The OTTOMAN EMPIRE fell during WW1 being the reason MUSLIM nations expanded north into what is today SOVIET EASTERN BLOCK nations like UKRAINE. TATARS are MUSLIMS----they occupied CRIMEA --and global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH
'Warburg family - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_family
The Warburg family is a prominent German and American banking family of German Jewish and originally Venetian Jewish descent',
wanted that valuable land on BLACK SEA. CRIMEAN WAR in late 1800s moved TATARS out bringing farmland to Russia and during TROTSKY/STALIN making RUSSIA into a far-right wing global corporate MARXISM---there was COLLECTIVIZATION of all that once privately owned CRIMEAN farmland. As always global banking 1% claim they are fighting the wealthy land owners as they come in an steal that land for themselves----AKA ---WORLD BANK/IMF.
'The feature of the project was that the government of the USSR issued for the full amount of the loan and passed to the “Joint” the bonds that were distributed by subscription. Thus the largest financial and political families in America – Rockefeller, Marshall, Warburg, Roosevelt, Hoover, and others became the holders of the shares of land in Crimea'.
This was MILITARIZED FOOD as USSR after WW 1 captured private farms across UKRAINE sending all food produced to the rich in MOSCOW and ST Petersberg. Those Ukrainians along with TATARS died en masse.
FINAL SOLUTION FOR JEWISH HOMELAND BECAME -------KIEVAN KINGDOM CRIMEA.
Jews fleeing WW 1 across Europe and Russia went to California/US to be brought back to CRIMEA and repatriated in Eastern Europe.
'Famine in Crimea, 1931
Famine in Crimea. They established collective farms ( kolkhoz) and increased the cultivation and production of grain, while the population of Crimea decreased due to the deportation of thousands of people, including at least 35,000 Crimean Tatars who were accused of being "wealthy."'.
Jewish homeland proposal for Crimea – Stalin and the “Crimea California” project
From Fort Russ, March 14, 2015
Translated by Kristina Rus
Originally published in “Ostrov Krym” (“Crimea Island”) in September, 1999
1948. Returning from Sevastopol to his summer house, Stalin recalls everything that was recently associated with Crimea. As the main theorist in the field of ethnic issues, it was obvious to him: if the problems on the Peninsula are not properly addressed, these problems will turn into a time bomb of a tremendous destructive power in the future. In recent decades, the ethnic question, along with the victorious pace of its antipode – the ideas of proletarian internationalism, was the basis and the driving force behind processes on a global scale. It, of course, is not comparable with the power of the Marxist-Leninist ideology in general. But…
The Crimean peninsula usually either contained several small municipal entities, or the entire Crimea or a part of it was part of other states. Therefore none of the historical events in Crimea should be considered in isolation, without regard to the fate of not only the Northern Black Sea region, but also Europe, and most importantly – the Soviet Union (Russia).
– But… – Stalin mused, – now Crimea is just a region in RSFSR.
Crimea is Russian, as it should be, for it is a historically predetermined fact. Only Russian, otherwise there will be a lot of hunters for this land. Take, for example, the project to create “Crimean California”…
These facts are little known today to the general public. Unavailability of archives raises a lot of conflicting rumors and speculation, but the secret is securely hidden…
In the second half of the nineteenth century, Crimea and Southern Ukraine was a sparsely populated region. By the beginning of the twentieth century every fourth resident was a newcomer to the peninsula. The [Russian – KR] Imperial government has provided financial assistance and granted a number of privileges to some ethnic groups. The privileges were mainly enjoyed by German colonists, and some others, including Jewish settlers. The privileges were expressed in large land plots, tax incentives, special terms loans and exemption from military service. That’s why these groups subsequently formed the basis of the forces that sought to create an independent national state in Crimea.
In 1920, after the liberation of Crimea from Wrangel and the establishment of Soviet authority, the privileged ethnic groups of colonists lost all benefits, and their plans to establish their own state became hopeless. In order to increase their influence they created societies and unions. In 1921 a [German] union called the “Bundestroy” was formed; in 1922 a Jewish consumer cooperative “Samodeiadelnost” was active.
In the early 1920’s, taking advantage of the extremely difficult predicament of the young Soviet Republic, a number of foreign firms started negotiations with the Soviet government on the provision of economic assistance under appropriate conditions: the concession of a number of developments on the territory of Crimea and the establishment of a Jewish autonomy. It is in the hungry 1921-22 years Crimea for the first time learned about the charitable Jewish organization “Joint”.
In 1920-30’s “Agro-Joint,” founded in the USA was already active in Crimea, relying on the Crimean Jewish colonists. In 1922 in Simferopol opened a branch of the “Agro-Joint” bank, financing resettlement of the new Jewish residents, as well as the training of Jewish human resources in educational institutions of Crimea. The largest office of “Agro-Joint” opened in Dzhankoy. It was at this time that more then 150 villages appeared in the Crimean steppes, which were inhabited exclusively by “persons of Jewish descent”.
This activity soon grew to a scope of interstate relations. In 1923, in the USSR and the United States almost simultaneously began discussions of the idea of a national autonomy and resettlement of Jews from Belarus, Ukraine, Russia to the Black sea area. According to documents found in the Crimean archives and other sources, it is now possible to partially restore the sequence of those early events.
Report this ad
… The elite circles of the capital’s intelligentsia began actively discussing the topic of resettlement of Jews to Crimea. From America arrived one of the leaders of “Joint”, a native of Russia, Rosen, urging the chairman of Crimean Central Executive Committee, Gaven, to allocate vacant land on a trial basis for resettlement of 1,000 Jewish families in exchange for financial and technical assistance. The catastrophic situation in Crimea after the famine of 1921-22, the lack of assistance from the Center did not leave Crimean authorities much choice.
One of the main ideologists of the implementation of the idea was a prominent member of the Soviet government, Yury Larin (Michael Lurie), a native of Simferopol, the future father-in-law of N. I. Bukharin. He developed a plan to create a Jewish Republic in Crimea and settling on its territory of 280 thousand Jews. At the same time, through Abram Bragin, close to Maria Ulyanova and Nicholai Bukharin through the newspaper “Pravda”, the head of the Jewish section of the Russian Communist Party of the Bolsheviks RCP(b), a hype was raised around “The Jewish pavilion” at the all-Soviet agricultural expo of 1923. It was financed by the same “Joint”. It is noteworthy that during his last visit to Moscow in October 1923, half-paralyzed Lenin was taken through the entire Jewish exhibit at the all-Soviet agricultural expo. Analysis of literature, ordered for Lenin at the time indicates his heightened attention to the Jewish issue and Crimea.
In November 1923, Bragin prepared a draft document, in accordance with which by the 10th anniversary of the October revolution, it was proposed to form an Autonomous Jewish region on the territory of Northern Crimea, the southern steppes of Ukraine and the Black sea coast up to the borders of Abkhazia [including Sochi – KR], with a total area of 10 million acres, with the aim of relocating 500 thousand Jews. Based on this document, Bragin, Rosen and zamnarcomnats [Deputy National Commissar? – KR], Broydo, presented through Lev Kamenev a Memorandum in the Politburo, in which it was stressed that the formation of a Jewish state “would be politically advantageous for Soviet authorities”. In case of successful implementation the authors of the note guaranteed the receipt of tens of millions of dollars “through Jewish, American, and international organizations”, as this “will cause an unprecedented interest in all economically and politically powerful organizations in America and Europe”.
The Politburo has repeatedly discussed the project. Its active supporters were Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinovyev, Bukharin, Rykov, and Tsuryupa and Chicherin. During the discussion, the emphasis has gradually shifted to just Crimea, since in Ukraine the memories of Jewish pogroms during the civil war were still fresh and a danger of repeating those tragic events still existed.
In January 1924, the talks were already about the “Autonomous Jewish government, federated with Russia”, a draft decree on the establishment in the Northern part of Crimea of a Jewish Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was prepared. Jewish Telegraph Agency (ETA) on February 20, 1924, published the appropriate announcement abroad.
To address the issues raised in the appeals of Larin and Bragin about the resettlement of Jews from the shtetls of Ukraine and Belarus, the Presidium of the USSR at the meeting of August 29, 1924, decided to form a Committee for land settlement of Jewish workers (KOMZET) and the Public Committee for land settlement of Jewish workers (OZET). KOMZET was headed by P. G. Smidovich, OZET – by Larin.
KOMZET focused their activities on resettlement of 500-600 thousand people. The need for this was based on the fact that “the economic structure of the Jewish population is absolutely not adapted to the Soviet system, with its course on State trade, cooperation and concentration of industry, and if emergency measures are not taken for the transfer of the Jewish population to productive labor, then a significant part of it would face the prospect of extinction and degeneration…”.
In May 1926 a long-term plan was established for the resettlement of Jews in the USSR for 10 years – 100 thousand families. In June of the same year a plan for the next 3 years was approved – 18 thousand families. In accordance with the decision of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party (VKP (b)) from July 26, 1928, the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR) along with Birobidzhan became the main base of the Jewish resettlement. By October-November 1928, 131,901.24 hectares of land was allocated in Crimea for these purposes.
Since 1921 there was an Autonomous Republic in Crimea, with its own Constitution. Gradually the consequences of famine were overcome, Crimean Tatars were resettled from the Crimean mountains into the steppe areas in order to provide them with land. More than 200 thousand Tatars-immigrants from Bulgaria and Romania received official permission to return to Crimea with the granting of benefits (the corresponding decision of the Central Executive Committee of RSFSR has not been repealed until now).
On April 21, 1926, a visiting session of the Bureau of the OK VKP (b) (Regional Committee of the Communist Party) in Bakhchisarai approved the prospective resettlement plan for the Republic, but it turned out that the resettlement of the Jews to Crimea was contrary to the attitudes of local authorities in respect of land provision of Tatar peasants. Inevitably this has led to a conflict between the leadership of the Crimean Republic and [Communist] party authorities and Moscow. The top officials got on the case in the capital. 49 famous writers and poets spoke in support of the “Crimean project” and appealed to the West for funding. A number of delegations were sent to America and Europe with the aim of campaigning for the establishment of a Jewish Republic in Crimea. In Berlin at a meeting with representatives of the financial and political elites of Europe, People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Chicherin, assured that the government of the USSR is treating the Crimean project “very seriously”, and “not a slightest problem” is expected to come in the way of its implementation.
The reaction of the leaders of the World Zionist organization was to include the issue about the “Crimean project” on the agenda of the Jewish Congress of America, held in Philadelphia. 200 wealthiest people in America asked the participants to raise funds for the Crimean project. The discussion was welcomed by the future presidents Hoover and Roosevelt, and the wife of Roosevelt, Eleanor, took part in its work personally. On the eve of the Congress on behalf of the Soviet government, Smidovich reassured that in exchange for financial assistance there “will be colonization of Crimea by Jews.” The Congress decided to support the “Crimean project” and to allocate $15 million.
During the Congress, some of its influential members have strongly opposed the project, describing it as a clever move of the Bolsheviks with the purpose of gaining access to international financial resources. However, the last word was made by L. Marshall, who positively characterized the situation in the USSR and the value of the “Crimean project”. Thus, despite the absence of diplomatic relations between the USSR and the United States, the Congress decided to begin investing in Crimea through the “Joint”.
The Politburo passed a resolution, in which the aim was “to stay the course on the possibility of organizing a Jewish Autonomous Unit under favorable results of resettlement” in Crimea. At the same time in the USSR and the USA simultaneously – probably not without the mediation of the Jewish community – began probing the soil with the purpose of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the countries. Thus, during the negotiations with one of the leaders of the “Joint,” Rosenberg, Larin and former Bundestroy member, Weinstein, on behalf of the Soviet leadership has stated, that the implementation of the “Crimean” project” “will be carried to a successful result under all circumstances”, but in connection with the “non-recognition by the American government of the Soviet government, the American Jewish community must move from a state of neutrality and to exert pressure on the government of the United States.” Rosenberg promised to provide the necessary assistance. The same was negotiated in Moscow by Warburg. Their efforts produced an impact on Roosevelt, who shortly after his election to the post of President of the United States, established diplomatic relations with the USSR.
All decisions on Crimea were taken under conditions of top secrecy. Even the Secretary of the Crimean Regional Communist Party Committee, sent from Moscow, Petropavlovsky was not aware of them. And the Deputy of Menzhinsky in GPU (State Political Dpartment at the NKVD), Trilisser, at the meeting of the CC RCP(B) (Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party of Bolsheviks) on anti-semitism was surprised by rumors in Jewish circles of the USSR about the creation in Crimea of a Jewish Republic. The situation was suddenly “blown up” by the Chairman of the Ukrainian CIC (Central Executive Committee), Petrovsky, who leaked the information about the decision of the Politburo in an interview with the correspondent of “Izvestia”.
On April 7, 1926, a Crimean Jewish conference opened in Simferopol, which was associated with an unpleasant for KOMZET incident. On April 11, “Red Crimea” published the basic ideas from the speech given in Yiddish by the representative of the Department of Nationalities of the Central Executive Committee, I. M. Rashkes: “We strive to create a solid land area with autonomy with a perspective in the future not for the concentration of world Jewry, but in order to settle the three million Jews from the USSR on this land”. The situation in Crimea immediately escalated: Crimean Tatars and Germans became alarmed. However, three days later, the editors published a letter of Rashkes, in which he retracted his words, calling it a “ridiculous idea”. Citing insufficient language skills of his employee, the editors apologized to the comrade from the capital…
In contrast to the project of resettlement of Jews, the Crimean Tatar Communists came up with the idea of creating in the North of Crimea of a German Autonomous Republic. One of the main opponents of the mass migration of Jews to Crimea became the Chairman of the Crimean CEC (Central Executive Committee), Veli Ibragimov. When the situation on the peninsula got out of control, he wrote an article in the Crimean Tatar newspaper “Yeni-Dunya”: “They demand land for resettlement to Crimea of 8,000 Jewish households, but …our inventory does not even satisfy our internal needs [this could justify Crimean Tatar deportation, see more later – KR], and therefore, the Crimean authorities has found it impossible to satisfy these demands. Recently we raised this issue in Moscow and hope that it will be resolved in our favor”. Ibragimov was supported by the national intelligentsia, which formerly was part of the party “Milli-Firca”.
On September 26, 1927, Larin has proposed a set of measures on settlement of Jews in Crimea, according to which the main specialization of their work would become grape alcohol production to supply the Crimean wine factories. One of the important points was the proposal of the NKVD of the Crimean ASSR “to develop… a plan of division for village councils of Jewish farming areas with the establishment of respective village councils in accordance with actual settlement and recognition of the official languages of Russian and Jewish on equal basis”.
The proposal was met with resistance from the leaders of the Crimean ASSR, primarily Veli Ibragimov. Worried by the development, Larin has sent a letter to Stalin, in which he accused Ibragimov in “igniting the dark Tatar masses”. Desperate telegrams were sent to Stalin and Molotov by completely bewildered Petropavlovsky. In the end, Ibragimov was summoned to Moscow, where at the beginning of 1928 he was arrested and charged with criminal offences in the civil war. Forced under pressure to confess to the murder of one of the Tatar activists and sheltering the bandits, he was shot.
At the same time the GPU was preparing a closed “process 63”: thus the elites of Tatar ethnic intelligentsia were exiled to Solovki. Protests among the Crimean Germans were brutally suppressed, but about a thousand of them managed to leave the USSR.
To free the land for the resettlement of the Jews the Presidium of the CEC of USSR approved a law recognizing the Northern Crimean territory – “the lands of national significance”. Decisive action of Moscow persuaded Americans to move from individual investments to large-scale long-term projects. The development of the loan agreement between the “Joint” and the government of the USSR had begun, which was signed on February 19, 1929. According to the contract, “Joint” allocated 900 thousand dollars a year for 10 years at 5% annual interest. In case of successful realization of the project the payout of the so-called incremental amounts up to 500 thousand dollars a year was agreed on. Debt repayment was to begin in 1945 and be completed in 1954 (when the transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine was accomplished by Nikita Khrushev!). In case of violation of the Soviet party of its obligations, the funding would cease. “Joint” has reserved the exclusive right to reduce the loan amount from 9 to 7 million dollars without explanation.
The feature of the project was that the government of the USSR issued for the full amount of the loan and passed to the “Joint” the bonds that were distributed by subscription. Thus the largest financial and political families in America – Rockefeller, Marshall, Warburg, Roosevelt, Hoover, and others became the holders of the shares of land in Crimea.
On September 5, 1930, by the decision of the Crimean CEC , Freidorf became the center of Jewish National District. In 1931, OK VCP(b) and the Crimean government stated that “the Jewish resettlement to Crimea is politically and economically justified”. A Jewish National Freidorf District, 32 Jewish national village council, and the newspaper “Lenin Weg” in Yiddish were established in the Republic.
The resettlement of the Jews coincided with the “dispossession” and forced deportation of Crimean peasants. GPU has deployed a network of camps across the peninsula (only in the Simferopol district there were four of them). According to a report by an employee of the Crimean OGPU, Salyn, by March 26, 1930, 16 thousand people were “dispossessed” and identified for deportation, and the total number of deported reached 25-30 thousand.
Regional authorities reacted differently to these events. In February, 1931, the Chairman of the CEC of the Crimean ASSR, Mehmet Ismail Kubaev at the party conference of Dzhankoy district said that Moscow is pursuing a policy of imperial chauvinism, impoverishing the labor masses of Crimea, first of all – Tatars. The OK Bureau regarded this speech as “counterrevolutionary” and Kabaev was immediately removed from his post.
Jewish collective farm in Crimea
The resettlement of Jews sometimes was met with rejection from the local population. Land, economic conflicts escalated into ethnic conflicts, in connection with which in July 1928, an outflow of immigrants was observed (certain farms lost 60-70%). According to the census of 1926 out of 39,921 Jews in rural areas lived only 4,083 people. On January 1, 1930, out of 49,100 Crimean Jews only 10,140 lived in villages. By 1941, the number of Jews increased, according to some estimates, up to 70 thousand, of which in 86 Jewish collective farms lived only 17 thousand people.
After the establishment of diplomatic relations with America, with the active assistance of the U.S. President Roosevelt activity in the colonization of Crimea began to decrease. At the same time increased the negative attitudes, fueled by the witch hunt on the “enemies of the people”. The refusal of the Americans to sign a new loan agreement until the full fulfillment of the contract resulted in that instead of a Jewish Republic in Crimea, two Jewish districts were established. There, according to the general principles of national policy of the USSR, all administrative offices, courts, educational institutions had Yiddish as an official language, and public and educational institutions were maintained at the expense of the state.
The activities of nationalist forces in Crimea, fueled from abroad, did not stop until 1934, but in later sources it is difficult to find even a mention of it, apparently, because on May 7, 1934, a Jewish Autonomous region in Khabarovsk krai was established. The branch of “Joint” in the USSR was abolished by the decision of the Politburo of the VCP (b) on May 4, 1938. By this time D. Rosenberg had already spent on the activities for the establishment of Jewish colonies in Crimea $30 million.
With the beginning of the Great Patriotic war one of the most important issues was the propaganda and socio-political provision of defense of the country. Simultaneously with the Anti-fascist Committee of Scientists, Slavic, Women’s and Youth Anti-fascist committees, a Jewish Anti-fascist Committee (JAC) was established. The Chairman of the Presidium was awarded with the order of Lenin, national artist of the USSR, member of the Arts Council’s Committee of SNK of the USSR, artistic director of the State Jewish Theater (GOSET), Solomon Mikhailovich Mikhoels (Vovsi). Executive Secretary – editor of the newspaper “Einikait” (“Unity”), journalist and theater critic Shakhno Epstein, and Deputy Chairman – the poet and playwright Itzik Fefer (Isaac Solomonovich).
To prevent the growth of Jewish nationalism in the country, the Committee was initially focused on overseas activities, having as its objective:
(1) To promote pro-Soviet sentiment in the world community, establishing contacts with international Jewish organizations;
(2) To attract foreign aid to the USSR.
On the proposal of Beria in 1943, Stalin allowed the heads of the Committee to visit overseas.
Officially, the trip of Mikhoels and Fefer was held on the initiative of Albert Einstein, but the mission pursued quite specific pragmatic purpose: to evoke sympathy for the Soviet Union from the Jews of the United States and other countries in order to influence public opinion, prompting them to agree about the necessity of opening a second front. Propaganda machine of F. Roosevelt wrongly represented the contribution of each of the allies to the war. Moreover, in the States, few people knew about the atrocities of fascism: no matter how paradoxical it may seem, the media in North America have kept silent about much of what was happening in occupied Europe.
The Americans, accepting the delegation of the Committee pursued its own goals. Although Mikhoels and Fefer acted as representatives of the Soviet Union, they were seen as messengers of all Russian Jews. (Note that by the beginning of the WWI on the territory of the Russian Empire lived 5.5 million Jews, and from the 1880’s, their immigration to America exceeded 1.5 million. According to estimates, on the eve of WWII on the territory of the USSR lived at least 3 million Jews). Such treatment of the delegation of the Committee was consistent with the level of hospitality towards Mikhoels abroad.
During his stay in the USA (three months), Canada (two months), Mexico (two weeks) and England (three weeks), Mikhoels met with Albert Einstein, the Chairman of the Administrative Committee of the World Jewish Congress, N. Goldman, who was the leader of the Masonic Lodge of the “Sons of Zion”, Senator D. Limen, the lawyer millionaire D. Rosenberg, writers W. Hashem, E. Sinclair, L. Feihtvanger, artist Marc Chagall, Charlie Chaplin, Chairman of the World Jewish Congress, the chief Rabbi of USA, Dr. Steven Wise, President of the American Federation of Labor, V. Green, the Oppenheimers, many prominent bankers and financiers. In England on the occasion of the arrival of Mikhoels the Honorary Committee was organised, which included the wife of Churchill, and politicians, and activists of working committees of Whitman. Mikhoels was seen as “a link between the best and the most beautiful of the old Jewish world and all the best and most beautiful of the new”.
The public rallies of Mikhoels were visited by a total of more than 500 thousand people, while the Foundation of the Red Army collected about $32 million. It seemed that all of America was eager to welcome Mikhoels, so it was not without excesses – part of the journey Mikhoels had to do on crutches, because during one of the meetings the excited audience toppled the wooden platform, on which Mikhoels was standing.
“The Crimean issue” was discussed at almost every serious meeting. It was about the project “Crimean California”, which did not come to fruition before the war, but was revived in 1943. D. Rosenberg admitted during the interview: “Crimea interests us not only as Jews, but as Americans, because Crimea – is the Black sea, the Balkans and Turkey”. Apparently, the delegation of the Committee was reminded that the time to pay the debt of the USSR was approaching, but the situation can change if the idea of creation of Jewish Republic in Crimea is revived. The offer was for a fantastic sum of $10 billion.
The political leadership of the USA and the FBI made their conclusions on the results of the trip of Mikhoels: industrial and financial circles and American cultural elites, leaders of Jewish organizations were deeply interested in the provision of Crimea to not only the Soviet Jews, but to the entire diaspora, therefore, the establishment of a Jewish Republic in Crimea looked like quite a good idea. In the long run it was beneficial to the USA, including for the implementation of their military-strategic and geopolitical objectives.
After Mikhoels returning to Moscow the project “Crimean California” moved to a new stage. In February 1944 – the year of successful strategic operations, the year of “ten Stalin’s strikes”, a document arrived at Molotov’s table, written in Moscow, on Kropotkin st #10, the headquarters of the Jewish Anti-fascist Committee:
“During the Patriotic war a number of issues related to life and settlement of Jewish masses of the Soviet Union emerged.
Before the war in the Soviet Union there were up to 5 million Jews from the Western regions of Ukraine and Belorussia, the Baltic States, Bessarabia and Bukhovina, as well as from Poland. In the Soviet areas, temporarily occupied by the Nazis, presumably, at least 1.5 million Jews were killed.
…At one time, a Jewish Autonomous Region in Birobidzhan was created with the prospect of transforming it into a Jewish Soviet Republic, so as to resolve the state-legal issue of the Jewish people. It must be recognized that the experience of Birobidzhan, due to a number of reasons, primarily the lack of mobilization of all possibilities, and also because of its extreme distance from the location of major Jewish labor masses, did not provide the desired effect. But, despite all the difficulties, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast became one of the most advanced regions in the Far Eastern region, which proves the ability of the Jewish masses to build their own statehood. This ability is better manifested in the development of the Jewish national districts in Crimea.
Judging from the above, we would have considered it appropriate to establish a Jewish Soviet Republic in one of the regions where it is possible for political reasons. It seems to us that one of the most suitable areas would be the territory of Crimea, which best suits the requirements in regards to the capacity for resettlement, and due to the successful experience in the development of Jewish national districts there.
The creation of a Jewish Soviet Republic once and for all would solve in the spirit of Bolshevism, in the spirit of the Leninist-Stalinist ethnic policy, the problem of state-legal status of the Jewish people and the further development of its centuries-old culture. No one has been able to solve this problem for many centuries, and it can only be resolved in our great socialist country.
The idea of creating a Jewish Soviet Republic enjoys exceptional popularity among the wide Jewish masses of the Soviet Union and the top representatives of the brotherly nations.
In the building of Jewish Soviet Republic the Jewish people’s masses of all countries of the world would provide considerable assistance, wherever they were…
Based on the above, we offer:
1. To create a Jewish Soviet Socialist Republic on the territory of Crimea.
2. Before the liberation of Crimea to appoint the government commission for the development of this issue.
We hope that You will pay due attention to this issue, on the implementation of which depends the fate of an entire nation.
Chairman of the Presidium of
The Jewish Anti-fascist
Committee of the USSR, S. Mikhoels
Executive Secretary, W. Epstein
Deputy Chairman of the Presidium, I. Fefer
February 15, 1944, Moscow”
'Cited in an article titled, Obama right that Roosevelt was called a socialist and a communist, is an insightful quote. It indicates the true attitude and sympathies of FDR towards the Soviet regime'.
While CALIFORNIA CRIMEA as a homeland for JEWISH citizens was pushed by US global banking 1% TRIBE OF JUDAH with backing of KNIGHTS OF MALTA------bringing US money to buy that CRIMEAN land from RUSSIA taken during CRIMEAN WAR from Muslim TATARS----including US FEDERAL funding ------there was nothing communist about the goals of CALIFORNIA CRIMEA and taking the land to collective farming. FDR and a few other WINNERS in ROBBER BARON few decades of ROARING 20s wanted land in CRIMEA as well. This was a LAND DEAL brokered by global banking 1% ----not COMMUNISM.
Our REAL 99% of WE THE JEWISH citizens didn't far well with either HITLER or STALIN so TRIBE OF JUDAH wheeling and dealing with STALIN for very valuable CRIMEAN LAND as FLIPPING THE EARTH'S ECONOMIC AXIS FROM WESTERN HEMISPHERE TO EASTERN HEMISPHERE was gearing up-----was not about helping the 99% of Jewish citizens.
REMEMBER, IT WAS THE RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVES IN CONGRESS WANTING A STALIN/MAOIST MARXISM INSTEAD OF THE FDR REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE 'NEW DEAL'
This was FAKE NEWS back in early 1900s coming from media called CONSERVATIVE FIRING LINE.
As the US entered WW 2 on the Western European front ----FDR and global banking 1% were wheeling and dealing with STALIN to resettle REAL 99% of Jewish in this CRIMEAN HOMELAND. Those Jewish refugees were sent to CRIMEA to claim vacated farmland --making COLLECTIVE FARMS.
The Commie Connection – FDR and Stalin
April 16, 2018
For all those admirers of Franklin Delano Roosevelt who believe he was a great president, remove the blinders and face up to the fact that his socialist mindset and administration destroyed the last remnants of the Old Republic. Most of these same cheer leaders for the “New Deal” are in love with big government and seek to empower a federal authority at the expense of the Federalism model that is based upon separations of power and States Rights. With the unholy alliance with the Soviet Union, FDR linked his inner objectives with the greatest autocrat liquidator that fought World War II, as a Communist expansionist to destroy most of the traditional institutions that make up Western Civilization.
Cited in an article titled, Obama right that Roosevelt was called a socialist and a communist, is an insightful quote. It indicates the true attitude and sympathies of FDR towards the Soviet regime.
“The Russian newspapers during the last election  published the photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt over the caption, ‘The first communistic President of the United States,'” said Sen. Thomas Schall, a Republican from Minnesota. “Evidently the Russian newspapers had knowledge concerning the ultimate intent of the President, which had been carefully withheld from the voters in this country. In fact, the voters of the United States were meticulously misled as to such intentions.” We found Schall’s comments in the book, All But the People: Franklin D. Roosevelt and his Critics, 1933-1939.”
While such condemnation should not be new to seasoned historians, the general public has been so isolated from the realities of the 1930’s and 1940’s that a refresher course is necessary to dispel all the favorable myths regarding the systematic deconstruction of America.
“By 1938, Garet Garrett, distinguished newspaperman, author and editorial write for the Saturday Evening Post, published an essay, “The Revolution Was.” In the opening paragraph, he said:
There are those who still think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of Depression, singing songs of freedom (Garrett, The People’s Pottage, p. 7)
Garrett went on to show that every problem faced by the New Deal was solved in a way which transformed the traditional concept of limited self government into a system that could not fail to:
Ramify the authority and power of executive government—its power, that is, to rule by decrees and rules and regulations of its own making.
Strengthen its hold on the economic life of the nation.
Extend its power over the individual.
Degrade Congress and the parliamentary principle.
Impair the great American tradition of an independent Constitutional judicial power.
Weaken all other powers—private enterprise, private finance, and the power of state and local governments.”
This litany of betrayal is ignored in mainstream society, because it is distasteful to admit that the country was destroyed from the oval office itself.
In the brilliant essay, The Friends of Uncle Joe, the deeply missed Joseph Sobran strikes to the core with his analysis.
Roosevelt’s eulogists likewise avoid the subject of Stalin, for whom FDR had the highest regard, calling him “a Christian gentleman” during the Yalta conference. He had befriended Stalin from the first year of his administration, when he extended diplomatic recognition to the murderous pariah state. Time and again he chose to help “Uncle Joe” when he didn’t have to, appeasing him from a position of strength. Even Neville Chamberlain never idealized Hitler as “Uncle Adolf.” When FDR asked Pope Pius XII to condemn Hitler, Pius sent back word that if he did so he would also have to condemn Stalin; Roosevelt withdrew the request.
Stalin had shown his true colors long before Roosevelt and Churchill took on as their ally the brave, bluff “Uncle Joe.” Had they never heard of the forced famine of Ukraine, the NKVD mass arrests, the Gulag camps, the purges and show trials, the murder of Trotsky, the invasions of Poland (with the Katyn Forest massacre of 15,000 Polish officers), Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania? All these things, and more, revealed not only the brutality of Stalin but the logic of Communism itself, which had begun its reign in Russia with the mass murder of Orthodox priests under Lenin. Communism was in essence a reversion to the principles of primitive warfare, directed not only against external enemies but against its own subjects if they resisted (or were even suspected of a disposition to resist) its tyranny.”
“FDR praised Stalin’s constitution for guaranteeing religious freedom while ignoring the purges, show trials, aggression against countries adjacent to Russia, and the persecution of the Russian Christians. It may sound incredibly today but FDR called Stalin, the Communist butcher, a Christian gentleman. Ever read that in high school? FDR was Stalin’s best friend among world leaders and that is in spite of Stalin killing more people before WWII started than Hitler would kill during the war. Amazing is it not?”
So what does all this mean? The absurdity that America and the English befriended Stalin as a necessary ally in the struggle to defeat Hitler misses the similar collectivist attitudes and authoritarian motives that both countries exhibited towards the New World Order that resulted from the disastrous conflict.
“I conclude that FDR had no illusions about the nature of Stalin’s régime. Recognizing the vital role played by the USSR in the war against Germany, however, he sought to develop personal contacts with the Soviet leader comparable to the close relations he had already established with Churchill. His objective was twofold: using persuasion, to ensure Soviet entry into the war against Japan and to enlist Soviet backing for the establishment of a United Nations along the lines proposed by the United States. At Yalta he achieved considerable success in achieving those basic goals.”
What can be drawn from this evaluation? No doubt Roosevelt knew the sinister nature of the Soviet dictator, but to conclude that FDR was simply being pragmatic in forging an alliance to combat Nazism misses the underlying anti-liberty similarities that both potentates shared. Likewise the post war strategy was based upon implementing a universal tyranny under the globalist banner of world governance. Establishing the UN was the first step in dismantling sovereignty of independent countries.
COULD IT BE THAT BOTH HITLER AND STALIN WORKED FOR THE SAME GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA WHO WANTED A WORLD WAR AND FDR WAS SIMPLY THAT.
The despicable record of the ‘Man of Steel’, Joseph Stalin is painful to read much less digest. In the final scrutiny of 20th century evil, what makes the victor a hero? The world was not saved from National Socialism by the expansion of totalitarian communism. Nor was the emerging American empire a noble substitute for a limited government republic.
The FDR legacy is not heroic and his shared sympathies with the ruthless Soviet oppressor are disgraceful. Degrees of evil are phantom separations when the ultimate purpose of either regime is to enslave and create dependency on their citizens. Each despot displays a flagrant disregard for respecting legitimate restrains on their powers, but every tyrant is willing to forfeit the natural rights of individuals to maintain and further their dominance of rule.
This forbidden history is far too distasteful for most to face up to and therefore, many will just dismiss it as erroneous or fictitious. Such denial has become central to a society that ignores political truths if unpleasant and earth shattering.
Confusion and self-delusion is the hallmark of a failed social structure. The Soviet gulag collapsed and it will not be long before the American police state implodes.
Confronting one’s own history is often difficult. The U.S. Presidency is now a repressive dictatorship. Much of the blame for setting this trend into motion lies at the feet of Roosevelt and his fellow travelers.
The term “Commie” has varied meaning and associations for different people. In the end, it embodies authoritarianism with no trace of compassion or respect for the individual.
The State once comprised supreme authority. This new millennium has produced a one world realm of globalism under the banner of the international community. Individual and independent sovereignty was assaulted last century. Now such intrinsic aspects must be completely purged from the final solution. Blame the collectivists for destroying self determination.
While the CRIMEAN collective farms gathered all private farms as much as possible, STALIN used that collectivization to deliberately create a FOOD shortage -----that ended in mass starvation of UKRAINIANS AND JEWISH citizens.
'In the years 1932 and 1933, a catastrophic famine swept across the Soviet Union. It began in the chaos of collectivization, when millions of peasants were forced off their land and made to join state farms'. 'Stalin is famous for initiating economic plans that helped move Russia from a poor, agrarian state to a large, industrial superpower. He pushed for rapid industrialization, the eradication of family farms in lieu of large communal farms, the end of personal ownership of land or businesses, and the dramatic weakening of organized religion'.
STALIN captured collective farms and began hauling all food produced to feed rich in MOSCOW and ST PETERSBURG.
While FDR and California global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH were wheeling and dealing with STALIN for these land deals in CRIMEA----Stalin PRETENDED he was preparing for this JEWISH HOMELAND IN CRIMEA.
"Why should the Jewish people go to Palestine where the land is less productive and requires big investments?" a Jewish newspaper asked at the time of the settlement, "Who go so far if the fertile Crimean land is beckoning to the Jewish people?"
Bringing this to today in US --------the same global banking 1% during CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA killed family farms and collectivized to BIG AG co-op farms---------LIKE LAND ---- O----LAKES
'the eradication of family farms in lieu of large communal farms, the end of personal ownership of land or businesses, and the dramatic weakening of organized religion''.
How Stalin Hid Ukraine's Famine From the World
In 1932 and 1933, millions died across the Soviet Union—and the foreign press corps helped cover up the catastrophe.
Oct 13, 2017
In the years 1932 and 1933, a catastrophic famine swept across the Soviet Union. It began in the chaos of collectivization, when millions of peasants were forced off their land and made to join state farms. It was then exacerbated, in the autumn of 1932, when the Soviet Politburo, the elite leadership of the Soviet Communist Party, took a series of decisions that deepened the famine in the Ukrainian countryside. Despite the shortages, the state demanded not just grain, but all available food. At the height of the crisis, organized teams of policemen and local Party activists, motivated by hunger, fear, and a decade of hateful propaganda, entered peasant households and took everything edible: potatoes, beets, squash, beans, peas, and farm animals. At the same time, a cordon was drawn around the Ukrainian republic to prevent escape. The result was a catastrophe: At least 5 million people perished of hunger all across the Soviet Union. Among them were nearly 4 million Ukrainians who died not because of neglect or crop failure, but because they had been deliberately deprived of food.
Neither the Ukrainian famine nor the broader Soviet famine were ever officially recognized by the USSR. Inside the country the famine was never mentioned. All discussion was actively repressed; statistics were altered to hide it. The terror was so overwhelming that the silence was complete. Outside the country, however, the cover-up required different, subtler tactics. These are beautifully illustrated by the parallel stories of Walter Duranty and Gareth Jones.
In the 1930s, all of the members of the Moscow press corps led a precarious existence. At the time, they needed the state’s permission to live in the USSR, and even to work. Without a signature and the official stamp of the press department, the central telegraph office would not send their dispatches abroad. To win that permission, journalists regularly bargained with foreign ministry censors over which words they could use, and they kept on good terms with Konstantin Umansky, the Soviet official responsible for the foreign press corps. William Henry Chamberlin, then the Moscow correspondent for the Christian Science Monitor, wrote that the foreign reporter “works under a Sword of Damocles—the threat of expulsion from the country or of the refusal of permission to re-enter it, which of course amounts to the same thing.”
Extra rewards were available to those, like Walter Duranty, who played the game particularly well. Duranty was The New York Times correspondent in Moscow from 1922 until 1936, a role that, for a time, made him relatively rich and famous. British by birth, Duranty had no ties to the ideological left, adopting rather the position of a hard-headed and skeptical “realist,” trying to listen to both sides of the story. “It may be objected that the vivisection of living animals is a sad and dreadful thing, and it is true that the lot of kulaks and others who have opposed the Soviet experiment is not a happy one,” he wrote in 1935—the kulaks being the so-called wealthy peasants whom Stalin accused of causing the famine. But “in both cases, the suffering inflicted is done with a noble purpose.”
This position made Duranty enormously useful to the regime, which went out of its way to ensure that Duranty lived well in Moscow. He had a large flat, kept a car and a mistress, had the best access of any correspondent, and twice received coveted interviews with Stalin. But the attention he won from his reporting back in the U.S. seems to have been his primary motivation. His missives from Moscow made him one of the most influential journalists of his time. In 1932, his series of articles on the successes of collectivization and the Five Year Plan won him the Pulitzer Prize. Soon afterward, Franklin Roosevelt, then the governor of New York, invited Duranty to the governor’s mansion in Albany, where the Democratic presidential candidate peppered him with queries. “I asked all the questions this time. It was fascinating,” Roosevelt told another reporter.
As the famine worsened, Duranty, like his colleagues, would have been in no doubt about the regime’s desire to repress it. In 1933, the Foreign Ministry began requiring correspondents to submit a proposed itinerary before any journey into the provinces; all requests to visit Ukraine were refused. The censors also began to monitor dispatches. Some phrases were allowed: “acute food shortage,” “food stringency,” “food deficit,” “diseases due to malnutrition,” but nothing else. In late 1932, Soviet officials even visited Duranty at home, making him nervous.
In that atmosphere, few of them were inclined to write about the famine, although all of them knew about it. “Officially, there was no famine,” wrote Chamberlin. But “to anyone who lived in Russia in 1933 and who kept his eyes and ears open, the historicity of the famine is simply not in question.” Duranty himself discussed the famine with William Strang, a diplomat at the British embassy, in late 1932. Strang reported back drily that the New York Times correspondent had been “waking to the truth for some time,” although he had not “let the great American public into the secret.” Duranty also told Strang that he reckoned “it quite possible that as many as 10 million people may have died directly or indirectly from lack of food,” though that number never appeared in any of his reporting. Duranty’s reluctance to write about famine may have been particularly acute: The story cast doubt on his previous, positive (and prize-winning) reporting. But he was not alone. Eugene Lyons, Moscow correspondent for United Press and at one time an enthusiastic Marxist, wrote years later that all of the foreigners in the city were well aware of what was happening in Ukraine as well as Kazakhstan and the Volga region:
The truth is that we did not seek corroboration for the simple reason that we entertained no doubts on the subject. There are facts too large to require eyewitness confirmation. … Inside Russia the matter was not disputed. The famine was accepted as a matter of course in our casual conversation at the hotels and in our homes.
Everyone knew—yet no one mentioned it. Hence the extraordinary reaction of both the Soviet establishment and the Moscow press corps to the journalistic escapade of Gareth Jones.
Jones was a young Welshman, only 27 years old at the time of his 1933 journey to Ukraine.
The movement of JEWISH citizens out of Western Europe to POLAND by HITLER was the deal made with STALIN in this agreement towards a JEWISH HOMELAND IN CRIMEA. International FAKE NEWS media tells us HITLER hated JEWS----his intention was KILLING those JEWS ---but, it is more likely they were sent to POLAND heading for this EX-PAT location in CRIMEA----KINGDOM KIEVAN.
It was thought this was the goal all the way to end of WW 2-----when STALIN reneged------said no JEWS allowed ----the CRIMEAN deal paid for by FDR and CALIFORNIA global banking 1% ended with all that money kept by STALIN. So, the JEWS sent to POLAND were killed as we know by HOLOCAUST.
'Although Stalin just shrugged the idea off at the time and instead gave the Soviet Jews their autonomous republic—in the Soviet Far East, on the border with China—as a result of these efforts, 65,000 Jews had lived in Crimea before the war – or 8% of the urban and 3% of the rural population of the peninsula. During the Holocaust, all the Crimean Jews who didn’t leave, around 40,000 people, were killed by the Nazis and their collaborators – at Simferopol (14,000), at Kerch (7,000), at Sevastopol (4,500)'.
Flash forward to today, this same goal of KIEVAN KINGDOM as JEWISH HOMELAND is being tossed about by the SAME GLOBAL BANKING 1% PLAYERS.
Stalin worked for global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA-----PUTIN works for global banking 1% KNIGHTS OF MALTA-----and global banking 1% TRIBE OF JUDAH has been partnered with both.
'Stalin and antisemitism -
At first collaborating with Jewish and half-Jewish Politburo members Grigory Zinoviev and Lev Kamenev against Jewish arch-rival Leon Trotsky, Stalin succeeded in marginalizing Trotsky. By 1929, Stalin had also effectively marginalized Zinoviev and Kamenev as well, compelling both to submit to his authority'.
This constant goal by global banking 1% TRIBE OF JUDAH to get the land tied to KIEVAN KINGDOM is same as STATE OF ISRAEL as HOMELAND--- there is no connection to the JEWISH RELIGION----just as there is no connection to CATHOLIC RELIGION by these OLD WORLD EUROPEAN AND JEWISH KINGS.
REMEMBER, most of those RUSSIANS forced to be USSR MARXIST are former RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CATHOLIC.
The Jews of Crimea Feel Safer With Russia in Charge
Abandoned idea of a Jewish homeland not dead after all as Jews in war-battered Ukraine weigh their options
By Mikhail Klikushin • 07/15/15 10:00am
There were times when the Jewish population of the Crimean peninsula exceeded 65,000. Now it”s around 10,000 out of 2 million, but it suddenly looks like this number has a chance to increase dramatically.
The tumultuous events around Crimea slipping out of Ukraine’s control divided the Ukrainian Jewish community. From the very first days, Crimean Jews threw their lot with Russia. “In Crimea, some Jews feel safer after Russian intervention,” reported Jewish Telegraphic Agency on March 4, 2014, less then a week after Russian ‘little green men’ put Russian flag in Sevastopol. “While many Ukrainian Jews have strongly condemned the Russian military incursion into Crimea,” JTA continued, “others see the intervention as restoring order in the wake of violent revolution that overthrew the pro-Russian government of President Viktor Yanukovych.”
Since then, Crimean Jews en masse exchanged their Ukrainian passports for Russian ones, and to the chagrin of their co-religionists elsewhere in Ukraine, asked the West and to put an end to the ‘unjust’ sanctions imposed on Russia over Crimea.
International Business Times reported in the beginning of July that Russian president Vladimir Putin was urged to allow as many as 40,000 Jewish people who left Crimea during the reign of the Soviet Union to return to the now Russian-held peninsula and to ease the complex procedures that come with being repatriated to Russia in hopes of revitalizing Crimea. This initiative was led by Leonid Grach, the chairman of the regional public organization “Crimean Forum For the Defense of the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens.”
According Mr. Grach, “the overwhelming majority among these people are high-skilled specialists, engineers and representatives of the intelligentsia that Crimea needs today.”
Mr. Grach has a partner in Israel – Alexander Redko, leader of the pro-Russian Progressive Liberal-Democratic party. “Many people left Crimea after they lost what they felt was their motherland,” he said. “Today we ask Putin to grant them easy access to Russian citizenship” that would allow them to return to Crimea.
REMEMBER, PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS HE SAME AS CLINTON FAR-RIGHT WING GLOBAL BANKING 1% MAKING THE RICH PROGRESSIVELY RICHER----NEO-LIBERALISM LAISSEZ FAIRE.
It’s not going to be a fast road for Jews who had been leaving Ukrainian Crimea during the decades of turmoil but their road to Crimea had never been easy in the first place.
A long time ago, when for the Jewish people Israel as a homeland seemed as reachable as a mirage, some Jews had high hopes for Crimea as a home for all the Jewish people of the world. The story was enfolded in tragedy and, of course, conspiracy, and it started with the Jewish Committee back in the days of World War II.
By the end of 1941, during the most dramatic period of the war, with the German army in the suburbs of Moscow, Stalin’s attention was drawn to a curious new proposal: to establish an International anti-Hitler Jewish Committee whose members were to be influential foreign – mostly American – Jews. This idea was received from two Jewish prisoners through the channels of the NKVD, Stalin’s fearsome secret police. The purpose of the Jewish Committee was obvious – to help the Red Army fight the Nazis by raising awareness in the West about terrible atrocities committed by Nazis against the Jews.
The idea belonged to two Polish Jews – Henryk Erlich and Viktor Alter, prominent representatives of the Polish branch of the Jewish Bund, influential figures within the international Jewish community with access to the hearts of its famous and pockets of its rich. In 1939, both had fled into Soviet territory from Poland in the first days after the war broke out. To their bad luck, the Bund leaders were recognized by the vigilant Jewish communist at the railroad station at Brest-Litovsk, arrested, sent to the dreadful Butyrskaya prison in Moscow and sentenced to death.
To Stalin, the idea seemed worth trying.
The prisoners were immediately released, placed at the luxurious Moscow Metropol Hotel and apologized to for the “injustice” on behalf of the Soviet state, they were given good food and told to put their idea in writing.
Thus was born the project of an International Jewish Anti-Hitler Committee, and Stalin quickly approved it – but not without adjustments. From Stalin’s perspective, the main goal of the Jewish organization should have been reduced to attracting Jewish capital into the war economy of the USSR. Solomon Lozovsky pointed out the simple math of Erlich and Alter’s idea: ”We can get millions of dollars from the West for just a little bit of work”.
Jewish organizations around the world, most of which were from the US, donated about $45 million to the Soviet Union during WWII.
Grasping the proposed idea, Stalin, however, modified it to his own liking. First, he ordered the re-arrest of the former leaders of the Bund. Second, the organization had to become a Soviet Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee. Third, it had to be ‘reinforced’ with proven Jewish Stalinists who had been tested by long-term cooperation with the NKVD. Stalin’s right-hand man Lavrenty Beria, head of the NKVD, personally cherry-picked some of the most suitable candidates for the Jewish Committee.
Solomon Lozovsky, former General Secretary of the International of the Trade Unions, international spying branch of the NKVD, was appointed the real, behind-the-scenes head of the Jewish Committee.
REMEMBER, THE WORLD WORKERS INTERNATIONAL WORK FOR WORLD BANK----IMF GLOBAL BANKING 1%.
'Industrial Workers of the World | One Big Union!iww.org The North American Regional Administration of the Industrial Workers of the World stand in complete solidarity with the brave workers in Georgia who have decided to take their lives into their own hands and fight their greedy employers for better working conditions'.
Of course, some of the future members of the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC) would have to be appointed from among the representatives of the Jewish intelligentsia – actors, writers and scientists. Using Lenin’s phrase, they would have to play the role of the “useful idiots” necessary to ensure the desired image of the new organization in the eyes of the influential American Jewish financial groups.
Messrs. Erlich and Alter became ‘Prisoner #41’ and ‘Prisoner #42′ in the inner prison of the city of Kuibyshev, where after two years of hell the first one hung himself in his cell and the second was shot. When concerned representatives of international Jewish organizations inquired about the fate of the leaders of the Polish Bund, , Stalin just shrugged his shoulders.
All the members of the JAC involved into the project of Jewish Republic in Crimea – 125 people – were arrested in 1948, and 23 of them were shot in 1952, the rest were sent to the GULAGs.
In 1953 Stalin died and one year later the new Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, previously the head of Ukraine for eleven years, with a stroke of his pen gave Crimea as a gift to his homeland as a pledge of ‘eternal friendship’ between Russia and Ukraine on the 300th anniversary of their unification, turning more than a million people, including 20,000 Jews, into ‘Ukrainians’ overnight.
Twenty years later, Mikhoels’ two daughters were among the first Soviet Jews to immigrate to Israel.
The Crimean project of the Jewish home seemed all but forgotten and the number of Jews living there never exceeded the prewar levels.
Maybe this is once again about to change.
This brings our discussion on FOOD public policy to today's US MOVING FORWARD. Global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA--TRIBE OF JUDAH CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have done in the US what STALIN did in UKRAINE/CRIMEA-------they have killed/consolidated/forced small private farmers onto COLLECTIVE FARMING AND DAIRY-----much like our US LAND O LAKES in MINNESOTA having expanded nationally.
This video will show the original land owner of what was to be made into a CO-OP------this PHILLIPS we are sure related to OLD WORLD ROYAL PHILLIPS of PHILLIPS PETROLEUM.
'Frank Phillips (November 28, 1873 – August 23, 1950) was the founder of Phillips Petroleum in Bartlesville, Oklahoma (marketed as Phillips 66) in 1917, along with his brother, Lee Eldas "L.E." Phillips Sr. In 2002, Phillips Petroleum merged with Conoco Oil Company and became ConocoPhillips'.
At the same time FDR was helping to create that JEWISH HOMELAND in CRIMEA----FDR was passing US NEW DEAL small private farm funding-----FARM BUREAU----while PHILLIPS PETROLEUM was bringing private small farm owners together for a collective farm/dairy LAND O LAKES.
'The feature of the project was that the government of the USSR issued for the full amount of the loan and passed to the “Joint” the bonds that were distributed by subscription. Thus the largest financial and political families in America – Rockefeller, Marshall, Warburg, Roosevelt, Hoover, and others became the holders of the shares of land in Crimea'.
'About this website
Land O'Lakes Farm Bowl
Professional football players find out if they have what it takes to be farmers'.
What makes us think of these COLLECTIVIZATION farm policies where small private farmers are forced into collective farming situations only later to lose all equity and land ownership when a MADMAN like STALIN or today's TRUMP comes along and is handed that land by a global banking 5% player like BETH FORD----hmmmm, wonder if she is related to HENRY FORD---FORD MOTOR who was partnered with PHILLIPS PETROLEUM in automobile/rubber as tires ---oil and gas as fuel------
We know BETH FORD is indeed working for global banking 1% and is somehow CEO of a collective co-op grown national after having only joined in 2012----guess where all that collective farmland is going very soon!
'Finally, the Ford name is eternally associated with industrialist Henry Ford (1863-1947). John Ford, Henry’s paternal grandfather, was born in Ballinascarthy, Ireland. Ancestrally, the Ford family was English but settled in Ireland during the sixteenth century. John Ford was forced to leave Ballinascarthy with his family, including 21-year-old son William, in 1847 at the height of the Famine. They made the difficult journey to Queenstown, Canada, and William’s mother, Tomasina, did not survive. John settled his family on a farm in Dearborn, Michigan. William helped his father with the upkeep of the farm. Eventually, he met Mary Litogot. The two married in 1861 and gave birth to their first son, Henry, in 1863.
Henry Ford’s Irish heritage instilled in him a strong work ethic. He became an engineer with the Edison Illuminating Company and after successfully building his first car in 1901, he established the Ford Motor Company in 1903. After introducing the Model T in 1908, the company took off'.
Land O'Lakes names new chief executive:
She will be the first female chief executive in the company's history.
By Adam Belz Star Tribune
July 26, 2018 — 6:37pm
Beth Ford, who joined Land O’Lakes in 2011 and most recently led its three largest business as chief operating officer, has been named chief executive officer of the giant agricultural cooperative.
Land O'Lakes said Thursday that it is promoting Beth Ford to become its new chief executive, moving up from a chief operating role overseeing its three largest businesses.
Ford, who joined Land O'Lakes in January 2012, will formally take the top job at the Arden Hills-based farmer-owned cooperative on Wednesday. She will be the first female chief executive in the $14 billion company's history and one of only 25 female chief executives at a Fortune 500 firm.
In an interview, Ford said her predecessor, Chris Policinski, left the company in good shape — both financially and strategically — by focusing on innovation and broadening the focus of the cooperative far beyond dairy products.
Ford joined Land O'Lakes early in 2012 from International Flavors and Fragrances, where she helped streamline the company's global-manufacturing infrastructure and built new factories in India, China and Singapore. Before that, she held several management jobs in supply chain and operations with Mobil Corp., PepsiCo and Pepsi Bottling Co., Hachette Book Group and Scholastic Inc.
Ford was born in Sioux City, Iowa. Her father was a truck driver and her mother was a nurse, therapist and minister. She earned her bachelor's degree from Iowa State University and a master's from Columbia University Business School.
She and her spouse, Jill Schurtz, have three teenage children and live in Minneapolis.