We will be discussing health public policy this week including my DEPOSITION on NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG.
I have spent a time period between JAN 2019 when PSYCHO-SEXUAL TORTURE allowed me to know that I was being ILLEGALLY SURVEILLED.
I will be updating for my case a TIMELINE for sexual assault now knowing more information about how this black market illegal surveillance video PORN network works.
These PORN MULES working for global banking 1% creating videos for DARK WEB PORN SITES----also, selling those streaming videos to global corporations wanting to see inside people's living spaces for PRODUCT research---for global corporations looking at how to monitor people's personal activities----for global corporations which are medical-----technology-based in developing products.
'About this website
theverge.com
Those 'mind-reading' EEG headsets definitely can't read your thoughts'
DON'T FORGET ---THE BIGGEST CONSUMER OF NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG ILLEGAL STREAMING VIDEO PORN IS GLOBAL MILITARY CORPORATIONS.
Don't worry------these technologies DO NOT READ YOUR MIND----they create algorithms for facial recognition. BUT, GLOBAL BANKING 1% USES THESE SPYING CAMERAS AND MICROPHONES for OTHER REASONS----
MIND - CONTROL IS NOT MIND READING.
While my HITTING began likely in SEATTLE where my being made PORN came with cameras and microphones inside living spaces and with public street and business surveillance-----the movement towards 24/7 illegal streaming video INSIDE of my living space is tied to my brief employment at JOHNS HOPKINS. I had not been aware of any illegal surveillance in Baltimore---I didn't even know the PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE structure was so far advanced so these DEPOSITIONS are new as of acts starting in JAN 2019.
'2006: Clinical trials for Argus II begin'.
NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG wanted me to stay inside my house and be silent. I have discussed the idea of COCHLEAR IMPLANTS as being the source of what I call GROUP SPEAK AND CHATTER. A NETWORK with public surveillance able to contact anyone wherever they are. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS plus public surveillance and inside my living space surveillance created 24/7 video streaming PORN.
I have discussed often how NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG loved to say ------WE ARE SEEING THROUGH HER EYES----CAMERA IN THE EYES.
'Retinal Physician - Innovation in Retina
www.retinalphysician.com/.../innovation-in-retina They approached the leaders of cochlear implant companies, including philanthropist-medical innovator Alfred Mann, who had a similar technology to restore hearing. For his part, after graduating from the MD/PhD program at Johns Hopkins, Dr. Greenberg went to work at the FDA reviewing medical devices'.
REMEMBER, I discuss often how our US medical corporations are PRODUCT MILLS---pushing medical devices into MARKET with little clinical trial research. Of course I would have to KNOW in order to understand----or even come close to giving CONSENT------and precluding an INFORMED CONSENT.
WHAT IS THE DANGER OF RADIATION FROM MICROCHIPS IMPLANTED INSIDE YOUR HEAD.
Below we see an example of LAWSUIT tied to these kinds of medical devices and procedures.
Eye Surgery Malpractice Lawsuit
Contact Us
Free Consultation (800) 553-8082 Call 24/7
Wallick v. Johns Hopkins Hospital (Filed January 4, 2017)
This is an ophthalmologist malpractice case filed in Baltimore City by a man residing in New Jersey. This case was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 4, 2017. It is the second medical malpractice case filed in 2017 in Maryland.
- Burley v. Western Maryland Eye Center: an ophthalmologist malpractice lawsuit filed in 2017 by a Frederick County woman alleging the doctor failed to properly perform an exchange implant surgery.
- Another ophthalmologist malpractice lawsuit, this one during cataract surgery
- Another cataract case
- P.G. County woman claims partial blindness, alleging her doctor did not realize she was at risk for suffering from an ischemic injury due to low hemoglobin levels and low blood pressure
Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations
Plaintiff is a 64-year-old male with a history of double vision. He has been diagnosed with divergence insufficiency (meaning his eyes point in the same direction). Plaintiff consults with the defendant doctor to discuss treatment options, and the defendant doctor recommends surgery.
The eye surgery is performed. However, plaintiff alleges that during the procedure, the defendant doctor improperly placed sutures in his left eye that come loose and caused a divot in the sclera (the white part of the eye). Defendant doctor then performs a second procedure to retrieve the sutures, but he again improperly utilizes the wrong tool for the repair. While performing the corrective procedure, he lacerates the plaintiff's sclera with a tool and damages the retina. After failing to repair these issues, he calls for an evaluation by a retina specialist who finds retinal tears with subretinal fluid and hemorrhage.
As a result of this, the plaintiff no longer has vision and is permanently disabled. He faces substantial extraordinary medical and care expenses.
Additional Comments
- Divergence insufficiency is considered a supranuclear palsy. The supranuclear eye movements are involved in keeping our eyes in proper position. The human visual system has to alternate quickly between convergence and divergence to properly focus on targets of different distances. In patients with divergence insufficiency, the patient cannot focus on objects and have poor depth perception. The problem is distance or near depending on which deficiency they manifest. In divergence insufficiency, the patients will often have difficulty with distance vision or double vision at a distance though not at near. This can be managed with prism in glasses, but without the prism the patient will have double vision.
- The defendant doctor is an older doctor with a resume as long as your arm. The Wilmer Eye Institute is world renowned and Baltimore jurors know it. Given these facts, the liability case needs to be very strong for the plaintiff to overcome the halo effect of this doctor and this medical facility.
- Medical malpractice lawsuits against ophthalmologists are not particularly common. This is not because they do not commit malpractice but because they are generally hard to prove.
- Baltimore City
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
- Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation
- Board certified physician in ophthalmology
- Johns Hopkins
- Failure to properly suture plaintiff's eye
- Failure to appropriately evaluate plaintiff's condition
- Negligently lacerating sclera and damaging the retina
- Negligently failing to repair the damage
- Negligently failing to provide appropriate care
- Medical Malpractice
- Matthew J. Marano, Jr., M.D. - licensed ophthalmologist
_______________________________________
I am working on collecting evidence for this case of NOSY NEIGHBORS AND THE GANG-----illegal surveillance and PORN. I will look at a few CONSUMERS of those illegally attained STREAMING VIDEO-------first, the medical consumers.
I speak often of who is on THE NETWORK-----it is a mixture of institutional/political/and military/policing citizens. I say------PUBLIC HEALTH does not allow for citizens to be sexually assaulted in communities nor does it allow for UNCONSENTED surveillance to be used as PSYCHO-SEXUAL TORTURE-----against political activists-----used by political machines-----or in the use by corporations when such devices are CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
I place the responsibility of such illegal actions upon those LEADERS AND BOARDS as we always say in MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE TECHNOLOGY TELEMEDICINE.
I discuss this often in context of HEALTH CARE PUBLIC POLICY----I have taken a stance against TELEMEDICINE because I see more MILITARY applications then I do POPULIST applications. I shout out frequently against JOHNS HOPKINS for one----in those pursuits.
'“Why can’t you do for the eye what you’ve done for the ear?” Al thought that was a really good question. So he started searching for people who could answer it. Fortunately, he found Robert Greenberg, MD (president of Second Sight), already at the Alfred Mann Foundation, but who had done some of the preliminary work in retinal prostheses at Johns Hopkins'.
This article written in 2008 shows the PRODUCTS stemming from research taking hold in early 2000. Before CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA our US FEDERAL AND LOCAL public health would never have approved these products which without coincidence the US FDA today with CORPORATE leaders------has no problem. Bring on the PRODUCT and we will settle with LAWSUIT CIVIL CLAIMS.
'2006: Clinical trials for Argus II begin'.
From Cochlear Implants to Retinal Implants:
An Interview with Brian Mech, Vice President of Business Development, Second Sight Medical Products
December 04, 2008
Interviews
Advances in design and technology have allowed Second Sight Medical Products to create retinal implants for blind people. Although the first generation of visual implants were based on cochlear implant technology and provided limited visual sensations to blind people, the new generation or retinal implants are smaller and have a significantly improved electrode array. In this interview, the American Academy of Audiology Web Content Editor, Douglas L. Beck, AuD, speaks with Brian Mech, VP at Second Sight.
Academy: Hi, Brian. Thanks for your time.
Mech: Hi, Doug. Thanks for yours, too.
Academy: Brian, I know Alfred Mann is a talented scientist and philanthropist and he has vast interests that span the globe, but he also was the founder of Advanced Bionics (the cochlear implant company) and founder of Second Sight, too?
Mech: Yes, exactly right. Mr. Mann, along with other private investors founded Second Sight in 1998.
Academy: And I guess you’ve been there, too, for about 10 years now?
Mech: Yes, almost 10 years.
Academy: Okay, well, would you get me caught up a little? I recall Advanced Bionics was sold to Boston Scientific a few years ago (2004), but now they’ve been re-acquired by Mr. Mann’s group?
Mech: Exactly. Mr. Mann’s group bought back the Advanced Bionics Cochlear Division last year. However, Boston retained the spinal cord stimulator and other projects, and Al has the cochlear implant group again.
Academy: That’s fabulous. After all, as best I recall from my visit, much of the early work in retinal implants started with the technology Advanced Bionics developed?
Mech: Right. In fact, it started when Sam Williams, one of our investors, one day said to Al Mann, “Why can’t you do for the eye what you’ve done for the ear?” Al thought that was a really good question. So he started searching for people who could answer it. Fortunately, he found Robert Greenberg, MD (president of Second Sight), already at the Alfred Mann Foundation, but who had done some of the preliminary work in retinal prostheses at Johns Hopkins. Dr. Greenberg was able to find the synergies between the results of those early projects and the technology available from Advanced Bionics and mapped out a plan to bring retinal implants to fruition. As you know, Doug, we’re working with patients who have become blind through retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
Academy: Right, and so these are adults who previously had vision. Well, as audiologists are very familiar with cochlear implants, rather than describing those in detail, please tell me the differences with regard to the implanted electrode. How are they different?
Mech: Cochlear implants might have 16 or 22 electrodes, whereas our latest generation of retinal implants have 60 electrodes, equivalent to 60 pixels of light and we are developing systems with up to 1,000 electrodes. That sounds like a lot, but remember we’re trying to replace millions of neural photoreceptors in the retina, so it’s a huge task. Additionally, although some people do have binaural cochlear implants, spatiality generally hasn’t been part of the equation with respect to cochlear implants. In general, most recipients have monaural cochlear implants, and they receive timing, loudness, and spectral components, but not spatial information.
With retinal implants, in addition to up and down, left and right, dark and light contrasts, we are working on providing higher levels of spatial resolution, so as to make the visual perception more realistic and useful as people walk, or navigate through unfamiliar areas.
Academy: Okay, and please tell me about where you are with regard to clinical trials. I recall the first study of a few years ago was the Argus I?
Mech: Right. We used an Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system and modified the electrode to make it suitable for implantation on the retina. So the regular cochlear portion of the device was behind the ear and the signal went across the skin through magnetic induction, as it does in cochlear implants, but the electrode cable was tunneled underneath the skin up to the eye and the array was implanted in the eye and onto the retina.
Academy: And the visual stimulus originated in a camera, mounted on a set of eyeglasses, worn by the subject?
Mech: Exactly. That system was first implanted in a human subject in February 2002, and six human subjects (in total) were implanted through 2004. In general, some subjects could read large letters (12 inches tall) projected on a wall, some could identify objects from a closed-set, like telling the difference between a knife, plate and a glass, and some could locate doors within a room.
Academy: And when did the clinical trial begin for Argus II?
Mech: That started in September 2006. The new internal device (implant) is totally re-engineered and has very little to do with cochlear implant technology. The implant and the whole package is small enough to fit within the eye, it’s the size of an aspirin. The external components are pretty much the same, still using a camera mounted on eyeglasses to obtain the visual image.
Academy: So the surgery must also be quite a bit simpler and faster?
Mech: Yes. The surgery involves only one surgeon, instead of the previous three and has been done in less than 2 hours as compared to the 8-9 hours of the Argus I.
Academy: Wow. I suspect it’s more of an out-patient procedure at this time?
Mech: Yes, that’s right.
Academy: OK, and as far as the visual percept the Argus II patients perceive?
Mech: Well, good question, and that’s really what the current trials are about. We’ve implanted 17 subjects worldwide and we’re continuing to expand the subject base across the United States, Europe, and Mexico. We recently presented on the orientation and mobility ability in the first 11 subjects that participated in the trial and showed that they could locate doors from 20 feet, and follow lines on the floor for 20 feet much more frequently when using the Argus II system switched on, than when the device was off.
SO, THIS ARTICLE WRITTEN IN 2008---INDICATES 17 PEOPLE WORLDWIDE IMPLANTED WITH THESE TECHNOLOGY AND THESE PARTICIPANTS SEEN TO BE SEEING DISABLED.
Academy: Very exciting information, Brian. What else can you tell us?
Mech: Not much, yet! We’re continuing to enroll subjects and we’ll be releasing more details of these studies over the next year or so.
Academy: I hope we can look forward to another update, perhaps in a year or so?
Mech: Absolutely, it would be my pleasure.
Brian Mech, is vice president of business development, with Second Sight Medical Products Inc., Sylmar, California. www.2-sight.com
Douglas L Beck, AuD, Board Certified in Audiology, is the Web Content Editor for the American Academy of Audiology.
______________________________________________
We will look at MY DEPOSITION where all that PSYCHO-SEXUAL TORTURE with my feeling of STANFORD TOTAL PRISON MODEL is looking like DEVICES IMPLANTED in my HEAD.
The constant FEEDBACK I was receiving both from NOSY NEIGHBORS and THE NETWORK included the sharing of VIDEO PORN images as well as a UNIT that is likely tied to being a EEG MACHINE.
We see where MONEY-MAKING in this black market video network must include 24/7 capture of both camera and microphone. If that video is to be used by MEGA-DATA CORPORATE analysis of personal habits---personal purchases of products----or personal travel NOSY NEIGHBORS must create a VIDEO feed to meet all the above kinds of SALES.
REMEMBER, those DARK WEB VIDEO PORN sites are best sellers when people can get a CODE and see an unsuspecting person anytime they want.
If NOSY NEIGHBORS want to sell that 24/7 video FEED to a medical study for example------they would need contact with ME 24/7.
1SCIENTIFICRepoRts | 5:16743 | DOI: 10.1038/srep16743www.nature.com
/scientificreports
Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear
Stefan Debener1,2,3, Reiner Emkes1, Maarten De Vos4 & Martin Bleichner1,2
This study presents first evidence that reliable EEG data can be recorded with a new cEEGrid electrode array, which consists of ten electrodes printed on flexible sheet and arranged in a c-shape to fit around the ear. Ten participants wore two cEEGrid systems for at least seven hours. Using a smartphone for stimulus delivery and signal acquisition, resting EEG and auditory oddball data were collected in the morning and in the afternoon six to seven hours apart. Analysis of resting EEG data confirmed well-known spectral differences between eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The ERP results confirmed the predicted condition effects with significantly larger P300 amplitudes for target compared to standard tones, and a high test-retest reliability of the P300 amplitude (r >= .74). Moreover, a linear classifier trained on data from the morning session revealed similar performance in classification accuracy for the morning and the afternoon sessions (both > 70%). These findings demonstrate the feasibility of concealed and comfortable brain activity acquisition over many hours.
______________________________________________
Whether our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE were recruited to a clinical trial filled with INFORMED consent--------willing people choosing to be PATIENTS----or through UNCONSENTING methods of expanding study populations------GOOGLE LENS got to this PRODUCT thanks to these clinical trials.
What is Google Lens?
The Google Lens technology relies upon your smartphone's camera to "see" what's around you and give you contextual information about your surroundings.
The product above has nothing to do with PUBLIC HEALTH-------but GOOGLE is making the BILLIONS.
'2006: Clinical trials for Argus II begin'.
From Cochlear Implants to Retinal Implants:
An Interview with Brian Mech, Vice President of Business Development, Second Sight Medical Products
December 04, 2008
Meanwhile, I talked to BALTIMORE citizens with great visual problems unable to get treatment by LASER because she could not PAY FOR IT.
'Google Lens Guide:
What You Can Do with This Powerful AI Feature
By Don Reisinger March 18, 2018
Google Lens is coming to all smartphones, adding new smarts to your camera. Here's what Google's machine learning-powered feature can do for you'.
From the mightiest flagship to the humblest budget handset, your phone's camera is getting smarter. Google Lens is coming to all smartphones — both Android and iOS devices — and it's going to expand just what you can do with artificial intelligence.
Unveiled at last year's Google I/O developer conference, Google Lens is a somewhat nebulous service that relies on a camera's ability to "see" what's around it. And now that the feature is expanding to an increasing number of Android phones, you may have questions about how it works.
Here's a closer look at Google Lens and what it could add to your smartphone.
What is Google Lens?
The Google Lens technology relies upon your smartphone's camera to "see" what's around you and give you contextual information about your surroundings.
Using the camera on your handset, Google Lens can scan a product, animal, text or something else in your environment and tell you what that object is. The service relies on information sourced from Google and other places to give you accurate information about the subject.
Google Lens' functions are baked in to other apps, including Google Photos and Google Assistant.
What phones are getting Google lens and when?
When Google Lens launched in 2017, it was available only on the company's Pixel line of handsets, appearing on the Pixel 2 devices first before arriving on the original Pixels. At the time, Google indicated that the feature would come to other Android-based smartphones but didn't say exactly when.
Then, in February, the company announced that Google Lens would roll out to Android flagships via Google Photos. This month, Google announced that Lens would be available for all Android phones, and in the past week, announced iPhone availability, too, with the iOS version of Google Photos. (In Google tradition, the feature seems to be rolling out to phones in stages so it may not be on yours yet.)
Google added that Lens will also find its way to Google Assistant on devices other than the Pixel and Pixel 2, and will work with a variety of flagship smartphones from Samsung, LG, Sony and several other vendors. Right now, Pixel phones are the only devices that can use Lens via Google Assistant. The company hasn't said exactly when other handsets will be able to utilize Lens this way.
RSS Feed
