Remember, ALLENDE came to power in Chile during ROBBER BARON global neo-liberalism sacking and looting of civilized societies-----and COLLECTIVIZED all Chilean wealth and property killing sovereign domestic small, regional, and national businesses and land ownership to prepare for PINOCHET as global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS to come in and claim all that Chilean wealth and land. It's a tag-team FAR-RIGHT WING GLOBAL CORPORATE FASCIST MARXISM.
What we read in both ALLENDE'S 'In the Midst of Winter' and PHILLIP'S 'The Legacy' is the same myth-making and propaganda around emotional, physical conflicts tied to being a sovereign citizen tied to TRAIL OF TEARS continuous wars courtesy of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH. In both cases these novelists bring those same criminal and corrupted PRIESTS/CARDINALS/RABBIS into being the source of solace and resources.
There are no groups of people so tied to RACE SUPREMACY THAN those global banking 1%--whether Asian global banking 1%----Arabic global banking 1%---European global banking 1%--or Jewish global banking 1%. The need to make a 99% of citizens seen or think they are LESS is not tied to reality----it is tied to WEALTH AND POWER.
During pre-Weimar Europe those POLISH 99% of sovereign citizens were made THE OTHER described as backward and ignorant just as our Latin American native citizens are today and both novels BY WOMEN no less keep those RACIAL SUPREMACY stereotypes alive.
THIS IS WHAT WE SEE IN LUCIA AND EVELYN AS CHARACTERS. IT IS WHAT WE SEE IN RUSSEL AND JOE.
So, Evelyn is NOT being empowered by these two madcap global banking 5% players fighting for her----and our 99% of WE THE WOMEN whether US or new to US immigrant are not being empowered in today's MOVING FORWARD.
1973 Chilean coup d'état - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d%27état
The 1973 Chilean coup d'état was a watershed moment in both the history of Chile and the ... Allende's appointed army chief, Augusto Pinochet, rose to supreme power within a year of the coup, formally assuming power in late-1974.
Augusto Pinochet - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet
Augusto José Ramón Pinochet Ugarte was a Chilean general, politician and the dictator of ... Pinochet had been promoted to Commander-in-Chief of the Army by Allende on 23 August 1973, having been its General Chief of Staff since early ...
United States intervention in Chile - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_Chile
Chile is a country in the southern South America. It borders the countries of Peru, Bolivia and .... Helms was also concerned about Allende supporters in the Chilean military, as it seemed they .... In the Chilean coup of 1973, Augusto Pinochet rose to power, overthrowing the democratically elected president Salvador Allende.
Chilean coup: 40 years ago I watched Pinochet crush a democratic...
www.theguardian.com/…/20…/sep/07/chile-coup-pinochet-allende
Sep 7, 2013 ... How the drama and repression developed as a US-backed coup overthrew Allende's government on 11 September 1973.
But all those 'disappeared' and sent to extreme poverty were 99% native citizens ---except that is not true even today our 99% of Latino immigrants are spread all over the world.
Global banking 5% freemason/Greek players out en force pretending to care about NATIVE PEOPLE.
AP July 4, 2018, 1:38 PM
Priest on the path to sainthood criticized for anti-Semitism
WARSAW, Poland -- Pope Francis' decision to move the World War II-era head of Poland's Catholic Church a step closer to possible sainthood has hit a stumbling block, after two leading Jewish organizations and even Polish Catholic publications called him out for anti-Semitic views. It's not clear if the protests will derail the sainthood cause of Cardinal August Hlond, but in the past the Vatican has taken such protests seriously and at the very least put the cases up for closer review.
In May, Francis approved a decree recognizing Hlond's "heroic virtues." Now the Vatican must confirm a miracle attributed to Hlond's intercession for him to be beatified, and a second one for him to be made a saint.
Hlond, born July 5, 1881, was the highest-ranking church official in Poland from 1926 to his death in 1948. He is highly respected in this overwhelmingly Catholic country for having rejected Nazi Germany's proposals for a collaborative government, and for protecting the church's independence during the first years of communism.
In its protest, the American Jewish Committee pointed to a passage in a 1936 pastoral letter by Hlond, who was Poland's primate then, that showed his attitude toward Jews and echoed the general line of the Catholic Church of the time.
The group also criticized Hlond's failure to condemn the killings of at least 40 Jews in Poland in 1946 by a mob and secret security. It argued that moving forward with the canonization process will be seen as an "expression of approval of Cardinal Hlond's extremely negative approach toward the Jewish community."
"It's very difficult to see how you can still claim that the man was a paragon (of saintliness) when the data is so explicit," AJC's director of interreligious affairs, Rabbi David Rosen, told The Associated Press.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Nazi-hunting body, said making Hlond a saint would "further embolden" Poland's right-wing government in its "headlong efforts to selectively rewrite Polish activities from that tragic era."
The disputed passage in Hlond's letter reads: "It is a fact that the Jews are fighting against the Catholic Church, persisting in free thinking, and are the vanguard of godlessness, Bolshevism and subversion."
It has frequently been cited as evidence of the Catholic Church's institutional anti-Semitism prior to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
But Hlond also wrote that there are many "ethically outstanding, noble and respectable" Jews, and that all Jews should be "respected and loved as persons and as neighbors."
In what appeared to be a condemnation of German Nazi laws, the letter warned against "imported from abroad" anti-Semitism that's "incompatible with Catholic ethics."
"It is not allowed to attack Jews, beat them, injure them or slander them," Hlond said in the letter, which priests read out in churches at Lent in 1936.
He said it was "good" to support Polish businesses and avoid Jewish ones, but it was "forbidden" to "ravage Jewish shops, destroy the goods of the Jews, break windows, throw firecrackers at their homes."
Rosen, who has decades of experience in Catholic-Jewish relations, said the process of making Hlond a saint should be halted.
But the Polish priest promoting Hlond's case before the Vatican's Congregations for the Causes of Saints said the criticism is "unfounded" because Hlond's words had been taken out of context. Mgr. Boguslaw Koziol has discussed all the documents with Vatican experts, and insists Hlond preached love regardless of nation or religion.
Koziol believes that the whole passage - titled "From our Sins" - was progressive for its time and aimed to protect Jews from violence. But he admits it also included questionable ideas.
Hlond's critics "have focused on this negative part of the letter, but are not quoting any other part," he told the AP.
Catholic weekly Tygodnik Powszechny argued that the letter failed to protect Jews from the attacks of Polish nationalists.
It said Hlond didn't "suggest any way out of the 'Jewish problem,' or any good plan for a dignified and peaceful coexistence in one country. One could protest: these were not yet the times of dialogue. But one may also reply: shouldn't we expect candidates for sainthood to be larger than the routine thinking of their times?"
Referring to the July 4, 1946 pogrom in the town of Kielce - where a mob and secret security forces killed at least 40 Jews and two Poles who were defending them - Rosen said that Hlond "did not condemn the pogrom nor urge Poles to stop murdering Jews. Rather, he pointed out that the Jews were all communists or supporters of communism and that the pogrom was their own fault."
Koziol, however, blames Poland's post-war communist rule for Hlond's reticence. Any direct condemnation would have meant a confrontation with the regime and repercussions for the church.
In 2005, the Vatican shelved the planned beatification of French priest the Rev. Leon Dehon and launched an inquiry after complaints about his anti-Semitic views.
________________________________________________
Here is where we disagree with PHILLIPS in her portrayal of THE LEGACY tying it to today's MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD for only the global 1%. We discuss OFTEN why a 99% of WE THE PEOPLE whether here in US or as PHILLIPS describes in UK-----should not support CORBYN because CORBYN is global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS----AND NOT LEFT POPULIST 99% OF LABOR.
So, Phillips as Allende with these novels are filling our journalism with the same FAKE ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT propaganda of communism/socialism being 'left populist' when it has always been FAR-RIGHT WING GLOBAL BANKING 1% ENSLAVEMENT OF 99% OF WORKERS.
So, being against CORBYN is NOT ----being anti-SEMITIC and Phillips does a disservice to 99% of REAL Jewish citizens by continuing this LYING, CHEATING, AND CORRUPTING of our political philosophies.
'Phillips says the book, while fictional, is also informed by current events including the shifting political landscape in Britain and the re-emergence of anti-Semitism, particularly in the Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn became leader.
“As brazen anti-Semitism — and its denial — erupted in Britain, that issue worked its way into the story as well,” she says'.
But she is a woman---and she is smiling! Here we see global banking 1% FAKE NEWS media in Israel keeping our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens from HAVING REAL INFORMATION.
Times of Israel Presents
Melanie Phillips to launch debut novel ‘The Legacy’ in Jerusalem
The Times of Israel hosts the internationally acclaimed author and columnist along with Beit Avi Chai and Israel B, on Tuesday, August 7
By TOI staff 25 July 2018, 11:02 am
What is the legacy of the modern assimilated Jew? That’s the question at the heart of “The Legacy,” the debut novel from outspoken British author and commentator Melanie Phillips.
Readers will have the chance to meet Phillips and get a signed copy of the book at its launch in Jerusalem on August 7, presented by The Times of Israel in partnership with Beit Avi Chai and Israel B.
Phillips began her career as a reporter, editor and columnist at The Guardian before building an international reputation with decades of searing analysis and commentary for the BBC and other major news outlets. These days, her regular columns appear in The Times of London and The Jerusalem Post.
he is also the author of several acclaimed non-fiction books including “Londonistan,” about the growing influence of Islam in Europe, and “Guardian Angel,” about her struggle with Jewish identity as a rising star at Britain’s leading liberal newspaper.
“The Legacy” tells the story of Russell Woolfe, a television producer in London whose father’s death drags him back into the cloistered Jewish world he had fought so hard to escape. There he stumbles across a mysterious worshiper at his father’s synagogue who may possess a priceless medieval manuscript that holds the key to Jewish survival.
As he becomes immersed in the beguiling text, Russell finds himself re-opening the lost memories of his childhood, causing him to reassess his own identity and his preconceptions of his own parents. Snapping at Russell’s heels are his perplexed non-Jewish wife and daughter, along with his own all-too-Jewish sister.
“I always wanted to write a novel but never thought I could manage it,” says Phillips. “I would play around with stories and characters but always junk them. But then a story formed itself in my mind and wouldn’t leave. This was about the discovery of an ancient manuscript, and arose from one real such discovery that I had written about. Then my father died, and I had a very strong impulse to work my way through some of those issues.”
‘The Legacy’ by Melanie Phillips. (Courtesy)
Phillips says the book, while fictional, is also informed by current events including the shifting political landscape in Britain and the re-emergence of anti-Semitism, particularly in the Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn became leader.
“As brazen anti-Semitism — and its denial — erupted in Britain, that issue worked its way into the story as well,” she says.
“Fiction allows you to get under the skin of such issues, to get inside the heads of the people involved, and to explore big themes like the pull of history and conflicted national identity. And once I got inside my characters’ heads, they took up residence in my own — from where they still show no sign of departing,” she says.
___________________________________________
Both novelists frame these novels around a TRAIL OF TEARS------for our 99% of Latinos citizens----for our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens---but we do not get the GORILLA-IN-ROOM source of TRAIL OF TEARS all around the world and through history. We KNOW there was a TRAIL OF TEARS as 99% of white Europeans and Africans were thrown into global slave trading back in colonial America----we KNOW there was a TRAIL OF TEARS in southeast Asia during several decades of building FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----we KNOW there is a TRAIL OF TEARS today as ASIAN, ARABIC, AFRICAN 99% of citizens are again being pushed into global banking 1% labor pool distribution system. The term TRAIL OF TEARS is directly connected to GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH----which neither author of these novels MENTIONS.
WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF IT IS BETTER FOR THE 99% OF SOVEREIGN CITIZENS TO UNDERSTAND THAT HISTORY---NOT DWELL ON HOW TO GRIEVE AND FORGET.
So, both ALLENDE and PHILLIPS have novels steeped in women handling continuous wars as empowered if they manage grief and forgetting ----while men are steeped in forgetting their brutalities.
What we liked from PHILLIP'S THE LEGACY was a close look at JOE the POLISH citizen and how he suffered having HIS family taken away to torture and death ---being left in a vise knowing neither HITLER nor STALIN would be HELPING the 99% of POLISH citizens. But Phillips as Allende keep that VAGUENESS OF 'COMMUNIST' VS 'FAR-RIGHT CORPORATE FASCIST' as the BAD in all these continuous wars never explaining that BOTH are the same GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. It is always sold as THE OTHER.
We can be sure these several decades of continuous wars in LATIN AMERICA courtesy those same global banking 1% far-exceeds this trail of tears simply because of population growth
'The Trail of Tears remains one of the worst human rights disasters to befall Native American peoples in United States history. Between 1838 and 1839, 15,000 Cherokees were taken from their ancestral homes in Georgia and placed on a forced march, finally ending up in the future state of Oklahoma. According to PBS, more than 4,000 of their number ultimately perished en route, due to the horrid conditions'.
What Was the Cause of the Trail of Tears?
The Trail of Tears was caused by the authorization and enforcement of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This initiative, passed by President Andrew Jackson, forced over 20,000 Native Americans out of their ancestral lands in North Georgia. The vast majority of these Native Americans were from the Cherokee Nation.
President Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 for two reasons. The first reason was the economic value of the land. By relocating the Native Americans from North Georgia, the government was able to sell the land to American settlers and speculators. There is also evidence that the land was rich in gold, which only increased economic interest in the area. The second reason that Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act was the recommendation of President James Monroe. In his last address to Congress in 1825, Monroe emphasized the benefits of passing the legislation.
When the Cherokees refused to leave their homeland, the federal government forcefully removed them. They were relocated to Oklahoma, but suffered an estimated 4,000 casualties along the way. The Cherokees attempted to protest the Indian Removal Act by filing judicial action against the state of Georgia. The case reached the Supreme Court, and John Marshall ruled in favor of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall stated that the U.S. government had no claim to the Cherokee lands. President Jackson, however, refused to enforce the decision.
___________________________________________
We all recognize THE JEWISH TRAIL OF TEARS just as we recognize all the other global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH victims of continuous wars sacking and looting 1000BC economics.
THE LEGACY addresses the morals and ethics of war years focusing on the rage of 99% of POLISH people having been victimized themselves by what starts as cultural unrest. JOE angry that COMMUNISTS killed his family associate our REAL 99% of Jewish people with communism. We believe in Poland there were Catholic priests selling the hate tied to Christ's death in the hands of PRE-CHRISTIAN OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS -----where does that war-time brutality throwing people into burning buildings and mutilating bodies ORIGINATE? Well, Latinos are doing it-----African tribes are doing it-----Arabic tribes are doing it----Asian tribes are doing it. THE LEGACY has a character who states just this. These brutality of war are not unique to our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens. When our 99% of men are steeped in ANCIENT MILITARY HISTORY tied to FREEMASONRY/GREEK that is how they see themselves as WARRIORS.
So, JOE is made to be anti-semitic because he equates COMMUNISM with our Jewish citizens when COMMUNISM is simply the flip side of global banking 1% rebranding of slavery -----MARXISM. A Jewish man is tied to writing MARXIST theory----both OLD WORLD ROMANS and TRIBES OF JUDAH are tied to LAISSEZ-FAIRE sack and loot.
JOE WAS ABLE TO HARBOR ANGER AGAINST TRIBES OF JUDAH SENDING IN STALIN BUT NOT HIS OWN GLOBAL BANKING 1% KNIGHTS OF MALTA SENDING IN HITLER.
Today's global 99% of men are as brutal as NEANDERTHAL MEN because they are saturated in that warrior history.
The Jewish Trail of Tears
The Evian Conference of 1938
by
Dennis R. Laffer
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Arts
Department of History
College of Arts and Sciences
University of South Florida
Major Professor: Graydon Tunstall, Ph.D.
John Belohlavek, Ph.D.
Kees Boterbloem, Ph.D.
Date of Approval:
March 16, 2011
Keywords: Intergovernmental Committee, refugees,
Anschluss
, forced emigration,
immigration restrictions
Copyright © 2011, Dennis R. Laffer
DEDICATION
I dedicate this thesis to Ellen, my wife of almost twenty five years, whose love, comfort, guidance and wisdom sustained me through sickness and health and enabled me to complete a long-held dream. The completion of a Master’s degree program in history and the writing of a thesis would not have been possible without her presence at my side. For her great patience, insight and support I will always be truly grateful.
I dedicate this work also to my daughters, Lauren Abigail and Jenny Elizabeth for their love, encouragement and patience. My interest in the topic of this work began in 1999 when they were both young and I deeply appreciate their
understanding of the time I needed to spend in my quest for knowledge about the Evian Conference. I hope that I have set an example for them that it is possible, even in the latter years of middle age, to reach new levels of accomplishment.
My greatest achievement will, however, always be the family with which I am blessed.
Finally, I dedicate this work to the victims of the Nazi era whose lives could have been saved had the world acknowledged, cared about and acted upon
the coming catastrophe. I honor those exceptional individuals and institutions, the upstanders that had the courage to speak out against tyranny and offer relief and
refuge to the innocent victims of man’s hatred against his fellow man.
__________________________________________
Here is where we disagree with PHILLIPS THE LEGACY. Where she describes CORRECTLY that local Catholic priests in Poland were whipping up anti-semitic rage against Jews in Poland---PHILLIPS never mentions THE COMMUNISTS are simply the same global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. The global banking 1% of Jewish bankers bought the RABBIS in Eastern Europe just as global banking 1% Catholic bankers bought priests and cardinals. We KNOW WW2 was a joint effort by BOTH OLD WORLD GLOBAL BANKING 1%.
We hear of POPE BENEDICT as being that HITLER YOUTH-----we hear of Russian RABBIS moving our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens into Poland and satellite nations knowing these regions were to be devastated in coming war. Which RABBIS moved those Jewish citizens into harm's way? Why was it necessary to set the stage for societal tensions by displacing sovereign Polish citizens?
WE KNOW the entire structure of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA were behind WW2 as they are MOVING FORWARD today WW3. So, it was NOT only a BENEDICT or a ZOROS behind massive war deaths and brutality.
WW 2 was planned during ROARING 20S global banking sacking and looting of Europe and THE AMERICAS------there already existed a MASTER PLAN by global banking 1%. WW3 has been staged by MOVING FORWARD CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA ----well before a TRUMP.
How can WE KNOW WW3 is MOVING FORWARD after ROBBER BARON few decades of sacking and looting and NOT these global banking 5% FAKE religious leaders for goodness sake.
AP July 4, 2018, 1:38 PM
Priest on the path to sainthood criticized for anti-Semitism
Pope Benedict XVI visits the tomb of Polish Cardinal August Hlond in Warsaw's St. John Cathedral Thursday May 25, 2006.
PIER PAOLO CITO / APWARSAW, Poland
-- Pope Francis' decision to move the World War II-era head of Poland's Catholic Church a step closer to possible sainthood has hit a stumbling block, after two leading Jewish organizations and even Polish Catholic publications called him out for anti-Semitic views. It's not clear if the protests will derail the sainthood cause of Cardinal August Hlond, but in the past the Vatican has taken such protests seriously and at the very least put the cases up for closer review.
In May, Francis approved a decree recognizing Hlond's "heroic virtues." Now the Vatican must confirm a miracle attributed to Hlond's intercession for him to be beatified, and a second one for him to be made a saint.
Hlond, born July 5, 1881, was the highest-ranking church official in Poland from 1926 to his death in 1948. He is highly respected in this overwhelmingly Catholic country for having rejected Nazi Germany's proposals for a collaborative government, and for protecting the church's independence during the first years of communism.
In its protest, the American Jewish Committee pointed to a passage in a 1936 pastoral letter by Hlond, who was Poland's primate then, that showed his attitude toward Jews and echoed the general line of the Catholic Church of the time.
The group also criticized Hlond's failure to condemn the killings of at least 40 Jews in Poland in 1946 by a mob and secret security. It argued that moving forward with the canonization process will be seen as an "expression of approval of Cardinal Hlond's extremely negative approach toward the Jewish community."
"It's very difficult to see how you can still claim that the man was a paragon (of saintliness) when the data is so explicit," AJC's director of interreligious affairs, Rabbi David Rosen, told The Associated Press.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Nazi-hunting body, said making Hlond a saint would "further embolden" Poland's right-wing government in its "headlong efforts to selectively rewrite Polish activities from that tragic era."
The disputed passage in Hlond's letter reads: "It is a fact that the Jews are fighting against the Catholic Church, persisting in free thinking, and are the vanguard of godlessness, Bolshevism and subversion."
It has frequently been cited as evidence of the Catholic Church's institutional anti-Semitism prior to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
But Hlond also wrote that there are many "ethically outstanding, noble and respectable" Jews, and that all Jews should be "respected and loved as persons and as neighbors."
In what appeared to be a condemnation of German Nazi laws, the letter warned against "imported from abroad" anti-Semitism that's "incompatible with Catholic ethics."
"It is not allowed to attack Jews, beat them, injure them or slander them," Hlond said in the letter, which priests read out in churches at Lent in 1936.
He said it was "good" to support Polish businesses and avoid Jewish ones, but it was "forbidden" to "ravage Jewish shops, destroy the goods of the Jews, break windows, throw firecrackers at their homes."
Rosen, who has decades of experience in Catholic-Jewish relations, said the process of making Hlond a saint should be halted.
But the Polish priest promoting Hlond's case before the Vatican's Congregations for the Causes of Saints said the criticism is "unfounded" because Hlond's words had been taken out of context. Mgr. Boguslaw Koziol has discussed all the documents with Vatican experts, and insists Hlond preached love regardless of nation or religion.
Koziol believes that the whole passage - titled "From our Sins" - was progressive for its time and aimed to protect Jews from violence. But he admits it also included questionable ideas.
Hlond's critics "have focused on this negative part of the letter, but are not quoting any other part," he told the AP.
Catholic weekly Tygodnik Powszechny argued that the letter failed to protect Jews from the attacks of Polish nationalists.
It said Hlond didn't "suggest any way out of the 'Jewish problem,' or any good plan for a dignified and peaceful coexistence in one country. One could protest: these were not yet the times of dialogue. But one may also reply: shouldn't we expect candidates for sainthood to be larger than the routine thinking of their times?"
Referring to the July 4, 1946 pogrom in the town of Kielce - where a mob and secret security forces killed at least 40 Jews and two Poles who were defending them - Rosen said that Hlond "did not condemn the pogrom nor urge Poles to stop murdering Jews. Rather, he pointed out that the Jews were all communists or supporters of communism and that the pogrom was their own fault."
Koziol, however, blames Poland's post-war communist rule for Hlond's reticence. Any direct condemnation would have meant a confrontation with the regime and repercussions for the church.
In 2005, the Vatican shelved the planned beatification of French priest the Rev. Leon Dehon and launched an inquiry after complaints about his anti-Semitic views.
____________________________________________
Both ALLENDE and PHILLIPS weave the myth of SUPREMACY throughout these novels. We hear PHILLIPS giving her OXFORD grad characters that feeling of people with religious beliefs as being IGNORANT. These policy and cultural stigmas tied to SUPREMACY calling what are a SHIP OF FOOLS 'elite' OR 'exceptional' has no basis in fact. It is all propaganda pushed for thousands of years by any global 1% wanting to maintain wealth and power.
So today in US we are watching as global banking 1% tell us the ASIAN 99% of citizens are more intelligent --these same global banking 1% were saying WHITE EUROPEANS were more intelligent -----these same global banking 1% keep saying JEWISH people are more intelligent.
'The thesis of the East Asian superiority in intelligence to Whites is false. This paper has focussed on IQ issues, but in another paper “The Myth of East Asian Racial and Cultural Supremacy” I will focus on broader civilisational issues which tend to not be discussed today'.
Global banking 1% OLD WORLD EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS no more believe that ASIANS are SUPERIOR than the MAN IN THE MOON. EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS are simply morphing into 3000BC HINDI/BRAHMIN PAGANISM.
RACE SUPREMACY HAS EXISTED THROUGHOUT ANCIENT AND MODERN HISTORY ---IT IS CULTURAL TIED TO KEEPING WEALTH AND POWER TO THAT FEW.
It is no accident that this article is tied to CULTURAL MARXISM------none of these socio-economic studies and data are LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE----they are all far-right wing global banking 1%. Who is pushing this ideal of white race in decline? Well, that would be FLIPPING THE EARTH'S AXIS GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS morphing into 3000BC Hindi Brahmin paganism.
'That is the exact alternative which confronts the white race. For white civilisation is today conterminous with the white race'.
ALLENDE makes reference continually to racial superiority of Hispanic or mixed race LATINO and native citizens as does PHILLIPS in describing Jewish 'intellectuals' vs 99% of REAL Jewish believers. All these SUPERIORITIES are FAKE.
The Myth of East Asian Intellectual Supremacy
by Peter J. White
Lothrop Stoddard writing in “The Rising Tide of Color Against White Supremacy”, (Charles Scribners, New York, 1920) stated in these terms the threat that now engulfs the White world: “ “Finally perish!” That is the exact alternative which confronts the white race. For white civilisation is today conterminous with the white race. The civilisations of the past were local. They were confined to a particular people or group of peoples. If they failed, there were always some unspoiled, well endowed barbarians to step forward and “carry on”. But today there are no more white barbarians. The earth has grown small, and men are everywhere in close touch. If white civilisation goes down, the white race is irretrievably ruined. It will be swamped by the triumphant coloured races, who will obliterate the white man by elimination or absorption. What has taken place in Central Asia, once a white and now a brown or yellow land, will take place in Australasia, Europe and America. Not today, nor yet tomorrow; perhaps not for generations; but surely in the end. If the present drift be not changed, we whites are all ultimately doomed. Unless we set our house in order, the doom will sooner or later overtake us all.”
This grim prophecy by Lothrop Stoddard is almost fulfilled: countries such as Australia, the United States and Britain will cease to be majority white before 2050 – in the case of the United States, by around 2040 or sooner. In this context it is important for pro-white organisations to tackle and refute ideologies harming white resistance to what is clearly a form of quiet or passive genocide. IQ is one such ideology.
“Racialists” and IQ
White racialists, with a few notable exceptions, have salivated, much like Pavlov’s dogs at the mere mention of IQ. IQ, so scientific and clinical, was typically used to show the intellectual superiority of Whites over Blacks. Such white racialists have been hypnotised by this “crude consumer index”. Fortunately this lack of criticism has not engulfed all conservative groups. For example conservative non-racialists Z. Dobbs and A.B. Roosevelt, “The Great Deceit: Social Pseudo-Sciences”, (Veritas Foundation, New York, 1964) show how, contrary to many so-called racialists, that IQ tests are a Leftist weapon. Pitirim Sorokin points out that Leo Tolstoi, Pushkin, Hegel, Vico and Sir Isaac Newton (predominately Nordics) would be regarded as inferior by standard IQ tests: P. Sorokin, “Fads and Fables in Modern Sociology” (1956), p.81.
However the Nordics, the Northern European people have been creators of civilisation as Henry Fairfield Osborn observed: “The northern races… invaded countries to the south, not only as conquerors, but as contributors of strong and intellectual elements to more or less decadent civilisations. Through the Nordic tide which flowed into Italy came the ancestors of Raphael, Leonardo, Galileo, Titian; also according to Gunther, of Giotto, Botticelli, Petrarch and Tasso. Columbus, from his portraits and from busts, whether authentic or not, was clearly of Nordic ancestry. Kosuth was a Calvinist and of a noble family and there is a presumption in favour of his being Nordic. Kosciusko and Pulaski were members of a Polish nobility which, at the time, was largely Nordic…” However the world of IQ, where human creativity is allegedly reducible to a number , discards all of this in favour of a fetish about IQ population means.
We can welcome the return of a “biological turn” in the study of man and society as a healthy revolt against the shifting environmentalism of the social sciences which cumulated in the relativistic nonsense of postmodernism and deconstructionism. This is step in the right direction towards re-establishing genuine scientificity in the social sciences.
However according to IQ theorist, Jewish psychologist H.J. Eysenck, Asians, (East Asians) are more intelligent than non-Jewish whites, but Jews are the most intelligent people on earth: see H.J. Eysenck and l. Kamin, “Intelligence: The Battle for the Mind”, (Pan, London, 1981), p.85. According to IQ theorist Arthur Jensen, because East Asians have a higher IQ than Whites (i.e., the East Asian mean or average IQ is greater than Whites), Whites and Asians can live side-by-side in multiracial America. Race and colour does not matter to him; all that matters is maximising IQ to preserve the high culture of Wagner, Verdi and Puccini – who are, of course, not Asians! In an interview in the magazine American Renaissance (May 26, 1992) edited by Jared Taylor, who also champions the East Asian superiority thesis), Jensen doesn’t say that Wagner et. al., are “Asians”, but he might as well have: “I think that the Asians [note, not merely East Asians] are capable of preserving that level of civilization, once introduced to it.” No reflection there about the fact that it was the white race who created that “civilization” in the first place.
Richard Lynn and J. Philippe Rushton are the main proponents of the East Asian (sometimes just “Asian” is used) superiority thesis. Lynn believes that Asian civilisation was probably more advanced than Europe civilisation until about 500 years ago (which is becoming now an Establishment view). Rushton sees European technological supremacy as a mere blip. Lynne sees China as being the ultimate ruler of the world, not only because of their eugenic practices, but because the Chinese are racially superior to Whites. “Whites” for Lynn include the Indians and Pakistanis, who are “Caucasians” and are not a “genetic problem”.
In a work with Tatu Vanhanen, “IQ and the Wealth of Nations”, (Praeger, Westport, 2002), this theme of Asian racial superiority is continued. (See also J.P. Rushton, Review, “Personality and Individual Differences” vol.34, 2002, pp.367-372.) It is absurd to judge entire nation’s intellectual potential by the crude mechanism of mean IQ scores as Lynn and Vanhanen do. For a start, most nations are now multiracial, and given Lynn’s own assumption that Black IQ scores are lower than Whites, there will hence be a lowering of the means. However Lynn and Vanhanen continue the racial superiority theme. It is claimed that China and Asia’s technology was in advance of Europe’s up until 1500 AD. Such claims are based on dated archaeological and histiographical evidence.
For example, you will find no mention of the Pyramids in Lynn/Vanhanen/Rushton. A 3,000 year old disc discovered in East Germany in 2000 depicts the cosmos, the sun, crescent moon and 32 stars. It is the earliest known accurate depiction of the cosmos. It was found on a hill called Mittelberg near the town of Nebra in the state of Saxony-Anholt. The site was an observatory and temple. A 3,000 year-old wooden staircase has been found at Hallstatt in northern Austria – the world’s oldest staircase.
Another fact to be mentioned is that Europeans had the first bronze metallurgy thousands of years before the Asians. Jewish philosopher Michael Levin in his paper “Is There a Superior Race?” in G. McDonald (ed), “A Race Against Time”, (New century books, Oakton, 2003), pp.272-280, says that Whites are superior to Asians given Whites’ cultural achievements, because a world without Asians would be recognizable, but a world without Whites would not be. In this context the discovery of Nordic mummies in the Chinese Turkistan region may give support to the “Aryans as creators of civilisation” theory. Nordics may have given China the chariot, metallurgical and textile technology which ‘kick-started’ Chinese civilisation. I will discuss this further in another paper. See J.P. Mallory and V. Mair, “The Tarim Mummies” (Thames and Hudson, New York, 2000).
Lynn and Vanhanen claim that Asian canal systems were superior to European ones (Perhaps, but heavier rainfall needed this anyway) and that the Chinese invented the stirrup (475 ADF – now known to be false, it was a European invention).
An effective refutation or the Asianist was given by Richard McCulloch when he said: “We should never forget we are the peoples of Western civilization. We are also the American people, which is why America is part of Western civilization. We have an unmatched record of achievement. No other people or civilization, including the East Asians and the Jews, even come close. This is demonstrable, provable, objective fact. The proof is overwhelming in the evidence presented in literally thousands of museums throughout the Western world, where the mind is overcome by the bewildering display of Western initiative, invention and innovation. Any attempt to compare the level of East Asian achievement with ours is laughable. If the results of IQ tests are consistent with this statement, then perhaps there is some other mental factor, not measured by IQ scores that accounts for our Promethean levels of achievement. Spengler recognised this unique quality when he characterised Western or Gothic civilization as Faustian”. Richard McCulloch, Instauration, August 1996, pp.5-9, at p.8
Some examples of Nordic super-geniuses include Gregory Smith who has an IQ in the top one fourth to one half of a per cent of IQs in the world (“Majority Super Genius”, Instauration, January 1999, p.15). Another example is that of a young Nordic girl who found a way of encrypting information on the internet, back in 2000, that worked 22 times faster than the MIT version used at the time: C. Jardine, “The Girl Whose Sums Could Change Our Lives”, The Weekly Telegraph, March 29-April 4, 2000) p.21.
Rushton grants that the IQ tests of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, with a smaller right tail towards the very high IQs. Thus the proportion of very high IQs and geniuses is much higher among Whites than Asians: M. Masters, “The Morality of Survival” (Part II), American Renaissance, August 1995, pp. 1, 3-5, at p.3. For IQ elitists such as Lynn and Rushton, this is a fact which should be of supreme analytical and theoretical importance because it is high IQ genius which builds and maintains civilisations, not mean/average intelligences.
Instead, no mention or development of this is made by Lynn and Rushton. Rushton said to Richard McCulloch at the second American Renaissance conference that McCulloch “shouldn’t find too much comfort in that.” (Instauration, August, 1996), hence dismissing White genius levels and in one sentence giving the race realist game away. McCulloch was hence right to criticise Rushton’s speech as “racially demoralizing”.
Although American Renaissance, which champions racial realism, has done some excellent work, the magazine operates with a wide category of “White” which includes Jews. There is a considerable literature by Jews denying that Jews are White and in general little attention is devoted to this question in the magazine. (See Hila Hershkoviz, “Ashkenazi Jews are Not White – Response to Haaretz Article”, Times of Israel December 5, 2014.) The editor of American Renaissance Jared Taylor, inconsistently, while accepting the standard race realist claim that Jews have a higher IQ than (Nordic) Whites also does not recognise that old Americans of Nordic descent are racially distinct people from the Jews. But if the populations are not distinct, then the IQ comparison simply collapses. He can’t have it both ways.
Jared Taylor holds that the Japanese and Chinese have built superior societies to Europeans: J. Taylor, “If We Do Nothing”, American Renaissance June 1996, pp.3-7, at p.4. Here though is the central paradox facing American Renaissance. It aims to defend the White race and White civilisation. But on the Asian superiority thesis, it follows that there is no reason to do this at all: Mankind would be better in IQ social Darwinist terms by letting the White race slide into extinction. Interestingly enough one can even find anti-racist liberal pieces in the magazine, presumably inserted to generate an atmosphere of objectivity, even though Establishment literature is full of such pieces: M. Meldahl, “Dissenting Voices” American Renaissance December 1993, pp.1,3.
Taylor reviewed Rushton’s pro-Asian work without making any criticisms, and in fact took it a step further by saying that Asians have a “large” brain and Whites “intermediate” and Blacks have a “small” brain. The White/Asian brain distinction is not substantiated on the evidence (more below). See S.J. Taylor “A New Theory of Racial Differences”, American RenaissanceDecember, 1994, pp.1, 3-7.
Abandon IQ
I recommend the abandonment of IQ as some sort of criterion for the assessment of the intellectual superiority of the races. The only real test is that of overall contribution to civilisation. The biological and psychological evidence (especially of identical twins reared apart), indicates that “intelligence” (whatever it is) is primarily determined by heredity, as are many group psychological differences: K. Lamb, “Individual and Group Character in the Social Psychology of William McDougal”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.39, no.3, 1999, pp.255-308. However, it is quite another matter to suppose that IQ measured by any test (e.g., IPAT, Raven matrices, WAIS, WISC etc.) actually measures “intelligence”. It is highly debateable whether there is a g, a unitary phenomenon accounting for all the multifarious manifestations of common sense intelligence as Jensen and Brand, following Charles Spearman (1883-1945), propose: A.R. Jensen, “The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability”, (Praeger, Westport, 1998); C. Brand, “The g Factor” John Wiley, New York, 1996).
The idea that human mental ability could be reduced to a singe number for ranking is highly counter-intuitive and should not be accepted without the strongest evidence. The existing evidence is only suggestive and not decisive: M.D. Lezak, “IQ: R.I.P.”, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol.10, 1988, pp.351-361. In any case, lacking a definition of “intelligence” based in turn on a general theory of intelligence, it becomes difficult to know what it is that we are trying to measure. Thus we should be sceptical of Jensen’s claim that intelligence is a form of information processing, or that the study of a grab bag of physiological variables such as reaction times may substitute for intelligence studies.
By such reductionist accounts, present day computers, which even the strong programme in AI do not yet regard as “thinking machines”, are superior to humans. A present day non-thinking computer can be programmed to do better than humans (including East Asian and Jews) on many cognitive tests – remembering that computers can beat humans at chess. Further, we would also expect that “creativity” should be an essential part of “intelligence”. Yet IQ tests do not measure creativity and have never intended to: H.B. Lyman, “Test Scores and What They Mean”, (Allyn and bacon, Boston, 1998), p.41.
The fundamental assumption of IQ assessment is that IQ is a property of an individual. In particular a number of individuals are assessed by a number M of specific abilities, i=1,2,3,… M. These are the components of general intelligence. These individuals may then be ordered by the order relation, “is at least as intelligent as”, so that an IQ ordering may be defined. The ordering is reflexive, transitive and complete. The IQ function f is a set of orderings of the individuals such that there is only one IQ ordering, Q. But the Four Arrow Impossibility conditions of: (1) unrestricted domain; (2) the Pareto condition; (3) independence of irrelevant individuals and (4) no domain ability, apply: A. Sen, “Collective Choice and Social Welfare”, (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1970). Hence by Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem there is no IQ Function simultaneously satisfying conditions (1)-(4). Hence if IQ orderings are nothing more than a distillation of individual ability orderings, then IQ is indeed “impossible”: P.J.W.N. Bird, “The Impossibility of IQ”, Economic Letters, vol.2, 1979, pp.95-97.
It is worth noting that there is even dissenting opinion about the alleged survival value of high intelligence. Arthur C. Clarke has said: “It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value.” Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart has also said: “Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together make genius.” Swiss researchers Fredric Merv and others at the University of Fribourg found that fast learning fruit fly larvae competing against more slow-witted ones in scarce food conditions did not win! More energy was devoted to making and rearranging neural connections in their brains leaving less energy to forage. Decisive action requires consideration of limited alternatives and smart people often out-smart themselves by complicating matters.
A Critique of the East Asian Superiority Thesis
The Black-White IQ difference has existed for as long as IQ tests have been administered. However race realists claim that the Black IQ mean of 85, and even lower in Africa indicates a racial inferiority in intelligence. Even if this was so, and it could well be, the African IQ scores are so low as to make the majority of the population so dysfunctional that they would not be able to operate modern technology, such as military technology used in warfare. This, alone, indicates that there is a problem with IQ tests.
It is not unreasonable to use our ordinary experience as an error detector. A gram of controlled experiment is not necessarily worth more than a tonne of unanalysed observations, if the experiment is misconstrued from the start. For example E.O. Wilson, “On Human Nature”, (Bantam Books, New York, 1979) cites the work of D.G. Freedman, a psychologist at the University of Chicago, on the behaviour of new born infants of different races. Chinese-American infants are less changeable and less perturbed by noise and movement than Caucasian-American infants. According to Wilson this gives an “air of dignity and self-possession” to the Chinese-Americans, whatever that means. An alternative explanation is that this indicates “superior” White intelligence – a hypothesis consistent with Rushton’s own data (see references below), that White babies are “superior” to east Asians to about the 7th year.
Another foundational problem with the East Asian superiority thesis is, as Jensen himself notes, we have no idea what a random sample of the population of China or even Japan is: see Jensen interview with American Renaissance, May 26 1992. Intelligence would vary greatly in any population encompassing nearly one third of humanity. Who knows where the mean IQ actually lies?
Lynn has said that the average East Asian IQ in Britain and Europe is 105 and also in the U.S. But in his paper, “Race Differences in Intelligence: A Global Perspective” The Mankind Quarterly, vol.31, no.3, Spring 1991, pp.255-296, the East Asian IQ is 103 (23 studies). But he also says that East Asians are visual-spatially “strong”, but verbally “weak”, with a verbal IQ of 96 rising to verbal 100, visual-spatial, 106. Mainland Chinese supposedly have an IQ of 105; Taiwanese 104.7; Hong Kong Chinese 107; Japan 105 and Singapore 103. The lowly White Americans average only 100 (although he does admit, but does not explain, that Minnesota Whites score higher at 105, which raises an immediate problem for the East Asian superiority thesis). And a surprise: the average IQ of Israel is 94!
Lynn and Rushton are not too concerned about what constitutes “White” and include North Africans and others who most theorists would not classify as “White”. The IQ of some countries, such as Australia, which has contributed more Nobel Prize winners than Japan, is a poor 98. But according to newspaper reports of televised Australian National IQ tests in 2002 , 2003 and 2004, the average Australian IQ score for a multiracial country was above 100. Men outscored women 112 to 108 and blondes (=Nordics) averaged 111 (which is greater than Lynn’s revised Ashkenazi Jewish average and also refutes the “dumb blonde” ideology of the media). People 181 to 200 cms tall (again predominately Nordics) averaged an IQ of 113. Some Anglo Saxon districts, which were not particularly affluent, averaged an IQ of 125! The state of the Australian Capital Territory averaged 114. Given the Flynn effect (see below), this is consistent with the assorts of scores which one would expect from Nordics: back in 1920 Stoddard found the average IQ score of Nordics in North America to be about 106: see William McDougall, “Is America Safe for Democracy?” (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1921), p.64. At that time the Italian-American IQ score was a lowly 84, which has now risen considerably, reaching 100.
Race realist Christopher Brand puts the White IQ at 104: R. Pearson, “Political Correctness and Research in Human Intelligence”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.36, 1996, pp.393-406, cited p.399, where Seligman puts the (non-Jewish) White IQ at 102: D. Seligman, “A Question of Intelligence”, (Birch Lane Press, New York, 1992). This is clearly a guessing game, lacking in scientific objectivity. It is inconsistent with a large amount of evidence. Thus Ralph Scott in “Education and Ethnicity”, (Council for Social and Economic Studies, Washington DC, nd), p.106, mentions the Achievement Test Scores of Fairfax County Public School, North Virginia (which has a strong minority focus, where White scores surpassed Asian scores (during ages 4-6 years; equal at ages 6-8 years and Whites greater at ages 8-11 years). In California’s competency test for public school teachers, in the test for 10th grade abilities in mathematics, Whites had an 80 percent pass rate, Asians 59 percent and Blacks 35 percent: American Renaissance, April, 1996, p.11.
The East Asian superiority thesis has been attacked on the grounds of the unrepresentativeness of the sampling of populations: A.R. Brody, “Intelligence”, (Academic Press, New York, 1992), p.313; M. Chon, “The Truth About Asian Americans”, in R. Jacoby and N. Glauberman (eds), The Bell Curve Debate” (Times Books, Random House, New York, 1995), pp.238-240, at p.239. Some competing studies have found no Asian-White IQ differences: H.W. Stevenson (et. al.), “Cognitive Performance and Academic Achievement of Japanese, Chinese and American Children”, Child Development, vol.56, 1985, pp.718-734. J.R. Flynn claims that Asian-Americans have the same non-verbal IQ as White Americans but a slightly lower verbal IQ: J.R. Flynn “Asian Americans: Achievement Beyond IQ, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1991): D. Budge, “US-Chinese Success ‘Due to Attitudes of Parents’,” The Times Education Supplement, May 1, 1998, p.20. N. Weyl, “World Population Growth and the Geography of Intelligence”, Modern Age, vol.22, 1978, pp.64-71, is sceptical of the Japanese IQ score as a 10 percent superiority in mathematics would give Japan an utterly decisive leadership in science, which has not occurred. Japan has a high level of mental development , but is not renowned for producing individuals of remarkable brilliance.
Rushton’s Racial Evolutionary Nonsense
J.P. Rushton in “Race, Evolution and Behavior”, 3rd edition, (Charles Darwin Research Institute, Port Huron, 2000), attempted to give an evolutionary foundation to the East Asian superiority thesis. Rushton’s work at the time received public interest through the claim that he made that Blacks have larger penises (erect) and testicles than Whites, and Whites in turn, larger genitals than Asians! Supposedly this has some relevance to intelligence. Rushton paid 50 volunteers members of the different races, recruited in a shopping mall, to answer questions about the size of their penises and how far they ejaculated! All this could show is how much an unrepresentative sample of males lie! In any case the testicle size claim was contradicted by C. Coon in “Racial Adaptations”, (Nelson-Hall, Chicago, 1982), p.189, who said that the medical evidence favoured Whites as having larger genitals.
At the basis of Rushton’s theory is r-K selection theory: R.H. MacArthur and E.O. Wilson, “The Theory of Island Biogeography”, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967). Here r is the population’s maximum growth rate and K the environment’s carrying capacity. Species selected for fast reproduction with a slow ability to compete are called r selected. K selected species have been selected for success at competition. The reproduction strategy of r species is to produce numerous offspring with little energy devoted to rearing them e.g., frogs. The K strategy is to produce few offspring with considerable energy devoted to rearing them e.g., humans. But Rushton claims that there are human racial differences in r-K strategy. Asians/Mongoloids have a more advanced K strategy than Whites/Caucasians, and in turn, allegedly, Caucasians over Negroids. Mongoloid superiority is allegedly expressed in (1) higher intelligence and brain size; (2) lower numbers of children; (3) less crime and other factors such as lower mortality.
First note that it highly doubtful that r-K theory can be applied to humans at all. Human reproductive strategies are varying degrees of K and not r at all. The most sexed populations should be more not less K: I. Silverman, “The r/K Theory of Human Individual Differences: Scientific and Social Issues”, Ethnology and Sociobiology, vol.11, 1990, pp.1-9.
Second it defies belief that Lynn and Rushton believe that the number of children born is highest in Blacks, intermediate in Whites and lowest in Asians. It is true that some African nations are undergoing massive population increases (e.g., Nigeria) but even here children are not treated in any type of r-strategy. In Asia Japan is facing a birth dearth, but China needed an oppressive state-enforced policy to slow down its massive population growth. Whites are a racial minority in the world with below replacement level birth rate and the more Nordic the country, generally the lower the birth rate. If Rushton was right Western countries would have the population levels of China and India.
Rushton hypothesizes that Mongoloids are intellectually superior to Whites because they evolved in a colder climate, as evidenced by their slight builds and the epicanthic folds of the eyes. However the epicanthic folds are usually regarded as an adaptation to dusty environments. Cold climates favour larger, stronger builds such as Nordic Whites. Pale skin is an adaptation to the cold, maximising vitamin D production. The light eyes of the Nordic are more of an adaptation to cold climates than the dark eyes of the Mongoloid. Eskimos have successfully lived in very cold environments such as Greenland – but so too have Nordics. It does not follow from such an Eskimo presence that they are physiologically better adapted to the cold than Nordics. The Viking settlement in Greenland died out because of cultural factors affecting adaptation during an unusually harsh climatic period, rather than racial factors: J. Diamond “Collapse” (Allan Lane, London 2005). Interestingly enough the Eskimo, a Mongoloid, arrived in the Arctic about 10,000 years ago, probably too late for major physiological changes to occur. Their mean IQ is 91 and they have a visual-spatial score of 90 – yet in the field have superior spatial-visual abilities. It is likely that the IQ tests are flawed because they could not have survived in such a harsh environment without peak spatial-visual skills.
It has not even been established that the challenges of a cold environment causes high intelligence to evolve. It could very well mean the reverse: that natural selection ensures that only intelligent people survive in cold environments. It may be a fact that high intelligence races are found in cold environments because they were highly intelligent to start with; Rushton commits an “after, therefore because of” fallacy in his reasoning. Nor should the challenges of desert environments be underestimated, where droughts and other challenges existed.
The Australian Aborigine with an IQ of allegedly 85, according to the race realists, has an extremely high visual acuity, greater than East Asians and Whites, with their visual cortex being larger than these races: M. Kohn, “The Race Gallery”, (Jonathan Cape, London 1995, p.125. Yet on standard IQ theory this race is regarded as intellectually “inferior”, which can hardly be correct since this race has exhibited great survival skills: E.M. Miller, “Paternal Provisioning Versus Mate-Seeking in Human Populations”, Personality and Individual Differences, vol.17, 1994.
Some racial theorists (e.g. Miller as above) hypothesise that climate-based evolution only lifted North East Asian IQ moderately. It was the infusion of White genes during and after the Mesolithic period which lifted Asian IQ to European levels. If this was so then the ground collapses from under the Asian IQ superiority thesis.
Rushton claims that American Asians commit fewer crimes than Whites and he refers to FBI Uniform Crime Statistics and National Victimisation Surveys : J.P. Rushton and G. Whitney, “Cross-National Variation in Crime Rates : Race, r-K Theory and Income”, Population and Environment, vol.23, 2002, pp.501-511.
Such statistics only measure individuals convicted and do not address group/collectivistic crime, such as Asian crime gangs: K-L. Chin, “Chinatown Gangs”, (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996). Police find it impossible to penetrate Chinese “Cong Societies” due to group loyalty and the fear instilled in Chinese-Americans: D.D. Daye, “A Law Enforcement Sourcebook on Asian Crime and Cultures”, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997). Open gang warfare exists across the United States between rival Asian gangs. W. Kleinknecki, “The New Ethnic Mobs: The Changing Face of Organised Crime in America”, (The Free Press, New York, 1996). Further, according to the FBI 1995 Supplementary Homicide Report, which would have been available before the 3rd edition of “Race, Evolution and Behaviour” was available, Asians (including South East Asians) in America committed murder at 1.23 times the White race.
It is impossible to suppose that East Asians commit less crime than Whites given the extent of bribery and “kick-backs” in Asian society, which is a way of life. Tax evasion and the use of a cash economy is also a matter of fact. None of this is considered by Rushton. Nor does he consider “political crimes” which never go into official murder statistics – otherwise the death toll from Chairman Mao’s regime would make nonsense of all cross-national crime comparisons.
Let us now consider the brain size issue. Rushton’s view is that Caucasoids and Mongoloids have evolved a larger brain being at a great distance from the Equator Negroids. Based on magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain, the averagre overall correlation of 0.44 was allegedly found between brain size measured by MRI and IQ: J.P. Rushton, “Race, Intelligence and Brain”, Personality and Individual Differences, vol.23, 1997, pp.169-180. Lynn cited 16 surveys with correlations between brain size and IQ ranging from 0.14 to 0.23. C. Coon in “Racial Adaptations” (p.174) believed that the correlation was higher at 0.30 citing: L. van Valen, “Brain Size and Intelligence in Man”, American Anthropologist, vol.74, 1976. Pp.425-427. If we take Rushton’s MRI measure and correct for age, the correlation falls to 0.22 and is reduced to negligible when further corrected for sex and head size: N. Raz (et. al.), “Neuroanatomical Correlates of Age-Sensitive and Age-Invariant Cognitive Abilities: An In Vivo Investigation”, Intelligence, vol.17, 1993, pp.407-422.
M. Kohn in “The Race Gallery” (Jonathan Cape, London, 1995) notes that Rushton pounces on the idea that there is a correlation between the time that the first molar tooth erupts and brain size, i.e., the later the teeth emerge, the bigger the brain. Rushton claims that the average age for the first molar in Africans is 5.8 years and 6.1 in Europeans and East Asians. However, he had to drop the Mongoloid Eskimos who have permanent teeth erupting at 5.5 years, which would bring the Mongoloid average down below Europeans.
Rushton claims that at birth, 4 months, and 1 year, Asians averaged a larger cranial capacity than Whites, although smaller in stature and lighter in weight: J.P. Rushton, “Cranial Size and IQ in Asian Americans from Birth to Age Seven”, Intelligence, vol.25, 1997, pp.7-20. Anecdotal evidence from midwifery should lead to scepticism about such a claim. Large-headed children delivered by women of slender builds with a small pelvis often face major birth traumas and White men who race mix with Chinese women often find that their wives cannot deliver naturally (needing a C-section) or else tear badly. The East Asians, as depicted by Rushton should face this type of birth problem, but do not.
Rushton says that Samuel George Morton’s 19th century data, as reassessed by S.J. Gould, indicates a Mongoloid average of 86.5 cubic inches and Caucasoids, 85.5 cubic inches. But Gould’s own tabulation is Mongoloids 87 cubic inches and Caucasians also 87 cubic inches and Africans, 83 cubic inches. Rushton is indeed right to note that Gould should not dismiss a difference on one cubic inch as “trivial”, but nor should Rushton have “massaged” Morton’s statistics to get his own preferred result.
In any case Rushton says that the mean difference in average brain size only emerges after correcting for body size, as Asians are in general shorter in stature and lighter in weight than Whites. In using autopsy brain mass data from Tobias (P.V. Tobias, “Brain-Size Grey Matter and Race – Fact or Fiction?” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol.32, 1970, pp.3-26), the Mongoloid series averaged 1,368 grams and Caucasoids 1,378 grams. In using U.S. military data, Mongoloids averaged 1,416 cubic cms and Caucasoids, 1,380 cubic cms – but only after adjusting for the effects of stature and weight: J.P. Rushton, “Mongoloid-Caucasoid Differences in Brain Size from Military Samples”, Intelligence, vol.15, 1991, pp.351-359.
L. Willerman, “Commentary on Rushton’s Mongoloid-Caucasoid Differences in Brain Size”, Intelligence, vol.15, 1991, pp.361-364, argues that Rushton makes an inappropriate correction; I maintain that a correction per se is inappropriate. Rushton seems to be operating with a model of cranial capacity as an index of brain power, like the engine capacity of a car. But there is no neurological reason to “correct” for stature and weight because these are irrelevant, even on his neurological model to the “brain power” of a given brain. Women, have brains, on average 15 percent smaller than men. To deal with this “inconvenient truth” scaling occurs so that when scaled against their smaller bodies the brain size difference disappears. But outside of political correctness, why should such a scaling occur if what we are interested in is “engine capacity”? But even though women’s brains are smaller than men’s, the Wernicke area, a key area for comprehending sounds and word meanings is 30 percent larger in women, and the Broca area, important for the ability to produce fluent and expressive speech, is 20 percent larger. Even here we cannot conclude from these size differences that women’s have a greater verbal superiority to men, as men’s Wernicke and Broca areas may be neurologically more efficient, even if smaller. Even though girls are outperforming boys at school (in an anti-male feminist environment), there is evidence that men’s brain cells transmit nerve impulses faster than women’s. The research was done by Professor Edward Reed of Toronto University, and Philip Vernon and Andrew Johnson of the University of Western Ontario. Males were found to have four times faster nerve conduction velocities than females, a significant sex difference in all test conditions in favour of males.
In 2004 it was claimed that a new species of human was discovered on the island of Flores Indonesia: Homo Floresiensis. This claim was based on the discovery of an 18,000 year old skeleton of a human only three feet high. The skeleton had a very small head, with a brain capacity of only 380 cubic cms – which by Lynn and Rushton’s reasoning should have made Homo Floresiensis an intellectual vegetable. But CAT scans done by Dean Falk of Florida State University indicate that this little human had a sophisticated brain structure and a high intelligence.
There is considerable ethno-racial variation in cranial measurements. Coon has the Norse at 1,470 cubic cms, the Eskimo at 1519 cubic cms and the Buriat at 1515 cubic cms. However Dr. H.C. Gordon of the British Medical Association found that the brain weights of Caucasian Whites was highest, followed by the Chinese and Japanese as did Coon in “The Story of Man” (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1967). According to W.J. Jamieson, “Intellectual Ability, Evolution and Eugenics”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.36, 1996, pp.381-392, p.383, the brain size of early 20th century Parisians was 1550 cubic cms. Other White males averaged over 1,500 cubic cms according to P. Sorokin in “Social and Cultural Mobility”, (Free Press, New York, 1965), p.220. Opposing Rushton’s position is that cranial capacity is a result of climate adaptation. Populations in cold climates have an average annual cranial capacity of 1,386 cubic cms and in hot climates 1,297 cubic cms, but there are a number of exceptions: K. Beals (et. al.), “Brain Size Cranial Morphology, Climate and Time Machines”, Current Anthropology, vol.25, no.3, 1984, pp.301-330.
Another problem for Rushton’s theory is the considerable neurological redundancy in the human brain. John Lorber, “Is Your Brain Really Necessary?” Science, vol.210, 1980, p.1232, reported on studies of victims of hydrocephalus (water on the brain). One subject had a respectable IQ of 126 and was a maths honour student, but had “virtually no brain”! All that the neurologist Lorber found in this subject’s head was a thin layer of brain cells only a millimetre in thickness. The rest of the intercranial space was filled with cerebrospinal fluid. This, not only raises problems for Rushton’s theory, but also for reductionist neurology. It is sufficient to note that brain size, at best, is only weakly correlated with IQ. What seems to be more important is the degree of neural connectiveness. Otherwise blue whales would be of a super-intelligence level. Further it has been argued that the degree of fissuring and thickness in the frontal cortical brain layers is more important than the sheer size of the human brain. The Negroid brain is generally less fissured than the White and Mongoloid brain. See C.F. Connolly, “External Morphology of the Primate Brain”, (Thomas, Springfield, 1950); F.W. Vint, “The Brain of the Kenya Native”, Journal of Anatomy, vol.66, 1934; H.G. Garrett, “IQ and Race Differences”, (Howard Allen, Cape Canaveral, 1973), p.14.
Sociobiologists have noted that during the last 20,000 years the upward trend in brain size has been reversed. Modern man has a smaller brain than the Cro-Magnons, by about 100-200 cubic cms. It is usually inferred that the Cro-Magnons were more intelligent than modern man: J.W. Jamieson, “Biological Diversity and Ethnic Identity: Changing Patterns in the Modern World”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.36, 1995, pp.193-199; B. Chiarelli, “Some comments on the Evolution of Hominid Intelligence” The Mankind Quarterly, vol.37, 1996, pp.29-36. Yet could it be that with modern man evolution departed from pursuing quantity and pursued quality? Perhaps evolution pursued the path of neural efficiency rather than sheer brain size? We will never know the answer to that question because we do not have a Cro-Magnon brain to subject to neurological investigation.
Dysgenics and the Decline of Intelligence
The “Flynn effect” has raised considerable controversy in intelligence research circles. U. Neisser (ed.) “The Rising Curve: Long-Term Gains in IQ and Related Measures”, (American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 1998). New Zealand researcher James Flynn noticed a trend of IQ improvement in 20 industrialised countries, with generational IQ gains rising more sharply as one moved away from educationally-loaded tests to culture-free tests, such as the Raven Progressive Matrices. The average IQ gain was three points per decade, with the rate of gain constant over 46 years. (1932-1978). The rate of gain was the same for ages 2-6 years, 6-16 years and adults, so the cause could not lie in schooling: J.R. Flynn, “The Mean IQ of Americans: Massive Gains 1932 to 1978”, Psychological Bulletin, vol.95, 1984, pp.29-51. Indeed, from 1963-1981 there was a decline in the American average performance of high school students on the standard Scholastic Aptitude Test (CAT). Flynn has said: “The combination of IQ gains and the decline in Scholastic Aptitude Test scores seems almost inexplicable… IQ gains of this magnitude pose a serious problem of causal explanation: Flynn as above. Flynn has convincingly argued in my opinion that environmental explanations of the Flynn effect (e.g., Flynn’s idea that it is due to nutrition) are inadequate. Further, Flynn acknowledges that the Black/White gap itself has not narrowed.
R. Scott and B. Poncy, “The “Flynn Effect”: How Applicable is it to Longitudinal IQ Assessment of American University Students?” The Mankind Quarterly vol.39,1999, pp.385-397, argue that the Flynn effect is in part a product of the Raven Matrices test. This test has the statistical flow that one more correct answer on the Raven Matrices test can increase a subject’s score by 1-3 points, which is approximately the “the average gain shown in an entire generation in the Scottish data”. (p.390) I agree that this is a statistical flow, but a Flynn effect (of a lesser magnitude) still exists for other IQ tests, such as the Wechster nonverbal and visuospatial tests: J.R. Flynn, “IQ Gains Over Time: Toward Finding the Causes”, in Neisser as above, pp.25-66.
R. Lynn in “Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations”, (Praeger, Westport, 1996) argues that apart from the Flynn effect there is a dysgenic trend for declining intelligence, as a negative fertility differential exists, with people of low IQ having more children than people of high IQ, regardless of race. (For a defence of Lynn against a mathematical objection by Samuel Preston, see J.C. Loehlin, “Whither Dysgenics: Comments on Lynn and Preston”, in Neisser (ed.), pp.389-398.) Lynn’s hypothesis raises the alarming prospect, noted before him by L. Stoddard in “The Rising Tide of Colour” and “Revolt Against Civilization” that an increasing proportion of the population lacks the genetic endowment to cope with modern technological society and may entirely in itself constitute a genetic time-bomb which threatens the existence of civilisation.
The thesis of the East Asian superiority in intelligence to Whites is false. This paper has focussed on IQ issues, but in another paper “The Myth of East Asian Racial and Cultural Supremacy” I will focus on broader civilisational issues which tend to not be discussed today.
_________________________________________________
ALLENDE creates a character in LUCIA her mother LENA having been RAPED by a white Chilean produced a mixed-race LUCIA. LUCIA makes her TRAIL OF TEARS escape to North America much more easily then EVELYN. LUCIA throughout IN MIDST OF WINTER has all the markings of a global banking 5% freemason/Greek player.
Now, we are just trying to add two plus two in this character LUCIA mother LENA------looking much like that partnership of ALLENDE/PINOCHET continuous wars 1970s CHILE AND ARGENTINA.
They say LUCIA the survivor-----we say LUCIA PINOCHET-----guilty of all kinds of government frauds and corruption.
The rehabilitation of ALLENDE'S RUSSEL as that global banking 5% freemason/Greek white player was an attack on our Western standards of morals and ethics.
Hmmmmmm, what WAS that OMEGA CLINIC LUCIA happened to know and work ----------tying EVELYN'S strong Latino Catholic rituals to what we know is a 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMIN retreat -----very ONE WORLD of ALLENDE
The OMEGA CLINIC in NIGERIA as well?
Omega Clinic
English
Edit
Share
Dossier Prof - Clinic Reception Rm
The Omega Clinic is a medical center in Omega's Gozu District.
ME2-2icon “The chances of surviving are… slim.” — Spoilers for Mass Effect 2 follow. ME2-2icon
This facility is supervised by Mordin Solus with assistance from Daniel and other personnel. In 2185, the Omega Clinic treated patients affected by a genetically-engineered plague. There are many characters that will say how much Dr. Mordin has helped them, and how much they owe him sitting and standing in various parts of the clinic. After Mordin accepted a posting on the Normandy SR-2, the facility came under the supervision of Daniel (if Commander Shepard chose the paragon option and let the batarians go) or another character.
Lucía Pinochet
...Inés Lucía Pinochet Hiriart (born December 14, 1943) is the eldest daughter of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet and Lucía Hiriart de Pinochet.
Under indictment for tax fraud, Pinochet traveled to the United States in January 2006 where she appealed for political asylum, but was promptly deported back to Argentina, the nation where she had last resided. At her father's military funeral in December 2006, she praised him for lighting a "flame of freedom" in September 1973, when he overthrew the government of Salvador Allende.
On September 13, 2007, Pinochet announced her intention to run as independent for a seat in parliament for the 23rd district (Las Condes, Vitacura, Lo Barnechea) in Santiago. However, she was arrested in October 2007 in the frame of the Riggs case, along with Pinochet's four other children and Lucia Hiriart, and 17 other persons (including two generals, one of his ex-lawyers and his ex-secretary). They are charged of embezzlement and use of false passports, accused of having illegally transferred $27m (£13.2m) to foreign bank accounts during Pinochet's rule.
Pinochet was elected councilwoman of Vitacura (a right-wing stronghold) in the 2008 election. She received nearly 16% of the votes, finishing second.
DON'T CRY FOR ME CHILE-------global banking 1% and me----we got the MONEY.
This is much like our US today's politics filling with HOOVERS-----NIXONS------FORDS all tied to global banking 1% sacking and looting frauds.
Lucia and Russel HELPING Evelyn by ending the road trip at OMEGA CLINIC grounds having that JAGUAR leading our 99% native victim to ONE WORLD 3000BC pagan ritual.
youtube.com
Informe Especial: “El Cema de Doña Lucía”
¿Chileno en el extranjero? Conéctate en https://www.tvnplay.com SUSCRÍBETE…
24horas.cl
Published on Jul 25, 2016
What we read in both ALLENDE'S 'In the Midst of Winter' and PHILLIP'S 'The Legacy' is the same myth-making and propaganda around emotional, physical conflicts tied to being a sovereign citizen tied to TRAIL OF TEARS continuous wars courtesy of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH. In both cases these novelists bring those same criminal and corrupted PRIESTS/CARDINALS/RABBIS into being the source of solace and resources.
There are no groups of people so tied to RACE SUPREMACY THAN those global banking 1%--whether Asian global banking 1%----Arabic global banking 1%---European global banking 1%--or Jewish global banking 1%. The need to make a 99% of citizens seen or think they are LESS is not tied to reality----it is tied to WEALTH AND POWER.
During pre-Weimar Europe those POLISH 99% of sovereign citizens were made THE OTHER described as backward and ignorant just as our Latin American native citizens are today and both novels BY WOMEN no less keep those RACIAL SUPREMACY stereotypes alive.
THIS IS WHAT WE SEE IN LUCIA AND EVELYN AS CHARACTERS. IT IS WHAT WE SEE IN RUSSEL AND JOE.
So, Evelyn is NOT being empowered by these two madcap global banking 5% players fighting for her----and our 99% of WE THE WOMEN whether US or new to US immigrant are not being empowered in today's MOVING FORWARD.
1973 Chilean coup d'état - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d%27état
The 1973 Chilean coup d'état was a watershed moment in both the history of Chile and the ... Allende's appointed army chief, Augusto Pinochet, rose to supreme power within a year of the coup, formally assuming power in late-1974.
Augusto Pinochet - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet
Augusto José Ramón Pinochet Ugarte was a Chilean general, politician and the dictator of ... Pinochet had been promoted to Commander-in-Chief of the Army by Allende on 23 August 1973, having been its General Chief of Staff since early ...
United States intervention in Chile - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_Chile
Chile is a country in the southern South America. It borders the countries of Peru, Bolivia and .... Helms was also concerned about Allende supporters in the Chilean military, as it seemed they .... In the Chilean coup of 1973, Augusto Pinochet rose to power, overthrowing the democratically elected president Salvador Allende.
Chilean coup: 40 years ago I watched Pinochet crush a democratic...
www.theguardian.com/…/20…/sep/07/chile-coup-pinochet-allende
Sep 7, 2013 ... How the drama and repression developed as a US-backed coup overthrew Allende's government on 11 September 1973.
But all those 'disappeared' and sent to extreme poverty were 99% native citizens ---except that is not true even today our 99% of Latino immigrants are spread all over the world.
Global banking 5% freemason/Greek players out en force pretending to care about NATIVE PEOPLE.
AP July 4, 2018, 1:38 PM
Priest on the path to sainthood criticized for anti-Semitism
WARSAW, Poland -- Pope Francis' decision to move the World War II-era head of Poland's Catholic Church a step closer to possible sainthood has hit a stumbling block, after two leading Jewish organizations and even Polish Catholic publications called him out for anti-Semitic views. It's not clear if the protests will derail the sainthood cause of Cardinal August Hlond, but in the past the Vatican has taken such protests seriously and at the very least put the cases up for closer review.
In May, Francis approved a decree recognizing Hlond's "heroic virtues." Now the Vatican must confirm a miracle attributed to Hlond's intercession for him to be beatified, and a second one for him to be made a saint.
Hlond, born July 5, 1881, was the highest-ranking church official in Poland from 1926 to his death in 1948. He is highly respected in this overwhelmingly Catholic country for having rejected Nazi Germany's proposals for a collaborative government, and for protecting the church's independence during the first years of communism.
In its protest, the American Jewish Committee pointed to a passage in a 1936 pastoral letter by Hlond, who was Poland's primate then, that showed his attitude toward Jews and echoed the general line of the Catholic Church of the time.
The group also criticized Hlond's failure to condemn the killings of at least 40 Jews in Poland in 1946 by a mob and secret security. It argued that moving forward with the canonization process will be seen as an "expression of approval of Cardinal Hlond's extremely negative approach toward the Jewish community."
"It's very difficult to see how you can still claim that the man was a paragon (of saintliness) when the data is so explicit," AJC's director of interreligious affairs, Rabbi David Rosen, told The Associated Press.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Nazi-hunting body, said making Hlond a saint would "further embolden" Poland's right-wing government in its "headlong efforts to selectively rewrite Polish activities from that tragic era."
The disputed passage in Hlond's letter reads: "It is a fact that the Jews are fighting against the Catholic Church, persisting in free thinking, and are the vanguard of godlessness, Bolshevism and subversion."
It has frequently been cited as evidence of the Catholic Church's institutional anti-Semitism prior to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
But Hlond also wrote that there are many "ethically outstanding, noble and respectable" Jews, and that all Jews should be "respected and loved as persons and as neighbors."
In what appeared to be a condemnation of German Nazi laws, the letter warned against "imported from abroad" anti-Semitism that's "incompatible with Catholic ethics."
"It is not allowed to attack Jews, beat them, injure them or slander them," Hlond said in the letter, which priests read out in churches at Lent in 1936.
He said it was "good" to support Polish businesses and avoid Jewish ones, but it was "forbidden" to "ravage Jewish shops, destroy the goods of the Jews, break windows, throw firecrackers at their homes."
Rosen, who has decades of experience in Catholic-Jewish relations, said the process of making Hlond a saint should be halted.
But the Polish priest promoting Hlond's case before the Vatican's Congregations for the Causes of Saints said the criticism is "unfounded" because Hlond's words had been taken out of context. Mgr. Boguslaw Koziol has discussed all the documents with Vatican experts, and insists Hlond preached love regardless of nation or religion.
Koziol believes that the whole passage - titled "From our Sins" - was progressive for its time and aimed to protect Jews from violence. But he admits it also included questionable ideas.
Hlond's critics "have focused on this negative part of the letter, but are not quoting any other part," he told the AP.
Catholic weekly Tygodnik Powszechny argued that the letter failed to protect Jews from the attacks of Polish nationalists.
It said Hlond didn't "suggest any way out of the 'Jewish problem,' or any good plan for a dignified and peaceful coexistence in one country. One could protest: these were not yet the times of dialogue. But one may also reply: shouldn't we expect candidates for sainthood to be larger than the routine thinking of their times?"
Referring to the July 4, 1946 pogrom in the town of Kielce - where a mob and secret security forces killed at least 40 Jews and two Poles who were defending them - Rosen said that Hlond "did not condemn the pogrom nor urge Poles to stop murdering Jews. Rather, he pointed out that the Jews were all communists or supporters of communism and that the pogrom was their own fault."
Koziol, however, blames Poland's post-war communist rule for Hlond's reticence. Any direct condemnation would have meant a confrontation with the regime and repercussions for the church.
In 2005, the Vatican shelved the planned beatification of French priest the Rev. Leon Dehon and launched an inquiry after complaints about his anti-Semitic views.
________________________________________________
Here is where we disagree with PHILLIPS in her portrayal of THE LEGACY tying it to today's MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD for only the global 1%. We discuss OFTEN why a 99% of WE THE PEOPLE whether here in US or as PHILLIPS describes in UK-----should not support CORBYN because CORBYN is global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS----AND NOT LEFT POPULIST 99% OF LABOR.
So, Phillips as Allende with these novels are filling our journalism with the same FAKE ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT propaganda of communism/socialism being 'left populist' when it has always been FAR-RIGHT WING GLOBAL BANKING 1% ENSLAVEMENT OF 99% OF WORKERS.
So, being against CORBYN is NOT ----being anti-SEMITIC and Phillips does a disservice to 99% of REAL Jewish citizens by continuing this LYING, CHEATING, AND CORRUPTING of our political philosophies.
'Phillips says the book, while fictional, is also informed by current events including the shifting political landscape in Britain and the re-emergence of anti-Semitism, particularly in the Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn became leader.
“As brazen anti-Semitism — and its denial — erupted in Britain, that issue worked its way into the story as well,” she says'.
But she is a woman---and she is smiling! Here we see global banking 1% FAKE NEWS media in Israel keeping our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens from HAVING REAL INFORMATION.
Times of Israel Presents
Melanie Phillips to launch debut novel ‘The Legacy’ in Jerusalem
The Times of Israel hosts the internationally acclaimed author and columnist along with Beit Avi Chai and Israel B, on Tuesday, August 7
By TOI staff 25 July 2018, 11:02 am
What is the legacy of the modern assimilated Jew? That’s the question at the heart of “The Legacy,” the debut novel from outspoken British author and commentator Melanie Phillips.
Readers will have the chance to meet Phillips and get a signed copy of the book at its launch in Jerusalem on August 7, presented by The Times of Israel in partnership with Beit Avi Chai and Israel B.
Phillips began her career as a reporter, editor and columnist at The Guardian before building an international reputation with decades of searing analysis and commentary for the BBC and other major news outlets. These days, her regular columns appear in The Times of London and The Jerusalem Post.
he is also the author of several acclaimed non-fiction books including “Londonistan,” about the growing influence of Islam in Europe, and “Guardian Angel,” about her struggle with Jewish identity as a rising star at Britain’s leading liberal newspaper.
“The Legacy” tells the story of Russell Woolfe, a television producer in London whose father’s death drags him back into the cloistered Jewish world he had fought so hard to escape. There he stumbles across a mysterious worshiper at his father’s synagogue who may possess a priceless medieval manuscript that holds the key to Jewish survival.
As he becomes immersed in the beguiling text, Russell finds himself re-opening the lost memories of his childhood, causing him to reassess his own identity and his preconceptions of his own parents. Snapping at Russell’s heels are his perplexed non-Jewish wife and daughter, along with his own all-too-Jewish sister.
“I always wanted to write a novel but never thought I could manage it,” says Phillips. “I would play around with stories and characters but always junk them. But then a story formed itself in my mind and wouldn’t leave. This was about the discovery of an ancient manuscript, and arose from one real such discovery that I had written about. Then my father died, and I had a very strong impulse to work my way through some of those issues.”
‘The Legacy’ by Melanie Phillips. (Courtesy)
Phillips says the book, while fictional, is also informed by current events including the shifting political landscape in Britain and the re-emergence of anti-Semitism, particularly in the Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn became leader.
“As brazen anti-Semitism — and its denial — erupted in Britain, that issue worked its way into the story as well,” she says.
“Fiction allows you to get under the skin of such issues, to get inside the heads of the people involved, and to explore big themes like the pull of history and conflicted national identity. And once I got inside my characters’ heads, they took up residence in my own — from where they still show no sign of departing,” she says.
___________________________________________
Both novelists frame these novels around a TRAIL OF TEARS------for our 99% of Latinos citizens----for our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens---but we do not get the GORILLA-IN-ROOM source of TRAIL OF TEARS all around the world and through history. We KNOW there was a TRAIL OF TEARS as 99% of white Europeans and Africans were thrown into global slave trading back in colonial America----we KNOW there was a TRAIL OF TEARS in southeast Asia during several decades of building FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----we KNOW there is a TRAIL OF TEARS today as ASIAN, ARABIC, AFRICAN 99% of citizens are again being pushed into global banking 1% labor pool distribution system. The term TRAIL OF TEARS is directly connected to GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH----which neither author of these novels MENTIONS.
WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF IT IS BETTER FOR THE 99% OF SOVEREIGN CITIZENS TO UNDERSTAND THAT HISTORY---NOT DWELL ON HOW TO GRIEVE AND FORGET.
So, both ALLENDE and PHILLIPS have novels steeped in women handling continuous wars as empowered if they manage grief and forgetting ----while men are steeped in forgetting their brutalities.
What we liked from PHILLIP'S THE LEGACY was a close look at JOE the POLISH citizen and how he suffered having HIS family taken away to torture and death ---being left in a vise knowing neither HITLER nor STALIN would be HELPING the 99% of POLISH citizens. But Phillips as Allende keep that VAGUENESS OF 'COMMUNIST' VS 'FAR-RIGHT CORPORATE FASCIST' as the BAD in all these continuous wars never explaining that BOTH are the same GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. It is always sold as THE OTHER.
We can be sure these several decades of continuous wars in LATIN AMERICA courtesy those same global banking 1% far-exceeds this trail of tears simply because of population growth
'The Trail of Tears remains one of the worst human rights disasters to befall Native American peoples in United States history. Between 1838 and 1839, 15,000 Cherokees were taken from their ancestral homes in Georgia and placed on a forced march, finally ending up in the future state of Oklahoma. According to PBS, more than 4,000 of their number ultimately perished en route, due to the horrid conditions'.
What Was the Cause of the Trail of Tears?
The Trail of Tears was caused by the authorization and enforcement of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This initiative, passed by President Andrew Jackson, forced over 20,000 Native Americans out of their ancestral lands in North Georgia. The vast majority of these Native Americans were from the Cherokee Nation.
President Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 for two reasons. The first reason was the economic value of the land. By relocating the Native Americans from North Georgia, the government was able to sell the land to American settlers and speculators. There is also evidence that the land was rich in gold, which only increased economic interest in the area. The second reason that Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act was the recommendation of President James Monroe. In his last address to Congress in 1825, Monroe emphasized the benefits of passing the legislation.
When the Cherokees refused to leave their homeland, the federal government forcefully removed them. They were relocated to Oklahoma, but suffered an estimated 4,000 casualties along the way. The Cherokees attempted to protest the Indian Removal Act by filing judicial action against the state of Georgia. The case reached the Supreme Court, and John Marshall ruled in favor of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall stated that the U.S. government had no claim to the Cherokee lands. President Jackson, however, refused to enforce the decision.
___________________________________________
We all recognize THE JEWISH TRAIL OF TEARS just as we recognize all the other global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH victims of continuous wars sacking and looting 1000BC economics.
THE LEGACY addresses the morals and ethics of war years focusing on the rage of 99% of POLISH people having been victimized themselves by what starts as cultural unrest. JOE angry that COMMUNISTS killed his family associate our REAL 99% of Jewish people with communism. We believe in Poland there were Catholic priests selling the hate tied to Christ's death in the hands of PRE-CHRISTIAN OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS -----where does that war-time brutality throwing people into burning buildings and mutilating bodies ORIGINATE? Well, Latinos are doing it-----African tribes are doing it-----Arabic tribes are doing it----Asian tribes are doing it. THE LEGACY has a character who states just this. These brutality of war are not unique to our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens. When our 99% of men are steeped in ANCIENT MILITARY HISTORY tied to FREEMASONRY/GREEK that is how they see themselves as WARRIORS.
So, JOE is made to be anti-semitic because he equates COMMUNISM with our Jewish citizens when COMMUNISM is simply the flip side of global banking 1% rebranding of slavery -----MARXISM. A Jewish man is tied to writing MARXIST theory----both OLD WORLD ROMANS and TRIBES OF JUDAH are tied to LAISSEZ-FAIRE sack and loot.
JOE WAS ABLE TO HARBOR ANGER AGAINST TRIBES OF JUDAH SENDING IN STALIN BUT NOT HIS OWN GLOBAL BANKING 1% KNIGHTS OF MALTA SENDING IN HITLER.
Today's global 99% of men are as brutal as NEANDERTHAL MEN because they are saturated in that warrior history.
The Jewish Trail of Tears
The Evian Conference of 1938
by
Dennis R. Laffer
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Arts
Department of History
College of Arts and Sciences
University of South Florida
Major Professor: Graydon Tunstall, Ph.D.
John Belohlavek, Ph.D.
Kees Boterbloem, Ph.D.
Date of Approval:
March 16, 2011
Keywords: Intergovernmental Committee, refugees,
Anschluss
, forced emigration,
immigration restrictions
Copyright © 2011, Dennis R. Laffer
DEDICATION
I dedicate this thesis to Ellen, my wife of almost twenty five years, whose love, comfort, guidance and wisdom sustained me through sickness and health and enabled me to complete a long-held dream. The completion of a Master’s degree program in history and the writing of a thesis would not have been possible without her presence at my side. For her great patience, insight and support I will always be truly grateful.
I dedicate this work also to my daughters, Lauren Abigail and Jenny Elizabeth for their love, encouragement and patience. My interest in the topic of this work began in 1999 when they were both young and I deeply appreciate their
understanding of the time I needed to spend in my quest for knowledge about the Evian Conference. I hope that I have set an example for them that it is possible, even in the latter years of middle age, to reach new levels of accomplishment.
My greatest achievement will, however, always be the family with which I am blessed.
Finally, I dedicate this work to the victims of the Nazi era whose lives could have been saved had the world acknowledged, cared about and acted upon
the coming catastrophe. I honor those exceptional individuals and institutions, the upstanders that had the courage to speak out against tyranny and offer relief and
refuge to the innocent victims of man’s hatred against his fellow man.
__________________________________________
Here is where we disagree with PHILLIPS THE LEGACY. Where she describes CORRECTLY that local Catholic priests in Poland were whipping up anti-semitic rage against Jews in Poland---PHILLIPS never mentions THE COMMUNISTS are simply the same global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. The global banking 1% of Jewish bankers bought the RABBIS in Eastern Europe just as global banking 1% Catholic bankers bought priests and cardinals. We KNOW WW2 was a joint effort by BOTH OLD WORLD GLOBAL BANKING 1%.
We hear of POPE BENEDICT as being that HITLER YOUTH-----we hear of Russian RABBIS moving our 99% of REAL Jewish citizens into Poland and satellite nations knowing these regions were to be devastated in coming war. Which RABBIS moved those Jewish citizens into harm's way? Why was it necessary to set the stage for societal tensions by displacing sovereign Polish citizens?
WE KNOW the entire structure of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS KNIGHTS OF MALTA were behind WW2 as they are MOVING FORWARD today WW3. So, it was NOT only a BENEDICT or a ZOROS behind massive war deaths and brutality.
WW 2 was planned during ROARING 20S global banking sacking and looting of Europe and THE AMERICAS------there already existed a MASTER PLAN by global banking 1%. WW3 has been staged by MOVING FORWARD CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA ----well before a TRUMP.
How can WE KNOW WW3 is MOVING FORWARD after ROBBER BARON few decades of sacking and looting and NOT these global banking 5% FAKE religious leaders for goodness sake.
AP July 4, 2018, 1:38 PM
Priest on the path to sainthood criticized for anti-Semitism
Pope Benedict XVI visits the tomb of Polish Cardinal August Hlond in Warsaw's St. John Cathedral Thursday May 25, 2006.
PIER PAOLO CITO / APWARSAW, Poland
-- Pope Francis' decision to move the World War II-era head of Poland's Catholic Church a step closer to possible sainthood has hit a stumbling block, after two leading Jewish organizations and even Polish Catholic publications called him out for anti-Semitic views. It's not clear if the protests will derail the sainthood cause of Cardinal August Hlond, but in the past the Vatican has taken such protests seriously and at the very least put the cases up for closer review.
In May, Francis approved a decree recognizing Hlond's "heroic virtues." Now the Vatican must confirm a miracle attributed to Hlond's intercession for him to be beatified, and a second one for him to be made a saint.
Hlond, born July 5, 1881, was the highest-ranking church official in Poland from 1926 to his death in 1948. He is highly respected in this overwhelmingly Catholic country for having rejected Nazi Germany's proposals for a collaborative government, and for protecting the church's independence during the first years of communism.
In its protest, the American Jewish Committee pointed to a passage in a 1936 pastoral letter by Hlond, who was Poland's primate then, that showed his attitude toward Jews and echoed the general line of the Catholic Church of the time.
The group also criticized Hlond's failure to condemn the killings of at least 40 Jews in Poland in 1946 by a mob and secret security. It argued that moving forward with the canonization process will be seen as an "expression of approval of Cardinal Hlond's extremely negative approach toward the Jewish community."
"It's very difficult to see how you can still claim that the man was a paragon (of saintliness) when the data is so explicit," AJC's director of interreligious affairs, Rabbi David Rosen, told The Associated Press.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Nazi-hunting body, said making Hlond a saint would "further embolden" Poland's right-wing government in its "headlong efforts to selectively rewrite Polish activities from that tragic era."
The disputed passage in Hlond's letter reads: "It is a fact that the Jews are fighting against the Catholic Church, persisting in free thinking, and are the vanguard of godlessness, Bolshevism and subversion."
It has frequently been cited as evidence of the Catholic Church's institutional anti-Semitism prior to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
But Hlond also wrote that there are many "ethically outstanding, noble and respectable" Jews, and that all Jews should be "respected and loved as persons and as neighbors."
In what appeared to be a condemnation of German Nazi laws, the letter warned against "imported from abroad" anti-Semitism that's "incompatible with Catholic ethics."
"It is not allowed to attack Jews, beat them, injure them or slander them," Hlond said in the letter, which priests read out in churches at Lent in 1936.
He said it was "good" to support Polish businesses and avoid Jewish ones, but it was "forbidden" to "ravage Jewish shops, destroy the goods of the Jews, break windows, throw firecrackers at their homes."
Rosen, who has decades of experience in Catholic-Jewish relations, said the process of making Hlond a saint should be halted.
But the Polish priest promoting Hlond's case before the Vatican's Congregations for the Causes of Saints said the criticism is "unfounded" because Hlond's words had been taken out of context. Mgr. Boguslaw Koziol has discussed all the documents with Vatican experts, and insists Hlond preached love regardless of nation or religion.
Koziol believes that the whole passage - titled "From our Sins" - was progressive for its time and aimed to protect Jews from violence. But he admits it also included questionable ideas.
Hlond's critics "have focused on this negative part of the letter, but are not quoting any other part," he told the AP.
Catholic weekly Tygodnik Powszechny argued that the letter failed to protect Jews from the attacks of Polish nationalists.
It said Hlond didn't "suggest any way out of the 'Jewish problem,' or any good plan for a dignified and peaceful coexistence in one country. One could protest: these were not yet the times of dialogue. But one may also reply: shouldn't we expect candidates for sainthood to be larger than the routine thinking of their times?"
Referring to the July 4, 1946 pogrom in the town of Kielce - where a mob and secret security forces killed at least 40 Jews and two Poles who were defending them - Rosen said that Hlond "did not condemn the pogrom nor urge Poles to stop murdering Jews. Rather, he pointed out that the Jews were all communists or supporters of communism and that the pogrom was their own fault."
Koziol, however, blames Poland's post-war communist rule for Hlond's reticence. Any direct condemnation would have meant a confrontation with the regime and repercussions for the church.
In 2005, the Vatican shelved the planned beatification of French priest the Rev. Leon Dehon and launched an inquiry after complaints about his anti-Semitic views.
____________________________________________
Both ALLENDE and PHILLIPS weave the myth of SUPREMACY throughout these novels. We hear PHILLIPS giving her OXFORD grad characters that feeling of people with religious beliefs as being IGNORANT. These policy and cultural stigmas tied to SUPREMACY calling what are a SHIP OF FOOLS 'elite' OR 'exceptional' has no basis in fact. It is all propaganda pushed for thousands of years by any global 1% wanting to maintain wealth and power.
So today in US we are watching as global banking 1% tell us the ASIAN 99% of citizens are more intelligent --these same global banking 1% were saying WHITE EUROPEANS were more intelligent -----these same global banking 1% keep saying JEWISH people are more intelligent.
'The thesis of the East Asian superiority in intelligence to Whites is false. This paper has focussed on IQ issues, but in another paper “The Myth of East Asian Racial and Cultural Supremacy” I will focus on broader civilisational issues which tend to not be discussed today'.
Global banking 1% OLD WORLD EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS no more believe that ASIANS are SUPERIOR than the MAN IN THE MOON. EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS are simply morphing into 3000BC HINDI/BRAHMIN PAGANISM.
RACE SUPREMACY HAS EXISTED THROUGHOUT ANCIENT AND MODERN HISTORY ---IT IS CULTURAL TIED TO KEEPING WEALTH AND POWER TO THAT FEW.
It is no accident that this article is tied to CULTURAL MARXISM------none of these socio-economic studies and data are LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE----they are all far-right wing global banking 1%. Who is pushing this ideal of white race in decline? Well, that would be FLIPPING THE EARTH'S AXIS GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD EUROPEAN KINGS AND QUEENS morphing into 3000BC Hindi Brahmin paganism.
'That is the exact alternative which confronts the white race. For white civilisation is today conterminous with the white race'.
ALLENDE makes reference continually to racial superiority of Hispanic or mixed race LATINO and native citizens as does PHILLIPS in describing Jewish 'intellectuals' vs 99% of REAL Jewish believers. All these SUPERIORITIES are FAKE.
The Myth of East Asian Intellectual Supremacy
by Peter J. White
Lothrop Stoddard writing in “The Rising Tide of Color Against White Supremacy”, (Charles Scribners, New York, 1920) stated in these terms the threat that now engulfs the White world: “ “Finally perish!” That is the exact alternative which confronts the white race. For white civilisation is today conterminous with the white race. The civilisations of the past were local. They were confined to a particular people or group of peoples. If they failed, there were always some unspoiled, well endowed barbarians to step forward and “carry on”. But today there are no more white barbarians. The earth has grown small, and men are everywhere in close touch. If white civilisation goes down, the white race is irretrievably ruined. It will be swamped by the triumphant coloured races, who will obliterate the white man by elimination or absorption. What has taken place in Central Asia, once a white and now a brown or yellow land, will take place in Australasia, Europe and America. Not today, nor yet tomorrow; perhaps not for generations; but surely in the end. If the present drift be not changed, we whites are all ultimately doomed. Unless we set our house in order, the doom will sooner or later overtake us all.”
This grim prophecy by Lothrop Stoddard is almost fulfilled: countries such as Australia, the United States and Britain will cease to be majority white before 2050 – in the case of the United States, by around 2040 or sooner. In this context it is important for pro-white organisations to tackle and refute ideologies harming white resistance to what is clearly a form of quiet or passive genocide. IQ is one such ideology.
“Racialists” and IQ
White racialists, with a few notable exceptions, have salivated, much like Pavlov’s dogs at the mere mention of IQ. IQ, so scientific and clinical, was typically used to show the intellectual superiority of Whites over Blacks. Such white racialists have been hypnotised by this “crude consumer index”. Fortunately this lack of criticism has not engulfed all conservative groups. For example conservative non-racialists Z. Dobbs and A.B. Roosevelt, “The Great Deceit: Social Pseudo-Sciences”, (Veritas Foundation, New York, 1964) show how, contrary to many so-called racialists, that IQ tests are a Leftist weapon. Pitirim Sorokin points out that Leo Tolstoi, Pushkin, Hegel, Vico and Sir Isaac Newton (predominately Nordics) would be regarded as inferior by standard IQ tests: P. Sorokin, “Fads and Fables in Modern Sociology” (1956), p.81.
However the Nordics, the Northern European people have been creators of civilisation as Henry Fairfield Osborn observed: “The northern races… invaded countries to the south, not only as conquerors, but as contributors of strong and intellectual elements to more or less decadent civilisations. Through the Nordic tide which flowed into Italy came the ancestors of Raphael, Leonardo, Galileo, Titian; also according to Gunther, of Giotto, Botticelli, Petrarch and Tasso. Columbus, from his portraits and from busts, whether authentic or not, was clearly of Nordic ancestry. Kosuth was a Calvinist and of a noble family and there is a presumption in favour of his being Nordic. Kosciusko and Pulaski were members of a Polish nobility which, at the time, was largely Nordic…” However the world of IQ, where human creativity is allegedly reducible to a number , discards all of this in favour of a fetish about IQ population means.
We can welcome the return of a “biological turn” in the study of man and society as a healthy revolt against the shifting environmentalism of the social sciences which cumulated in the relativistic nonsense of postmodernism and deconstructionism. This is step in the right direction towards re-establishing genuine scientificity in the social sciences.
However according to IQ theorist, Jewish psychologist H.J. Eysenck, Asians, (East Asians) are more intelligent than non-Jewish whites, but Jews are the most intelligent people on earth: see H.J. Eysenck and l. Kamin, “Intelligence: The Battle for the Mind”, (Pan, London, 1981), p.85. According to IQ theorist Arthur Jensen, because East Asians have a higher IQ than Whites (i.e., the East Asian mean or average IQ is greater than Whites), Whites and Asians can live side-by-side in multiracial America. Race and colour does not matter to him; all that matters is maximising IQ to preserve the high culture of Wagner, Verdi and Puccini – who are, of course, not Asians! In an interview in the magazine American Renaissance (May 26, 1992) edited by Jared Taylor, who also champions the East Asian superiority thesis), Jensen doesn’t say that Wagner et. al., are “Asians”, but he might as well have: “I think that the Asians [note, not merely East Asians] are capable of preserving that level of civilization, once introduced to it.” No reflection there about the fact that it was the white race who created that “civilization” in the first place.
Richard Lynn and J. Philippe Rushton are the main proponents of the East Asian (sometimes just “Asian” is used) superiority thesis. Lynn believes that Asian civilisation was probably more advanced than Europe civilisation until about 500 years ago (which is becoming now an Establishment view). Rushton sees European technological supremacy as a mere blip. Lynne sees China as being the ultimate ruler of the world, not only because of their eugenic practices, but because the Chinese are racially superior to Whites. “Whites” for Lynn include the Indians and Pakistanis, who are “Caucasians” and are not a “genetic problem”.
In a work with Tatu Vanhanen, “IQ and the Wealth of Nations”, (Praeger, Westport, 2002), this theme of Asian racial superiority is continued. (See also J.P. Rushton, Review, “Personality and Individual Differences” vol.34, 2002, pp.367-372.) It is absurd to judge entire nation’s intellectual potential by the crude mechanism of mean IQ scores as Lynn and Vanhanen do. For a start, most nations are now multiracial, and given Lynn’s own assumption that Black IQ scores are lower than Whites, there will hence be a lowering of the means. However Lynn and Vanhanen continue the racial superiority theme. It is claimed that China and Asia’s technology was in advance of Europe’s up until 1500 AD. Such claims are based on dated archaeological and histiographical evidence.
For example, you will find no mention of the Pyramids in Lynn/Vanhanen/Rushton. A 3,000 year old disc discovered in East Germany in 2000 depicts the cosmos, the sun, crescent moon and 32 stars. It is the earliest known accurate depiction of the cosmos. It was found on a hill called Mittelberg near the town of Nebra in the state of Saxony-Anholt. The site was an observatory and temple. A 3,000 year-old wooden staircase has been found at Hallstatt in northern Austria – the world’s oldest staircase.
Another fact to be mentioned is that Europeans had the first bronze metallurgy thousands of years before the Asians. Jewish philosopher Michael Levin in his paper “Is There a Superior Race?” in G. McDonald (ed), “A Race Against Time”, (New century books, Oakton, 2003), pp.272-280, says that Whites are superior to Asians given Whites’ cultural achievements, because a world without Asians would be recognizable, but a world without Whites would not be. In this context the discovery of Nordic mummies in the Chinese Turkistan region may give support to the “Aryans as creators of civilisation” theory. Nordics may have given China the chariot, metallurgical and textile technology which ‘kick-started’ Chinese civilisation. I will discuss this further in another paper. See J.P. Mallory and V. Mair, “The Tarim Mummies” (Thames and Hudson, New York, 2000).
Lynn and Vanhanen claim that Asian canal systems were superior to European ones (Perhaps, but heavier rainfall needed this anyway) and that the Chinese invented the stirrup (475 ADF – now known to be false, it was a European invention).
An effective refutation or the Asianist was given by Richard McCulloch when he said: “We should never forget we are the peoples of Western civilization. We are also the American people, which is why America is part of Western civilization. We have an unmatched record of achievement. No other people or civilization, including the East Asians and the Jews, even come close. This is demonstrable, provable, objective fact. The proof is overwhelming in the evidence presented in literally thousands of museums throughout the Western world, where the mind is overcome by the bewildering display of Western initiative, invention and innovation. Any attempt to compare the level of East Asian achievement with ours is laughable. If the results of IQ tests are consistent with this statement, then perhaps there is some other mental factor, not measured by IQ scores that accounts for our Promethean levels of achievement. Spengler recognised this unique quality when he characterised Western or Gothic civilization as Faustian”. Richard McCulloch, Instauration, August 1996, pp.5-9, at p.8
Some examples of Nordic super-geniuses include Gregory Smith who has an IQ in the top one fourth to one half of a per cent of IQs in the world (“Majority Super Genius”, Instauration, January 1999, p.15). Another example is that of a young Nordic girl who found a way of encrypting information on the internet, back in 2000, that worked 22 times faster than the MIT version used at the time: C. Jardine, “The Girl Whose Sums Could Change Our Lives”, The Weekly Telegraph, March 29-April 4, 2000) p.21.
Rushton grants that the IQ tests of Asians shows a relatively small standard deviation, with a smaller right tail towards the very high IQs. Thus the proportion of very high IQs and geniuses is much higher among Whites than Asians: M. Masters, “The Morality of Survival” (Part II), American Renaissance, August 1995, pp. 1, 3-5, at p.3. For IQ elitists such as Lynn and Rushton, this is a fact which should be of supreme analytical and theoretical importance because it is high IQ genius which builds and maintains civilisations, not mean/average intelligences.
Instead, no mention or development of this is made by Lynn and Rushton. Rushton said to Richard McCulloch at the second American Renaissance conference that McCulloch “shouldn’t find too much comfort in that.” (Instauration, August, 1996), hence dismissing White genius levels and in one sentence giving the race realist game away. McCulloch was hence right to criticise Rushton’s speech as “racially demoralizing”.
Although American Renaissance, which champions racial realism, has done some excellent work, the magazine operates with a wide category of “White” which includes Jews. There is a considerable literature by Jews denying that Jews are White and in general little attention is devoted to this question in the magazine. (See Hila Hershkoviz, “Ashkenazi Jews are Not White – Response to Haaretz Article”, Times of Israel December 5, 2014.) The editor of American Renaissance Jared Taylor, inconsistently, while accepting the standard race realist claim that Jews have a higher IQ than (Nordic) Whites also does not recognise that old Americans of Nordic descent are racially distinct people from the Jews. But if the populations are not distinct, then the IQ comparison simply collapses. He can’t have it both ways.
Jared Taylor holds that the Japanese and Chinese have built superior societies to Europeans: J. Taylor, “If We Do Nothing”, American Renaissance June 1996, pp.3-7, at p.4. Here though is the central paradox facing American Renaissance. It aims to defend the White race and White civilisation. But on the Asian superiority thesis, it follows that there is no reason to do this at all: Mankind would be better in IQ social Darwinist terms by letting the White race slide into extinction. Interestingly enough one can even find anti-racist liberal pieces in the magazine, presumably inserted to generate an atmosphere of objectivity, even though Establishment literature is full of such pieces: M. Meldahl, “Dissenting Voices” American Renaissance December 1993, pp.1,3.
Taylor reviewed Rushton’s pro-Asian work without making any criticisms, and in fact took it a step further by saying that Asians have a “large” brain and Whites “intermediate” and Blacks have a “small” brain. The White/Asian brain distinction is not substantiated on the evidence (more below). See S.J. Taylor “A New Theory of Racial Differences”, American RenaissanceDecember, 1994, pp.1, 3-7.
Abandon IQ
I recommend the abandonment of IQ as some sort of criterion for the assessment of the intellectual superiority of the races. The only real test is that of overall contribution to civilisation. The biological and psychological evidence (especially of identical twins reared apart), indicates that “intelligence” (whatever it is) is primarily determined by heredity, as are many group psychological differences: K. Lamb, “Individual and Group Character in the Social Psychology of William McDougal”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.39, no.3, 1999, pp.255-308. However, it is quite another matter to suppose that IQ measured by any test (e.g., IPAT, Raven matrices, WAIS, WISC etc.) actually measures “intelligence”. It is highly debateable whether there is a g, a unitary phenomenon accounting for all the multifarious manifestations of common sense intelligence as Jensen and Brand, following Charles Spearman (1883-1945), propose: A.R. Jensen, “The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability”, (Praeger, Westport, 1998); C. Brand, “The g Factor” John Wiley, New York, 1996).
The idea that human mental ability could be reduced to a singe number for ranking is highly counter-intuitive and should not be accepted without the strongest evidence. The existing evidence is only suggestive and not decisive: M.D. Lezak, “IQ: R.I.P.”, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol.10, 1988, pp.351-361. In any case, lacking a definition of “intelligence” based in turn on a general theory of intelligence, it becomes difficult to know what it is that we are trying to measure. Thus we should be sceptical of Jensen’s claim that intelligence is a form of information processing, or that the study of a grab bag of physiological variables such as reaction times may substitute for intelligence studies.
By such reductionist accounts, present day computers, which even the strong programme in AI do not yet regard as “thinking machines”, are superior to humans. A present day non-thinking computer can be programmed to do better than humans (including East Asian and Jews) on many cognitive tests – remembering that computers can beat humans at chess. Further, we would also expect that “creativity” should be an essential part of “intelligence”. Yet IQ tests do not measure creativity and have never intended to: H.B. Lyman, “Test Scores and What They Mean”, (Allyn and bacon, Boston, 1998), p.41.
The fundamental assumption of IQ assessment is that IQ is a property of an individual. In particular a number of individuals are assessed by a number M of specific abilities, i=1,2,3,… M. These are the components of general intelligence. These individuals may then be ordered by the order relation, “is at least as intelligent as”, so that an IQ ordering may be defined. The ordering is reflexive, transitive and complete. The IQ function f is a set of orderings of the individuals such that there is only one IQ ordering, Q. But the Four Arrow Impossibility conditions of: (1) unrestricted domain; (2) the Pareto condition; (3) independence of irrelevant individuals and (4) no domain ability, apply: A. Sen, “Collective Choice and Social Welfare”, (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1970). Hence by Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem there is no IQ Function simultaneously satisfying conditions (1)-(4). Hence if IQ orderings are nothing more than a distillation of individual ability orderings, then IQ is indeed “impossible”: P.J.W.N. Bird, “The Impossibility of IQ”, Economic Letters, vol.2, 1979, pp.95-97.
It is worth noting that there is even dissenting opinion about the alleged survival value of high intelligence. Arthur C. Clarke has said: “It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value.” Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart has also said: “Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together make genius.” Swiss researchers Fredric Merv and others at the University of Fribourg found that fast learning fruit fly larvae competing against more slow-witted ones in scarce food conditions did not win! More energy was devoted to making and rearranging neural connections in their brains leaving less energy to forage. Decisive action requires consideration of limited alternatives and smart people often out-smart themselves by complicating matters.
A Critique of the East Asian Superiority Thesis
The Black-White IQ difference has existed for as long as IQ tests have been administered. However race realists claim that the Black IQ mean of 85, and even lower in Africa indicates a racial inferiority in intelligence. Even if this was so, and it could well be, the African IQ scores are so low as to make the majority of the population so dysfunctional that they would not be able to operate modern technology, such as military technology used in warfare. This, alone, indicates that there is a problem with IQ tests.
It is not unreasonable to use our ordinary experience as an error detector. A gram of controlled experiment is not necessarily worth more than a tonne of unanalysed observations, if the experiment is misconstrued from the start. For example E.O. Wilson, “On Human Nature”, (Bantam Books, New York, 1979) cites the work of D.G. Freedman, a psychologist at the University of Chicago, on the behaviour of new born infants of different races. Chinese-American infants are less changeable and less perturbed by noise and movement than Caucasian-American infants. According to Wilson this gives an “air of dignity and self-possession” to the Chinese-Americans, whatever that means. An alternative explanation is that this indicates “superior” White intelligence – a hypothesis consistent with Rushton’s own data (see references below), that White babies are “superior” to east Asians to about the 7th year.
Another foundational problem with the East Asian superiority thesis is, as Jensen himself notes, we have no idea what a random sample of the population of China or even Japan is: see Jensen interview with American Renaissance, May 26 1992. Intelligence would vary greatly in any population encompassing nearly one third of humanity. Who knows where the mean IQ actually lies?
Lynn has said that the average East Asian IQ in Britain and Europe is 105 and also in the U.S. But in his paper, “Race Differences in Intelligence: A Global Perspective” The Mankind Quarterly, vol.31, no.3, Spring 1991, pp.255-296, the East Asian IQ is 103 (23 studies). But he also says that East Asians are visual-spatially “strong”, but verbally “weak”, with a verbal IQ of 96 rising to verbal 100, visual-spatial, 106. Mainland Chinese supposedly have an IQ of 105; Taiwanese 104.7; Hong Kong Chinese 107; Japan 105 and Singapore 103. The lowly White Americans average only 100 (although he does admit, but does not explain, that Minnesota Whites score higher at 105, which raises an immediate problem for the East Asian superiority thesis). And a surprise: the average IQ of Israel is 94!
Lynn and Rushton are not too concerned about what constitutes “White” and include North Africans and others who most theorists would not classify as “White”. The IQ of some countries, such as Australia, which has contributed more Nobel Prize winners than Japan, is a poor 98. But according to newspaper reports of televised Australian National IQ tests in 2002 , 2003 and 2004, the average Australian IQ score for a multiracial country was above 100. Men outscored women 112 to 108 and blondes (=Nordics) averaged 111 (which is greater than Lynn’s revised Ashkenazi Jewish average and also refutes the “dumb blonde” ideology of the media). People 181 to 200 cms tall (again predominately Nordics) averaged an IQ of 113. Some Anglo Saxon districts, which were not particularly affluent, averaged an IQ of 125! The state of the Australian Capital Territory averaged 114. Given the Flynn effect (see below), this is consistent with the assorts of scores which one would expect from Nordics: back in 1920 Stoddard found the average IQ score of Nordics in North America to be about 106: see William McDougall, “Is America Safe for Democracy?” (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1921), p.64. At that time the Italian-American IQ score was a lowly 84, which has now risen considerably, reaching 100.
Race realist Christopher Brand puts the White IQ at 104: R. Pearson, “Political Correctness and Research in Human Intelligence”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.36, 1996, pp.393-406, cited p.399, where Seligman puts the (non-Jewish) White IQ at 102: D. Seligman, “A Question of Intelligence”, (Birch Lane Press, New York, 1992). This is clearly a guessing game, lacking in scientific objectivity. It is inconsistent with a large amount of evidence. Thus Ralph Scott in “Education and Ethnicity”, (Council for Social and Economic Studies, Washington DC, nd), p.106, mentions the Achievement Test Scores of Fairfax County Public School, North Virginia (which has a strong minority focus, where White scores surpassed Asian scores (during ages 4-6 years; equal at ages 6-8 years and Whites greater at ages 8-11 years). In California’s competency test for public school teachers, in the test for 10th grade abilities in mathematics, Whites had an 80 percent pass rate, Asians 59 percent and Blacks 35 percent: American Renaissance, April, 1996, p.11.
The East Asian superiority thesis has been attacked on the grounds of the unrepresentativeness of the sampling of populations: A.R. Brody, “Intelligence”, (Academic Press, New York, 1992), p.313; M. Chon, “The Truth About Asian Americans”, in R. Jacoby and N. Glauberman (eds), The Bell Curve Debate” (Times Books, Random House, New York, 1995), pp.238-240, at p.239. Some competing studies have found no Asian-White IQ differences: H.W. Stevenson (et. al.), “Cognitive Performance and Academic Achievement of Japanese, Chinese and American Children”, Child Development, vol.56, 1985, pp.718-734. J.R. Flynn claims that Asian-Americans have the same non-verbal IQ as White Americans but a slightly lower verbal IQ: J.R. Flynn “Asian Americans: Achievement Beyond IQ, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1991): D. Budge, “US-Chinese Success ‘Due to Attitudes of Parents’,” The Times Education Supplement, May 1, 1998, p.20. N. Weyl, “World Population Growth and the Geography of Intelligence”, Modern Age, vol.22, 1978, pp.64-71, is sceptical of the Japanese IQ score as a 10 percent superiority in mathematics would give Japan an utterly decisive leadership in science, which has not occurred. Japan has a high level of mental development , but is not renowned for producing individuals of remarkable brilliance.
Rushton’s Racial Evolutionary Nonsense
J.P. Rushton in “Race, Evolution and Behavior”, 3rd edition, (Charles Darwin Research Institute, Port Huron, 2000), attempted to give an evolutionary foundation to the East Asian superiority thesis. Rushton’s work at the time received public interest through the claim that he made that Blacks have larger penises (erect) and testicles than Whites, and Whites in turn, larger genitals than Asians! Supposedly this has some relevance to intelligence. Rushton paid 50 volunteers members of the different races, recruited in a shopping mall, to answer questions about the size of their penises and how far they ejaculated! All this could show is how much an unrepresentative sample of males lie! In any case the testicle size claim was contradicted by C. Coon in “Racial Adaptations”, (Nelson-Hall, Chicago, 1982), p.189, who said that the medical evidence favoured Whites as having larger genitals.
At the basis of Rushton’s theory is r-K selection theory: R.H. MacArthur and E.O. Wilson, “The Theory of Island Biogeography”, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967). Here r is the population’s maximum growth rate and K the environment’s carrying capacity. Species selected for fast reproduction with a slow ability to compete are called r selected. K selected species have been selected for success at competition. The reproduction strategy of r species is to produce numerous offspring with little energy devoted to rearing them e.g., frogs. The K strategy is to produce few offspring with considerable energy devoted to rearing them e.g., humans. But Rushton claims that there are human racial differences in r-K strategy. Asians/Mongoloids have a more advanced K strategy than Whites/Caucasians, and in turn, allegedly, Caucasians over Negroids. Mongoloid superiority is allegedly expressed in (1) higher intelligence and brain size; (2) lower numbers of children; (3) less crime and other factors such as lower mortality.
First note that it highly doubtful that r-K theory can be applied to humans at all. Human reproductive strategies are varying degrees of K and not r at all. The most sexed populations should be more not less K: I. Silverman, “The r/K Theory of Human Individual Differences: Scientific and Social Issues”, Ethnology and Sociobiology, vol.11, 1990, pp.1-9.
Second it defies belief that Lynn and Rushton believe that the number of children born is highest in Blacks, intermediate in Whites and lowest in Asians. It is true that some African nations are undergoing massive population increases (e.g., Nigeria) but even here children are not treated in any type of r-strategy. In Asia Japan is facing a birth dearth, but China needed an oppressive state-enforced policy to slow down its massive population growth. Whites are a racial minority in the world with below replacement level birth rate and the more Nordic the country, generally the lower the birth rate. If Rushton was right Western countries would have the population levels of China and India.
Rushton hypothesizes that Mongoloids are intellectually superior to Whites because they evolved in a colder climate, as evidenced by their slight builds and the epicanthic folds of the eyes. However the epicanthic folds are usually regarded as an adaptation to dusty environments. Cold climates favour larger, stronger builds such as Nordic Whites. Pale skin is an adaptation to the cold, maximising vitamin D production. The light eyes of the Nordic are more of an adaptation to cold climates than the dark eyes of the Mongoloid. Eskimos have successfully lived in very cold environments such as Greenland – but so too have Nordics. It does not follow from such an Eskimo presence that they are physiologically better adapted to the cold than Nordics. The Viking settlement in Greenland died out because of cultural factors affecting adaptation during an unusually harsh climatic period, rather than racial factors: J. Diamond “Collapse” (Allan Lane, London 2005). Interestingly enough the Eskimo, a Mongoloid, arrived in the Arctic about 10,000 years ago, probably too late for major physiological changes to occur. Their mean IQ is 91 and they have a visual-spatial score of 90 – yet in the field have superior spatial-visual abilities. It is likely that the IQ tests are flawed because they could not have survived in such a harsh environment without peak spatial-visual skills.
It has not even been established that the challenges of a cold environment causes high intelligence to evolve. It could very well mean the reverse: that natural selection ensures that only intelligent people survive in cold environments. It may be a fact that high intelligence races are found in cold environments because they were highly intelligent to start with; Rushton commits an “after, therefore because of” fallacy in his reasoning. Nor should the challenges of desert environments be underestimated, where droughts and other challenges existed.
The Australian Aborigine with an IQ of allegedly 85, according to the race realists, has an extremely high visual acuity, greater than East Asians and Whites, with their visual cortex being larger than these races: M. Kohn, “The Race Gallery”, (Jonathan Cape, London 1995, p.125. Yet on standard IQ theory this race is regarded as intellectually “inferior”, which can hardly be correct since this race has exhibited great survival skills: E.M. Miller, “Paternal Provisioning Versus Mate-Seeking in Human Populations”, Personality and Individual Differences, vol.17, 1994.
Some racial theorists (e.g. Miller as above) hypothesise that climate-based evolution only lifted North East Asian IQ moderately. It was the infusion of White genes during and after the Mesolithic period which lifted Asian IQ to European levels. If this was so then the ground collapses from under the Asian IQ superiority thesis.
Rushton claims that American Asians commit fewer crimes than Whites and he refers to FBI Uniform Crime Statistics and National Victimisation Surveys : J.P. Rushton and G. Whitney, “Cross-National Variation in Crime Rates : Race, r-K Theory and Income”, Population and Environment, vol.23, 2002, pp.501-511.
Such statistics only measure individuals convicted and do not address group/collectivistic crime, such as Asian crime gangs: K-L. Chin, “Chinatown Gangs”, (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996). Police find it impossible to penetrate Chinese “Cong Societies” due to group loyalty and the fear instilled in Chinese-Americans: D.D. Daye, “A Law Enforcement Sourcebook on Asian Crime and Cultures”, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997). Open gang warfare exists across the United States between rival Asian gangs. W. Kleinknecki, “The New Ethnic Mobs: The Changing Face of Organised Crime in America”, (The Free Press, New York, 1996). Further, according to the FBI 1995 Supplementary Homicide Report, which would have been available before the 3rd edition of “Race, Evolution and Behaviour” was available, Asians (including South East Asians) in America committed murder at 1.23 times the White race.
It is impossible to suppose that East Asians commit less crime than Whites given the extent of bribery and “kick-backs” in Asian society, which is a way of life. Tax evasion and the use of a cash economy is also a matter of fact. None of this is considered by Rushton. Nor does he consider “political crimes” which never go into official murder statistics – otherwise the death toll from Chairman Mao’s regime would make nonsense of all cross-national crime comparisons.
Let us now consider the brain size issue. Rushton’s view is that Caucasoids and Mongoloids have evolved a larger brain being at a great distance from the Equator Negroids. Based on magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain, the averagre overall correlation of 0.44 was allegedly found between brain size measured by MRI and IQ: J.P. Rushton, “Race, Intelligence and Brain”, Personality and Individual Differences, vol.23, 1997, pp.169-180. Lynn cited 16 surveys with correlations between brain size and IQ ranging from 0.14 to 0.23. C. Coon in “Racial Adaptations” (p.174) believed that the correlation was higher at 0.30 citing: L. van Valen, “Brain Size and Intelligence in Man”, American Anthropologist, vol.74, 1976. Pp.425-427. If we take Rushton’s MRI measure and correct for age, the correlation falls to 0.22 and is reduced to negligible when further corrected for sex and head size: N. Raz (et. al.), “Neuroanatomical Correlates of Age-Sensitive and Age-Invariant Cognitive Abilities: An In Vivo Investigation”, Intelligence, vol.17, 1993, pp.407-422.
M. Kohn in “The Race Gallery” (Jonathan Cape, London, 1995) notes that Rushton pounces on the idea that there is a correlation between the time that the first molar tooth erupts and brain size, i.e., the later the teeth emerge, the bigger the brain. Rushton claims that the average age for the first molar in Africans is 5.8 years and 6.1 in Europeans and East Asians. However, he had to drop the Mongoloid Eskimos who have permanent teeth erupting at 5.5 years, which would bring the Mongoloid average down below Europeans.
Rushton claims that at birth, 4 months, and 1 year, Asians averaged a larger cranial capacity than Whites, although smaller in stature and lighter in weight: J.P. Rushton, “Cranial Size and IQ in Asian Americans from Birth to Age Seven”, Intelligence, vol.25, 1997, pp.7-20. Anecdotal evidence from midwifery should lead to scepticism about such a claim. Large-headed children delivered by women of slender builds with a small pelvis often face major birth traumas and White men who race mix with Chinese women often find that their wives cannot deliver naturally (needing a C-section) or else tear badly. The East Asians, as depicted by Rushton should face this type of birth problem, but do not.
Rushton says that Samuel George Morton’s 19th century data, as reassessed by S.J. Gould, indicates a Mongoloid average of 86.5 cubic inches and Caucasoids, 85.5 cubic inches. But Gould’s own tabulation is Mongoloids 87 cubic inches and Caucasians also 87 cubic inches and Africans, 83 cubic inches. Rushton is indeed right to note that Gould should not dismiss a difference on one cubic inch as “trivial”, but nor should Rushton have “massaged” Morton’s statistics to get his own preferred result.
In any case Rushton says that the mean difference in average brain size only emerges after correcting for body size, as Asians are in general shorter in stature and lighter in weight than Whites. In using autopsy brain mass data from Tobias (P.V. Tobias, “Brain-Size Grey Matter and Race – Fact or Fiction?” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol.32, 1970, pp.3-26), the Mongoloid series averaged 1,368 grams and Caucasoids 1,378 grams. In using U.S. military data, Mongoloids averaged 1,416 cubic cms and Caucasoids, 1,380 cubic cms – but only after adjusting for the effects of stature and weight: J.P. Rushton, “Mongoloid-Caucasoid Differences in Brain Size from Military Samples”, Intelligence, vol.15, 1991, pp.351-359.
L. Willerman, “Commentary on Rushton’s Mongoloid-Caucasoid Differences in Brain Size”, Intelligence, vol.15, 1991, pp.361-364, argues that Rushton makes an inappropriate correction; I maintain that a correction per se is inappropriate. Rushton seems to be operating with a model of cranial capacity as an index of brain power, like the engine capacity of a car. But there is no neurological reason to “correct” for stature and weight because these are irrelevant, even on his neurological model to the “brain power” of a given brain. Women, have brains, on average 15 percent smaller than men. To deal with this “inconvenient truth” scaling occurs so that when scaled against their smaller bodies the brain size difference disappears. But outside of political correctness, why should such a scaling occur if what we are interested in is “engine capacity”? But even though women’s brains are smaller than men’s, the Wernicke area, a key area for comprehending sounds and word meanings is 30 percent larger in women, and the Broca area, important for the ability to produce fluent and expressive speech, is 20 percent larger. Even here we cannot conclude from these size differences that women’s have a greater verbal superiority to men, as men’s Wernicke and Broca areas may be neurologically more efficient, even if smaller. Even though girls are outperforming boys at school (in an anti-male feminist environment), there is evidence that men’s brain cells transmit nerve impulses faster than women’s. The research was done by Professor Edward Reed of Toronto University, and Philip Vernon and Andrew Johnson of the University of Western Ontario. Males were found to have four times faster nerve conduction velocities than females, a significant sex difference in all test conditions in favour of males.
In 2004 it was claimed that a new species of human was discovered on the island of Flores Indonesia: Homo Floresiensis. This claim was based on the discovery of an 18,000 year old skeleton of a human only three feet high. The skeleton had a very small head, with a brain capacity of only 380 cubic cms – which by Lynn and Rushton’s reasoning should have made Homo Floresiensis an intellectual vegetable. But CAT scans done by Dean Falk of Florida State University indicate that this little human had a sophisticated brain structure and a high intelligence.
There is considerable ethno-racial variation in cranial measurements. Coon has the Norse at 1,470 cubic cms, the Eskimo at 1519 cubic cms and the Buriat at 1515 cubic cms. However Dr. H.C. Gordon of the British Medical Association found that the brain weights of Caucasian Whites was highest, followed by the Chinese and Japanese as did Coon in “The Story of Man” (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1967). According to W.J. Jamieson, “Intellectual Ability, Evolution and Eugenics”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.36, 1996, pp.381-392, p.383, the brain size of early 20th century Parisians was 1550 cubic cms. Other White males averaged over 1,500 cubic cms according to P. Sorokin in “Social and Cultural Mobility”, (Free Press, New York, 1965), p.220. Opposing Rushton’s position is that cranial capacity is a result of climate adaptation. Populations in cold climates have an average annual cranial capacity of 1,386 cubic cms and in hot climates 1,297 cubic cms, but there are a number of exceptions: K. Beals (et. al.), “Brain Size Cranial Morphology, Climate and Time Machines”, Current Anthropology, vol.25, no.3, 1984, pp.301-330.
Another problem for Rushton’s theory is the considerable neurological redundancy in the human brain. John Lorber, “Is Your Brain Really Necessary?” Science, vol.210, 1980, p.1232, reported on studies of victims of hydrocephalus (water on the brain). One subject had a respectable IQ of 126 and was a maths honour student, but had “virtually no brain”! All that the neurologist Lorber found in this subject’s head was a thin layer of brain cells only a millimetre in thickness. The rest of the intercranial space was filled with cerebrospinal fluid. This, not only raises problems for Rushton’s theory, but also for reductionist neurology. It is sufficient to note that brain size, at best, is only weakly correlated with IQ. What seems to be more important is the degree of neural connectiveness. Otherwise blue whales would be of a super-intelligence level. Further it has been argued that the degree of fissuring and thickness in the frontal cortical brain layers is more important than the sheer size of the human brain. The Negroid brain is generally less fissured than the White and Mongoloid brain. See C.F. Connolly, “External Morphology of the Primate Brain”, (Thomas, Springfield, 1950); F.W. Vint, “The Brain of the Kenya Native”, Journal of Anatomy, vol.66, 1934; H.G. Garrett, “IQ and Race Differences”, (Howard Allen, Cape Canaveral, 1973), p.14.
Sociobiologists have noted that during the last 20,000 years the upward trend in brain size has been reversed. Modern man has a smaller brain than the Cro-Magnons, by about 100-200 cubic cms. It is usually inferred that the Cro-Magnons were more intelligent than modern man: J.W. Jamieson, “Biological Diversity and Ethnic Identity: Changing Patterns in the Modern World”, The Mankind Quarterly, vol.36, 1995, pp.193-199; B. Chiarelli, “Some comments on the Evolution of Hominid Intelligence” The Mankind Quarterly, vol.37, 1996, pp.29-36. Yet could it be that with modern man evolution departed from pursuing quantity and pursued quality? Perhaps evolution pursued the path of neural efficiency rather than sheer brain size? We will never know the answer to that question because we do not have a Cro-Magnon brain to subject to neurological investigation.
Dysgenics and the Decline of Intelligence
The “Flynn effect” has raised considerable controversy in intelligence research circles. U. Neisser (ed.) “The Rising Curve: Long-Term Gains in IQ and Related Measures”, (American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 1998). New Zealand researcher James Flynn noticed a trend of IQ improvement in 20 industrialised countries, with generational IQ gains rising more sharply as one moved away from educationally-loaded tests to culture-free tests, such as the Raven Progressive Matrices. The average IQ gain was three points per decade, with the rate of gain constant over 46 years. (1932-1978). The rate of gain was the same for ages 2-6 years, 6-16 years and adults, so the cause could not lie in schooling: J.R. Flynn, “The Mean IQ of Americans: Massive Gains 1932 to 1978”, Psychological Bulletin, vol.95, 1984, pp.29-51. Indeed, from 1963-1981 there was a decline in the American average performance of high school students on the standard Scholastic Aptitude Test (CAT). Flynn has said: “The combination of IQ gains and the decline in Scholastic Aptitude Test scores seems almost inexplicable… IQ gains of this magnitude pose a serious problem of causal explanation: Flynn as above. Flynn has convincingly argued in my opinion that environmental explanations of the Flynn effect (e.g., Flynn’s idea that it is due to nutrition) are inadequate. Further, Flynn acknowledges that the Black/White gap itself has not narrowed.
R. Scott and B. Poncy, “The “Flynn Effect”: How Applicable is it to Longitudinal IQ Assessment of American University Students?” The Mankind Quarterly vol.39,1999, pp.385-397, argue that the Flynn effect is in part a product of the Raven Matrices test. This test has the statistical flow that one more correct answer on the Raven Matrices test can increase a subject’s score by 1-3 points, which is approximately the “the average gain shown in an entire generation in the Scottish data”. (p.390) I agree that this is a statistical flow, but a Flynn effect (of a lesser magnitude) still exists for other IQ tests, such as the Wechster nonverbal and visuospatial tests: J.R. Flynn, “IQ Gains Over Time: Toward Finding the Causes”, in Neisser as above, pp.25-66.
R. Lynn in “Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations”, (Praeger, Westport, 1996) argues that apart from the Flynn effect there is a dysgenic trend for declining intelligence, as a negative fertility differential exists, with people of low IQ having more children than people of high IQ, regardless of race. (For a defence of Lynn against a mathematical objection by Samuel Preston, see J.C. Loehlin, “Whither Dysgenics: Comments on Lynn and Preston”, in Neisser (ed.), pp.389-398.) Lynn’s hypothesis raises the alarming prospect, noted before him by L. Stoddard in “The Rising Tide of Colour” and “Revolt Against Civilization” that an increasing proportion of the population lacks the genetic endowment to cope with modern technological society and may entirely in itself constitute a genetic time-bomb which threatens the existence of civilisation.
The thesis of the East Asian superiority in intelligence to Whites is false. This paper has focussed on IQ issues, but in another paper “The Myth of East Asian Racial and Cultural Supremacy” I will focus on broader civilisational issues which tend to not be discussed today.
_________________________________________________
ALLENDE creates a character in LUCIA her mother LENA having been RAPED by a white Chilean produced a mixed-race LUCIA. LUCIA makes her TRAIL OF TEARS escape to North America much more easily then EVELYN. LUCIA throughout IN MIDST OF WINTER has all the markings of a global banking 5% freemason/Greek player.
Now, we are just trying to add two plus two in this character LUCIA mother LENA------looking much like that partnership of ALLENDE/PINOCHET continuous wars 1970s CHILE AND ARGENTINA.
They say LUCIA the survivor-----we say LUCIA PINOCHET-----guilty of all kinds of government frauds and corruption.
The rehabilitation of ALLENDE'S RUSSEL as that global banking 5% freemason/Greek white player was an attack on our Western standards of morals and ethics.
Hmmmmmm, what WAS that OMEGA CLINIC LUCIA happened to know and work ----------tying EVELYN'S strong Latino Catholic rituals to what we know is a 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMIN retreat -----very ONE WORLD of ALLENDE
The OMEGA CLINIC in NIGERIA as well?
Omega Clinic
English
Edit
Share
Dossier Prof - Clinic Reception Rm
The Omega Clinic is a medical center in Omega's Gozu District.
ME2-2icon “The chances of surviving are… slim.” — Spoilers for Mass Effect 2 follow. ME2-2icon
This facility is supervised by Mordin Solus with assistance from Daniel and other personnel. In 2185, the Omega Clinic treated patients affected by a genetically-engineered plague. There are many characters that will say how much Dr. Mordin has helped them, and how much they owe him sitting and standing in various parts of the clinic. After Mordin accepted a posting on the Normandy SR-2, the facility came under the supervision of Daniel (if Commander Shepard chose the paragon option and let the batarians go) or another character.
Lucía Pinochet
...Inés Lucía Pinochet Hiriart (born December 14, 1943) is the eldest daughter of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet and Lucía Hiriart de Pinochet.
Under indictment for tax fraud, Pinochet traveled to the United States in January 2006 where she appealed for political asylum, but was promptly deported back to Argentina, the nation where she had last resided. At her father's military funeral in December 2006, she praised him for lighting a "flame of freedom" in September 1973, when he overthrew the government of Salvador Allende.
On September 13, 2007, Pinochet announced her intention to run as independent for a seat in parliament for the 23rd district (Las Condes, Vitacura, Lo Barnechea) in Santiago. However, she was arrested in October 2007 in the frame of the Riggs case, along with Pinochet's four other children and Lucia Hiriart, and 17 other persons (including two generals, one of his ex-lawyers and his ex-secretary). They are charged of embezzlement and use of false passports, accused of having illegally transferred $27m (£13.2m) to foreign bank accounts during Pinochet's rule.
Pinochet was elected councilwoman of Vitacura (a right-wing stronghold) in the 2008 election. She received nearly 16% of the votes, finishing second.
DON'T CRY FOR ME CHILE-------global banking 1% and me----we got the MONEY.
This is much like our US today's politics filling with HOOVERS-----NIXONS------FORDS all tied to global banking 1% sacking and looting frauds.
Lucia and Russel HELPING Evelyn by ending the road trip at OMEGA CLINIC grounds having that JAGUAR leading our 99% native victim to ONE WORLD 3000BC pagan ritual.
youtube.com
Informe Especial: “El Cema de Doña Lucía”
¿Chileno en el extranjero? Conéctate en https://www.tvnplay.com SUSCRÍBETE…
24horas.cl
Published on Jul 25, 2016
RSS Feed
