We want to take a few days next week to look at civil unrest civil wars tied to global banking 1% MOVING FORWARD WW3------just to remind our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens and our new to US cities deemed FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES that this is all planned, deliberate, and is history repeating itself ---via same dastardly global banking 5% freemason/Greek civil unrest players.
When we discuss US GROUND RENT/LAND TRUSTS and how MOVING FORWARD policies being passed have goals of eminent domain for property ownership by only global corporate campuses and global 1%-----these same policies are MOVING FORWARD in WESTERN EUROPE----while Eastern Europe is simply returning to far-right wing LIBERTARIAN STALINIST MARXISM while PUTIN lies about goals of yet another RUSSIAN LAND REFORM.
Russia as we state often never had a AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT I AM MAN social progressive COMMON LAW MAGNA CARTA moment so private property rights do not exist outside global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS laying a little patronage on a few players.
This article written in 2001 ---Bush era when rebuilding US CITIES AS FAILED STATES expanded these same global corporate campus EMINENT DOMAIN LAND REFORMS.
Land reform, kind of, maybe
Print edition | THE ECONOMIST
8th 2001 | moscow
PRIVATE land-ownership and political freedom usually go together. But not in Russia, where it is the powers-that-be, not the people, who decide about land. It has always been that way. Before communism, there was a bit of public-spiritedness, a lot of capitalism, even the glimmerings of the rule of law. But land? Russia's rulers, whether tsars, Communists or post-Soviet bureaucrats, have never allowed their people fully to exercise the most fundamental of all property rights.
Since the collapse of Soviet power in 1991, private land-ownership has been a classic Russian muddle: it exists in theory, not in practice. The constitution allows it. A presidential decree by Boris Yeltsin in 1993 laid out some of the basic rules. But a proper land code, explaining everything from mortgage rights to rules on how land can be used, has never reached the statute book. Now President Vladimir Putin and the government want to get a move on. A land code will arrive shortly in the Duma, Russia's lower house of parliament. But formidable obstacles remain.
The main one is that strong vested interests like things the way they are. Land is a big source of power and money for the bureaucracy. Do you want to build a house? Then pay a bribe. Do you want to buy a derelict factory, and turn it into something else? Pay a lot more. Do you want to build a large dacha in a nature reserve outside Moscow? Then you probably will not need to pay anything: that sort of thing is the privilege of top officials and well-connected tycoons.
In Russia's provinces, land ranks along with the tax system as a huge source of control and patronage for local leaders and their friends. Federal government landholdings—belonging to ministries, the presidential administration, the armed forces and security services—are vast, largely secret and frequently exploited for the private convenience and profit of officials. The openness that a publicly accessible land register would bring would be most unwelcome.
Third, the agricultural lobby is nervous about upsetting the post-Soviet farming set-up. The remains of state and collective farms provide awful conditions for workers, low investment and poor yields—but rich pickings for farm bosses and their friends. Anything that would let private farmers flourish on Russia's 200m hectares (500m acres) of farmland, whether as individuals or in agribusiness, is also a threat, though in some regions like Saratov and Tatarstan, local governors have gone ahead and privatised land, with modestly encouraging results. Private farms are already more productive.
This debate is dressed up in fancy language. Agrarian, nationalist and left-wing politicians talk of land reform in terms of the rape and pillage of Russian tradition.
MORE FAKE 'LEFT' REFORMERS PRETENDING TO BE AGRARIAN
“It's like selling your own mother,” says one. Collectivism, they say, is the natural state of affairs in the countryside. But there are serious worries too. Unlike industry, much of which has been grabbed by a mix of Soviet-era managers and new spivs, most land is at least still nominally in the collective hands of ordinary Russians. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a veteran dissident, recently said that a free market in farmland would benefit “the greedy hands of robbers who have stolen billions from Russia”. He and others fear that, if big business gets its hands on agriculture, a new class of landless peasants will emerge. Russians already hear the word latifundiya and do not like the sound of it.
Yet that debate is so far an artificial one. Even if farmland were fully privatised, and could be freely bought and sold, demand for it is so low, supply so large, and prices so low, that there would be little early change. Private farmers, about 260,000 of them, work about a tenth of the total. But their problems are many, and their number is falling.
The new code deals only with urban land, although it does not have the outright ban on sales of farmland that the rural lobby wants. Urban land reform has more support. Homeowners and businessmen want secure title to the land on which their property stands. But there are stumbling-blocks. One is a cadastral survey, to give a clear definition of each plot of land. This is well advanced in some cities, far less so in others. Sergei Say, the civil servant who heads the federal cadastre service, reckons it will be five years before the land register is complete and publicly accessible.
Another difficulty is that of getting decisions on land use, a notorious source of corruption even in countries with far more honest public services than Russia's. Even if the new law lays down the rules for changing a plot, say, from industrial to residential use, local bureaucrats would find it hard to shake off old interfering habits.
Clear new rules about land, even if limited to some categories and hampered by bureaucrats, would be an encouraging symbolic step. But to make a real difference, they would need a lot of political oomph behind them. That is not yet in prospect. Mr Putin's current plan seems to be to allow governors to interpret the new land code flexibly, region by region. That sounds bad for reform.
When we read in US national FAKE NEWS media that a HILLARY or a TRUMP is partnered with RUSSIA----with PUTIN----this is to what global banking 1% CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA are partnered with for these few decades and yes, those RUSSIAN LAND REFORMS were indeed to install massive global corporate campus factories---but why is RUSSIA now morphing back to far-right wing LIBERTARIAN STALINIST MARXISM ----not building those huge Chinese FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES---as is MOVING FORWARD in US?
As this article states concerns for agriculture and natural resources are being applied in RUSSIA where they are abandoned in US/CANADA ---because Russia and Siberia will be that bread basket/luxury housing for global 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. So, while US is being made a tribute slave state----stripped of all natural resources and left environmentally devastated----a little restraint is happening in RUSSIA. LAND REFORM for global foreign factories ----yes, lots of DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE SMART CITIES----yes. But a little light on the movement of foreign global corporations into any but small regions of Russia.
Here we see SCHNEIDER offering himself as the answer for FAKE NEWS----while being FAKE NEWS---he gives an opinion as to why RUSSIA is getting it wrong---build massive Chinese special zones he says-----knowing the goal of global banking 1% is not to bring too much FOREIGN GLOBAL CORPORATE investment into soon to be USSR
Senior Digital Strategist in London, United Kingdom
Working on the last 16 years in Business Consulting and Technology companies, I acquired multidisciplinary knowledge in several industries, including the Public Sector.
I led large business and public sector transformation projects enabled through multicultural teams, driving changes on the way of working, enhancing the efficiency on the processes and driving sustainable changes for these organisations in several countries'.
Special Economic Zones: Where Russia is getting it wrong
Jul 28, 2016 Guilherme Schneider
Russia has 28 different Special Economic Zones, but it’s still waiting for a major success story on the scale of the SEZ in Shenzhen, China. So what should Russia do next?
A worker in the welding shop of the Ford Sollers plant located in the Alabuga Special Economic Zone. Photo: RIA Novosti
As Russia adapts to life under sanctions, it’s also leading to a re-thinking of how different strategic initiatives – such as the one on Special Economic Zones (SEZs) – can be used to jumpstart economic growth in the country. Last June, the Kremlin called the initiative on Special Economic Zones in Russia “inefficient.” That’s because recent initiatives in this area have proven to be expensive and haven’t provided the expected return on investment.
Special Economic Zones are a controversial subject: for each successful example, there are a myriad of failed projects. Today there are more than 4,500 SEZs around the world and the number keeps growing.
Russia’s SEZ initiatives in recent years have focused on attracting foreign investment to several regions of Russia. Today, there are 28 zones in Russia, and this is actually the first clue why the execution of this kind of project has not been as successful as originally hoped. Without any clear Russian success story, the creation of 28 parallel initiatives has proven to be costly and ineffective.
The first thing that the Russian government should do is to conduct more comprehensive research in one or, at maximum, a couple of zones, to spur the development of a deeper strategy
The first thing that the Russian government should do is to conduct more comprehensive research in one or, at maximum, a couple of zones, to spur the development of a deeper strategy. Offering fiscal incentives without creating the environment for business around these zones is a decisive factor that contributes to failure.
The most successful zones understood this constraint, and before implementing the SEZ, they planned the local infrastructure and carried out other initiatives. Simply replicating successful models from other nations will not be enough for Russia - it is necessary to adapt good models, while taking into account the characteristics of the local economy.
Specialists often refer to the Shenzhen experience in China as a success story. In the 1980s, an SEZ initiative transformed the city into an economic exporting powerhouse. Its model proved successful because for every foreign investor taking advantage of the local tax incentives and built-to-export infrastructure, there were Chinese companies providing intermediate services and goods. This is what economists call “backward and forward” links, making the SEZ not a stand-alone initiative but, rather, an enabler of the region’s industrialization.
Investing, first, in the creation of a local network of entrepreneurs and fostering the growth of new mid-sized companies that could become suppliers of larger foreign companies, is an important step. Entrepreneurs and small-to-midsize enterprises (SMEs) need to have access to cheaper credit than is typically available through commercial banks or other lending institutions.
Local infrastructure is another factor that should be evaluated and improved. Large manufacturing production centers need large outflow corridors, easy access to ports, logistics hubs and/or consumer markets. Both manufacturing and services companies need access to a surplus workforce, often specialized. There is a need for a coordinated initiative between the SEZ and local universities, in order to buildup the necessary knowledge to maintain the skills and capabilities of the workforce.
The rule of law and ease of doing business is often an overlooked factor for the success of businesses in countries, and it is not an exception in the case of the SEZs. According to The Economist, 61 of the 139 approved SEZs in the Indian state of Maharashtra failed because of capricious policymaking, a murky screening process and concern over economic prospects. And a high percentage of SEZs in Senegal flopped because of a combination of excessive bureaucracy, high electricity costs and distance from a good port.
Another article from the Asian Development Bank echoes this point: “Putting in place independent governing authorities and enabling legal frameworks are key ingredients that can help SEZs increase the chances of success. Among the countries in Asia with SEZs, those with independent SEZ authorities increase exports by 27 percent compared to those without.”
The same article comments, as well, on the importance of the clear link between the SEZ and the country’s economic development strategy.
SEZs can be a tool for economic development in Russia if they can be inserted into a broader strategy and approach. They can be the justification for the introduction of necessary reforms in the economy as well as enable investments in the areas that will not just benefit the SEZ, but also the entire surrounding areas.
The Kremlin needs to create a SEZ strategy in the “Russian way,” understanding the constraints of its own economy and creating the fertile soil not just for the zones themselves but also for entrepreneurship in Russia as a whole. And they should be created with the understanding that this kind of strategy initially will create small results in the short-term. However, each SEZ will prepare the economy for more sustainable growth and greater results over the long run.
We want to look at two global banking 1% freemason LITERARY STAR novels again released now to create societal FADS that existed for centuries used by same global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA---TRIBE OF JUDAH----in staging civil unrest civil wars using global banking 5% freemason/Greek civil unrest players black, white, and brown players. ECO's novel released in 2010 just in time to plant all those population group tensions----
-this group hated that group ----this group were criminal and deviant---these groups were populist all of which is FAKE MYTH-MAKING HISTORY. Now, Eco in PRAGUE CEMETERY does a good job in the historic depiction of bringing ITALY to a republic----the POPULIST HERO sold as GENERAL working to free those 99% of ITALIANS enslaved by OLD WORLD KINGS-----was of course working for GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS. Eco is not shy to be clear all those 99% of Western European citizens used in 'revolutions' killed fighting for what are today's global banking 5% freemason/Greek players killing those 99% of populist citizens.
TAKING THE VEILS OFF in Western Europe during these revolutions filled with secret societies, criminality, corruption and no one knowing who to trust-----TODAY'S MOVING FORWARD CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA.
When we have writers deliberately creating these negative stereotypes of every population group while the anti-hero filled with murder, criminality, covert actions are labelled respectable people----we have today's CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA----rationalizing deviancy with a good dose of 5% freemason/Greek FAKE religious players black, white, and brown.
Prague Czech Republic has always been that border of Western and Eastern OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS---and a source of lots of 5% freemason/Greek civil unrest civil war players
'Prague has been a political, cultural and economic centre of central Europe complete with a rich history. Founded during the Romanesque and flourishing by the Gothic, Renaissance and Baroque eras,
Prague was the capital of the kingdom of Bohemia and the main residence of several Holy Roman Emperors, most notably of Charles IV (r. 1346–1378)'
The Prague Cemetery
by Umberto Eco – review
Umberto Eco's picarasque novel about 19th century Jew-haters is a gift for conspiracy theorists
Sat 26 Nov 2011 19.04 EST First published on Sat 26 Nov 2011 19.04 EST
Imagine Dan Brown adorned with a PhD: that's Umberto Eco, who before he took up fiction 30 years ago in The Name of the Rose was a semiotician and a medieval literary scholar. Like Brown's The Da Vinci Code and The Lost Symbol, Eco's sixth novel, The Prague Cemetery, snakes along an underground trail that twists through the enlightened heresies and bigoted gospels respectively propagated by Freemasons and Illuminati, Jesuits and Jew-baiters, before hinting at an ideological conspiracy that underlines the deceits of contemporary politics.
The difference is that Brown devises a puzzle and goes on to solve it, whereas Eco's more highbrow pleasure lies in open-ended mystification. Brown wants us to believe in his cobweb of mystical coincidences and to trust his elucidation of those cryptic codes. Eco, however, is at best whimsically sceptical, at worst deliberately misleading: for him, the purpose of a story is to tell ingenious lies rather than to arrive at a drearily rational truth. Brown's recurrent hero is an academic turned detective, a so-called "symbologist" from Harvard whose special skill is the reassuring decipherment of riddles, while the protagonist of The Prague Cemetery is a professional forger, a malcontent who fakes documents for a living.
In this rambling, ramshackle picaresque novel, the bilious Captain Simone Simoni slithers across Europe in the pay of one secret service after another, claiming personal responsibility for the calumnies that provoked most of the political crises of the 19th century. He serves his apprenticeship during Italy's campaign to liberate itself from Austrian rule. Officially he joins the novelist Alexandre Dumas in embellishing the mystique of Garibaldi; secretly he demolishes the patriotic myth, exposing the fabled warrior as a short, bandy-legged mediocrity. Abandoning Sicily for Paris, he stirs up trouble during the Commune, and goes on to concoct the incriminating document that causes Dreyfus to be convicted of treason. Side excursions link him with the Turkish conman Osman Bey and with the Romanovs in their efforts to suppress the bomb-throwing nihilists. Simonini's customers and victims are all actual historical characters, which enables Eco to suggest that history is a tissue of fictions, not a tale told by an idiot but a text slickly pieced together by self-appointed authorities who should never be trusted.
Simonini also dabbles in diabolism, and enjoys hoaxing the hoaxer Leo Taxil, who in 1897 staged a perverse and sexually flagrant Black Mass to mock Freemasonry and the Catholic church. His masterpiece is a Gothic fantasy about a nocturnal gathering of rabbis who come together in the cemetery in the Prague ghetto, among upended gravestones that might be the pages of a chaotic, crumbling book, to avenge the humiliations of their race by planning a Jewish coup that will commandeer financial and political power. Elaborating their mad schemes, Simonini the crazed anti-Semite sketches the notorious "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", which Hitler called his "warrant for genocide".
Despite the venom, The Prague Cemetery is a literary exercise, a novel that contains a critique of its own artifice. Eco awards himself the capitalised status of Narrator, and tries to elucidate the maunderings of two less reliable narrators, Simonini and a priest who is his alter ego. Wittily self-conscious, Eco discourses on the difference between plot and story, and supplies a diagram of their parallel development to help us through the labyrinth. This is a book made from a garbling of other books, with Victor Hugo, Proust and Zola, among its mob of subsidiary characters.
For Eco, the undertaking may be playful, a study of noxious nonsense that is illustrated with some controversially nasty caricatures of greedy Jews. But some of the million copies of The Prague Cemetery already sold in Europe and South America have probably been read by fanatics and fantasists who are eager to be duped by the conspiracy theories that Eco sceptically demolishes. The chief rabbi of Rome has expressed alarm about the violence of Simonini's hatred, and a review in the Vatican newspaper worried about the zest with which the novel revives injurious stereotypes. The world we live in – economically shaky, politically feeble, menaced by zealots, with a fearful populace half-elated by the prospect of catastrophe yet still urgently searching for scapegoats – is only too similar to that described by Eco in his survey of 19th-century Europe. What may have begun as a learned game, a pseudo-historical farrago in the manner of Dumas and Hugo, at times seems dangerously and reprehensibly close to the truth.
Eco has said, a little snottily, that he wants to appeal even to those who have the bad taste "to take Don Brown seriously". Would it bother him if these credulous readers missed his postmodern irony and took The Prague Cemetery a little too seriously? History is a nightmare, and Simonini's enfevered babbling won't help us to awaken from it.
Here is a second global banking 1% LITERARY STAR novel setting the stage for Eco's PRAGUE CEMETERY population tensions -----filled with lots of evil, immorality, covert actions with CONSTANTINE writing a novel making these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA a conspiracy by a LONE, SATANIST ----THE ANTI-CHRIST.
With all kinds of descriptions of an EVIL INSTITUTE-----which can be nothing but what is called the ILLUMINATI----global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS----having goals of bringing our US moral society down to BLACK OCCULTISM. If we look a few centuries to the last ROBBER BARON 'fake revolutions' Eco creates the same ANTI-HERO----
CONSTANTINE makes no bones of being a global banking 5% GREEK----grad from global hedge fund corporation OLD WORLD KINGS Johns Hopkins published by her GREEK press.
We want to emphasize--whether our US California forests burning ---climate change----all kinds of references to END TIMES and REVELATIONS----please remember---none of this is tied to GOD, JESUS or religion--it is simply the goal of MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE.
It is no coincidence that CONSTANTINE creates characters as heroes FOR GOOD----being professors from HARVARD all these 5% Greek player characters deeply tied to CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS VALUES.
'The Veritas Deception'
involves all these same EVIL institutions as Eco's PRAGUE CEMETERY---creating the SOCIETAL FAD that people are naturally self-interested and evil. As well, it paints a picture of a US Congress filled with trained sociopaths---that is indeed true--those 5% freemason/Greek players are handpicked because they are identified as sociopaths.
Author Spotlight: Greek-American Lynne Constantine
Posted By Maria A. Karamitsos on May 24, 2017
Meet Author Lynne Constantine
Lynne Constantine grew in Baltimore, MD. She traces her Greek roots to Ikaria and Northern Greece, near Thessaloniki. Though from a young age Lynne’s true love was reading and making up stories, she didn’t begin writing seriously until after college. Lynne earned a Master’s Degree from Johns Hopkins University.
For years, Lynne worked in corporate marketing, managing a department responsible for direct mail and direct response campaigns. This allowed her to use her creative talents, but never provided a true outlet. Though she ascended the corporate ladder, something was missing.
A few years later, while discussing that “something”, she and her sister Valerie decided to write a book together. Circle Dance, a story about a Greek-American family, was published in 2012. She’s published two short stories, “Mother’s Day”, about a woman struggling with infertility; and “The Deception”, a prequel to Circle Dance. The Veritas Deception, a spellbinding thriller, was published in 2016. Her next book is expected later this year.
Lynne is also a social media consultant and speaker, and teaches at teaches at various workshops. She works with new authors to build their brand platforms. She is a monthly contributor to SUSPENSE MAGAZINE and a contributing editor to THE BIG THRILL magazine. Read out to learn more about Lynne Constantine.
Without coincidence, Eco brings LORD NELSON into his ITALIAN REVOLUTION as a brutal landowner in an Italian Kingdom----we understand all this 1940-50s moralizing on TV--from RIFLEMAN, BONANZA, to all AMERICAN families like the NELSONS-----was a global banking 1% freemason TV STAR FAD----but what we know is this----our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens overwhelmingly want to live and let live---simply want civil society, freedom and justice---and a REAL domestic free market economy that allows stability, the accumulation of modest wealth, and a society steeped in morals, ethics---regardless if religious.
Eco in PRAGUE CEMETERY and Constantine in Veritas Deception both paint characters ruthless, self-driven, evil, corrupt---capable of doing anything global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS tell them----and a 99% WE THE PEOPLE fooled every time.
The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet The Window Pane 1953
This is from Season 2 Episode 4, that aired on October 9th, 1953.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bronte is a town and comune in the Metropolitan City of Catania, in Sicily, southern Italy. The town is situated approximately 10 miles (16 km) west-northwest from Mount Etna, on the side of the valley of the Simeto river, and about 20 miles (32 km) west from Giarre and the coast. Bronte is mostly reliant on farming for its economy, particularly of pistachio nuts.
Bronte's name derives from that of one of the First Cyclopes and it means "The Thunderer". Legend has it that the Cyclopes lived under Mount Etna.
In 1520 Charles V united the twenty-four hamlets of the surrounding area, which formed the town of Bronte. Mount Etna nearly destroyed the town three times, in 1651, in 1832, and finally in 1843.
In 1799, King Ferdinand III created Bronte as a Duchy, and rewarded admiral Horatio Nelson with the title of Duke for the help he had provided him in suppressing the revolution in Naples and so in recovering his throne. As well as being made a Duke, Nelson was given as a fief the Castello Maniace, which at the time was the remains of a Benedictine Monastery. The Castle passed into the Bridport family when the 1st Viscount Bridport married the then Duchess of Bronte, who was Admiral Nelson's niece. The Bridports continued to live in the castle until 1982 when the current Viscount sold the property to the Comune of Bronte. Today it is a local tourist attraction in Maniace, and has been restored (including the recreation of ceramic-tiled floors) by the Comune. It is built in the style of an English country house (with formal garden) set in the hills of eastern Sicily.
In 1860, during Giuseppe Garibaldi's Expedition of the thousand, there was a citizen's revolt. Sicilian peasants had hoped for - and did not get from Garibaldi - reforms from the restrictive conditions imposed by noble landowners. This hope had been reinforced by Garibaldi's decree of 2 June 1860 that land would be re-distributed. The southerners revolted in several localities, and at Bronte on August 4, 1860, Garibaldi's friend and general Girolamo ("Nino") Bixio bloodily repressed one of these uprisings with two battalions of Redshirts, massacring more than a dozen, peasants and nobles alike, and putting the torch to the town theater and municipal archives. Bixio ordered a kangaroo court and had five Bronteans summarily shot, all of which earned him the sobriquet "the Butcher of Bronte".
As with all global banking 1% NOVELS creating FADS creating historical FICTION----this novel which should not be read until all THANKSGIVING CHEER is absorbed------does a good job describing global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH goals of filling our US society with VEILS OFF immorality---indeed these goals of demoralizing are REAL MOVING FORWARD by CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA. As well what is REAL are these EVIL GENETIC ENGINEERING GOALS----GMO HUMANS minus CONSCIENCE ----is indeed MOVING FORWARD by THE INSTITUTE ---AKA KNIGHTS OF MALTA--TRIBE OF JUDAH.
The novel is FICTION as it creates HEROES from the very institutions training our global banking 5% freemason/Greeks to be those ROBBER BARON SOCIOPATHS. Of course there is no VERITAS coming from HARVARD---as there are no FREEMASON/GREEK moral heroes coming from Washington beltway MD.
This book is written having a goal of propaganda so not good writing----but it does let us know what global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS are trying to sell as FAKE HISTORICAL FICTION.
This book is written having a goal of propaganda so not good writing----but it does let us know what global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS are trying to sell as FAKE HISTORICAL FICTION.
More POD PEOPLE this time instead of a town of 99% WE THE PEOPLE under mind-control now our US Congressional 5% players as ROBBER BARONS sociopaths are the POD PEOPLE---really, these 5% players are simply NATURAL sociopaths.
The Veritas Deception by Lynne Constantine
The Veritas Deception
on Tour August 2016
Synopsis: There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death.
Days after U.S. Senator Malcolm Phillips changes his vote on a bill he sponsored, he is murdered and his death disguised as an accident. He contacted one man before he died: investigative journalist, Jack Logan. He left Jack a single clue to help him uncover the truth and keep Phillip’s widow, Taylor, safe. But safe from whom?
Jack and Taylor’s desperate hunt leads them to a vast network of corrupt authority controlling everything from social media and television programming to law enforcement and US legislation. The key to unraveling a complex web of lies is a set of ancient relics, dating back to the time of Christ. But what do these relics have to do with a senator’s death?
Allies turn to foes when Jack and Taylor discover that those closest to them are part of the conspiracy, and that they too have been manipulated. How long has a puppet master been pulling their strings—and will Jack and Taylor trust the right people long enough to win what becomes a colossal battle for souls?
The Veritas Deception is one of those books that take you by surprise. The things happening troughout the book, you cannot even imagine to happen. But it does give you something to think about.
The story evolves around Jack and Taylor and Damon Crosse. The latter is a villain you do not come across very often. He has patience to work out his evil plan. No rush, just have the intend to corrupt and distroy any morality in the world and he takes his time for this. Many years to be precise while knowing that once the plan works it will be long after he's gone. He has taken years to raise foster kids to do his bidding and has them in high ranking positions. And what he needs are 30 silver coins that will give him the power to summon the devil himself.
Well the 30 coins are the Judas coins and that part together with the devil part were a downer for me, but the part where he is the heartless villain trying to rid the world of any moral was well written en thought out. He has people everywhere in high ranking places. He controls the tv shows that air and has many people in the goverment and legal system. You never know who belongs to him, no-one can be trusted.
And this is also what Jack and Taylor find out. Even their lives have been fabricated by this man. And to stop Damon they need to figure out who can be trusted.
I do not want to go into detail since I do think it is worth reading although you need to take the devil part not to seriously to my opinion and really think about what Damon is doing and the consequenses it could have. Are people really so easy to manipulate? The way he wants to actually execute his "evil" plan is quite meticulous. But to be honost I do not like these open endings. Are we getting a follow up story or not?
My rating 3/5
Read an excerpt: Chapter One
Jack Logan had ditched his Catholic upbringing but kept the guilt. He hadn’t planned on blowing his entire afternoon listening to the woman he was interviewing talk about her dead daughter, but he didn’t have the heart to tell the grieving mother that he already had enough for the story. So instead, he bought her lunch and dinner, listening as she painted a picture of the girl she had loved and had failed to save. Now he was behind schedule and would have to work all night. Man, he hated the pieces involving kids. The parents got to him every time, and his attempts at comforting them were as effective as a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound.
His phone was ringing as he approached the door to his apartment, and he jammed the key in the lock. Pushing the door open, he rushed over and snatched it, upsetting the bottle of Bass Ale and spilling the dregs on the table.
“Great.” He clicked the green button. “Yes?”
“Could you sound any more annoyed?” It was his editor.
Oh, yeah! If we could only have gotten CLINTON-ERA ROBERT REICH---you know, that HITLER NAZI LABOUR PARTY global banking 5% freemason/Greek player working today for WORLD BANK/UNITED NATIONS----to fight for annulment of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA for same reasons as Trump---we could have stopped MOVING FORWARD sacking and looting of US taking America to colonial status---but then REICH is that far-right wing global corporate FASCIST player just as we see in this article------here in UKRAINE-----home of KIEVAN EMPIRE--unleashing all the same population tensions---bringing in all those secret society civil unrest civil war winged monkeys----as described in Eco's ----PRAGUE CEMETERY. CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA were guilty of massive and systemic frauds and should have been ANNULLED----so too TRUMP.
'Robert Reich: If Trump Is Guilty, His Presidency Must Be Annulled
Robert Reich , Newsweek Columnist and chancellor’s professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley
On 8/28/18 at 7:36 AM'
We want to be clear----the BLACK SEA/CASPIAN CENTER INSTITUTE found in CRIMEAN region being ground zero for MOVING FORWARD WW3 in Western/Eastern Europe is same far-right wing Bush neo-con STANFORD/YALE source of 5% civil unrest PLAYERS black, white, and brown players.
'In 2008, he founded the Center for Ukrainian Studies of the Southern Federal University of Russia, and from 2009-2013, he was the founding head of the Black Sea-Caspian Center of the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, an analytical institute of the Presidential Administration of Russia'.
Those familiar with Russian history last century know the global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS favorite civil unrest 'MARXIST' player---Gorbachev being that Reagan/Clinton global banking neo-liberal privatizing all that was USSR common wealth to RUSSIAN BEOWULF oligarchy A NEO-LIBERAL AS HEAD OF COMMUNIST PARTY----INDEED---SAME PEOPLE --POPOV
'But all this was ancient history, or seemed like it, on May 1, 1990, in the fifth year of Mikhail Gorbachev’s rule as General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev’s policies of Perestroika and Glasnost, his ultimately failed policies to liberalize and revitalize the communist state, were in full swing. Estonia and Lithuania had declared independence from the Soviet Union in March. Things were changing quickly. And as such, May Day would be different.
For the first time, the May Day parade was voluntary and open to any and all participants. The idea was that the Communist Party would lead the parade, with citizens’ groups of various sorts--encouraged by the newly-elected radical reformist mayor of Moscow, Gavriil Popov—joining in'.
Radical reformist----MAYOR OF MOSCOW----POPOV.
“Death to Russia” Riots in Kiev: A Sign of War to Come in Donbass?
By Jafe Arnold Last updated Feb 22, 2018
February 22, 2018 – Fort Russ –
By Eduard Popov, translated by Jafe Arnold –
KIEV, Ukraine – Ukraine is irreversibly slipping further into Nazification. Following the oath-taking of 600 militants of the newfound National Squads (a subsidiary organization of the Azov regiment intended to “aid” police in keeping order) and following the de facto occupation of the Cherkassy city council (the regional center right next to the Kiev region), Ukrainian Nazis are rehearsing new assaults in the spirit of Ernst Rohm’s street fighters from 1920’s Germany.
Like any historical analogy, this one is conditional. The situation in today’s Ukraine is much worse. While in Weimar Germany the state as a whole did not indulge the Nazis nor use the full force of its repressive apparatus against them, in Ukraine the oligarchic regime of President Poroshenko has given the Nazi street movements the green light. Why and for what purpose will be discussed below.
For now, let us recap the facts. On February 18th, Kiev saw Ukrainian “radicals” (Ukrainian Newspeak for outright Nazis) from C14, Right Sector, and Nikolai Kokhanivsky’s Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (which is the continuation of Bandera’s OUN-b) attack the building of Rossotrudnichestvo (a Russian agency promoting Russian culture) with rocks and eggs.
After this, activists descended on Russian Alfa-Bank and pelted it with rocks. On their way to the Rossotrudnichestvo building, the Ukrainian “nationalists” also swooped down on Russian Sberbank and broke its windows with stones. The police stationed at Sberbank did not intervene.
What is so special about this situation?
What is it here that allows us to talk of Ukrainian Nazis coordinating with Ukrainian police and intelligence services?
First of all, the February 18th actions were prepared and advertised beforehand. A “rehearsal” was held on February 17th with a first attack on the Rossotrudnichestvo building. At that moment, there were around 100 people inside, including many children present for a theater rehearsal. The Nazis broke down the doors, left graffiti inscriptions on the walls, destroyed the exhibition in honor of the Russian opera singer Feodor Chaliapin, and torched a Russian flag.
Immediately afterwards, the Nazi groups published calls across social networks to attack the same building and Russian banks the following day as part of their “Death to Russia” action. In other words, the February 18th attacks were widely advertised, rehearsed, and therefore no secret to the Kiev police.
“Death to Russia” spray-painted in Ukrainian
But what did the law enforcement of the Ukrainian capital do? According to the independent Ukrainian resource, strana.ua, on February 17th the Kiev police broke their security contract with Rossotrudnichestvo’s office in Kiev. A photo has since been linked of an official letter from the police department to the head of the Kiev branch of Rossotrudnichestvo, Konstantin Vorobyev. The letter says that due to “force majeure circumstances”, the police were hereby unilaterally cancelling their contract for the protection of the premises at Borisoglebskaya street starting at 21:00 on February 17th.
Thus, the Ukrainian state de facto gave the green light to Ukrainian Nazi attacks on cultural and financial organizations belonging to a country which maintains diplomatic and trade relations with Ukraine and on whose territory around 4.4 million Ukrainian migrant workers earn their living. Russia, alongside the EU, is still Ukraine’s main trading partner.
In my previous articles, I’ve repeatedly pointed out the link between Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov and the main Ukrainian “Aryan”, Andrey Biletsky. As it turns out, Avakov’s ties are not limited to the Azov regiment and National Squads. Kokhanivsky’s OUN, Right Sector, and C14 are organizations operating at different levels of ministerial subordination. For example, the C14 racists are considered to be the “personal proxy” Nazis of the SBU used to carry out sensitive tasks.
Judging by everything at hand, I would presume that the attack on the Russian cultural center was more than or not so much of an interior ministry affair, and that Avakov is pursuing political goals which differ, for example, from the repetitious demonstrations of force and political stances that Avakov and Biletsky coordinate in tandem.
I understand Avakov’s goal to be “warming up” a pseudo-patriotic spirit in Ukrainian society as much as possible and thereby creating a favorable psychological atmosphere in the run-up to a new war in Donbass for which, in line with our previous analyses, Russia is increasingly being presented as the main enemy of the Ukrainian oligarch-Nazi state. After all, Ukraine’s military preparations in the “Anti-Terrorist Operation Zone” need appropriate propagandistic support, as only a minority of Ukrainian society wants war in Donbass, much less suicidal war with Russia.
By all accounts, war will break out very soon. I would like to be mistaken in this prediction, but Ukrainian military and political developments seem to suggest that war is coming.
Do sane Ukrainians recognize this threat?
Are those who once supported the Euromaidan and ATO now reeling back in fear of the torchlight marches of Ukrainian Nazis and their rehearsals for seizing power? Without a doubt, yes.
For example, following numerous threats, searches, and SBU allegations of “revealing state secrets” (?), the editor-in-chief of strana.ua, Igor Guzhva, fled to Austria. If he hadn’t fled, Guzhva would have shared the fate of those dozens of Ukrainian opposition journalists who have been killed under mysterious circumstances. Perhaps his site’s reporting on the Nazi attack on Russian cultural and financial institutions will be portrayed as an “FSB operation.”
Another clever Ukrainian who supported the Ukrainian state’s suicide on the Euromaidan and who now fears the possible implications of a Maidan 3.0, the political analyst Oleg Voloshin, wrote on social networks on the events of February 17th and 18th: “If this is not a lite version of 1917, then I don’t know what else to compare it to. Those who say that peacekeepers and external control must be imposed on the whole territory of Ukraine, and not only in Donbass, are right. Someone has to rein in this lumpen revolt under nationalist slogans.” This is a more than relevant statement, especially if we consider the fact that the head of the OUN movement, Nikolai Kokhanivsky, promised that riots at Russian facilities in Kiev will continue.
However, the sobering-up of people like Voloshin makes little difference. The “Death to Russia” action and the National Squads’ march speak to something bigger than a mere dead-end of the Euromaidan. In my opinion, all of this is the logical result of the evolution of the Ukrainian idea as such.
On this note, I’ll end this article with a polemical statement: humanity’s main enemy in Ukraine is not Ukrainian Nazis, but “Ukrainianism” itself. The first is the brainchild offspring of the second. The spiritual roots of Ukrainian Nazism can be traced back to the semi-literate, malicious verses of the “Ukrainian God”, Taras Shevchenko.
Eduard Popov is a Rostov State University graduate with a PhD in history and philosophy. In 2008, he founded the Center for Ukrainian Studies of the Southern Federal University of Russia, and from 2009-2013, he was the founding head of the Black Sea-Caspian Center of the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, an analytical institute of the Presidential Administration of Russia. In June 2014, Popov headed the establishment of the Representative Office of the Donetsk People’s Republic in Rostov-on-Don and actively participated in humanitarian aid efforts in Donbass. In addition to being Fort Russ’ guest analyst since June, 2016, Popov is currently the leading research fellow of the Institute of the Russian Abroad and the founding director of the Europe Center for Public and Information Cooperation.