I discussed in detail how our Baltimore City Police and security are using computers to tap into what I call THE NETWORK of public space surveillance to include what I know to be a NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG illegal surveillance and pornography tapping into that NETWORK OF public space surveillance. I have pointed out that THE POLICE AND SECURITY KNOW the vulnerabilities of hacking for these illegal activities-------it is easily done these days with SPYING CAMERA/MICROPHONE products ------so, my experiences are not SECRET-----they are not UNREALISTIC------they are PROBABLE and ACTIONABLE.
For example, a patrol police car would use THE NETWORK of surveillance for public space and private business/corporate campuses to see inside a business looking for burglars---looking for property damage ----so, I know the police and security have access to CHATTER/FEEDBACK on THE NETWORK just as I do.
THERE IS NO SECRET TO THIS.
BREAKING AND ENTERING -
Merriam-Websterwww.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breaking and... Breaking and entering definition is - the act of forcing or otherwise gaining unlawful passage into and entering another's building. How to use breaking and entering in a sentence. the act of forcing or otherwise gaining unlawful passage into and entering another's building…
When I started this DEPOSITION I brought forward concerns of ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE-----of BUILDING AND APARTMENT KEYS being duplicated handed to NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG compromising our building and apartment safety. I heard and investigated one such case of BASEMENT door being opened-----I as well, heard front foyer activity thinking it was a tenet------lots of time spent in that foyer rather than the usual opening of doors and coming in---in that case whoever was accessing foyer stayed for some minutes and LEFT----DID NOT COME IN----making me feel that access was not tenet.
THIS IS BREAKING AND ENTERING------
Then I identified two kinds of THEFT-------illegal surveillance inside buildings and apartments/homes open door to ROBBERY as NOSY NEIGHBORS easily see where and what of value a victim has------and identity theft being not only ILLEGAL PORN/IMAGE CAPTURE by surveillance----but as well, our personal identification/voice capture being used to create BLACK MARKET identities and voice dubbing of victims of these illegal surveillance pornography.
Below I show an article tied to same identity theft issues in my case. If I go to ATM inside store-----in BANK FOYER-I take that ATM CARD holding it flat to push into card slot------when LIGHTS are directly overhead in full view of ATM KEYPAD-----that HACKED LIGHT captures not only the numbers on ATM CARD----but also the PIN NUMBER a bank consumer is sliding in and out of slot.
My case involves this same activity while I deal with other avenues of IDENTITY THEFT-----VOICE/IMAGES DUBBING from surveillance microphones/cameras-------
'Jackpotting' ATM Hack Comes to the United States |
"Jackpotting" has drained ATMs of tens of millions of dollars worldwide. ... A Devastating ATM Hack Swept the World—And Finally Hit the US.
In July 2016, ATM hackers in Taiwan raked in more than $2 million using a new type of malware attack that manipulated machines into spitting out tons of cash. The method, dubbed "jackpotting," quickly spread across parts of Asia, Europe, and Central America, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of stolen cash. By November 2016, the FBI issued a warning that "well-resourced and organized malicious cyber actors have intentions to target the US financial sector” using this approach. But it took a year for the attack to arrive stateside.
Finally, I have not spoken about the criminal action below -------when NOSY NEIGHBOR threatens a BUILDING OWNER/TENET who tries to GET illegal surveillance out of BUILDING AND OR APARTMENT/HOME------threats like HARD-WIRING that building if asked to leave as TENET for example------this is EXTORTION.
NOSY NEIGHBOR IS COMMITTING CRIMES INSIDE BUILDINGS ----OWNER MAY NOT LIKE CRIMES------NOSY NEIGHBOR THREATENS TO HARM PROPERTY/OR VICTIM FURTHER/OR VICTIM IF ACTION IS TAKEN TO REMOVE THAT NOSY NEIGHBOR.
Protection RACKETS generally involve STORE OWNERS/BUILDING OWNERS having to pay organize crime to NOT BURGLE that store----to NOT DAMAGE that building property------and all this is called PROTECTION RACKET. In my case of illegal surveillance cameras and microphones the DAMAGE is the illegal surveillance-----the HARD-WIRING of a building-owners' electrical circuitry-----all done with NO CONSENT from BUILDING OWNER and/or TENET.
So, if a TENET fights to remove illegal surveillance so as not to be made PORNOGRAPHY------NOSY NEIGHBOR ramps up threats of intimidation, shame, humiliation by releasing more and more pornographic/images to THE NETWORK porn.
VICTIM MADE PUBLIC SPECTACLE IF SHE/HE DOES NOT ALLOW ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE.
BUILDING OWNER THREATENED WITH MORE BUILDING DAMAGE IF HE/SHE DOES NOT ALLOW ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Extortion (also called shakedown, outwrestling and exaction) is a criminal offense of obtaining money, property, or services from an individual or institution, through coercion. It is sometimes euphemistically referred to as a "protection racket" since the racketeers often phrase their demands as payment for "protection" from (real or hypothetical) threats from unspecified other parties; though often, and almost always, such "protection" is simply abstinence of harm from the same party, and such is implied in the "protection" offer. Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property is not required to commit the offense. Making a threat of violence which refers to a requirement of a payment of money or property to halt future violence is sufficient to commit the offense. Exaction refers not only to extortion or the demanding and obtaining of something through force, but additionally, in its formal definition, means the infliction of something such as pain and suffering or making somebody endure something unpleasant.
I discussed the term HARD-WIRING regarding NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG capture of a BUILDING -------attaching surveillance devices directly to building electrical circuits----via simple PLUG-IN at electrical socket------or more complicated attachment of hack to incoming electrical wiring tied to FUSE BOX-------then there is the capture by HACKERS to major electrical circuitry even outside of building. Below is an article doing a good job showing the detail of electrical circuitry inside a building----broken ROOM BY ROOM------when I describe NOSY NEIGHBOR sitting in front of a computer screen with camera and microphone images from other side of wall-----this is how HARD WIRING can occur-----NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG find it CRITICAL to gain access to BASEMENTS of BUILDINGS because that is where FUSE BOX/METER and all electrical cables coming from FUSE BOX for each ROOM of building can be HACKED. My NOSY NEIGHBOR as I stated originally had been illegally breaking and entering my building including BASEMENT--------going up my FIRE ESCAPE to reach what is called WEATHER HEAD-----AND SERVICE ENTRANCE connecting public utility lines to each building.
THIS IS WHERE HARD-WIRE HACKING BY NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG OCCURS.
Knowing this BASEMENT DOOR lock was compromised by DUPLICATES of key made by TENET------I placed a DOOR SAFETY BAR to secure BASEMENT DOOR. The only access for NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG will be FRONT DOOR-----or if entry is inside job-------the TENET being a TAG TEAM NOSY NEIGHBOR will be the one doing FURTHER DAMAGE to the BUILDING with more and more HARD-WIRING for illegal surveillance cameras and microphones.
Please use these diagram-electrical-wiring instructions carefully for all electrical installations. There's never any reason to be working with live or energized circuits.
The utility company will wire the service usually to the meter, then from the meter, you run heavy gauge cables through the wall into the service panel box and connect them to the hot terminal bus.
WEATHER HEAD---SERVICE ENTRANCE -------- METER/FUSE BOX ------------ GROUNDING ROD
Illegal surveillance and pornography opens broad avenues of crime-----from robbery, identity theft, racketeering, and moving from what I discussed as NON-CONTACT SEXUAL ASSAULT------to CONTACT PHYSICAL SEXUAL ASSAULT.
HIND SIGHT IS 20/20------
I was walking past a building on my block about 4 years ago. As I passed the side sidewalk directly against this building I heard from inside-------
YOU LET THEM SEE YOU BUT YOU WILL NOT LET ME SEE YOU says a man.
I DID NOT KNOW THEY WERE SEEING ME says the woman.
I continued walking not wanting to hear------thinking this was a private conversation between apartment occupants. Who THEY were ----did not know-------what THEY saw did not know.
Today, I know that building is a NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG owned-building. I know that the man was referring to THE NETWORK PORNOGRAPHY sight------and I know the woman was trying to say------she did not know or GIVE CONSENT for any illegal pornography attained from this ONE APARTMENT.
When a man or woman uses the exposure by non-contact illegal surveillance porn as an excuse for that victim to be further victimized by PHYSICAL ASSAULT-----that person assaulting the illegal surveillance porn victim is trying to INTIMIDATE-----HUMILIATE----SHAME that victim into thinking and feeling victim is DEGRADED and open to further physical sexual assault.
A victim of SEXUAL ASSAULT----whether non-contact or contact sexual assaults are often embarrassed-----they are dis-empowered by loss of PERSONAL IDENTITY------ie, that woman was a GOOD woman-----thought now to be BAD WOMAN.
In my timeline trying to determine when I was first compromised---thinking about the structure of how this SURVEILLANCE NETWORK was built over time----from public space surveillance to open secret BLACK MARKET ACTIVITIES like NOSY NEIGHBOR AND THE GANG illegal surveillance and PORNOGRAPHY.
Escalation from Fetish Burglaries to Sexual Violence:
Escalation from Fetish Burglaries to Sexual Violence:
A Retrospective Case Study of Former Col., D. Russell Williams
ANDREW E. BRANKLEY*, ALASDAIR M. GOODWILL and KYLIE S. REALE Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Criminal history narrative studies reveal an escalation in sexual offender behaviour from non-contact to contact offending, with an ever-increasing likelihood of sexual violence and homicide. In particular, researchers have found that sexual offenders often have a history of committing burglaries prior to contact offences. Accordingly, researchers have suggested that burglaries may be associated with an increased likelihood of future sexual offending, particularly when they have a sexual element to them. However, to date, there has been little quantitative research focusing on the mechanisms of escalation in sexual of- fences. This paper seeks to study factors associated with sexual offence escalation in terms of changes in offence seriousness and frequency.
Specifically, case evidence was gleaned from a series of fetish burglaries and subsequent sexual assaults and murders committed by the former Canadian Colonel David Russell Williams (RW). Cluster analysis, chi- square, ANOVA, and regression analyses were conducted on the crime scene information of RW’s 82 cases of fetish burglary. Analyses revealed a significant escalation in the fre- quency and seriousness of RW’s fetish burglary offences prior to committing acts of sexual violence and ultimately sexual homicide.
Recommendations for future research predicting escalation of sexual offending by frequency and seriousness of offending behaviour are discussed. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key words: escalation; sexual offenders; fetishism; burglary; non-contact offending
The current scientific framework to psychological research provides for both nomothetic and idiographic approaches, but the latter is sadly underutilised, particularly in criminal, forensic, and investigative psychology. In clinical forensic case studies, idiographic approaches are thought to be useful in identifying variations in assessment and treatment efficacy at the individual level (Smith, 2012). Within criminal and investigative contexts, it is argued that, although police investigations tend to work in a reverse manner, where the intent is to identify the offender from behavioural and crime scene details (Rainbow & Greg- ory, 2011), the reverse, idiographic approach can still be fruitful. One clear example is pro- vided by Dan Fishman (1999), who suggests the systematic study of individual cases can be used to build a pragmatic nomothetic evidence base.
Indeed, case studies of offenders have been used in the past to test and optimise current investigative methodology (Aggrawal, 2011;Cooper,Swaminath,Baxter,&Poulin,1990;McCann,2000;Schlesinger,2002;White, 2007;Wilcox,Foss,&Donathy, 2005). Therefore, it becomes increasingly important to evaluate aggregated nomothetic-based understanding of sexual offending behaviour from the individual idiographic level for congruent and conceptual validity.
This transaction between the experimental, deductive approach and the clinical, inductive approach is the core of pragmatic psychology and provides the substantive framework for this manuscript. In the current study, the details from the case of former Canadian Air Force Colonel David Russell Williams (RW) will be analysed in hopes of gleaning a deeper understanding of offending behaviour for both behavioural research and criminal investigations. RW was convicted in 2010 of 88 counts, including two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of sexual assault, two of forcible confinement, and 82 break and enter1 charges, dating back to 2007. The majority of RW’s offending behaviour focused on the acquisition of fetish items (usually undergarments) and the extensive photographing of these items; typically neatly laid-out on a ?at surface (e.g. ?oor, beds, and tables) and/or on his person in various states of undress. The investigation and conviction of RW provide a useful investigative case study, as a large amount of forensic evidence (e.g. photographs and undergarments) was collected from both the crime scenes and from RW’s homes, providing much insight into his offending behaviour. As such, the current paper will provide a quantitative analysis of escalation in frequency and seriousness in his offending behaviour over time and contextual life events, based on available data (R v. Williams, 2010).