Nothing does that better than bringing world media to TRUMP INSTALLING A US EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM while TRUMP as CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA work for those global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS and the foreign sovereignty of MALTA. We will take next week to discuss in detail RELIGIOUS public policy but we will mention 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL as what we call secret societies tied to OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. When we say those global banking 1% cannot EVOLVE away from OLD WORLD SACK AND LOOT of civil, developed societies reverting to
FAR-RIGHT, AUTHORITARIAN, MILITARISTIC, EXTREME WEALTH EXTREME POVERTY LIBERTARIAN MARXISM-----GLOBAL NEO-LIBERAL LAISSEZ-FAIRE ECONOMICS.
'The Bible Distinction between "The House of Israel" and "The ...www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl479.htm
Israel and Judah Separate Nations.
The 12 Tribes of Israel became two nations, with widely different destinies, until the time when they will be united in the coming age (Ezekiel 37:22). The distinction or separation between Judah and Israel was foreshadowed at an early date. We read in Psalm 114:1-2 "When Israel went out of Egypt'.
We are 100% positive there are no groups whether OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS----whether TRIBES OF ISRAEL FREEMASONRY-----whether our JEWISH RABBINICAL societies-------NO ONE HAS THE BLOODLINE LINEAGE DATING ANCESTRAL LINES FROM CAIN AND ABEL----ABRAHAM----begatting this family and that family. Today's 12 OR 10 TRIBES OF ISRAEL be they US youth gangs named for these tribes-----whether they are global mafia cartels named for these tribes----whether our OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS create family trees around these tribes----whether our JEWISH global 1% promote they are the original GOD'S CHILDREN from these family bloodlines----NO ONE HAS THESE DOCUMENTS AND ANCESTORY.COM DNA analysis cannot tell us if we are related to TRIBES OF ISRAEL no matter how much money those global corporations charge us.
So, all US national and global media surrounding TRUMPS INSTALLING A US EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM is tied to UNITING THE KINGDOM OF ISRAEL divided in 800BC---700BC bringing what was back then the collapse of civilized society with the EXODUS of EX-PAT 99% of WE THE PEOPLE from this ancient GATEWAY of migration of our ancestors from AFRICA THROUGH NEAR EAST moving either north into Western Europe---or East to FAR-EAST ORIENT and Eastern European RUSSIA.
EACH POPULATION GROUP BLACK, WHITE, AND BROWN HAS ITS OWN VERSION OF THIS ARTICLE BELOW OF COURSE MAKING THEM THE ANCESTORS OF ANCIENT KINGS AND QUEENS.
THIS is the FLIPPING EARTH'S ECONOMIC AXIS DARK AGES to which MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD is taking US 99% WE THE PEOPLE and our global 99% of citizens and it is centered on the collapse of ANCIENT ISRAEL'S civilization between 1000BC----700BC----STONE AGE MEETS IRON AGE.
Ancient Israel (the United and Divided Kingdom)
Along with the reemergence of Iron hierarchies and complex societies came the restoration of literacy and recursive institutions throughout the Near East. Written testimony about the social experiences and evolving of inhabitants survives for a number of societies. While many Ancient Near Eastern societies labored to reconstitute and to remodel themselves according to the values of the previous era, the written testimony of one society, ancient Israel, challenged traditional concepts of political legitimacy, human rights, and polytheism. Unfortunately, our knowledge of the history of ancient Israel largely on one source, the Old Testament. From a historical this massive work contains strands of information set to writing as early as the reign of King Solomon (961-922 BC). Most of it was probably compiled, however, during the Babylonian Captivity (586-539 BC) or later. It is unnecessary to stress that the purpose of the Old Testament was religious. Its contents were assembled to teach the Israelites about the covenant between the god Yahweh and themselves. According to the Old Testament, Yahweh chose the Israelites to serve as human agents to his plan of salvation. The Old Testament stresses that Yahweh was consistently faithful to his promises to the Israelites and that he expected them to remain faithful in their devotion to him in return. This much .Difficulties arise when we try to distinguish genuine historical information from matters of faith, particularly when there is little external information to corroborate the particulars of the Old Testament narrative. As we have already seen with respect to the Stele of (1204 BC), when external source material does surface it tends to confirm the general historical outline, however minimally. Besides that document additional inscriptions, such as the and the Tel Dan , have surfaced in (Jordan) and Tel Dan. Each of these is contemporary with the Era of the Divided Kingdoms (9th century BC) and each refers to the polities of Judah and Israel as the House of David or the House of , respectively. These demonstrate not only the names by which these were known to their neighbors, but also that the two kings, David and , were historical. Both texts, in fact, recount plundering expeditions conducted by neighboring kings ( the king of Moab and an unnamed king of Aram, possibly ) in the territories of Israel and Judah, respectively. Apart from furnishing external corroboration for their existence, therefore, the texts provide a decidedly contrasting perspective to the narrative presented by the Old Testament.In addition, Israel and Judah as subjugated territories in the annals of the Assyrian Empire, including one inscribed relief that portrays King Jehu of Israel (c. 841-814 BC) bowing before the Assyrian King III.
These points need emphasis because they help to place ancient Israel within the context of wider Iron Age Near Eastern developments. Insofar as specific details about the history of Israel and Judah are concerned, we must rely almost exclusively on the narrative of the Old Testament itself. As one scholar has observed, were it not for that document we would probably know far more about less celebrated polities such as the kingdom of in eastern Cilicia (where several long royal inscriptions have survived) than we would about Israel or Judah. Without the benefit of the Old Testament, in other words, the place in history of Israel and Judah to those of other tributary states that succumbed to the expansion of early Iron Age empires, alongside the Aramaeans, the Moabites, the Philistines, and the . We would know nothing, moreover, about earlier aspects of the Hebrew narrative, including the eras of the Patriarchs, the Exodus, or the Wanderings in the Wilderness.
In order to illuminate the historical path of the ancient Israelites we are compelled to parse the narrative of the Old Testament carefully.To do this, biblical historians rely on three competing strategies. Some insist, for example, that archaeological research in Palestine and the Near East has revealed and will continue to reveal material and textual evidence to confirm the fundamental historicity of the Old Testament. Some of this evidence we have alluded to . Opposing scholars are quick to observe that some of the emerging archaeological evidence actually contradicts the Old Testament narrative or is chronologically too imprecise to furnish suitable corroboration of recorded events. Some sites allegedly conquered by the Hebrews in Canaan, for example, appear to have been unoccupied at the presumed time of the invasion (ca. 1200-1100 BC). A second line of reasoning posits, therefore, that the Old Testament exclusively as a religious and literary document. It neither furnishes nor was it ever intended to furnish accurate historical data prior to the time of the monarchy, at which time its compilers were sufficiently familiar with events to describe their state as a historically definable entity.According to this argument, the Old Testament tells us far more about the intellectual prism through which later Israelites viewed their origins and their narrative than it does about history per se. A third perspective holds that some of the themes presented in the Pentateuch – the primeval history, the stories of the Patriarchs, the Exodus, the revelation to Moses at Mt. Sinai, and the Wanderings in the Wilderness -- resemble short credo-like recitations of recollected experience. These within the framework of cult practices perhaps as early as the time of the Judges (1200-1000 BC). Fundamental as they were to the recursive process of preserving cultural memory, these themes emphasized a reiterated belief that Yahweh had worked through history to save this people. From this the purpose of the narrative was to reinforce belief in Yahweh’s efficacy by emphasizing the need for sustained devotion. Apart from certain themes that were expressed in broadest possible terms – for example, that the Israelites eventually settled in Palestine, that their tribes became located in particular areas, and that the nascent society underwent a process of state formation, the Old Testament narrative preserves little that is historically recoverable or definable. While each of these perspectives holds merit, the main issues remain confused. Scholarly debate about these matters has significantly diminished our ability to rely on the Old Testament as a basis for historical reconstruction. Matters long taken for granted, such as when and how the Hebrews arrived in Canaan and where they originated, remain open questions. The Stele of and its associated relief at indicate, for example, that the Israelites were a people (not a place) inhabiting Canaan, dwelling in tents and fighting on camel back ca. 1204 BC. However, they do not confirm the narrative of a flight from Egypt, the Wanderings in the Wilderness, or even the tradition that the Israelites invaded Canaan at this time (as opposed to having resided there all along).
Rather than attempt to sift through the narrative of the Old Testament for random kernels of historical authenticity, it seems wiser to explore its value as a general interpretation of Iron Age social and cultural transition, not only in Israel throughout the wider region.In many the patterns discernible for the Israelites in the Old Testament narrative apply equally to neighboring societies such as the Ammonites, the Moabites, the , the Philistines, and the Canaanites. Many of these peoples exhibited common attributes, including associated and similar experiences during the process of state formation. In fact, the emergence of these states was to some degree a product of their immediate proximity to one another and the inevitable consequence of encroaching territorial claims. Another factor to consider was their common emergence from the upheaval provoked during the collapse of the Late Bronze Age. If we recall that the wider region of Late Bronze Age Canaan was overrun by such diverse elements as the Sea Peoples, the , the Israelites, and the Aramaeans, we should expect to see common patterns of societal development occurring across the landscape. The archaeological evidence indicates, for example, that Late Bronze Age Canaanite urban communities such as , Lachish, , Bethel, Gezer, and Beth .As urban societies reemerged, it is safe to assume that they did so with populations representing an amalgam of previously settled and newly arrived inhabitants, again, not merely in Israel but throughout the region. Given the lack of recursive institutions during the interim, attempts to explain the complexity of these settlement origins would have been challenging for any of the emerging hierarchies. The idealization of so variegated a past required a process of simplification. However, to hold validity with its intended audience, the Old Testament narrative also needed a semblance of historical plausibility. In other words, the reliance on strategies for survival, such as pastoralism, farming, warfare, and the formation of centralized hierarchies needed to convey a sense of lived experience, as opposed to literary invention.
When examined from this perspective the narrative of the Old Testament appears to reflect the challenges endured by a number of Iron Age societies that transited from pastoral roots to settled urban existence. Perhaps of the time spent in the Babylonian Captivity, the compilers of the Old Testament reflected on this process more than others, closely examining its costs and its benefits. If so, the value of this reflection lies more in its interpretation of a fundamental change in lifestyle than in its account of any specific historical experience. Regardless of the complex origins of the Israelites, in other words, they as a people witnessed their society’s transformation from a stateless population of dispersed, tribally based, rural elements to nucleated urban populations with a centralized hierarchy. They then witnessed the suppression and defeat of this hierarchy by those of larger, militarily stronger powers. In this we have referred repeatedly to the acculturation of newly arrived migrant populations, such as the Akkadians, the Amorites, the , the , the Hittites, and the . However, the process by which cultural assimilation has never truly been explained. By devising a sense of trajectory for this experience and by subjecting it to the scrutiny of recalled memory, the writers of the Old Testament were able to articulate their experience as a process of gradual enlightenment. Apart from matters of faith, .
Before addressing these matters, a brief outline of events as recorded by the Old Testament (and other relevant sources) needs to be presented, despite its potentially limited historical value. Even the dates must remain approximate. The cultural significance of the cultural tradition will be explored in a later section.
Historical Outline – the Era of the Patriarchs, ca. 1850-1000 BC
According to the Old Testament the Hebrews began their history as a tribally based pastoral element migrating through Mesopotamia and surviving along the margins of urban societies such as Sumer, Akkadia, and Babylonia. Around 1850 BC, Abraham led his following from Ur in southern Mesopotamia to Haran in northern Euphrates valley and then to Hebron in Canaan. Sometime between 1700 and 1580 BC, Joseph led a migration into Egypt. According to the Hebrew tradition not all the related tribal communities relocated to Egypt. The Benjaminites, for example, claimed to have remained in Canaan throughout the Egyptian experience and were viewed throughout the historical era as the keepers of ancestral law. In the period 1290-1224 BC, Moses conducted the Exodus from Egypt. Based on the testimony furnished by the Stele of Merneptah in 1204 BC, and allowing forty years for the Wanderings in the Wilderness, the Exodus is presumed by many to have occurred during the reign of the New Kingdom Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses II. This would be consistent with other destabilizing developments of the Late Bronze Age, mentioned above. The Stele of Merneptah allows for the possibility that the Hebrews (referred to specifically as the Israelites) invaded Canaan. If so, during the next two centuries their populations gradually adapted to settled agricultural existence. They lived side by side with surviving elements of native Canaanite population and in close proximity to competing, highly militaristic neighbors, such as the Philistines, the Aramaeans, and the Phoenicians.
The Period of Judges and the Settlement in Canaan (1200-1000 BC)
Hebrew society at this point was organized according to a loose confederacy of twelve tribes, ten in the north, two (Judah, Benjamin) in south. Each tribe was ruled by tribal warlords referred to as judges or Suffetes. Their populations remained highly segmentary with each regulating its own affairs. Within each tribal population there were also sub tribes and smaller kinship-based communities. The Hebrew tribal confederacy was centered on a commonly held sanctuary (something referred to in Greek as an amphyctyony, or an association of neighboring states organized to defend a religious sanctuary). Although the sanctuary was relocated several times (Shechem, Bethel, Gilgal, and Shiloh), there was ever only one at any given time. According to the book of Joshua, the confederate tribes first accepted the cult of Yahweh at Shechem and became united to each other and to Yahweh by a covenant. Some have interpreted this to mean that Shechem was where the Yahweh cult was initially conferred on the northern tribes by those who had migrated out of Egypt. The fact that it had to be conferred or accepted indicates, however, that the cult had many competitors, most particularly the Phoenician Baal cult, but others as well, including that of the love goddess Asherah. It is worth nothing, for example, that the names of several Israelite kings express variations of the name, Baal.
None of this is BIBLE-BELIEVING-----it is corrupted religion captured by global banking 1% and their secret societies of FREEMASON/GREEKS. Whoever is brutal enough to take power becomes that TRIBE OF ISRAEL.
Our US native Americans are becoming 'protected' by global banking 1% now-----the same global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS colonizing the AMERICAS and killing all our native citizens now pretending to promote them BECAUSE-----our US native citizens crossed the BERING SEA in ALASKA from where SARAH PALIN can see RUSSIA AND CHINA-----so they are ancestral EASTERN EUROPEAN/RUSSIA.
CLINTON ERA 1990s made that billionaire club of our 1% of US natives as MOVING FORWARD goes EASTERN EUROPEAN/RUSSIAN.
These groups are not really gaining any power----IT IS MYTH-MAKING surrounding the creation of that THIRD EMPIRE OF RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH.
So, all these 5% to the 1% freemason/Greeks who had adopted those secret hand shakes----hand signs----wearing the funny hats of Western Hemisphere KINGS AND QUEENS are now morphing to far-Eastern freemasonry/Greek secret societies----PUTIN'S BATMAN WINS OVER THE GOTHAM CITY NYC BATMAN.
All the LITERARY STARS of global banking we have highlighted these few months-----LOVETT and his UK Holy GRAIL------John Irving and his AVENUE OF MYSTERIES----Annie PROULX and her BARKSKINS----and Umberto ECO's novels NAME OF ROSE to BAUDOLINO all lead 99% of WE THE PEOPLE to believe FLIPPING OF EARTH'S ECONOMIC AXIS is simply taking us back to European DARK AGES-----when we are going ALL THE WAY BACK to the FALL OF ANCIENT ISRAELI CIVILIZATION.
This is why we see today's global banking 5% players rushing over to save our US NATIVE citizens----Elizabeth Warren has that US native blood----it does nothing to protect our 99% of native citizens of AMERICA ----it is simply MOVING FORWARD myth-making the THIRD EMPIRE being in EASTERN EUROPE/RUSSIA.
Native Americans Are Related To The Ten Lost Tribes: Chief Riverwind Says
MessageToEagle | October 27, 2016 | Ancient Civilizations & Places
MessageToEagle.com – Is it possible that Native Americans are closely related to the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel?
Native American Chief Joseph Riverwind of Northern Arawak Nation has put forward a controversial theory some think is worth closer investigation. The Amahura war chief is convinced the two nations have very much in common and he points out several striking similarities between their religion, customs and ancient history.
Chief Riverwind, is a descendant of Native Americans and Bnei Anousim, Jews who were forced to hide or forced convert to Catholicism during the 14th and 15th century.
In an interview with breaking Israel News, Chief Riverwind made it clear there is no doubt in his mind Native Americans and Jews have more in common than most realize.
“Among my people, our ancient name for God is Yah Yah ‘The Supreme Spirit of Spirits’, very similar to Yahweh.
Among my wife’s ancestors, the AniKituwahYah (Cherokee), they called God YoHeWaH. And the similarities don’t stop there. They carried an ark into battle, celebrate seven feasts, kept a seventh day of rest, had cities of refuge, and don’t eat pork,” Chief Riverwind says.
Though the etymological similarities may be coincidental Chief Riverwind thinks Native American creation stories also resemble certain Biblical accounts.
The story of the Great Flood and Noah is one example. A Choctaw story tells how the Creator came to a man called Nuah and told him the world would be covered with water. The man was told to make a great raft to save mankind. The stories come from oral traditions which date to pre-Columbian times.
Another Native American story tells of a time when the world was all one land mass, and we were all one tribe. We tried to build a sky tower to the creator. These are pre-missionary oral traditions. They are passed down through specially trained storytellers who are forbidden from changing a single word,” Chief Riverwind says.
“First Nations have many prophecies that have been passed down for generations. We know that in the long ago time, the Creator destroyed the earth with water, and today, we are living in the generations when the fires will come to purify the Earth.”
As Chief Riverwind explained, the Anishnabi (Chippewa) believe they are from the Tribe of Ephraim.
The goal of reuniting the ancient KINGDOM OF ISRAEL made to sound RELIGIOUS----tied to our CHRISTIAN BIBLE----our Jewish TORAH----our MUSLIM KORAN----our HINDI ? is simply myth-making by a global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS wanting to destroy one civil society to start a new civil society. THIS IS ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL POWER public policy----not religious public policy.
Here is COUNTERPUNCH media outlet often a source of good 99% populist articles this time being global banking 5% PLAYERS pretending TRUMP'S actions and the responses of ISRAEL'S NETANAHU AND TURKEY'S ERDOGAN are going to bring a RELIGIOUS WAR ----instead of simply killing WESTERN HEMISPHERE civil society FLIPPING to EASTERN HEMISPHERE trade routes.
We want to keep reminding our 99% of WE THE PEOPLE---no matter the population group-----we are never WINNERS when we allow these global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS take over our sovereign nations as happened in US with EISENHOWER AVIATION ACT and CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA MOVING FORWARD.
None of this has to do with JEWISH control of our world----the bloodlines as we say have been so corrupted---record-keeping destroyed---and guess what? Back in migration from Africa to near-East all citizens would have adopted that JEWISH religion just as DARK AGES Europe made everyone adopt Catholic religion.....we all no doubt have ancestors once calling themselves JEWISH.
December 11, 2017
Trump’s Jerusalem Decision Risks Uniting the Entire Arab World Against the US
by Patrick Cockburn
President Trump and the Israeli government will have foreseen and discounted a Palestinian “day of rage” and protests among Muslims everywhere in the wake of the US recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and plans to move its embassy there. They assume that this will all blow over because US allies such as the rulers of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Egypt will be satisfied with pro-forma protests, and the Palestinians are too weak to do anything except demonstrate ineffectively.
The US and Israel could be miscalculating: when I lived in Jerusalem I came to believe that many dramatic events in Israel, such as shootings and bombings, often had less effect than the outside world expected. But anything involving Jerusalem itself, and above all its Muslim holy sites, had a much bigger impact than anybody had imagined.
The immediate consequence of Trump’s action is that the US becomes weaker because it has carried out another initiative of which the rest of the world disapproves. A superpower at the height of its strength might get away with such a demarche, but not a politically divided US, its influence already ebbing because of failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. The move is so obviously against US foreign policy interests that it will further persuade other world leaders that Trump is an impossible ally.
The move could have other dangerous consequences. There is a myth that the Israeli-Palestinian struggle was not an issue that concerned Osama bin Laden or played a role in the rise of al-Qaeda. In fact, bin Laden’s speeches and writings are full of references to the Palestinians – and his first public utterances in the 1980s were calls for a boycott of American goods because of its backing for Israel.
The connection between the Palestinian question and 9/11 was played down at the time, particularly by neocon pundits and think tanks who claimed that the US could safely ignore the issue while pursuing an aggressive policy in Iraq. It is true that 9/11 damaged the Palestinians because they were marginalised as the US and its allies began a series of wars during which they largely disappeared from the news agenda.
But as the wars in Iraq and Syria come to an end, focus will shift back to Israel and the Palestinians. Isis and al-Qaeda have been defeated in their efforts to change regimes in Baghdad and Damascus. If they are going to survive and get support in the Muslim world, they will need to find a new enemy. Battered they may be, but they have far more activists and resources than bin Laden at the time of 9/11. The declaration on Jerusalem throws al-Qaeda-type movements a lifeline, just as they are facing complete defeat.
Trump inherited the war to eliminate the self-declared Caliphate from President Obama and has continued it unchanged. Most decisions about the conflict have in any case been taken by the Pentagon and not by the White House. Up to now the biggest change in US policy in the region has been the effort to end Obama’s détente with Iran and build up an anti-Iranian coalition. This will now become a more difficult job.
In October, Trump de-certified the nuclear deal with Iran, demonising the Iranians as the source of all instability in the region. He and his administration tend to conflate Iranians and Shias in much the same way as do Saudi Arabia and the Sunni monarchs of the Gulf. His National Security Adviser H R McMaster said in late October that “what is most important, not just for the United States but for all nations, is to confront the scourge of Hezbollah and to confront the scourge of the Iranians and the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps].”
It is unclear how far this belligerent rhetoric is going to turn into real military action. If Trump does want to confront Iran and the axis of states and paramilitary organisations it leads, then he has left it a bit late. The Iranian Shia side has triumphed in the war in Syria and Iraq against predominantly Sunni resistance, which was once backed by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey. The role of Hezbollah and the Shia paramilitary, Hashd al-Shaabi, will naturally diminish because there is no longer a war to fight and the central governments in Baghdad and Damascus are becoming stronger.
The recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital will make it easier for Tehran to call for all Muslims, Shia and Sunni, to stand together in defence of the Palestinians and the holy sites. It will make it more difficult, though not impossible, for Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies to act with the US, move closer to Israel and portray Iran as the greatest threat in the region.
There is a broader consequence of the switch in US policy: there are some 1.5 billion Muslims in the world who are the majority in some 50 states and make up 22 per cent of the world’s population. None of them will be pleased by Trump’s latest action. The population of many of these countries, including some of the largest such as Turkey (80 million) and Pakistan (193 million), were already very anti-American before the Trump presidency. In 2012, polls showed that 74 per cent of Pakistanis considered the US as an enemy. Even this high figure is surpassed by Turkey where 82 per cent said this summer that they had an unfavourable view of the US. Divided about everything else, Turks agree on their dislike of the US, which will again make it more difficult for the US to act against Iran.
President Putin is to visit Istanbul on Monday to speak to President Erdogan about Jerusalem and Syria, a sign that it may be difficult to isolate the issue of the Israeli capital from other conflicts.
All these important developments are happening, though nothing has really changed on the ground: Israel already treated Jerusalem as its capital, and the so-called peace process with the Palestinians has been a sham for years. The US can no longer pretend to be an even-handed mediator, but then it never was one in the first place.
By recognising Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, Trump and Israel may have broken a political rule which says it is dangerous to mess with de facto situations others have informally come to accept. Doing so can have unexpectedly disastrous consequences. A good example of this happened less than three months ago when President Masoud Barzani held a referendum demanding Iraqi Kurdish formal independence, though the Iraqi Kurds had enjoyed de facto near independence since 2003. The Iraqi, Turkish and Iranian governments, who had accepted the previous situation for years, reacted furiously and within three weeks the Kurds lost control of Kirkuk and much of their territory. It may be that President Trump and Israel will likewise find that they risked more than they imagined and will pay a heavier price than expected for formalising Israeli rule in Jerusalem.
UNITED CHURCH OF GOD is a global banking 1% freemasonry group----it is not religious just as many of our mega-churches in US built these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA.
Hmmmm, it that DELAWARE'S REHOBOTH BEACH we see below---those DUPONTs and that tie to TRIBES OF ISRAEL no doubt.
So, in US we have been forced to listen to a US media PRETENDING we had a RELIGIOUS RIGHT which was always global banking 1% freemason/Greeks MOVING FORWARD FADS tied to the myth-making of bringing these two TRIBES OF ISRAEL together-----REUNION FOR ISRAEL AND JUDAH.
As Climate Change rises to LEVEL 3 then LEVEL then LEVEL 5 degrees as will occur if we do not STOP MOVING FORWARD US CITIES DEEMED FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES filled with global corporate campuses and global factories as too in Africa-------these lands in LEVANT as Africa as Western Europe as southeast Asia will be a DUST BOWL----and inhabitable. So, there is no strategic value to advance wealth and power in WINNING THESE LANDS.
The power and wealth comes from CONTINUOUS WARS----comes from SACKING AND LOOTING CIVIL SOCIETIES MOVING FORWARD by global banking 1% US national and international media by TRUMP INSTALLING US EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM.
OH, NO! WHAT TRIBE ARE WE AND WHAT TRIBE DO WE NEED TO PRETEND TO BE!
QUOTH THE RAVEN---NEVERMORE-----THE TRIBES OF AMERICA ARE HISTORY.....BUT ONLY IF OUR 99% WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE----MYTH-MAKING.
This was written in 1998----CLINTON/BUSH ERA. This is how REAL LEFT social progressive academics have known for several decades the MASTER PLANS tied to US CITIES DEEMED FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES and MOVING FORWARD.
UCG.org / Good News /
A Future Reunion for Israel and Judah
A Future Reunion for Israel and Judah
Posted on Aug 16, 1998 by Jerold Aust
However tragic separation may be, God includes within His masterful design a plan to redeem Israel and humankind, to eventually bring them together with God and each other.Israel’s separation began during the reigns in the 10th century B.C. of Rehoboam and Jeroboam. However tragic separation may be, God includes within His masterful design a plan to redeem Israel and humankind, to eventually bring them together with God and each other (Romans 11:7, 25-27).
God reveals that all 12 tribes of Israel will once again be united: “Surely I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, wherever they have gone, and will gather them from every side and bring them into their own land; and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king over them all; they shall no longer be two nations, nor shall they ever be divided into two kingdoms again …
“Then they shall be My people, and I will be their God. David My servant shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd; they shall also walk in My judgments and observe My statutes, and do them. Then they shall dwell in the land that I have given to Jacob My servant, where your fathers dwelt; and they shall dwell there, they, their children, and their children’s children, forever; and My servant David shall be their prince forever.
“Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them … I will set My sanctuary in their midst forevermore. My tabernacle also shall be with them; indeed I will be their God, and they shall be My people. The nations also will know that I, the Lord, sanctify Israel, when My sanctuary is in their midst forevermore” (Ezekiel 37:21-28).
Have such prophecies ever been fulfilled? Ezekiel wrote these words some 350 years after Jeroboam’s reign. The northern 10 tribes of Israel had been defeated and carried away into captivity at the hands of the Assyrians in the eighth century B.C. Ezekiel himself was writing from Babylon, where he, along with much of the populace of the southern kingdom of Judah, had been exiled several years earlier.
Ezekiel did not live to see these words fulfilled, nor has anyone since. A careful reading of the Bible shows that only a few remnants of the northern 10 tribes ever reunited with the exiles from the kingdom of Judah in their homeland. And later even their descendants were largely scattered after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in A.D. 70.
Although many descendants of Judah have resettled in the Middle East since the modern state of Israel was established in 1948, most of Judah’s descendants remain scattered among the nations.
Clues as to when Ezekiel’s prophecies will finally be fulfilled can be found in the words that “David My servant shall be king over them” and “My servant David shall be their prince forever.”
If David will literally “be their prince forever,” this will obviously be after he has been brought back to life. Several passages in Scripture show that this resurrection of David—to eternal life—will occur at Jesus Christ’s return (1 Corinthians 15:12-54; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17). It is at that time that this man after God’s own heart (Acts 13:22) will be given eternal life, along with many others who will live and reign with Jesus Christ (Revelation 20:4-6). Made immortal, David will then be able to rule over a reunited Israelite kingdom forever.
The Israelites will eventually be reunited under King David and reconciled to their Creator, from whom their sins had cut them off (Isaiah 59:1-2).
This prophecy is but a tiny glimpse of the astounding future God reveals to us through His prophets. To understand more, be sure to request your free booklets What Is Your Destiny? , God’s Holy Day Plan: The Promise of Hope for All Mankind and What Happens After Death? GN
'One World Religion
On Tuesday’s program, I taught on the prophesied one-world dictator in the end time—the Antichrist. However, the Bible foretells that he will have a religious partner that will cause the religions of the world to pledge allegiance to, thereby worshipping the Antichrist and his world governing system. He is referred to, in scripture, as the False Prophet. On today’s edition of End of the Age, I will continue on with Part 2 of the prophecies concerning the Antichrist and False Prophet'!
Whether one reads anti-religious media or religious media-----we are now hearing today's POPE FRANCIS-----a JESUIT-----promoting as hard as he can that global banking 1% UNITED NATIONS ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE for only the OLD WORLD GLOBAL 1% and yes, ONE WORLD ONE RELIGION as he is the WESTERN ROMAN POPE who will morph to Eastern European Russian Orthodoxy ----the THIRD AND LAST EMPIRE.
'How The Jesuits Rule In Russia – Johnny Cirucci
Banksters. Rector Efimov mentions the Central Bank and how banks are many times more prosperous than Russia’s farmers and then, again, fails to explain why'.
So, POPE FRANCIS took the name of FRANCIS because MOVING FORWARD must pretend to help what will be third world DARK AGES poor especially in Western nations like US and Europe while being JESUIT tied to OLD WORLD GLOBAL 1% KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA. So, today's pope is no more anti-POLISH----anti-Russian than the last popes---
HE IS FLIPPING THE EARTH'S ECONOMIC AXIS FROM WESTERN HEMISPHERE TO EASTERN HEMISPHERE.
Below we see a 5% FAKE religious leader KNOWING the goals of MOVING FORWARD pretending to hate this Roman Catholic pope.
'Polish priest wishes Pope Francis a quick death for open door policy to Muslims
Posted on March 21, 2018 by Dr. Eowyn
Pope Francis, real name Jorge Bergoglio, has called on Christians in Europe and the U.S. to open their doors to Muslim refugees and migrants. Last August, he went so far as to pontificate that refugees’ wellbeing trumps national security., while he himself is safely ensconced behind the Vatican’s 40 ft. tall walls.
Wall that surrounds the Vatican
Bergoglio’s stance on Muslim refugees and on other issues has so alienated some Catholic clergy that a former high-ranking member of the Roman Curia, the administrative apparatus of the Holy See, penned an open letter. Addressed to Pope Francis, the anonymous cleric lays out the “difficulties” he and “many others have with the way you talk and act.”'
12 Times Pope Francis Has Openly Promoted a One World Religion or a New World Order
9:00AM EDT 8/1/2016 Michael Snyder
On Sunday, Pope Francis told hundreds of thousands of young people gathered for World Youth Day in Poland that they need to "believe in a new humanity" and that they should refuse "to see borders as barriers." Every two or three years, Catholics from all over the planet converge for one of these giant conferences, and as you will see below the Pope has not been shy about using historic occasions to promote his agenda. Unfortunately, it has become exceedingly clear that his agenda includes moving humanity toward a one world religion and a new world order. Of course Pope Francis is not going to use those exact phrases, but at this point it is very obvious what he is trying to do. If you don't believe me now, perhaps you will see things differently after you have viewed the evidence that I have compiled in the rest of this article.
Let's start with what the Pope had to say at the World Youth Day conference on Sunday...
"People may judge you to be dreamers, because you believe in a new humanity, one that rejects hatred between peoples, one that refuses to see borders as barriers and can cherish its own traditions without being self-centered or small-minded," Francis told his flock.
By itself, this statement is not that dramatic. But when you put it into the context of everything else Pope Francis has done and said over the past couple of years, a clear pattern begins to emerge...
May 2016: Pope Francis welcomed one of the top Sunni clerics in the world to the Vatican, and he reportedly told the cleric that "our meeting is the message". And mainstream news outlets all over the planet clearly understood what was being communicated. For example, the Daily Mail article about this meeting was titled "Pope embraces grand imam at historic Vatican meeting in a bid to bring the Catholic and Muslim churches together."
January 2016: The Vatican releases an extremely disturbing video in which Pope Francis declared that all of the major world religions are "seeking God or meeting God in different ways" and that ultimately "we are all children of God." The video also featured leaders from various major religions, and they are shown declaring fidelity to their particular gods. First, we see a female Buddhist cleric tell us "I have confidence in the Buddha", followed by a Jewish rabbi declaring "I believe in God". As the video goes on, a Catholic priest announces "I believe in Jesus Christ," and last of all an Islamic leader boldly declares "I believe in God, Allah." If you have not seen the video yet, you can watch the entire thing right here. After watching that video, nobody can deny that the Vatican is openly promoting a one world religion.
November 2015: Pope Francis declared that fundamentalism, even Christian fundamentalism, is a "sickness" during remarks in which he stressed the similarity of the major religions.
September 2015: Pope Francis traveled to New York City to deliver a speech that kicked off a conference during which the United Nations unveiled a "new universal agenda" for humanity.
September 2015: During a stop at St. Patrick's Cathedral, Pope Francis stressed the unity between Christianity and Islam. These words were directly spoken by him...
I would like to express two sentiments for my Muslim brothers and sisters: Firstly, my greetings as they celebrate the feast of sacrifice. I would have wished my greeting to be warmer. My sentiments of closeness, my sentiments of closeness in the face of tragedy. The tragedy that they suffered in Mecca.
In this moment, I give assurances of my prayers. I unite myself with you all. A prayer to almighty god, all merciful.
July 2015: During a trip to Ecuador, Pope Francis spoke of the need for "a new economic and ecological world order" in which the wealth of the planet is "shared by everyone".
July 2015: Pope Francis denounced global capitalism and refers to its excesses as the "dung of the devil".
HOW FAR-RIGHT EXTREME WEALTH EXTREME POVERTY LIBERTARIAN MARXIST OF A JESUIT POPE.
June 2015: Pope Francis called for "a new global political authority" that would have the resources necessary "to deal with the world's economic problems and injustices".
October 2014: Pope Francis publicly embraced the theory of evolution by making statements such as these...
-"When we read about creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything. But that is not so."
-"The Big Bang, which today we hold to be the origin of the world, does not contradict the intervention of the divine creator but, rather, requires it."
-"Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve."
By fully embracing the theory of evolution, Pope Francis has aligned himself with the leftist social engineers that are seeking to merge humanity into a socialist new world order, and he has aligned himself against "fundamentalists" that believe that there is one true God that created the heavens and the Earth.
LEFTIST SOCIAL ENGINEERS???
----WE KNOW FAR-RIGHT WING EUGENICS TIED TO SOCIAL DARWINISM IS THE STANCE OF ONE WORLD FOR ONLY THE GLOBAL 1%.
June 2014: For the first time in the history of Catholicism, Pope Francis authorized "Islamic prayers and readings from the Quran" at the Vatican. In ancient times, this would have been considered blasphemy, but today nobody really even notices when something like this happens.
During his very first ecumenical meeting as Pope, Francis made it very clear that he believes that Christians and Muslims both "worship the one God" ...
I then greet and cordially thank you all, dear friends belonging to other religious traditions; first of all the Muslims, who worship the one God, living and merciful, and call upon Him in prayer, and all of you. I really appreciate your presence: in it I see a tangible sign of the will to grow in mutual esteem and cooperation for the common good of humanity.
The Catholic Church is aware of the importance of promoting friendship and respect between men and women of different religious traditions—I wish to repeat this: promoting friendship and respect between men and women of different religious traditions—it also attests the valuable work that the Pontifical Council for interreligious dialogue performs.
Can you see the pattern?
Pope Francis is all about bringing people together. He wants to bring nations together, and he wants to bring religions together. But in the end, what is the purpose for all of this unity?
An increasing number of "fundamentalist" Christians are concerned that Pope Francis is setting the stage for a one world religion and a new world order. Merging all of the countries of the world into a giant super-state and merging all of the religions of the world into a single faith may sound like a good idea to many, but the truth is that it would just result in a level of tyranny that most people would not even dare to imagine.
Just to share this video one more time to ask our 99% of US and global labor pool new immigrants to look at the economic trade development tied to migrations that exploded in 1000BC----800BC when the ancient EMPIRE OF ISRAEL broke apart and sent those 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL north and east. This is to where MOVING FORWARD back to DARK AGES will take 99% of US and global immigrant citizens if we do not STOP MOVING FORWARD. Those thinking they will ride the coattails of OLD WORLD ROYALS to these Eastern Europe ECO-DOMES OF SIBERIA -----need to WAKE UP-----things get very dastardly if CLIMATE CHANGE moves to LEVEL 3 then 4---then 5-----and those global banking 1% are allowed to MINE OUR EARTH'S CORE of all magnetic ore ending the
FLIPPING OF EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELDS NORTH AND SOUTH POLES.
2000 Years of History (1000 BC - 1000 AD)
Published on May 3, 2009 YOU TUBE
2000 year animation shows empires growing and countries changing. History of Europe, Africa, and Asia from the earliest countries to the year 1000.
'University of Leeds, UC San Diego and the Indian Institute of Technology'.
SCIENCE DAILY as LEEDS/UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO are all great big global banking 1% myth-making/propaganda institutions and if we educate from these FAKE DATA NEWS outlets we will be COMMONER CORED into being made fearful of natural events. What is MOVING FORWARD with all that fracking of EARTH'S MANTLE, mining of EARTH'S LOWER LEVELS to magnetic core is a MANUFACTURED DISRUPTION of what would naturally have continued for millions of years----THE FLIPPING OF EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELDS-----with our EARTH'S CORE as hot as needed for 99% WE THE PEOPLE SUSTAINABILITY.
If we keep allowing these global banking 1% to attack our EARTH'S natural resources we will indeed be a 99% of COOKED GEESE. Losing Earth's magnetic fields that protect from solar radiation is as bad as global banking 1% deliberately creating larger and larger OZONE HOLES in north and south poles just to create a stream of MICROWAVES for SMART CITIES 5G ground level microwave saturation.
IF OUR US AND GLOBAL 5% TO THE 1% FREEMASON/GREEKS WORKED AS HARD TO BE US CITIZENS AS THEY DO GLOBAL BANKING 5% PLAYERS THEN WE CAN STOP MOVING FORWARD AND RETURN BACK TO A FUTURE OF 20TH CENTURY REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE FREE MARKET ECONOMICS WITH EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER LAW----EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND ACCESS ----FIRST WORLD DEVELOPED NATION-----
'What will happen if the core of the Earth cools down?
Sahaj Ramachandran, Amateur astronomer
Answered Dec 29 2015 · The Earth's core is indeed cooling down, but it will take billions of years to completely to do so. But what would happen if the core was frozen solid'?
BILLIONS OF YEARS TO DO SO-----INDEED IF LEFT TO COOL NATURALLY.
from research organizations
Earth's core is melting ... and freezing
May 18, 2011
University of Leeds
The inner core of the Earth is simultaneously melting and freezing due to circulation of heat in the overlying rocky mantle, according to new research.
The inner core of Earth is simultaneously melting and freezing due to circulation of heat in the overlying rocky mantle, according to new research. The findings could help us understand how the inner core formed and how the outer core acts as a 'geodynamo', which generates the planet's magnetic field.
Credit: © KristijanZontar / Fotolia
The inner core of Earth is simultaneously melting and freezing due to circulation of heat in the overlying rocky mantle, according to new research from the University of Leeds, UC San Diego and the Indian Institute of Technology.
The findings, published May 19 Nature, could help us understand how the inner core formed and how the outer core acts as a 'geodynamo', which generates the planet's magnetic field.
"The origins of Earth's magnetic field remain a mystery to scientists," said study co-author Dr Jon Mound from the University of Leeds. "We can't go and collect samples from the centre of Earth, so we have to rely on surface measurements and computer models to tell us what's happening in the core."
"Our new model provides a fairly simple explanation to some of the measurements that have puzzled scientists for years. It suggests that the whole dynamics of Earth's core are in some way linked to plate tectonics, which isn't at all obvious from surface observations.
"If our model is verified it's a big step towards understanding how the inner core formed, which in turn helps us understand how the core generates the Earth's magnetic field."
Earth's inner core is a ball of solid iron about the size of our moon. This ball is surrounded by a highly dynamic outer core of a liquid iron-nickel alloy (and some other, lighter elements), a highly viscous mantle and a solid crust that forms the surface where we live.
Over billions of years, Earth has cooled from the inside out causing the molten iron core to partly freeze and solidify. The inner core has subsequently been growing at the rate of around 1mm a year as iron crystals freeze and form a solid mass.
The heat given off as the core cools flows from the core to the mantle to Earth's crust through a process known as convection. Like a pan of water boiling on a stove, convection currents move warm mantle to the surface and send cool mantle back to the core. This escaping heat powers the geodynamo and coupled with the spinning of Earth generates the magnetic field.
Scientists have recently begun to realise that the inner core may be melting as well as freezing, but there has been much debate about how this is possible when overall the deep Earth is cooling. Now the research team believes they have solved the mystery.
Using a computer model of convection in the outer core, together with seismology data, they show that heat flow at the core-mantle boundary varies depending on the structure of the overlying mantle. In some regions, this variation is large enough to force heat from the mantle back into the core, causing localised melting.
The model shows that beneath the seismically active regions around the Pacific 'Ring of Fire', where tectonic plates are undergoing subduction, the cold remnants of oceanic plates at the bottom of the mantle draw a lot of heat from the core. This extra mantle cooling generates down-streams of cold material that cross the outer core and freeze onto the inner core.
Conversely, in two large regions under Africa and the Pacific where the lowermost mantle is hotter than average, less heat flows out from the core. The outer core below these regions can become warm enough that it will start melting back the solid inner core.
Co-author Dr Binod Sreenivasan from the Indian Institute of Technology said: "If Earth's inner core is melting in places, it can make the dynamics near the inner core-outer core boundary more complex than previously thought.
"On the one hand, we have blobs of light material being constantly released from the boundary where pure iron crystallizes. On the other hand, melting would produce a layer of dense liquid above the boundary. Therefore, the blobs of light elements will rise through this layer before they stir the overlying outer core.
"Interestingly, not all dynamo models produce heat going into the inner core. So the possibility of inner core melting can also place a powerful constraint on the regime in which the Earth's dynamo operates."
Co-author Dr Sebastian Rost from the University of Leeds added: "The standard view has been that the inner core is freezing all over and growing out progressively, but it appears that there are regions where the core is actually melting. The net flow of heat from core to mantle ensures that there's still overall freezing of outer core material and it's still growing over time, but by no means is this a uniform process.
"Our model allows us to explain some seismic measurements which have shown that there is a dense layer of liquid surrounding the inner core. The localised melting theory could also explain other seismic observations, for example why seismic waves from earthquakes travel faster through some parts of the core than others."
TRY THE THEORY OF FRACKING THE HECK OUT OF EARTH'S MANTLE GLOBALLY.