patent application” is used. This may seem unnecessarily redundant, and through common usage it may be. Generally speaking when most inventors talk about a non-provisional patent application they are referring to a utility patent application. Technically, however, design patent applications could also be characterized as being non-provisional patent applications, and so too could plant patent applications. Most inventors are not inventing asexually reproduced plants, and in fact last week there were only 31 plant patents issued and since the 1930s there have been fewer than 28,000 plant patents issued all total. Because you cannot file a design provisional application, almost universally when a distinction is being made between provisional patent applications and non-provisional patent applications the conversation is about utility patents.
There is much more to learn about patents and the patent application process, from basic information about whether you need a patent, to patent drafting techniques. In addition to beginning with Invention to Patent 101 – Everything You Need to Know to Get Started, I specifically recommend starting with these tutorial articles:
_________________________________________
'The agreement has a chapter on intellectual property (IP) rights, touching on everything from copyright to trademarks, patents, confidential information, pharmaceutical intellectual property, cyber-squatting of domain names, and internet service provider (ISP) liability'.
As global IVY LEAGUE universities which are now essentially hedge fund global corporate R and D -----spent these several years of Obama buying and cornering from students all ideas on products and gained patent-control----these same global IVY LEAGUES working for global 1% were the drivers from BUSH---TO OBAMA----of writing Trans Pacific Trade Pact. As everyone says---this is not about trade---it is about capturing all government structures to a global corporate tribunal and tribunal court.
What the global 1% are doing as they buy all patents ever registered for several centuries----is write new INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS laws-----redefining concepts such as patents----making sure global 1% control almost any PATENTABLE IDEA.
WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% CAME UP WITH THESE IDEAS---WE DEVELOPED AND DESIGNED THESE IDEAS----THE GLOBAL 1% BUY AND OWN ALL THOSE PATENTS. THEN THEY CREATE MYTHS ABOUT HOW THEY WERE THE EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE BEHIND THESE IDEAS.
As we are shouting REBUILD LOCAL ECONOMIES those global 1% are trying to assure we have no way to manufacture ANYTHING.
The 5% and that 1% are really pretty pathetic human capital
As we are shouting REBUILD LOCAL ECONOMIES those global 1% are trying to assure we have no way to manufacture ANYTHING.
The reason ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE sounds so appealing to those leaders of developing nations is this----they are assuring leadership in those nations forever along with any route to economic markets from their nation. The problem for those developing nation leaders is of course that global 1% will fight and throw each other under the bus for more and more power and wealth.......there is no winners other than that original OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE----now tied to OLD WORLD FREEMASONRY GROUPS.
December 1 2015
ACCC airs concerns over intellectual property provisions in Trans-Pacific Partnership
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has warned the intellectual property provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership may "tilt the balance" in favour of IP rights holders to the detriment of competition and consumers.
It also warns the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the agreement risk making it harder for the Turnbull government to pursue domestic reforms in Australia's interest.
The ACCC warns the TPP may burden Australia with IP obligations to other countries that have consequences for competition. Photo: Penny Stephens
The ACCC is one of the most high-profile government bodies to raise such concerns.
The final text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – a historic trade pact between 12 countries, including Australia and the United States – was released last month after more than five years of negotiations.
Experts have had four weeks to assess it.
The agreement has a chapter on intellectual property (IP) rights, touching on everything from copyright to trademarks, patents, confidential information, pharmaceutical intellectual property, cyber-squatting of domain names, and internet service provider (ISP) liability.
However, the ACCC has warned – in its submission to the Productivity Commission's inquiry into intellectual property arrangements in Australia – that its IP provisions must be submitted to "robust analysis" to see what their impacts will be on competition and consumers.
It says the TPP may burden Australia with IP obligations to other countries that have significant consequences for competition "over decades".
It does not explain what those consequences could be.
"The ACCC is concerned that the agreement appears to impose IP restrictions beyond existing international treaties, and this may tilt the balance in favour of IP rights holders to the detriment of competition and consumers," its submission says.
It has also warned that the TPP's investor-state dispute settlement provisions need to be analysed properly before the government enacts the agreement.
ISDS provisions give foreign companies the right to sue Australian governments for introducing laws they say have harmed their interests.
"The ACCC agrees with the Productivity Commission's view expressed in its 2013-14 Trade and Assistance Review that such [ISDS] provisions risk impeding domestic reforms in the public interest," the ACCC has warned.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says the TPP will be a "gigantic foundation stone" for the economy which will deliver jobs and growth.
Trade Minister Andrew Robb says it will deliver "substantial benefits for Australia" in the rapidly growing Asia-Pacific region.
Australia's legal and academic communities do not agree about the benefits or consequences of ISDS provisions in modern trade agreements.
Many experts say fears about ISDS provisions are overblown.
However, critics have said Australia risks losing billions of dollars in court battles with foreign companies.
TPP partners such as Japan, Vietnam and New Zealand are generally more comfortable with ISDS provisions than Australia.
__________________________________________
This video shows two things----it shows the talent and skill our our 99% of citizens ---we know how to create new products! It shows as well how broad this global 1% patenting scheme will become. Remember, the global 1% are from all nations ---not only US---not only UK ------so to meet the terms of ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE----all members must gain wealth and power and this includes PATENTING PRODUCTS.
This is what a global corporate tribunal court will do and know what? WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.
So, this US citizen who no doubt is probably telling the truth will have NO SUPPORT from our state attorney generals----no support from our US Justice in protecting HIS PATENT----these attorneys will be geared to protect that JAPANESE GLOBAL 1%-----so there will be NO WAY for any global 99% to patent their own inventions.
US Patent Office Fraud
Wisco Kidd
Start at:
Published on Apr 25, 2009 YOU TUBE VIDEO
The patent examiner assigned to my application is a straight up bold face liar. I called her on her lies then two more agents and a commissioner backed up the whore for a Japanese corporation. So if four public servants lie, it becomes the truth! My application number is 11/647,104 and it is publication number is 2008-0156564-A1. The patent that the government sanctioned criminals say anticipates mine and was "disclosed" by is Miyazawa et al patent # 5,845,727. Mine is called "The Electric Horse(tm): battery powered electric motor bicycle drive train" and pedaling is an option, it self propels! Theirs is called a "driving force auxiliary device"; their drawings and specifications show that you must pedal first before the motor kicks in. Theirs is a geriatric dead weight piece of junk where mine will take a person down the road 10 miles without pedaling. Evidently the Patent Office is filled with narcissistic individuals that lie for foreign corporations and screw American inventors out of their work on a regular basis. The US Marshals, the FBI and the Department of Justice better arrest these soulless corporate shills or they are complacent accomplices to crime themselves. If you are interested in any more information about the crime USPTO is perpetrating against me I'll be glad to supply you with information. So don't even try for a Patent until the system is purged of greedy liars who bow to corporate greed. Thanks for watching.
______________________________________________
Again, it is not our rank and file 99% of citizens as workers being corrupted---it is the process of breaking down our once strong Federal, state, and local government agencies----outsourcing them-----creating many different employment status ---as this one talks of telecommuting from home with no oversight and accountability.
It does not take a corrupt public employee to game and corrupt our US patent system----those employees could have no idea someone high-ranking is doing this fraud----as with all our government corruption.
This is not new---our patent system was strong and protected BEFORE CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA---what will happen as TRANS PACIFIC TRADE PACT MOVES FORWARD is the entire US patent system will disappear----and WE THE PEOPLE will no longer have access to what will now revert to DARK AGES only the global 1% controlling patents/manufacturing/and trade sales.
Clash over patent-office fraud a sign of what’s to come for federal workers
By Lisa Rein December 8, 2016
Patent documents for the Wright brothers’ “flying machine.” (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post)House Republicans on Wednesday dressed down a top U.S. Patent and Trademark Office official and a union leader for what they called a weak response to reports of time and attendance fraud by patent examiners.
The rebukes, in response to an inspector-general investigation released this summer, may foreshadow things to come with President Donald Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling Congress.
Trump and conservatives on Capitol Hill have vowed to target the federal bureaucracy, holding civil servants accountable when they perform poorly or break the rules — behavior they say has been tolerated by the Obama administration across the government with few repercussions.
The patent office has struggled in recent years with reports that some of its employees are chronically gaming the system, a practice made easier by the large number who work from home with little oversight by managers.
The agency’s watchdog has found plenty of fodder. In 2014, the inspector general for the Commerce Department, the patent office’s parent, reported that paralegals at the small office that handles patent appeals were told by their supervisors to fudge their timecards because they had so little work to do.
Also that year, The Washington Post reported on the findings of an internal investigation by patent officials after whistleblowers complained that their colleagues and examiners they supervise repeatedly lied about their hours and got overtime pay and bonuses for work they didn’t do.
A 32-page internal report revealed a culture of time and attendance abuse and scant oversight of the patent office’s award-winning telework program. But top patent officials removed the most damaging revelations from the findings, providing the inspector general’s office with an account half the length and with many potentially embarrassing findings removed.
Last year, investigators found that a single patent examiner racked up more than 18 weeks of pay for work he did not do, while his teleworking manager never noticed.
And a 15-month analysis, released in August by Deputy Inspector General David Smith, of thousands of patent examiners’ turnstile badge swipes, computer log-ins and remote computer connections to federal systems showed consistent discrepancies between the time employees reported working and the hours they actually put in.
This time and attendance abuse cost the government as much as $18.3 million, with employees who review patent applications billing the agency for almost 300,000 hours they never worked, investigators found. They said the full scale of the fraud is probably double what the numbers show, because they gave employees the benefit of the doubt: If they badged in once at the agency’s Alexandria headquarters or logged in at home, they got credit for a day of work.
“What is most troubling is that the numbers . . . are a conservative estimate,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee’s subcommittee on government operations, said at a hearing Wednesday.
Meadows called the August report “alarming” and told a top patent official that “internal controls are lacking” to monitor fraud. “I want an accountable workforce going forward,” he said.
Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), the subcommittee’s top Democrat, said the inspector general had not made the case that fraud was widespread, noting the bogus hours accounted for only 1.6 percent of the hours investigators tracked.
The hearing focused on 415 employees who investigators said lied about working at least one day every other week — and 56 employees whose time could not be accounted for an average of three days a pay period.
Russell Slifer, the patent office’s deputy director, told lawmakers that “any abuse of time and attendance . . . is unacceptable.” He said the agency has taken steps to give managers more tools to monitor when their employees are working.
But Slifer defended the agency’s roughly 8,000 patent examiners, saying the vast majority are honest, hard workers, many of whom do not have enough time to review each application on their docket. He also said that many examiners do their research offline, so if they are not logged onto their computers for a day or even two, that does not mean they are playing hooky.
Meadows was furious. “You’ve got over 8,000 employees and 400 or so who are taking advantage of the system,” he told Slifer. “Are you suggesting it’s okay to not log into your computer for two days? Do you think you can actually do your work for 48 hours without logging in?”
“Yes,” Slifer answered.
“Is that the best practice?” Meadows asked. Slifer acknowledged that it was not.
Patent officials have not been able to identify or interview or pursue disciplinary action against the 415 employees they think gamed the system; privacy laws prevent them from matching computer data gathered in the inspector general’s investigation with personnel records.
Slifer said that 30 patent examiners the agency was investigating separately for time and attendance fraud have been disciplined or fired. He did not say over what period or how serious the fraud was.
After the hearing, patent office spokesman Patrick Ross said in an email that officials would not provide further information. Cause of Action Institute, a watchdog group, said it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the patent office in November seeking detailed records on disciplinary action.
Republicans also criticized the union representing patent examiners, which has an unusually close relationship with management. Pamela Schwartz, president of the Patent Office Professional Association, was first grilled by Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) on her full-time work for the union while on the federal payroll — a legal, widespread practice known as official time. Republicans have vowed to weaken or eliminate it.
Meadows then called Schwartz to account for her advice to the patent examiner known as “Examiner A,” who bilked the government out of tens of thousands of dollars. The union had urged him to resign, which he did, before patent officials could fire him.
Meadows asked the union leader: “So you advised the employee to resign” rather than face the consequences of his actions?
“We advised the employee their record would have less on it if they resigned,” Schwartz said.
Meadows asked her for a commitment that she would negotiate new language in the union contract that would allow managers to see their employees’ work schedules and make it easier to fire employees who commit fraud.
“If they falsify records, are you willing to support their termination?” the congressman asked. Schwartz hedged and would not commit.
“I would need clarification on that,” she said. “It’s possible you could falsify some records and the appropriate level of discipline would not be termination.”
______________________________________
Let's return to that original comment that started our discussion today-----
'Elon Musk's heralded biography is dripping wet with being extraordinary and a visionary. If this is truly not the case, it will still be hard to convince others, so you may loose more in the audience, and thus thwart your own passions and desires in this war'.
If WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% keep allowing only the MYTH as source of information ---will that comment above really be true?
IT WILL BE HARD TO CONVINCE OTHERS SO YOU MAY LOOSE MORE IN THE AUDIENCE THUS THWART YOUR OWN PASSIONS-----
That statement is indeed TRUE-----we do lose some people committed to believing what corporate media---corporate universities----corporate pols and players tell them----
KNOW WHAT? WE ARE SEEING FEWER AND FEWER OF THOSE KINDS OF CITIZENS----WE ARE WAKING UP ----PLEASE CREATE REAL TALKING POINTS FOR LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC POLICY!
Our response:
---that is a great description of these supposed EXCEPTIONAL 1%-----they are creating a FICTION to make themselves VIRTUOUS---HERALDED---it mirrors the DARK AGES----this is why we say the ideals of OLD WORLD FREEMASONRY are long gone and today we have LYING, CHEATING, AND STEALING held as virtuous. I have no fear of a disappearing audience----know what? If one is pushed to FICTION in order to attain attention -----THAT IS VANITY'.
When we allow the US to be brought back to colonization and 99% of citizens having no rights, impoverished, and enslaved as with MOVING FORWARD we are returning to those DARK AGES days where incompetent 1% enriched through brute force create images of themselves to justify that position in SOCIETY. America is a MERITOCRACY---one would say---know, America has always been controlled by those same global 1%----but it felt as though the 99% were free to determine their destiny. Of course we never attained this freedom for all US citizens----we were on the way.
The American people were indeed free---we were indeed growing our own wealth and economic stability---THAT IS NOT FICTION. Meritocracy simply means people climb a ladder----whether social or income because they can compete and advance in an economic race WITH A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
Laissez faire economics were installed by REAGAN/CLINTON at this point in US history to end that level playing field. That global 1% were ready to come in and by force and FICTION take all the wealth of our growing nation and our families.
THIS DID NOT HAVE TO HAPPEN---SO INDEED---WE WERE FREE AND ABLE TO DETERMINE OUR DESTINY. WE ARE SIMPLY ALLOWING MOVING FORWARD TO END THIS FREEDOM AND STATUS AS CITIZEN.
Because a small group of 5% to the 1% having no particular talent----having no morals, ethics, or VIRTUE----were installed to power the global 1% must create FICTIONS as to why that 1% continue to garner all avenues to wealth and power. It is the same as the legends written 4 thousand years ago making HEROES----GODS AND GODDESSES----with the global 1% seeing themselves reflected in those images.
WHEN THE LEAST CAPABLE AND THE LEAST WORTHY RISE TO THE TOP BY BRUTE FORCE---THEY MUST CREATE FICTIONS TO SEEM EXCEPTIONAL.
Vanity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Vainglory" redirects here. For the Old English poem, see Vainglory (Old English poem). For the video game, see Vainglory (video game). For the style of artwork, see Vanitas. For other uses, see Vanity (disambiguation).
This painting represents the Dutch "Vanitas" (Latin for vanity) by Adam Bernaert,[1] The Walters Art Museum.Vanity is the excessive belief in one's own abilities or attractiveness to others. Prior to the 14th century it did not have such narcissistic undertones, and merely meant futility.[2] The related term vainglory is now often seen as an archaic synonym for vanity, but originally meant boasting in vain, i.e. unjustified boasting;[3] although glory is now seen as having an exclusively positive meaning, the Latin term gloria (from which it derives) roughly means boasting, and was often used as a negative criticism.[4]
If we have read WAR AND PEACE then we easily saw the FICTIONS created by our OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE GLOBAL 1% and their 5% to the 1% freemason/Greeks. When we refer MOVING FORWARD as back to the DARK AGES it is because these global Wall Street players are so attached to the mythology of KINGS AND QUEENS and that period of extreme wealth. If you haven't read it you should to know that mentality of extreme wealth and the FAKE SENSE OF VIRTUE AND HONOR.
What War and Peace did well is show how all that pomp and circumstance of royalty---of freemason VIRTUE was SMOKE AND MIRRORS. That is what today's CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA now Trump are trying so hard to paint for themselves-----THEY ARE EXCEPTIONAL when in fact they are not even as capable as you and I.
LEO TOLSTOY and FREEMASONRY
COUNT LYEV NIKOLAYEVICH TOLSTOY (1828-1910).
Russian novelist and moral philosopher comes from
a Russian landed gentry dating back 300 years.
His parents died by the time he was 9 yrs old.
Raised by female relatives, and educated by French tutors.
He lived a middle-gentry life of the last of the old serfdom period.
His "War and Peace" appeared in parts in 1865 and 1869.
He was 37 yrs old.
Freemasonry's presence in Tolstoy's War and Peace, which many consider Russia's greatest novel, is a reflection of the long existence (since 1771) of the Craft in Russia. Masonry was banned by Czar Alexander in 1821, a ban continued by the Communists in 1922. Masonry was only revived in 1993. There are now some 10 lodges meeting in Russia under Russia's Grand Lodge.
MoscowLotus
Alexander Pushkin
Harmony
Quatuor Coronati
Northern Lights (Armenian-speaking)
St.PetersburgNovaya Astra
VoronezhGamaioun
ArkhangelskPolar Star
ZvenigorodAurora (English-speaking)
VladivostokPacific Rim
Fraternal Love a Lodge meeting in Turkey, France, Lebanon and Russia
Such a renewal is not surprising when the long-time cultural influence of Masonry in Russia is considered. While Freemasonry's consideration in Count Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace is the most famous example, the masonic fraternity figures in "The Possessed" by Dostoevsky, and in the works of other master authors such as; V.I.Likin, N.M.Karamzin, M.M.Kheraskov, V.I.Maikov, A.N.Radishchev, A.A.Rzhevskii, A.P.Sumarokov, and M.M.Shcherbatov.
This literature compares with the works of Scotland's Robert Burns & Sir Walter Scott, England's Rudyard Kipling & Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, alongwith Germany's Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, and America's Edgar Allan Poe.
War and Peace is widely accepted as being autobiographical, and the figure of Pierre Bezukhov is as consumed as was Tolstoy with the great questions of life. There is no evidence that Tolstoy joined a Lodge, but he spent considerable time investigating masonic activities.
The masonic initiation scene in War and Peace is justly celebrated:
'Pierre gradually began to recover himself and looked about at the room and at the people in it. Round a long table covered with black sat some twelve brethren in garments like those he has already seen. Several of them Pierre had met in St. Petersburg society. In the president's chair sat a young man he did not know, with a peculiar cross hanging from his neck. On his right sat the Italian abbe whom Pierre had seen at Anna Pavlovna's two years before. There was also present a very distinguished dignitary, and a Swiss tutor who had formerly been tutor at the Kuragins. All maintained a solemn silence, listening to the words of the president, who held a mallet in his hand. Let into the wall was a star-shaped light. At one side of the table was a small carpet was various figures worked upon it; on the other was something resembling an altar on which by a (New) Testament and a skull."
Pierre seeks initiation as part of his quest for self-knowledge, a major theme in the book. He hopes that the secrets of the Masons will prove the Golden Fleece or Holy Grail. He is representative of a whole generation of Russian intellectuals who were trying to reconcile the Slavic East with the bewildering bonanza of ideas from the West. Of course, he expects too much. In Book Six, Chapter Seven, it is now 1808, and Pierre is busily arranging dining and funeral Lodges, donating for the erection of temples, helping with charities - and becoming disillusioned.
When he had joined the Freemasons he had experienced the feeling of one who confidently steps onto the smooth surface of a bog. When he put his foot down, it sank in. …. All the members of the Lodges were men Pierre knew in ordinary life, and it was difficult for him to regard them merely as Brothers in Freemasonry. … Under the Masonic aprons and insignia he saw the uniforms and decorations at which they aimed in ordinary life.
In questioning the purity of Masonry and the motives of its members, and in suggesting its misuse by its members for pedestrian old-boy networking, Tolstoy anticipates the sceptical observations about the Craft of another famous Russian, Leon Trotsky, who writes in Chapter Nine of his autobiography, "My Life":
"In the early years of this century, Russia was a vast laboratory of social thinking. My work on the history of freemasonry had fortified me in a realization of the subordinate place of ideas in the historical process. 'Ideas do not drop from the sky'.."
Pierre is an embodiment of a disillusioned Tolstoy who found Freemasonry to be far less than what he had expected. Pierre describes those like himself as one who are 'seeking and vacillating, who had not yet found in Freemasonry a straight and comprehensible path, but hoped to do so'. He decides that the fault is his own and that he needs to deepen his understanding of Masonry by further study. So he goes abroad to seek masonic knowledge in other countries. Upon returning to his Lodge a special meeting is called to hear of his travels. Pierre in desperation asks his Grand Master if what he has found will be implemented, and is told NO. He leaves his lodge.
In a letter of Tolstoy to his wife in 1866, he wrote:
"After drinking coffee I went to the Rumyantsev Museum and sat there till three o'clock read very interesting Masonic manuscripts. I can't describe to you why the reading produced on me a depression I have not been able to get rid of all day. What is distressing is that all those Masons were fools."
Hard words but maybe Pierre/Tolstoy had found that while Masons talk of problems and express such good deeds, they fail to study What is Freemasonry!!
______________________________________
We posted a year or so ago a lecture from a southern university with a professor whose job it was to CREATE THAT IMAGE OF VIRTUE ---that SMOKE AND MIRROR ----when talking about the history of ROBBER BARONS during the late 1800s early 1900s ROARING 20s-----that was a corporate university where professors are hired only if they create that IMAGE OF VIRTUE of those 1%. So, ROBBER BARONS like Rockefeller and Carnegie had all kinds of myths created to make them INEVITABLE ECONOMIC HEROES. They simply had family money from the OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE and they HIJACKED the talents of real inventors and genius.
IF WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% KEEP ALLOWING OLD ---REALLY, REALLY OLD MONEY COME IN AND FLEECE OUR ASSETS OVER AND OVER ----WE CANNOT BE FREE---WE CANNOT BE CITIZENS---STOP ALLOWING THESE POSERS TO BE LEADERS.
This is why we spend so much time breaking down these images of EXCEPTIONALISM being painted for those dastardly 5% AND THOSE 1%.
We shout over and again-----the 5% are not LEADERS----THEY ARE FOLLOWERS----simply doing anything they are told. AND THEY ARE. We make clear the stories in media created for a BILL GATES-----AN APPLE'S JOB------A FACEBOOK'S ZUCKERBERG ---------AN UNDERARMOUR'S PLANK----A SPACE X'S MUSK----are all FICTIONS.
THEIR FAMILIES SIMPLY HAD OLD WORLD WEALTH AND BOUGHT PATENTS FOR PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS DEVELOPED AND DESIGNED BY REAL TALENTED AND INTELLIGENT 99% OF WE THE PEOPLE.
'Elon Musk's heralded biography is dripping wet with being extraordinary and a visionary. If this is truly not the case, it will still be hard to convince others, so you may loose more in the audience, and thus thwart your own passions and desires in this war'.
Our response:
---that is a great description of these supposed EXCEPTIONAL 1%-----they are creating a FICTION to make themselves VIRTUOUS---HERALDED---it mirrors the DARK AGES----this is why we say the ideals of OLD WORLD FREEMASONRY are long gone and today we have LYING, CHEATING, AND STEALING held as virtuous. I have no fear of a disappearing audience----know what? If one is pushed to FICTION in order to attain attention -----THAT IS VANITY'.
A Lot Of People Think Elon Musk Is Already Greater Than Steve Jobs Ever Was
- Alyson Shontell
- Aug. 28, 2013, 3:02 PM
Steve Jobs was a marketing master who turned a near-bankrupt Apple into the most valuable company in the world.
But many people are starting to believe Elon Musk is better than Steve Jobs ever was.
There's an insatiable thirst for tech innovation right now, and Musk seems to be one of few people taking moonshots. He is the founder of SpaceX and electric car company Tesla. Musk is also the brains behind the Hyperloop, a hypothetical transportation system that could get people from New York to California in 30 minutes.
OH, REALLY????
Musk, like Jobs, has already had a massive consumer hit too. He co-founded PayPal in 1999, which completely transformed online transactions.
Tesla's soaring stock is just one example of Musk's wild popularity. Although it's only expected to deliver 20,000 cars in 2013, the stock has risen more than 400% in the past year to a $20 billion market cap.
Tesla's valuation is sky-high and its stock is up 400% since last year.CNBC
Another example can be found on question and answer site, Quora, where thousands of people are expressing their pro-Muskness.
The most upvoted answers are unanimous: Elon Musk isn't the next Steve Jobs. He's better.
Dolly Singh has worked with Musk for years. She joined him as Head of Talent Acquisition at SpaceX and calls Musk "brilliant, dynamic, charismatic" and "an exceptional freak of nature."
She also says this:
"In my humble opinion, Mr. Jobs in all his greatness has nothing on Elon. Elon is Wernher von Braun, Howard Hughes, Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and every other badass all rolled into one."
Her reasoning: Musk has taught himself everything from design to building rocket ships. He's read tons of literature plus he's an engineer. He's not just imaginative like Jobs was, but he also has the ability to build everything himself.
Currently, 1,200 people have upvoted her response.
Another answer with more than 3,000 up votes lists all the ways Musk is not Steve Jobs (such as, "Steve Jobs patented everything; Musk hates patents") and concludes:
"Elon Musk isn't the next Steve Jobs. He is far beyond and better than Steve Jobs ever was."
__________________________________________
Elon Musk is a spoiled child of a OLD WORLD MERCHANT OF VENICE MINING CORPORATION FAMILY---- below we see the same spoiled child of an OLD WORLD MERCHANT OF VENICE REAL ESTATE FAMILY.
All of the development of computer technology was done by Department of Defense-----by public and private universities using their STUDENTS AND FACILITY to design products that were then sold as patents. A meeting of DAVOS SWITZERLAND GLOBAL 1% says----WE NEED TO MINE PLANETS FOR MINERALS-----then the Department of Defense and our universities suddenly get funded for research and development-----NASA----source of all the space engineering used by SPACE X----was designed by WE THE PEOPLE--THE 99% -----so, all the R and D is done----all the plans and stages are developed BY WE THE PEOPLE THE 99%----and in walks MUSK and his money to buy patents making his family the one made extremely rich. MUSK had nothing to do with the idea of space mining---that came from the global 1%---MUSK was not tied to any research or development in TESLA--in SPACE X ----he probably does not even know space mechanics---he hires talented people to do everything.
Below we see the same done for PLANK AND UNDERARMOUR-----PLANK is simply that same son of an old wealth familty buying the PATENT for a new kind of fabric for sportswear. All the R and D was done by the 99% of WE THE PEOPLE in university----in Department of Defense et al ---and then that patent is sold to PLANK. If we believe the myth of a PLANK working his way up the ladder from selling out of his trunk to building third world global factories in Asia WE ARE ALWAYS GOING TO BE SERFS----NOT CITIZENS AND LEADERS.
PLEASE DON'T ALLOW THESE MYTHS ---TIED TO VIRTUE AND HONOR AND LIFTING ONESELF UP BY BOOTSTRAPS----BECAUSE NONE OF THIS IS TRUE FOR THOSE PESKY 5% AND THAT 1%.
As Tolstoy made clear in War and Peace----the royals could not manage their way out of a closet-----the people sent in as officers to become generals could not manage a war if their lives depended on it----as Tolstoy made clear wars just happen--they unroll with these so-called generals never having a hand on the cause of winning. At the same time----those Freemasons with that VIRTUOUS goal of honor and justice---are shown to be a group filled with all kinds of people having all kinds of goals for being in these groups----almost none of which is being VIRTUOUS OR JUST.
Under Armour Startup Story
Introduction
This startup story features Kevin Plank, a former Fork Union Military Academy Football player who turned sweat into a billion dollar business.
Under Armour Stats
- Founder: Kevin Plank
- Age at Founding: 24
- Started In: 1996
- Industry: Sports Apparel
- Annual Revenue: $1.83BB in Retail Sales
- # of Employees: 5,900
- Famous For: Creating a revolutionary new T-shirt built from microfibers that wicked moisture and kept athletes cool, dry, and light.
As a 23 year old former captain of the University of Maryland Football team, Plank had noticed that compression shorts stayed dry during practice. He decided to take that same material to create moisture wicking gear. Under Armour’s original funding came from Planks personal savings and credit card debt. During college, Plank had saved about $20,000 by selling t-shirts at concerts. He ended up going about $40,000 in credit card debt spread across five cards. By 1997 (one year after founding the company), he was broke.
Then, he made his first sale to Georgia Tech for about $17,000. Two dozen NFL teams soon followed suit. At the end of his second year, he had sold $100,000 in product. Then, the product took off and major teams and retailers began carrying the product, creating a multi-million dollar business that now does nearly $2BB in sales and has over 5,900 employees.
Under Armour’s Funding
While Under Armour’s initial funding came from Plank himself, the company went public less than 10 years after it’s founding to raise $115 Million for expansion capital. The stock doubled in its first day of trading. The company has since sold additional shares of the company to help fuel it’s continued growth. Below, is a chart of the companies trailing five year growth rate compared to it’s competitors.
Important Under Armour Milestones:1995: Plank comes up with the idea for Under Armour while playing football at the University of Maryland.
1996: Plank uses $20k of his personal savings and $40k of credit card debt to launch the company. At the end of the year, he has sales totaling $17,000.
1997: Plank sells $100,000 worth of product to twelve NFL football teams.
1998: Under Armour is asked to create uniforms for Any Given Sunday.
2000: UA takes off with National advertising campaigns.
2002: The company becomes carried in 2,500 retail stores.
2013: Under Armour acquires MapMyFitness for $150 Million.
Kevin Plank Startup Advice: “You need to put your hands around the throat of your business, and you need to run it. There’s no other way.”
_____________________________________
The global 1% are creating MYTHS and our captured media and corporate universities teach myth and not fact ----this is the value of REAL PUBLIC EDUCATION----we had public schools over last century that held power accountable to these lies. This is why CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA work so hard to KILL OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS ---to install a COMMONER CORE----to assure 99% of WE THE PEOPLE will not know it is all myth and they are being USED FOR THEIR TALENT AND GETTING NOTHING.
Below we see just that progression. Here is global IVY LEAGUE STANFORD which like global IVY LEAGUE JOHNS HOPKINS attract the smartest of our citizens ----literally use their ideas and creations developed during 4 years-----or graduate positions---and patents them----that patent brings Stanford and Hopkins lots of wealth and power---those students ---not so much.
The Department of Defense is filled with WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% and all R and D is done by those talented people. Look at who is headlined as head of departments?
THEY ARE NOT THE ONES DOING THE WORK---THEY ARE THE ONES SIMPLY TIED TO GLOBAL 1% TAKING ALL THE GLORY.
This structure was super-sized during Obama as Clinton neo-liberals made global corporate R and D of all our public and private universities ----expanding from just a few global IVY LEAGUES.
NOW THE BEST OF THE BEST ARE BROUGHT TO GLOBAL IVY LEAGUES THAT PATENT ALL THEIR GREAT IDEAS TO MAKE THAT SAME OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE GLOBAL 1% EXTREMELY RICH.
Who controls the internet today? Global Google----and a few search engine corporations. We watch as we do SEARCHES for words or terms -----used to be we would see those searches getting the most action from 99% of citizens---today we searched the word VANITY to get to the history of its use----and we got 20 search pages of corporations selling the product BATHROOM VANITIES. This is all WE THE PEOPLE will access on our internet if we keep allowing MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE GLOBAL CORPORATE TRIBUNAL RULE.
Who invented the Internet?
Updated: 06/16/2017 by Computer Hope
A single person did not create the Internet that we know and use today. Below is a listing of different people who have helped contribute to and develop the Internet.
The idea
The initial idea of the Internet is credited to Leonard Kleinrock after he published his first paper entitled "Information Flow in Large Communication Nets" on May 31, 1961.
In 1962, J.C.R. Licklider became the first Director of IPTO and gave his vision of a galactic network. Also, with ideas from Licklider and Kleinrock, Robert Taylor helped create the idea of the network that later became ARPANET.
Initial creation
The Internet as we know it today first started being developed in the late 1960's in California in the United States.
In the summer of 1968, the Network Working Group (NWG) held its first meeting, chaired by Elmer Shapiro, at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI). Other attendees included Steve Carr, Steve Crocker, Jeff Rulifson, and Ron Stoughton. In the meeting, the group discussed solving issues related to getting hosts to communicate with each other.
In December 1968, Elmer Shapiro with SRI released a report "A Study of Computer Network Design Parameters." Based on this and earlier work by Paul Baran, Thomas Marill and others, Lawrence Roberts and Barry Wessler created the Interface Message Processor (IMP) specifications. Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc. (BBN) was later awarded the contract to design and build the IMP subnetwork.
General public learns about Internet
The UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) put out a press release introducing the public to the Internet on July 3, 1969.
First network equipment
On August 29, 1969, the first network switch and the first piece of network equipment called "IMP" (Interface Message Processor) is sent to UCLA.
On September 2, 1969, the first data moves from the UCLA host to the switch. The picture to the right is Leonard Kleinrock next to the IMP.
The first message and network crash
On Friday October 29, 1969 at 10:30 p.m., the first Internet message was sent from computer science Professor Leonard KleinRock's laboratory at UCLA, after the second piece of network equipment was installed at SRI. The connection not only enabled the first transmission to be made, but is also considered the first Internet backbone.
The first message to be distributed was "LO", which was an attempt at "LOGIN" by Charley S. Kline to log into the SRI computer from UCLA. However, the message was unable to be completed because the SRI system crashed. Shortly after the crash, the issue was resolved, and he was able to log into the computer.
E-mail is developed
Ray Tomlinson sends the first network e-mail in 1971. It's the first messaging system to send messages across a network to other users.
TCP is developed
Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn design TCP during 1973 and later publish it with the help of Yogen Dalal and Carl Sunshine in December of 1974 in RFC 675. Most people consider these two people the inventors of the Internet.
First commercial network
A commercial version of ARPANET, known as Telenet, is introduced in 1974 and considered to be the first Internet Service Provider (ISP).
Ethernet is conceivedBob Metcalfe develops the idea of Ethernet in 1973.
The Modem is introduced
Dennis Hayes and Dale Heatherington released the 80-103A Modem in 1977. The Modem and their subsequent modems become a popular choice for home users to connect to the Internet and get online.
TCP/IP is created
In 1978, TCP splits into TCP/IP, driven by Danny Cohen, David Reed, and John Shoch to support real-time traffic. The creation of TCP/IP help create UDP and is later standardized into ARPANET on January 1, 1983. Today, TCP/IP is still the primary protocol used on the Internet.
DNS is introduced
Paul Mockapetris and Jon Postel introduce DNS in 1984, which also introduces the domain name system. The first Internet domain name, symbolics.com, is registered on March 15, 1985 by Symbolics, a Massachusetts computer company.
First commercial dial-up ISPThe first commercial Internet Service Provider (ISP) in the US, known as "The World", is introduced in 1989. The World was the first ISP to be used on what we now consider to be the Internet.
HTMLIn 1990, Tim Berners-Lee develops HTML, which made a huge contribution to how we navigate and view the Internet today.
WWWTim Berners-Lee introduces WWW to the public on August 6, 1991 and becomes available for everyone August 23, 1991. The World Wide Web (WWW) is what most people today consider the "Internet" or a series of sites and pages that are connected with links. The Internet had hundreds of people who helped develop the standards and technologies used today, but without the WWW, the Internet would not be as popular as it is today.
First graphical Internet browser
Mosaic is the first widely used graphical World Wide Web browser developed and first released on April 22, 1993 by the NCSA with the help of Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina. A big competitor to Mosaic was Netscape, which was released a year later. Today's Internet browsers we use today, e.g. Internet Explorer, Chrome, Firefox, etc., got their inspiration from the Mosaic browser.
Java and JavaScript
Originally known as oak, Java is a programming language developed by James Gosling and others at Sun Microsystems in 1995. Today, Java is still used to create Internet applications and other software programs.
JavaScript was developed by Brendan Eich in 1995 and originally known as LiveScript. LiveScript was released with Netscape Navigator 2.0 and renamed to JavaScript with Netscape Navigator 2.0B3. JavaScript is an interpreted client-side scripting language that allows a web designer the ability to insert code into their web page.
Related Questions
That is a great overview, but who are the key inventors of the Internet?
If you had to isolate the key inventors of the Internet, it would have to be two people: Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn. The WWW, which is different from the Internet, but what most people think of as the "Internet", was invented later by Tim Berners-Lee.
But I thought Al Gore invented the Internet.
______________________________________
We posted an article this past week that told us our once strong academic IVY LEAGUES were now simply product factories and being admitted was tied more to who you know---is your family rich----can you be used as a DO ANYTHING WE ARE TOLD PLAYER?
When national media tells us that a CLINTON---BUSH---OBAMA---NOW TRUMP are exceptional----whether exception students with high academic achievement----or whether a successful business person---none of the above have any exceptional qualities----they are staged in positions to create MYTH---Clinton as a RHODES SCHOLAR we are told is quite the genius----OH, REALLY? Absolutely no one who talks with Clinton would ever say that. Obama was quite the constitutional scholar being placed as head of HARVARD LAW REVIEW----know what? That is simply a position ----and Obama is no more intelligent or capable than 99% of WE THE PEOPLE. He was identified as a TYPE---A PLAYER---HAD THE CONNECTIONS---
Trump as a great business man -----WOW WHAT A MYTH!
America did indeed have two centuries of great people as leaders-----the early founding fathers were indeed genius----our communities and public schools created real leaders----identified by MERITOCRACY the best and allowed them to excel. Today----if one of our citizens from a poor community is that gifted student---they are hustled to a global IVY LEAGUE where the are USED TO CREATE PATENTS AND PRODUCTS.
Please stop sending our truly gifted and exceptional citizens to work for GLORY AND HONOR for a FAKE GLOBAL 1% -----stealing our talent and intelligence for THEIR WEALTH at the expense of 99% of WE THE PEOPLE. The top priority to reverse MOVING FORWARD is rebuilding our local community economies and we need all EXCEPTIONAL 99% WE TEAM WE THE PEOPLE. Send those 5% to the 1% players to the benches!
Is the Ivy League’s Admission Bias a ‘Trade Secret’?
Princeton sues to block the government’s release of documents that could show discrimination.
By
Jason L. Riley
March 28, 2017 6:39 p.m. ET Shortly after the Supreme Court’s dispiriting decision last year in Fisher v. University of Texas, which upheld the use of racial preferences in college admissions, Gallup released some encouraging poll results. More than 6 out of 10 white, black and Hispanic respondents said they disagreed with the ruling. And 7 in 10 people—including 76% of ...............
Below we see just this----HOPKINS has a motto---there is no bad idea and they have everyone patenting ideas from citizens in Baltimore to students at all Baltimore university campuses-----we talked a few years ago about the SOARING PURCHASES OF PATENTS by the global 1%-----this is what HOPKINS AND MARYLAND IS DOING.
The people with the ideas are the 99% of WE THE PEOPLE patenting with those global 1% having absolutely NO ABILITY--TALENT---INTELLIGENCE simply buying those patented ideas. Keep in mind----patents of products cover broadly an inventor's intentions with his/her product to the point that NO ONE ELSE CAN PATENT ANYTHING LOOKING LIKE IT.
This is COMPLETE CAPTURE OF IDEAS FOREVER -----AND YES, MARYLAND AND HOPKINS LEADS IN THIS GOAL AND THE GLOBAL 1% TIED TO THESE INSTITUTIONS WILL TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN.
And again with that MYTH------the myth of IVY LEAGUEs being better than our once STRONG PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES-----CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA killed our public universities BECAUSE they graduated REAL talented leaders.
Hopkins, Maryland among top universities granted patents
By: Tim Curtis Daily Record Business Reporter June 8, 2017
The Hopkins dome. (File)
Johns Hopkins University and the University of Maryland rank among the top universities in the world at being granted utility patents, according to a list compiled by the National Academy of Inventors and the Intellectual Property Owners Association.
For the third straight year, Hopkins notched a top ten finish. The university finished seventh on the list, its highest finish ever on the list. Hopkins was granted 167 patents in 2016.
Maryland ranked 27th on the list for the second straight year, tying its highest appearance on the list. The university was granted 72 patents last year.
Both universities have been on the list every year in its five-year history.
The list compiles the top 100 universities worldwide who have been granted utility patents by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
________________________________
The global 1%----people with NO ABILITY-----are rounding up all ideas and patents so in the future NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO CREATE A PRODUCT not tied to them.
At the same time---the patenting process in place for 3 centuries----and several centuries over in old Europe is BEING CORRUPTED---SURPRISE! CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have changed the concept of what patenting is-----where legal protections lie----creating conditions for those global 1% to keep control of all ideas FOREVER.
Now, the Robber Baron period of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA was completely ILLEGAL ---completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL and all that was done whether laws, programs, societal structure changes can be VOIDED ---EASY PEASY. This will be one we need to VOID----and undue all the consolidation of patenting and products into the hands of a TALENTLESS GLOBAL 1%.
Please understand this process because it basically will make it illegal for anyone to manufacture any ordinary product----from shoes to brooms----from disability wheelchairs to can openers.
The global 1% trying to assure that the global 1% have absolutely no avenue towards patenting and manufacturing a product and this will be used to throw those NEWLY RICH thinking they were really MERCHANTS OF VENICE.
What is a Utility Patent?
By Gene Quinn
April 22, 2017
Black’s Law dictionary defines “utility patent” as “the customary type of patent issued to any novel, non-obvious, and useful machine, article of manufacture, composition of matter or process.” A utility patent is one of three separate types of patents that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can award inventors, with the other two types of patent being: (1) a design patent, which protects only the way a tangible product looks (see also Design Patents 101); and (2) a plant patent, which protects a new variety of asexually reproducible plant.
A patent for an invention is the grant of a property right to the inventor, issued by the Patent Office. The right granted by the Patent Office, in the language of the statute and of the grant itself, is “the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling” the invention in the U.S. or “importing” the invention into the U.S. When the patent obtained is a utility patent the rights obtained cover the way the invention is structured and functions, with exclusive rights being owned by the inventor even if the allegedly infringing product looks different.
Generally speaking, a utility patent will have a term that begins on the date the patent issues and ends on the date that is twenty years from the date the application for the utility patent was filed in the United States. If the patent application that ultimately issues contains a specific reference to an earlier filed U.S. or international application, the term ends twenty years from the filing date of that earlier patent application. This patent term for utility patents is referred to as the “twenty-year term.”
It is, however, possible that a utility patent will last longer than this twenty years. For example, if Patent Office interjects delay into the patent examination process the patent owner will receive additional patent term added. Further discussion of the topic of additional patent term, whether by patent term extension or patent term adjustment, is complex and goes beyond the scope of this article. See MPEP 2710 and MPEP 2733.
To obtain a utility patent a utility patent application must be filed at the U.S. Patent Office. Many inventors will choose to start the process toward obtaining a utility patent by filing a provisional patent application first and then within 12 months filing a non-provisional utility patent application. Whenever you hear the term “provisional patent application” you should generally be thinking about a utility patent application because you cannot file a provisional patent application for a design. In other words, design patent applications and provisional patent applications are unrelated. More specifically, you cannot claim priority to a provisional patent application when you file a design patent application.
In the previous paragraph the term “non-provisional utility patent application” is used. This may seem unnecessarily redundant, and through common usage it may be. Generally speaking when most inventors talk about a non-provisional patent application they are referring to a utility patent application. Technically, however, design patent applications could also be characterized as being non-provisional patent applications, and so too could plant patent applications. Most inventors are not inventing asexually reproduced plants, and in fact last week there were only 31 plant patents issued and since the 1930s there have been fewer than 28,000 plant patents issued all total. Because you cannot file a design provisional application, almost universally when a distinction is being made between provisional patent applications and non-provisional patent applications the conversation is about utility patents.
There is much more to learn about patents and the patent application process, from basic information about whether you need a patent, to patent drafting techniques. In addition to beginning with Invention to Patent 101 – Everything You Need to Know to Get Started, I specifically recommend starting with these tutorial articles:
_________________________________________
'The agreement has a chapter on intellectual property (IP) rights, touching on everything from copyright to trademarks, patents, confidential information, pharmaceutical intellectual property, cyber-squatting of domain names, and internet service provider (ISP) liability'.
As global IVY LEAGUE universities which are now essentially hedge fund global corporate R and D -----spent these several years of Obama buying and cornering from students all ideas on products and gained patent-control----these same global IVY LEAGUES working for global 1% were the drivers from BUSH---TO OBAMA----of writing Trans Pacific Trade Pact. As everyone says---this is not about trade---it is about capturing all government structures to a global corporate tribunal and tribunal court.
What the global 1% are doing as they buy all patents ever registered for several centuries----is write new INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS laws-----redefining concepts such as patents----making sure global 1% control almost any PATENTABLE IDEA.
WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% CAME UP WITH THESE IDEAS---WE DEVELOPED AND DESIGNED THESE IDEAS----THE GLOBAL 1% BUY AND OWN ALL THOSE PATENTS. THEN THEY CREATE MYTHS ABOUT HOW THEY WERE THE EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE BEHIND THESE IDEAS.
As we are shouting REBUILD LOCAL ECONOMIES those global 1% are trying to assure we have no way to manufacture ANYTHING.
The 5% and that 1% are really pretty pathetic human capital
As we are shouting REBUILD LOCAL ECONOMIES those global 1% are trying to assure we have no way to manufacture ANYTHING.
The reason ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE sounds so appealing to those leaders of developing nations is this----they are assuring leadership in those nations forever along with any route to economic markets from their nation. The problem for those developing nation leaders is of course that global 1% will fight and throw each other under the bus for more and more power and wealth.......there is no winners other than that original OLD WORLD MERCHANTS OF VENICE----now tied to OLD WORLD FREEMASONRY GROUPS.
December 1 2015
ACCC airs concerns over intellectual property provisions in Trans-Pacific Partnership
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has warned the intellectual property provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership may "tilt the balance" in favour of IP rights holders to the detriment of competition and consumers.
It also warns the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the agreement risk making it harder for the Turnbull government to pursue domestic reforms in Australia's interest.
The ACCC warns the TPP may burden Australia with IP obligations to other countries that have consequences for competition. Photo: Penny Stephens
The ACCC is one of the most high-profile government bodies to raise such concerns.
The final text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – a historic trade pact between 12 countries, including Australia and the United States – was released last month after more than five years of negotiations.
Experts have had four weeks to assess it.
The agreement has a chapter on intellectual property (IP) rights, touching on everything from copyright to trademarks, patents, confidential information, pharmaceutical intellectual property, cyber-squatting of domain names, and internet service provider (ISP) liability.
However, the ACCC has warned – in its submission to the Productivity Commission's inquiry into intellectual property arrangements in Australia – that its IP provisions must be submitted to "robust analysis" to see what their impacts will be on competition and consumers.
It says the TPP may burden Australia with IP obligations to other countries that have significant consequences for competition "over decades".
It does not explain what those consequences could be.
"The ACCC is concerned that the agreement appears to impose IP restrictions beyond existing international treaties, and this may tilt the balance in favour of IP rights holders to the detriment of competition and consumers," its submission says.
It has also warned that the TPP's investor-state dispute settlement provisions need to be analysed properly before the government enacts the agreement.
ISDS provisions give foreign companies the right to sue Australian governments for introducing laws they say have harmed their interests.
"The ACCC agrees with the Productivity Commission's view expressed in its 2013-14 Trade and Assistance Review that such [ISDS] provisions risk impeding domestic reforms in the public interest," the ACCC has warned.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says the TPP will be a "gigantic foundation stone" for the economy which will deliver jobs and growth.
Trade Minister Andrew Robb says it will deliver "substantial benefits for Australia" in the rapidly growing Asia-Pacific region.
Australia's legal and academic communities do not agree about the benefits or consequences of ISDS provisions in modern trade agreements.
Many experts say fears about ISDS provisions are overblown.
However, critics have said Australia risks losing billions of dollars in court battles with foreign companies.
TPP partners such as Japan, Vietnam and New Zealand are generally more comfortable with ISDS provisions than Australia.
__________________________________________
This video shows two things----it shows the talent and skill our our 99% of citizens ---we know how to create new products! It shows as well how broad this global 1% patenting scheme will become. Remember, the global 1% are from all nations ---not only US---not only UK ------so to meet the terms of ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE----all members must gain wealth and power and this includes PATENTING PRODUCTS.
This is what a global corporate tribunal court will do and know what? WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.
So, this US citizen who no doubt is probably telling the truth will have NO SUPPORT from our state attorney generals----no support from our US Justice in protecting HIS PATENT----these attorneys will be geared to protect that JAPANESE GLOBAL 1%-----so there will be NO WAY for any global 99% to patent their own inventions.
US Patent Office Fraud
Wisco Kidd
Start at:
Published on Apr 25, 2009 YOU TUBE VIDEO
The patent examiner assigned to my application is a straight up bold face liar. I called her on her lies then two more agents and a commissioner backed up the whore for a Japanese corporation. So if four public servants lie, it becomes the truth! My application number is 11/647,104 and it is publication number is 2008-0156564-A1. The patent that the government sanctioned criminals say anticipates mine and was "disclosed" by is Miyazawa et al patent # 5,845,727. Mine is called "The Electric Horse(tm): battery powered electric motor bicycle drive train" and pedaling is an option, it self propels! Theirs is called a "driving force auxiliary device"; their drawings and specifications show that you must pedal first before the motor kicks in. Theirs is a geriatric dead weight piece of junk where mine will take a person down the road 10 miles without pedaling. Evidently the Patent Office is filled with narcissistic individuals that lie for foreign corporations and screw American inventors out of their work on a regular basis. The US Marshals, the FBI and the Department of Justice better arrest these soulless corporate shills or they are complacent accomplices to crime themselves. If you are interested in any more information about the crime USPTO is perpetrating against me I'll be glad to supply you with information. So don't even try for a Patent until the system is purged of greedy liars who bow to corporate greed. Thanks for watching.
______________________________________________
Again, it is not our rank and file 99% of citizens as workers being corrupted---it is the process of breaking down our once strong Federal, state, and local government agencies----outsourcing them-----creating many different employment status ---as this one talks of telecommuting from home with no oversight and accountability.
It does not take a corrupt public employee to game and corrupt our US patent system----those employees could have no idea someone high-ranking is doing this fraud----as with all our government corruption.
This is not new---our patent system was strong and protected BEFORE CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA---what will happen as TRANS PACIFIC TRADE PACT MOVES FORWARD is the entire US patent system will disappear----and WE THE PEOPLE will no longer have access to what will now revert to DARK AGES only the global 1% controlling patents/manufacturing/and trade sales.
Clash over patent-office fraud a sign of what’s to come for federal workers
By Lisa Rein December 8, 2016
Patent documents for the Wright brothers’ “flying machine.” (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post)House Republicans on Wednesday dressed down a top U.S. Patent and Trademark Office official and a union leader for what they called a weak response to reports of time and attendance fraud by patent examiners.
The rebukes, in response to an inspector-general investigation released this summer, may foreshadow things to come with President Donald Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling Congress.
Trump and conservatives on Capitol Hill have vowed to target the federal bureaucracy, holding civil servants accountable when they perform poorly or break the rules — behavior they say has been tolerated by the Obama administration across the government with few repercussions.
The patent office has struggled in recent years with reports that some of its employees are chronically gaming the system, a practice made easier by the large number who work from home with little oversight by managers.
The agency’s watchdog has found plenty of fodder. In 2014, the inspector general for the Commerce Department, the patent office’s parent, reported that paralegals at the small office that handles patent appeals were told by their supervisors to fudge their timecards because they had so little work to do.
Also that year, The Washington Post reported on the findings of an internal investigation by patent officials after whistleblowers complained that their colleagues and examiners they supervise repeatedly lied about their hours and got overtime pay and bonuses for work they didn’t do.
A 32-page internal report revealed a culture of time and attendance abuse and scant oversight of the patent office’s award-winning telework program. But top patent officials removed the most damaging revelations from the findings, providing the inspector general’s office with an account half the length and with many potentially embarrassing findings removed.
Last year, investigators found that a single patent examiner racked up more than 18 weeks of pay for work he did not do, while his teleworking manager never noticed.
And a 15-month analysis, released in August by Deputy Inspector General David Smith, of thousands of patent examiners’ turnstile badge swipes, computer log-ins and remote computer connections to federal systems showed consistent discrepancies between the time employees reported working and the hours they actually put in.
This time and attendance abuse cost the government as much as $18.3 million, with employees who review patent applications billing the agency for almost 300,000 hours they never worked, investigators found. They said the full scale of the fraud is probably double what the numbers show, because they gave employees the benefit of the doubt: If they badged in once at the agency’s Alexandria headquarters or logged in at home, they got credit for a day of work.
“What is most troubling is that the numbers . . . are a conservative estimate,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee’s subcommittee on government operations, said at a hearing Wednesday.
Meadows called the August report “alarming” and told a top patent official that “internal controls are lacking” to monitor fraud. “I want an accountable workforce going forward,” he said.
Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), the subcommittee’s top Democrat, said the inspector general had not made the case that fraud was widespread, noting the bogus hours accounted for only 1.6 percent of the hours investigators tracked.
The hearing focused on 415 employees who investigators said lied about working at least one day every other week — and 56 employees whose time could not be accounted for an average of three days a pay period.
Russell Slifer, the patent office’s deputy director, told lawmakers that “any abuse of time and attendance . . . is unacceptable.” He said the agency has taken steps to give managers more tools to monitor when their employees are working.
But Slifer defended the agency’s roughly 8,000 patent examiners, saying the vast majority are honest, hard workers, many of whom do not have enough time to review each application on their docket. He also said that many examiners do their research offline, so if they are not logged onto their computers for a day or even two, that does not mean they are playing hooky.
Meadows was furious. “You’ve got over 8,000 employees and 400 or so who are taking advantage of the system,” he told Slifer. “Are you suggesting it’s okay to not log into your computer for two days? Do you think you can actually do your work for 48 hours without logging in?”
“Yes,” Slifer answered.
“Is that the best practice?” Meadows asked. Slifer acknowledged that it was not.
Patent officials have not been able to identify or interview or pursue disciplinary action against the 415 employees they think gamed the system; privacy laws prevent them from matching computer data gathered in the inspector general’s investigation with personnel records.
Slifer said that 30 patent examiners the agency was investigating separately for time and attendance fraud have been disciplined or fired. He did not say over what period or how serious the fraud was.
After the hearing, patent office spokesman Patrick Ross said in an email that officials would not provide further information. Cause of Action Institute, a watchdog group, said it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the patent office in November seeking detailed records on disciplinary action.
Republicans also criticized the union representing patent examiners, which has an unusually close relationship with management. Pamela Schwartz, president of the Patent Office Professional Association, was first grilled by Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) on her full-time work for the union while on the federal payroll — a legal, widespread practice known as official time. Republicans have vowed to weaken or eliminate it.
Meadows then called Schwartz to account for her advice to the patent examiner known as “Examiner A,” who bilked the government out of tens of thousands of dollars. The union had urged him to resign, which he did, before patent officials could fire him.
Meadows asked the union leader: “So you advised the employee to resign” rather than face the consequences of his actions?
“We advised the employee their record would have less on it if they resigned,” Schwartz said.
Meadows asked her for a commitment that she would negotiate new language in the union contract that would allow managers to see their employees’ work schedules and make it easier to fire employees who commit fraud.
“If they falsify records, are you willing to support their termination?” the congressman asked. Schwartz hedged and would not commit.
“I would need clarification on that,” she said. “It’s possible you could falsify some records and the appropriate level of discipline would not be termination.”
______________________________________
Let's return to that original comment that started our discussion today-----
'Elon Musk's heralded biography is dripping wet with being extraordinary and a visionary. If this is truly not the case, it will still be hard to convince others, so you may loose more in the audience, and thus thwart your own passions and desires in this war'.
If WE THE PEOPLE THE 99% keep allowing only the MYTH as source of information ---will that comment above really be true?
IT WILL BE HARD TO CONVINCE OTHERS SO YOU MAY LOOSE MORE IN THE AUDIENCE THUS THWART YOUR OWN PASSIONS-----
That statement is indeed TRUE-----we do lose some people committed to believing what corporate media---corporate universities----corporate pols and players tell them----
KNOW WHAT? WE ARE SEEING FEWER AND FEWER OF THOSE KINDS OF CITIZENS----WE ARE WAKING UP ----PLEASE CREATE REAL TALKING POINTS FOR LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC POLICY!
Our response:
---that is a great description of these supposed EXCEPTIONAL 1%-----they are creating a FICTION to make themselves VIRTUOUS---HERALDED---it mirrors the DARK AGES----this is why we say the ideals of OLD WORLD FREEMASONRY are long gone and today we have LYING, CHEATING, AND STEALING held as virtuous. I have no fear of a disappearing audience----know what? If one is pushed to FICTION in order to attain attention -----THAT IS VANITY'.
RSS Feed
