This is the last policy tied to BANKING PUBLIC POLICY we will discuss this week. Next week we will use this to segue into NATIVE AMERICAN PUBLIC POLICY--------since LOST TRIBES see themselves as those NATIVE AMERICANS.
Global banking 5% freemason/Greek players started working on a BARTERING MOVEMENT a few decades ago because they KNEW the goal of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS was to take ALL US 99% WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens OUT of the global monetary system reserved for ONLY THE GLOBAL 1% AND THEIR 2%. Remember, we have spoken often of MOVING FORWARD 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMIN as returning to STONE AGE---where of course people BARTERED and used STONE et al as CURRENCY.
That is what far-right wing global banking CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have been promoting this past decade---------THE SHARING ECONOMY.
Without coincidence our NATIVE AMERICANS who have a religion very, very tied to NATURE RELIGION----what we call NATURE MYSTICISM-------also had a BARTERING -----as TRADE AND BANKING system.
Those people PRETENDING to be LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL as NATIVE AMERICANS push the religion of TRANSHUMANISM-----which KILLS REAL NATIVE AMERICAN nature religion but they are embracing ancient NATIVE AMERICAN TRADE AND BANKING based upon BARTERING.
The History of the Trade
and Barter System
Items that are used as money often have little value in and of themselves. For example, the paper used to print money is not particularly valuable. Money has value because it is an exchange medium that people understand and accept as such. When everyone accepts that a bill or a coin has value, people can use it as a form of payment to purchase goods or services. Before money existed, people used other systems to perform exchanges. Bartering involves a direct trade for goods and services. Although some aspects of this transaction are similar to the exchange of money, bartering required time as people hammered out the terms of the deal. Utilizing money as the medium for trade simplified transactions significantly. Trade and barter were precursors to the monetary system used in today's society. Although trade and barter may seem almost archaic, they were the business solutions for people who lived before the convenience of credit card processing.
Bartering is the process of trading services or goods between two parties without using money in the transaction. When people barter, everyone benefits because they receive items or services they need or want. Bartering also has an advantage because even people without money can get something they need. Bartering might involve trading a service for an item. For example, you could agree to perform yard work for someone in exchange for a bushel of apples from a tree in their yard. When people choose to barter to meet a need, they can save their money for other needs.
Mesopotamia tribes were likely the starting point of the bartering system back in 6000 BC. Phoenicians saw the process, and they adopted it in their society. These ancient people utilized the bartering system to get the food, weapons, and spices they needed. Because of salt's great value, Roman soldiers bartered their services for the empire in exchange for salt. In Colonial America, the colonists used bartering to get the goods and services they needed. Even after the invention of money, people continued to barter.
The simplicity of bartering is one of the main advantages of this system. Issues with international trade, foreign exchange, and unbalanced economic power are virtually nonexistent with a bartering system. However, some disadvantages also exist. For a bartering transaction to occur, both parties' wants or needs must coincide to lead them to make a deal. Without a standard measure of value of goods and services, parties in the bartering transaction will need to spend time agreeing on the terms of the deal. It's common for both parties to place a higher value on their own goods or services and a lower value on the other party's items. Trust is also a component of bartering, because the representation of the goods or services offered must be accurate. If something is misrepresented in a transaction, the other party will have little recourse when a problem ensues. When bartering, people may need to store their accumulated possessions to preserve their purchasing power. Depending on the types of items, this might be difficult and inconvenient.
Because bartering does not involve the exchange of money for goods and services, it might seem like an ideal way to avoid paying taxes on transactions. However, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service informs taxpayers that the fair market value of goods or services received via bartering is considered taxable income. Parties who engage in bartering transactions must report this value as income on tax returns. The IRS requires reporting of bartering for the year it occurs. Failure to report bartering activity could lead to tax penalties.
_______________________________________
Here we see what is the ABSOLUTELY KNOWN migration history of our NATIVE AMERICANS have them leaving the Asian continent and crossing to NORTH AMERICA 10,000---14,000 years ago. Doing this isolated them from all GEO-POLITICAL ---ECONOMIC development tied to global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS-----KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH.
STONE AGE TRADE AND BANKING WAS NATIVE AMERICAN TRADE AND BANKING.
'Perfectly Preserved Footprints of 14,000-year-old Humans Reveal How Stone Age People Explored Deep Dark Caves
This LOST TRIBE OF ISRAEL myth-making and propaganda even distorts REAL history surrounding those LOST TRIBES. We discussed in detail this migration of LOST TRIBE into what is to become KIEVAN KINGDOM---CRIMEA and UKRAINE today. This is what we discussed in detail the goal for the next STATE OF ISRAEL------flipping the EARTH'S ECONOMIC AXIS from Western Hemisphere to Eastern will kill today's ISRAEL as JERUSALEM to become ISRAEL as KIEVAN KINGDOM indeed tied to LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
So, why is JEWISH history being CORRUPTED? All this FAKE DATA AND ACADEMIC FAKE writing is being done by GLOBAL BANKING 1% ----NOT RELIGIOUS. These are the .00014% of global richest KILLING Jewish and TORAH religion.
TRIBES OF JUDAH-----NOT RELIGIOUS-----AND MOSTLY TRANSHUMANIST.
TRANSHUMANISM IS ATHEIST------IS SATANIC-----IS NIHILISTIC.
Jewish banking is morphing into 3000BC STONE AGE BARTERING ------ergo, NATIVE AMERICAN TRADE AND MONEY.
Those global 1% of TRIBES OF JUDAH still RAGING GLOBAL NEO-LIBERAL CAPITALISTS.
Native Americans and Jews: The Lost Tribes Episode
An all-too forgotten historical debate
By David Koffman
In the 8th century BCE, the Assyrians dispersed the Kingdom of Israel, giving life and legend to the Lost Tribes. The repatriation of these lost tribes eventually became an integral part of the Jewish–and Christian–messianic dream, and there have been Lost Tribe speculations about numerous “discovered” populations. One the most fascinating — and unfortunately forgotten — such discussions centered on the Native Americans. How did American Jews respond to this? Why and how did Jews credit or discredit it? What did these theories signify about American Jewish agendas and anxieties?
A Theory is Born
One of the first books to suggest the Native American Lost Tribe theory was written by a Jew, the Dutch rabbi, scholar, and diplomat Manasseh ben Israel. In The Hope of Israel (1650), Ben Israel suggested that the discovery of the Native Americans, a surviving remnant of the Assyrian exile, was a sign heralding the messianic era. Just one year later, Thomas Thorowgood published his best seller Jewes in America, Or, Probabilities that those Indians are Judaical, made more probable by some Additionals to the former Conjectures.
The Lost Tribe idea found favor among early American notables, including Cotton Mather (the influential English minister), Elias Boudinot (the New Jersey lawyer who was one of the leaders of the American Revolution), and the Quaker leader William Penn.
The notion was revived after James Adair, a 40-year veteran Indian trader and meticulous chronicler of the Israelitish features of Native American religion and social custom wrote The History of the American Indians…Containing an Account of their Origin, Language, Manners, Religion and Civil Customs in 1775. Even Epaphras Jones, an American Bible professor engaged the theory in 1831, claiming that anyone “conversant with the European Jews and the Aborigines of America… will perceive a great likeness in color, features, hair, aptness to cunning, dispositions for roving, &s.”
Religious Connotations
Some of these writers were interested in Native American history, but most of them were just interested in the Bible. Indeed, the Lost Tribe claim should be seen as part of a general 19th-century fascination with biblical history. Explorations of Holy Land flora and fauna, the geography of the Holy Land, the life of Jesus-the-man, were very much en vogue. A close identification among some 17th and 18th century Americans with the chosen people of Scripture helped Christian settlers see their colonization of New England as a reenactment of Israel’s journey into the Promised Land.
It also contributed to a more general religious myth-making scheme that helped define the national identity of the United States. To cite just one example, in a 1799 Thanksgiving Day sermon, Abiel Tabbot told his congregation in Massachusetts:
“It has often been remarked that the people of the United States come nearer to a parallel with Ancient Israel, than any other nation upon the globe. Hence, ‘OUR AMERICAN ISRAEL,’ is a term frequently used; and common consent allows it apt and proper.”
A curious incident that drew considerable attention and “proved,” at least to some, that Native Americans had ancient Israelite origins unfolded when tefillin (phylacteries) were “discovered” in Pittsfield, Massachusetts in the early 19th century. Their discoverer wrote that this “forms another link in the evidence by which our Indians are identified with the ancient Jews, who were scattered upon the face of the globe, and to this day remain a living monument, to verify and establish the eternal truths of Scripture.”
Prominent Jews Respond
Around the time of the Pittsfield
incident, Mordecai Manuel Noah, the journalist, playwright, politician, and Jewish American statesman, began spilling ink about the subject. Noah wrote a play She Would be a Soldier; or, The Plains of Chippewa (1819), that resolved the tension between the Yankees and the British by identifying the Indian Great Spirit with the God of the Bible. Noah’s ideas about Jewish-Native affinities grew in a distinctly political manner when he invited Natives Americans to help settle “Ararat,” the separatist Jewish colony he hoped to establish on Grand Island on the Niagara River around 1825.
Noah’s writings on Jewish Natives came to their full expression with his Discourse on the Evidences of the American Indians Being the Descendants of the Lost Tribes of Israel (1837). The work documented a host of theological, linguistic, ritual, dietary, and political parallels between Jews and Native Americans. Most importantly, he identified several essential character traits shared by the two peoples, all of which were, of course, highly laudable. For Noah, the conflation of Indians and Jews sanctioned the latter as divinely ordained Americans.
Another notable Jewish-Indian incident occurred in 1860, when stones hewn with Hebrew inscriptions were found near Newark, Ohio. The story unfolded over the course of many months and was followed closely by The Israelite, The Occident, and The Jewish Messenger, whose respective editors represented the intellectual vanguard of American Jewry. Isaac Mayer Wise, the leader of the Reform movement in America, employed philological proofs to undermine the stone’s authenticity. He rejected any connections between Jews and Native Americans, though it’s notable that he bothered to engage the story at all. Isaac Leeser, a traditionalist, sided in favor of the Lost Tribes theory. Reviewing the relics in question, The Occident, Leeser’s newspaper, concluded, “The sons of Jacob were walking on the soil of Ohio many centuries before the birth of Columbus.”
Implications
From a historical and scientific point of view, the Native American Lost Tribe claim is clearly narishkeit (Yiddish for foolishness). But even a brief exploration of it — who was making it and why, who was refuting it and why, reveals important insights about American Jewry. Popular thought about who Jews were — their place in America, with whom they could or should be associated — helps us understand how Jews negotiated their place in American society. Theories about Ancient Israelite Indians should not be dismissed as mere fantasy. Rather they are important precisely because they are fantasy.
Jews responded to the Lost Tribes claim about Native Americans in sermons, plays, public statements, scholarly works, and popular writings. The critical responses are more understandable: from the perspective of Reform and science, the theory is flagrantly nonsensical. But there are other reasons some may have rejected it: so as not to be associated with that which was thought of as native, primitive, and barbarian, so as not to be thought of as atavistic or lower on the evolutionarily ladder than other Europeans, so as not to be thought of as imminently disappearing from history, and so as not to be in need of Christian civilizing (i.e. missionizing). Advocates, on the other hand, had to go against the scholarly consensus and side with religious figures who could be dismissed as fanatics.
Accepting Native Americans as ancient Israelites held several — sometimes mutually exclusive — implications for American Jews. Foremost, it meant that the Indians were, in some way, related. It could buttress the sentiment that America was the New Jerusalem. This was the destined place where the original exiles, scattered to unknown corners of the world, were ingathered to their God-chosen Promised Land. They were not “lost” at all. Rather, the near aboriginal connection of Jews to the American soil served as evidence of the end of exile, and another reason to support a new American Jewish identity.
Many of the major figures in 19th-century American Jewry weighed in–in one manner or another–on the Jewish-Indian controversy. The practical stakes were never high, but the claim — so ubiquitous and so fluid (since it was used for so many different functions by so many different people) — was taken seriously and fretted over by Jewish leaders of very different orientations. The Lost Tribe theory had significant symbolic stakes — for Jews, Christians and Native Americans. Linking America and its earliest inhabitants with the Bible and its theology, meant staking a claim on America–and championing God’s plan for the New World.
______________________________________
WHICH NATIVE AMERICANS ARE CALLING FOR REVISIONIST HISTORY VIA BERING STRAIT-----THOSE GLOBAL BANKING BILLIONAIRE NATIVE PLAYERS WORKING FOR TRANSHUMANISM.
Bill Clinton and global banking 1% NEO-LIBERALS in 1990s as part of dismantling all that is our US PUBLIC FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT------privatized NATIVE LAND MANAGEMENT from being TRIBAL to being US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE. That killed native standing and protections via TRIBAL AGREEMENTS and threw those US 99% of WE THE NATIVE AMERICANS into a global trading status----not sovereign TRIBAL.
This is why Clinton gave native tribes CASINOS as an economy-----and these neo-liberals made sure all wealth from this native economy went to creating NATIVE BILLIONAIRES while 99% of US NATIVE AMERICANS remained in DEEP POVERTY.
These CASINOS operated as hyper-neo-liberal laissez faire CAPITALISM while NATIVE TRIBAL TRADE AND MONEY as BARTERING was killed.
GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBES OF JUDAH KILLED NATIVE AMERICAN NATURAL TRADE AND BANKING AS BARTERING SYSTEM.
Those BILLIONAIRE NATIVE AMERICANS-----all that casino money brought when BILL CLINTON made TRIBAL LANDS ----FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Here is NATIVE AMERICAN nature religion being KILLED by what will become TRANSHUMANISM.
USA
Native Americans Call For Rethink of Bering Strait Theory
By Cecily Hilleary
June 15, 2017 12:42 PM
Butch McIntosh wears traditional Native American regalia at the Pow Wow of Champions on the fairgrounds in Tulsa, Okla. Saturday Aug. 11, 2007.
It’s one of the most contentious debates in anthropology today: Where did America’s first peoples come from — and when? The general scientific consensus is that a single wave of people crossed a long-vanished land bridge from Siberia into Alaska around 13,000 years ago. But some Native Americans are irked by the theory, which they say is simplistic and culturally biased.
The first European explorers to reach the Americas looked to the Bible to explain the origins of the people they encountered and misnamed “Indians.” Biblical tradition holds that humans were created some 4,000 years ago and that all men descend from Adam — including indigenous peoples whom Europeans regarded as primitive.
Indians in Virginia. Engraving by Theodore de Bry, 1590, based on a watercolor by John White in 1585.
“Dominant science believed in a concept of superiority,” said Alexander Ewen, a member of the Purepecha Nation and author of the “Encyclopedia of the American Indian in the Twentieth Century.”
“And that created an idea that either people were genetically inferior or that there were stages of civilization, and Indians were at a lower stage,” he said.
Since “primitives” weren’t sophisticated enough to have sailed the oceans, early scientists concluded Indians had reached North America by some unknown land route. They found their answer in the Bering Strait.
Map of eastern Russian and Alaska with a light brown boarder depicting Beringia, where archaeolosits believe ancient Americans crossed from Siberia into Alaska around 13,000 years ago. Courtesy, U.S. National Park Service.
Ewen says that theory cemented into dogma and persists to this day, even in the face of new discoveries and technology that suggests Indians arrived much earlier and by different routes.
“In the first place, it’s simplistic,” said Ewen. “The people in this hemisphere were -- and are -- extremely diverse, more than any other place in the world.”
Chipping away at a theory
In the 1930s, scientists examined a pile of mammoth bones in Clovis, N.M., where they found distinctive spear points. Since then, tens of thousands of “Clovis points” have been found across North America and as far south as Venezuela. Scientists decided the Clovis people must have been America’s first peoples, arriving 13,000 years ago.
Excavations in the 1970s pushed the date even further back, to as much as 16,000 years ago. Archaeologist James Adovasio dated artifacts found at Pennsylvania’s Meadowcroft Rockshelter to be up to 16,000 years old, to harsh criticism.
The Meadowcroft Rockshelter in Washington County, Pa., where archaeologists found artifacts dating back 16,000 years.
Other branches of science have weighed in: In 1998, University of California-Berkeley linguist Johanna Nichols argued that it would have taken up to 50,000 years for a single language to diversify into the many languages spoken by modern Native American groups. That meant ancient Indians would have to have arrived 19,000 years ago.
Geologists have complicated matters by suggesting that the Bering Strait wasn’t passable until 10 or 12,000 years ago. This gave way to theories that early humans might have sailed down the Pacific coast into the New World.
Meanwhile, in 2015, Harvard University geneticist Pontus Skoglund discovered DNA links between Amazon Indians and the indigenous peoples in Australia and New Guinea.
An elderly member of Brazil's Surui Nation. Researchers found the Surui bear a genetic relationship to indigenous peoples of Australia and New Guinea.
In the past decade, Smithsonian Institution anthropologist Dennis Stanford met scathing criticism for suggesting Stone Age Europeans paddled across the Atlantic thousands of years before Columbus. In April of this year, researchers in California analyzed crushed mastodon bones they said were butchered by humans 130,000 years ago, a theory the bulk of scientists, including Adavasio, rejects – not because it’s not possible, he stipulates, but because the data isn’t conclusive.
Native American accounts
Should science consider the origin beliefs of tribes themselves?
Montana’s Blackfoot tradition holds that the first Indians lived on the other side of the ocean, but their creator decided to take them to a better place. “So he brought them over the ice to the far north,” the account reads.
The Hopi people of Arizona say their ancestors had to travel through three worlds, finally crossing the ocean eastward to a new and final new world. And Oklahoma’s Tuskagee people believe the “Great Spirit” chose them to be the first people to live on the earth.
File--This July 23, 2008, photo was taken from inside the Paisley Caves near Paisley, Ore., where archaeologists found stone tools and human DNA dating back more than 13,000 years, evidence humans settled North America earlier than previously thought.
Stories like these aren’t given much weight by science, said Joe Watkins, supervisory anthropologist at the National Park Service and a member of the Choctaw Nation.
“They are generally believed to be anecdotal,” he said. “The deep time depth and the possibility of multiple interpretations seem to make scientists uncomfortable.”
That isn’t to say Watkins believes every tribal tradition is “true.”
“But I do believe most of them carry within them kernels of truth of use to researchers. It seems imprudent to dismiss any possible line of evidence," he said.
___________________________________
While TRIBES OF JUDAH corrupt REAL JEWISH TORAH history with all this FAKE LOST TRIBES revisionist history-------so, too KNIGHTS OF MALTA CATHOLIC killing our CHRISTIAN/CATHOLIC BIBLICAL history as BOTH OLD WORLD KINGS --------push TRANSHUMANISM.
'What if you were seeking to subvert or deconstruct the current laws of the United States, our constitution, our way of life? Our way of life in total, even down to the most fundamental of all of our human governmental hierarchies, the family. How would you do it'?
TRUMP/PENCE are being sold by national FAKE NEWS media as THEOCRACY-----you know, raging global neo-liberal billionaires always seen as DEEPLY RELIGIOUS. TRUMP/PENCE as FAKE CHRISTIANS pushing TRANSHUMANISM AS RELIGION-------are fighting those TRANSHUMANIST LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
'“Our governing move is three things
— top down, bottom up, and inside out'.
This is how in Western/Eastern Europe as too THE AMERICAS is being taken to TRANSHUMANISM replacing our WESTERN RELIGIONS----Jewish/Catholic/Protestant/Muslim----and even our NATIVE AMERICAN nature religions.
THIS GROUPS IS NOT 99% POPULIST FROM THE RIGHT WING----THEY ARE THE SAME MOVING FORWARD CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA------
Deconstructing Western civil society for installing global corporate extreme wealth extreme poverty DEEP DEEP REALLY DEEP STATE------TOTALITARIAN MARXISM.
MARXISM is a global banking 1% political philosophy tied to SERFDOM------STONE AGE BARTERING as only monetary activity for 99% of US and global WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens.
This group of black HEBREWS just happened to migrate from a hyper-NEO-LIBERAL CHICAGO ----------home of TRANSHUMANISM IN DIVINITY
'Moments in U.S. Diplomatic History
American-Israeli Tensions over the Black Hebrew Community
More Moments in U.S. Diplomatic History
Ben Ammi 2The African Hebrew Israelites of Jerusalem, often referred to as the Black Hebrew Community (BHC), is a religious group that claims to be Jewish descendants of one of the “Ten Lost Tribes” of Israel. According to the group, in 1966, their founder, Ben Ammi Ben-Israel (born Ben Carter, a Chicago metallurgist), had a vision calling for African Americans to return to the “Promised Land” (Israel) and establish the “Kingdom of God.”'
The Plan To Change Everything: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, Inside-Out
Michael O'Fallon
Posted on August 21, 2019, 11:52 am
What if you were seeking to subvert or deconstruct the current laws of the United States, our constitution, our way of life? Our way of life in total, even down to the most fundamental of all of our human governmental hierarchies, the family. How would you do it?
The term for undertaking such a massive societal shift can be summed up in a word that is becoming increasingly familiar in our normal day-to-day discussions: deconstruction.
The deconstruction of our societal hierarchies is a complex undertaking with the primary concern of fracturing the cohesiveness of a society, nation, or community with the intention of taking the useful rubble of the demolition and rebuilding a new, reformed hierarchy.
So what is it that is being done to deconstruct our nation?
Van Jones, the progressive political commentator and former Green Jobs Advisor to the Obama White House, stated the following at the NOW Campaign for America’s Future back in 2010:
“Our governing move is three things — top down, bottom up, and inside out.
We need to work on the middle and the bottom. Government will handle the top down but it’s also bottom-up and inside-out — so now you’re challenged as you leave here — your challenge is to take care of that bottom part and that inside-out part — the heart part.”
Van Jones gave a brief, truncated version of ‘what is going on.’ A more thorough understanding of the strategy for complete societal and social change is as follows:
Grievance Scholars Expose the Trojan Horse of Social Justice in Faith & Academics
by James Lindsay & Michael O'Fallon
Administrator
Posted on August 09, 2019, 4:43 pm
In this first of five interviews conducted in New York City, Sovereign Nations Founder Michael O’Fallon and the co-founders of New Discourses, Dr. Peter Boghossian and Dr. James Lindsay, discuss the current tools of societal and institutional deconstruction being introduced throughout civilization under the banner of “Social Justice.” These, they discuss, are presented in a manner not unlike the legendary Trojan Horse.
Dr. Peter Boghossian and Dr. James Lindsay are best known for their work in exposing the impact of “Grievance Studies” in the secular university system.
The Grievance Studies affair, also referred to as the “Sokal Squared” scandal (in reference to a similar 1996 hoax by Alan Sokal), was the fourteen-month investigative whistleblowing project of a team composed of these two authors, together with Helen Pluckrose.
Its mission was to create bogus academic papers and submit them to academic journals in the areas of cultural, queer, race, gender, fat, and sexuality studies. The authors’ intent was to expose problems in “grievance studies,” a term they apply to a particular approach to studying these academic topics that proceed from a radical political agenda using means adapted from postmodern cultural analysis. Their conclusion is that under that approach “a culture has developed in which only certain conclusions are allowed,” one that “put social grievances ahead of objective truth.”
The result of their inquiry has created a crisis of confidence around all academic disciplines that fall under the umbrella of cultural studies, particularly those within the “theoretical humanities.” This crisis arises because not only were the methods and ethics applied in their bogus papers intentionally insufficient, but also the methodology they used for them was consistent. It always began with a conclusion or approach that they believed would flatter the political biases of the reviewers and editors evaluating their submissions and then bent the existing literature to reach those conclusions. This is, in a word, sophistry, and it cannot be trusted.
Even worse, they were able to determine that the ultimate reason for their success was not a matter of luck or a failure of the peer review system, but instead of having learned to write consistently with what their reviewers consider exemplary scholarship in those fields. They have every reason to believe that the peer review system worked exactly as intended, and they credit their success to having gained legitimate expertise in the relevant fields of thought, mostly applied postmodern Critical Theory.
This effort gained significant international attention and has created awareness of a considerable vacuum of rigor and trustworthiness in the scholarship our academies produce on culturally important topics like sex, gender, race, sexuality, and other matters of identity. This vacuum, they contend, was created by the scholars and activists they sought to expose, who used the banner of Social Justice to bully more rigorous work out of the discussion and to establish their own hegemony of thought over all topics relevant to the study of identity and culture. In this sense, they have revealed a decades-long scandal that has in many ways prevented us from the kind of successful progress we should have been able to expect in the decades following the Civil Rights Movements.
This isn’t merely a problem within the secular university system, however. As many will be aware, it has gone forth from our halls of higher education and taken root in education, law, the corporate world, society at large, and even public policy. Not only that, it has also been making significant inroads into the Christian faith, even conservative Evangelical Protestant faith. In June of 2019, the largest Protestant denomination in the world, the Southern Baptist Convention, passed a resolution stating that Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality could effectively be used by Christians as “analytical tools” alongside but subordinate to Scripture. This is what Lindsay describes as “a very fine wooden horse sitting outside your gates.”
How do they know? Beyond their expertise in how postmodern Critical Theory works, they’ve lived it, and not only once. They’ve personally watched the rise of these tools in the settings of the secular university system, which it has effectively institutionalized according to Social Justice, and they watched it tear apart the “New Atheism” movement of the early 2000s and 2010s as it was introduced there to fill the ideological vacuum felt by many atheists in the movement. One by one, Boghossian tells us, every organization he has ever loved has been infected and taken over by this parasitic ideology.
This rise of the primary tools of deconstructionism is not uncommon among other Christian denominations, secular universities, STEM fields, knitting clubs, Boy Scouts, medical fields, and corporate organizations. Social Justice’s paradigm-shifting presence is nearly everywhere. Its trajectory is also predictable. It comes in as a type of analytical tool, offered with the intention of helping to better “the oppressed” in issues of race, sex, gender, sexuality, and other identities that haven’t always had a fair shake in life, and then it does exactly what it has always claimed to do: it makes the personal political. In fact, it makes everything political, and the only politics it is interested in are identity politics.
In this in-depth discussion, Lindsay, Boghossian and O’Fallon begin by reviewing the Southern Baptist Convention’s Resolution 9 and then compare and contrast the strategic use of Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality in nearly every facet of our society. Point by point, they explain how these “analytic tools” get put into application in practice and how they undermine communities. Their stated goal is not political or to take sides. It is to help anyone who is facing the decision to adopt tools like Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality to better understand what is really being offered and how it is likely to play out if accepted.
___________________________________
As this article shows----TRANSHUMANISTS are those MOVING FORWARD far-right wing, authoritarian, militaristic extreme wealth extreme poverty global corporate LIBERTARIAN MARXISTS.
NEO-LIBERALISM was as close to LIBERTARIAN as one can get----LIBERTARIAN is the right of global .00014% to do anything they want for power and wealth.
Remember, when we allow our US economy to be completely controlled by global corporations which are consolidating into just a few multi-national global corporations-----we have CORPORATE CEOs as TRANSHUMANISTS like ELON MUSK----and AMAZON'S BEZOS.
We can believe the below ZOLTAN ISTVAN is NOT REAL JEWISH------
TRASHING JEWS----Hmmmmm, that sounds like FAKE ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT civil unrest civil war GLOBAL BANKING 5% FREEMASON/GREEK PLAYER.
'Friday, April 28, 2017
If they are the only JOB-MAKERS then people wanting JOBS become GROUP SPEAK AND CHATTERS which is MOVING FORWARD TRANSHUMANISM----GLOBAL CORPORATE MARXISM.
THE STONE AGE BARTERING AS BANKING FOR 99% OF WE THE PEOPLE.
HUFFINGTON POST went from pretending to be a left social progressive media outlet---to pretending to be a right wing media outlet now morphing to TRANSHUMANIST media outlet.
Zoltan Istvan, Contributor
Libertarian Candidate for California Governor 2018;
Creator of Immortality Bus; Author of bestselling Philosophy novel The Transhumanist Wager
A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging
03/10/2014 02:43 pm ET Updated May 10, 2014
A new generation of transhumanists is emerging. You can feel it in handshakes at transhumanist meet-ups. You can see it when checking in to transhumanist groups in social media. You can read it in the hundreds of transhumanist-themed blogs. This is not the same bunch of older, mostly male academics that have slowly moved the movement forward during the last few decades. This is a dynamic group of younger people from varying backgrounds: Asians, Blacks, Middle Easterners, Caucasians, and Latinos. Many are females, some are LGBT, and others have disabilities. Many are atheist, while others are spiritual or even formally religious. Their politics run the gamut, from liberals to conservatives to anarchists. Their professions vary widely, from artists to physical laborers to programmers. Whatever their background, preferences, or professions, they have recently tripled the population of transhumanists in just the last 12 months.
“Three years ago, we had only around 400 members, but today we have over 10,000 members,” says Amanda Stoel, co-founder and chief administrator of Facebook group Singularity Network, one of the largest of hundreds of transhumanist-themed groups on the web.
Transhumanism is becoming so popular that even the comic strip Dilbert, which appears online and in 2000 newspapers, recently made jokes about it.
Despite its growing popularity, many people around the world still don’t know what “transhuman” means. Transhuman literally means beyond human. Transhumanists consist of life extensionists, techno-optimists, Singularitarians, biohackers, roboticists, AI proponents, and futurists who embrace radical science and technology to improve the human condition. The most important aim for many transhumanists is to overcome human mortality, a goal some believe is achievable by 2045.
Transhumanism has been around for nearly 30 years and was first heavily influenced by science fiction. Today, transhumanism is increasingly being influenced by actual science and technological innovation, much of it being created by people under the age of 40. It’s also become a very international movement, with many formal groups in dozens of countries.
Despite the movement’s growth, its potential is being challenged by some older transhumanists who snub the younger generation and their ideas. These old-school futurists dismiss activist philosophies and radicalism, and even prefer some younger writers and speakers not have their voices heard. Additionally, transhumanism’s Wikipedia page — the most viewed online document of the movement — is protected by a vigilant posse, deleting additions or changes that don’t support a bland academic view of transhumanism.
Inevitably, this Wikipedia page misses the vibrancy and happenings of the burgeoning movement. The real status and information of transhumanism and its philosophies can be found in public transhumanist gatherings and festivities, in popular student groups like the Stanford University Transhumanist Association, and in social media where tens of thousands of scientists and technologists hang out and discuss the transhuman future.
Jet-setting personality Maria Konovalenko, a 29-year-old Russian molecular biophysicist whose public demonstrations supporting radical life extension have made international news, is a prime example.
“We must do more for transhumanism and life extension,” says Konovalenko, who serves as vice president of Moscow-based Science for Life Extension Foundation. “This is our lives and our futures we’re talking about. To sit back and and just watch the 21st Century roll by will not accomplish our goals. We must take our message to the people in the streets and strive to make real change.”
Transhumanist celebrities like Konovalenko are changing the way the movement gets its message across to the public. Gauging by the rapidly increasing number of transhumanists, it’s working.
A primary goal of many transhumanists is to convince the public that embracing radical technology and science is in the species’ best interest. In a mostly religious world where much of society still believes in heavenly afterlives, some people are skeptical about whether significantly extending human lifespans is philosophically and morally correct. Transhumanists believe the more people that support transhumanism, the more private and government resources will end up in the hands of organizations and companies that aim to improve human lives and bring mortality to an end.
Global banking 5% freemason/Greek players started working on a BARTERING MOVEMENT a few decades ago because they KNEW the goal of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS was to take ALL US 99% WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens OUT of the global monetary system reserved for ONLY THE GLOBAL 1% AND THEIR 2%. Remember, we have spoken often of MOVING FORWARD 3000BC HINDI-BRAHMIN as returning to STONE AGE---where of course people BARTERED and used STONE et al as CURRENCY.
That is what far-right wing global banking CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have been promoting this past decade---------THE SHARING ECONOMY.
Without coincidence our NATIVE AMERICANS who have a religion very, very tied to NATURE RELIGION----what we call NATURE MYSTICISM-------also had a BARTERING -----as TRADE AND BANKING system.
Those people PRETENDING to be LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL as NATIVE AMERICANS push the religion of TRANSHUMANISM-----which KILLS REAL NATIVE AMERICAN nature religion but they are embracing ancient NATIVE AMERICAN TRADE AND BANKING based upon BARTERING.
The History of the Trade
and Barter System
Items that are used as money often have little value in and of themselves. For example, the paper used to print money is not particularly valuable. Money has value because it is an exchange medium that people understand and accept as such. When everyone accepts that a bill or a coin has value, people can use it as a form of payment to purchase goods or services. Before money existed, people used other systems to perform exchanges. Bartering involves a direct trade for goods and services. Although some aspects of this transaction are similar to the exchange of money, bartering required time as people hammered out the terms of the deal. Utilizing money as the medium for trade simplified transactions significantly. Trade and barter were precursors to the monetary system used in today's society. Although trade and barter may seem almost archaic, they were the business solutions for people who lived before the convenience of credit card processing.
Bartering is the process of trading services or goods between two parties without using money in the transaction. When people barter, everyone benefits because they receive items or services they need or want. Bartering also has an advantage because even people without money can get something they need. Bartering might involve trading a service for an item. For example, you could agree to perform yard work for someone in exchange for a bushel of apples from a tree in their yard. When people choose to barter to meet a need, they can save their money for other needs.
- Native American Trade Routes and the Barter Economy – This lesson plan is great for teaching kids at the middle school level about both the history of Native American tribes and the nature of the barter system, blending concepts into one plan.
- History of Finance – In the early days of the American colonies, foreign banks controlled the currency, and bartering was commonplace.
- American Indians of ND: Bartering – Practice a game of bartering with your students, and you'll quickly see the difficulties in negotiation that can sometimes ensue.
- Trading Post – For much younger students (in grade 4), this lesson plan combines show-and-tell with bartering.
- What Is Money? – Young students (grades 3-5) will delve into what money is, why currency developed, and how bartering worked.
- Bartering Lesson – Teachers can use this printable packet, which is full of useful terms and phrases.
- Barter and Money – This plan is for much older students (grade 10), and delves more into the nuances of bartering and trade.
- Barter Relationships – Can you create an equation and mathematically validate a trade? This article delves into that question.
Mesopotamia tribes were likely the starting point of the bartering system back in 6000 BC. Phoenicians saw the process, and they adopted it in their society. These ancient people utilized the bartering system to get the food, weapons, and spices they needed. Because of salt's great value, Roman soldiers bartered their services for the empire in exchange for salt. In Colonial America, the colonists used bartering to get the goods and services they needed. Even after the invention of money, people continued to barter.
The simplicity of bartering is one of the main advantages of this system. Issues with international trade, foreign exchange, and unbalanced economic power are virtually nonexistent with a bartering system. However, some disadvantages also exist. For a bartering transaction to occur, both parties' wants or needs must coincide to lead them to make a deal. Without a standard measure of value of goods and services, parties in the bartering transaction will need to spend time agreeing on the terms of the deal. It's common for both parties to place a higher value on their own goods or services and a lower value on the other party's items. Trust is also a component of bartering, because the representation of the goods or services offered must be accurate. If something is misrepresented in a transaction, the other party will have little recourse when a problem ensues. When bartering, people may need to store their accumulated possessions to preserve their purchasing power. Depending on the types of items, this might be difficult and inconvenient.
Because bartering does not involve the exchange of money for goods and services, it might seem like an ideal way to avoid paying taxes on transactions. However, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service informs taxpayers that the fair market value of goods or services received via bartering is considered taxable income. Parties who engage in bartering transactions must report this value as income on tax returns. The IRS requires reporting of bartering for the year it occurs. Failure to report bartering activity could lead to tax penalties.
_______________________________________
Here we see what is the ABSOLUTELY KNOWN migration history of our NATIVE AMERICANS have them leaving the Asian continent and crossing to NORTH AMERICA 10,000---14,000 years ago. Doing this isolated them from all GEO-POLITICAL ---ECONOMIC development tied to global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS-----KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH.
STONE AGE TRADE AND BANKING WAS NATIVE AMERICAN TRADE AND BANKING.
'Perfectly Preserved Footprints of 14,000-year-old Humans Reveal How Stone Age People Explored Deep Dark Caves
- By Hannah Osborne On 5/15/19 at 4:23 AM EDT '
This migration history is SOLID AS ROCK in anthropological studies and DATA. Only REVISIONIST HISTORY paints LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL as those NATIVE AMERICANS.
THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL ARE SIMPLY CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE RELIGION-----TRANSHUMANISM.
There is as much difference for NATURE RELIGIONS/PAGAN MYSTICISM and our major JEWISH/CATHOLIC/MUSLIM/PROTESTANT/HINDI-BUDDHIST religions-------
TRANSHUMANISM AND GMO PLANTS AND ANIMALS ARE AN AFFRONT---ATTACK ALL THESE RELIGIONS.
Global banking 1% are indeed using NATIVE AMERICAN trade and banking as BARTERING as the future for our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE and new to US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES---immigrants. - Humans May Have Been Stuck on Bering Strait for 10,000 Years ...www.livescience.com/43726-bering-strait... A dominant theory suggests the ancestors of Native Americans crossed the Bering Strait about 15,000 years ago and quickly colonized North America, and then South America.
- Humans Crossed the Bering Land Bridge to People the Americas ...www.livescience.com/64786-beringia-map-during... Although it's gone now, the Bering Land Bridge persisted for thousands of years, from about 30,000 years ago to 16,000 years ago, according to global sea level estimates, said Julie Brigham-Grette ...
- Crossing The Bering Strait 14000 Years Ago - Image ResultsMore Crossing The Bering Strait 14000 Years Ago images
- The Death of the Bering Strait Theory - IndianCountryToday.comnewsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/archive/the... Two new studies have now, finally, put an end to the long-held theory that the Americas were populated by ancient peoples who walked across the Bering Strait land-bridge from Asia approximately 15,000 years ago.
- The Bering Land Bridge and the First Americans - SAPIENSwww.sapiens.org/archaeology/bering-land-bridge... Searching for the Origins of the First Americans. Geneticists believe that the split into northern and southern branches took place about 13,000 years ago. At some point between these two splits (between 23,000 and 13,000 years ago), people on the land bridge moved into Alaska.
- The Siberian Origins of Native Americans - Teaching & Learningpandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ea210/SiberianOriginsNA.htm The most likely answer to these questions is that the first people to cross the Bering Strait into Alaska did so toward the end of the last Ice Age, about 14,000 years ago. Also, there is mounting evidence that this first crossing represented only one of at least three distinct migrations from Asia into North America.
- Home [www.indigenous-americans.com]www.indigenous-americans.com/Artiacts.html The Bering Strait Crossing occurred in the third migration 3,000 to 5,000 years ago. The first migration from was Polynesia and the second migration from Africa. Upon arrival to the Americas, Europeans instigated Native American tribes to capture and enslave their own tribal members which were BEFORE the “official” African slave trade started.
This LOST TRIBE OF ISRAEL myth-making and propaganda even distorts REAL history surrounding those LOST TRIBES. We discussed in detail this migration of LOST TRIBE into what is to become KIEVAN KINGDOM---CRIMEA and UKRAINE today. This is what we discussed in detail the goal for the next STATE OF ISRAEL------flipping the EARTH'S ECONOMIC AXIS from Western Hemisphere to Eastern will kill today's ISRAEL as JERUSALEM to become ISRAEL as KIEVAN KINGDOM indeed tied to LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
So, why is JEWISH history being CORRUPTED? All this FAKE DATA AND ACADEMIC FAKE writing is being done by GLOBAL BANKING 1% ----NOT RELIGIOUS. These are the .00014% of global richest KILLING Jewish and TORAH religion.
TRIBES OF JUDAH-----NOT RELIGIOUS-----AND MOSTLY TRANSHUMANIST.
TRANSHUMANISM IS ATHEIST------IS SATANIC-----IS NIHILISTIC.
Jewish banking is morphing into 3000BC STONE AGE BARTERING ------ergo, NATIVE AMERICAN TRADE AND MONEY.
Those global 1% of TRIBES OF JUDAH still RAGING GLOBAL NEO-LIBERAL CAPITALISTS.
Native Americans and Jews: The Lost Tribes Episode
An all-too forgotten historical debate
By David Koffman
In the 8th century BCE, the Assyrians dispersed the Kingdom of Israel, giving life and legend to the Lost Tribes. The repatriation of these lost tribes eventually became an integral part of the Jewish–and Christian–messianic dream, and there have been Lost Tribe speculations about numerous “discovered” populations. One the most fascinating — and unfortunately forgotten — such discussions centered on the Native Americans. How did American Jews respond to this? Why and how did Jews credit or discredit it? What did these theories signify about American Jewish agendas and anxieties?
A Theory is Born
One of the first books to suggest the Native American Lost Tribe theory was written by a Jew, the Dutch rabbi, scholar, and diplomat Manasseh ben Israel. In The Hope of Israel (1650), Ben Israel suggested that the discovery of the Native Americans, a surviving remnant of the Assyrian exile, was a sign heralding the messianic era. Just one year later, Thomas Thorowgood published his best seller Jewes in America, Or, Probabilities that those Indians are Judaical, made more probable by some Additionals to the former Conjectures.
The Lost Tribe idea found favor among early American notables, including Cotton Mather (the influential English minister), Elias Boudinot (the New Jersey lawyer who was one of the leaders of the American Revolution), and the Quaker leader William Penn.
The notion was revived after James Adair, a 40-year veteran Indian trader and meticulous chronicler of the Israelitish features of Native American religion and social custom wrote The History of the American Indians…Containing an Account of their Origin, Language, Manners, Religion and Civil Customs in 1775. Even Epaphras Jones, an American Bible professor engaged the theory in 1831, claiming that anyone “conversant with the European Jews and the Aborigines of America… will perceive a great likeness in color, features, hair, aptness to cunning, dispositions for roving, &s.”
Religious Connotations
Some of these writers were interested in Native American history, but most of them were just interested in the Bible. Indeed, the Lost Tribe claim should be seen as part of a general 19th-century fascination with biblical history. Explorations of Holy Land flora and fauna, the geography of the Holy Land, the life of Jesus-the-man, were very much en vogue. A close identification among some 17th and 18th century Americans with the chosen people of Scripture helped Christian settlers see their colonization of New England as a reenactment of Israel’s journey into the Promised Land.
It also contributed to a more general religious myth-making scheme that helped define the national identity of the United States. To cite just one example, in a 1799 Thanksgiving Day sermon, Abiel Tabbot told his congregation in Massachusetts:
“It has often been remarked that the people of the United States come nearer to a parallel with Ancient Israel, than any other nation upon the globe. Hence, ‘OUR AMERICAN ISRAEL,’ is a term frequently used; and common consent allows it apt and proper.”
A curious incident that drew considerable attention and “proved,” at least to some, that Native Americans had ancient Israelite origins unfolded when tefillin (phylacteries) were “discovered” in Pittsfield, Massachusetts in the early 19th century. Their discoverer wrote that this “forms another link in the evidence by which our Indians are identified with the ancient Jews, who were scattered upon the face of the globe, and to this day remain a living monument, to verify and establish the eternal truths of Scripture.”
Prominent Jews Respond
Around the time of the Pittsfield
incident, Mordecai Manuel Noah, the journalist, playwright, politician, and Jewish American statesman, began spilling ink about the subject. Noah wrote a play She Would be a Soldier; or, The Plains of Chippewa (1819), that resolved the tension between the Yankees and the British by identifying the Indian Great Spirit with the God of the Bible. Noah’s ideas about Jewish-Native affinities grew in a distinctly political manner when he invited Natives Americans to help settle “Ararat,” the separatist Jewish colony he hoped to establish on Grand Island on the Niagara River around 1825.
Noah’s writings on Jewish Natives came to their full expression with his Discourse on the Evidences of the American Indians Being the Descendants of the Lost Tribes of Israel (1837). The work documented a host of theological, linguistic, ritual, dietary, and political parallels between Jews and Native Americans. Most importantly, he identified several essential character traits shared by the two peoples, all of which were, of course, highly laudable. For Noah, the conflation of Indians and Jews sanctioned the latter as divinely ordained Americans.
Another notable Jewish-Indian incident occurred in 1860, when stones hewn with Hebrew inscriptions were found near Newark, Ohio. The story unfolded over the course of many months and was followed closely by The Israelite, The Occident, and The Jewish Messenger, whose respective editors represented the intellectual vanguard of American Jewry. Isaac Mayer Wise, the leader of the Reform movement in America, employed philological proofs to undermine the stone’s authenticity. He rejected any connections between Jews and Native Americans, though it’s notable that he bothered to engage the story at all. Isaac Leeser, a traditionalist, sided in favor of the Lost Tribes theory. Reviewing the relics in question, The Occident, Leeser’s newspaper, concluded, “The sons of Jacob were walking on the soil of Ohio many centuries before the birth of Columbus.”
Implications
From a historical and scientific point of view, the Native American Lost Tribe claim is clearly narishkeit (Yiddish for foolishness). But even a brief exploration of it — who was making it and why, who was refuting it and why, reveals important insights about American Jewry. Popular thought about who Jews were — their place in America, with whom they could or should be associated — helps us understand how Jews negotiated their place in American society. Theories about Ancient Israelite Indians should not be dismissed as mere fantasy. Rather they are important precisely because they are fantasy.
Jews responded to the Lost Tribes claim about Native Americans in sermons, plays, public statements, scholarly works, and popular writings. The critical responses are more understandable: from the perspective of Reform and science, the theory is flagrantly nonsensical. But there are other reasons some may have rejected it: so as not to be associated with that which was thought of as native, primitive, and barbarian, so as not to be thought of as atavistic or lower on the evolutionarily ladder than other Europeans, so as not to be thought of as imminently disappearing from history, and so as not to be in need of Christian civilizing (i.e. missionizing). Advocates, on the other hand, had to go against the scholarly consensus and side with religious figures who could be dismissed as fanatics.
Accepting Native Americans as ancient Israelites held several — sometimes mutually exclusive — implications for American Jews. Foremost, it meant that the Indians were, in some way, related. It could buttress the sentiment that America was the New Jerusalem. This was the destined place where the original exiles, scattered to unknown corners of the world, were ingathered to their God-chosen Promised Land. They were not “lost” at all. Rather, the near aboriginal connection of Jews to the American soil served as evidence of the end of exile, and another reason to support a new American Jewish identity.
Many of the major figures in 19th-century American Jewry weighed in–in one manner or another–on the Jewish-Indian controversy. The practical stakes were never high, but the claim — so ubiquitous and so fluid (since it was used for so many different functions by so many different people) — was taken seriously and fretted over by Jewish leaders of very different orientations. The Lost Tribe theory had significant symbolic stakes — for Jews, Christians and Native Americans. Linking America and its earliest inhabitants with the Bible and its theology, meant staking a claim on America–and championing God’s plan for the New World.
______________________________________
WHICH NATIVE AMERICANS ARE CALLING FOR REVISIONIST HISTORY VIA BERING STRAIT-----THOSE GLOBAL BANKING BILLIONAIRE NATIVE PLAYERS WORKING FOR TRANSHUMANISM.
Bill Clinton and global banking 1% NEO-LIBERALS in 1990s as part of dismantling all that is our US PUBLIC FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT------privatized NATIVE LAND MANAGEMENT from being TRIBAL to being US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE. That killed native standing and protections via TRIBAL AGREEMENTS and threw those US 99% of WE THE NATIVE AMERICANS into a global trading status----not sovereign TRIBAL.
This is why Clinton gave native tribes CASINOS as an economy-----and these neo-liberals made sure all wealth from this native economy went to creating NATIVE BILLIONAIRES while 99% of US NATIVE AMERICANS remained in DEEP POVERTY.
These CASINOS operated as hyper-neo-liberal laissez faire CAPITALISM while NATIVE TRIBAL TRADE AND MONEY as BARTERING was killed.
GLOBAL BANKING 1% OLD WORLD KINGS KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBES OF JUDAH KILLED NATIVE AMERICAN NATURAL TRADE AND BANKING AS BARTERING SYSTEM.
Those BILLIONAIRE NATIVE AMERICANS-----all that casino money brought when BILL CLINTON made TRIBAL LANDS ----FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Here is NATIVE AMERICAN nature religion being KILLED by what will become TRANSHUMANISM.
USA
Native Americans Call For Rethink of Bering Strait Theory
By Cecily Hilleary
June 15, 2017 12:42 PM
Butch McIntosh wears traditional Native American regalia at the Pow Wow of Champions on the fairgrounds in Tulsa, Okla. Saturday Aug. 11, 2007.
It’s one of the most contentious debates in anthropology today: Where did America’s first peoples come from — and when? The general scientific consensus is that a single wave of people crossed a long-vanished land bridge from Siberia into Alaska around 13,000 years ago. But some Native Americans are irked by the theory, which they say is simplistic and culturally biased.
The first European explorers to reach the Americas looked to the Bible to explain the origins of the people they encountered and misnamed “Indians.” Biblical tradition holds that humans were created some 4,000 years ago and that all men descend from Adam — including indigenous peoples whom Europeans regarded as primitive.
Indians in Virginia. Engraving by Theodore de Bry, 1590, based on a watercolor by John White in 1585.
“Dominant science believed in a concept of superiority,” said Alexander Ewen, a member of the Purepecha Nation and author of the “Encyclopedia of the American Indian in the Twentieth Century.”
“And that created an idea that either people were genetically inferior or that there were stages of civilization, and Indians were at a lower stage,” he said.
Since “primitives” weren’t sophisticated enough to have sailed the oceans, early scientists concluded Indians had reached North America by some unknown land route. They found their answer in the Bering Strait.
Map of eastern Russian and Alaska with a light brown boarder depicting Beringia, where archaeolosits believe ancient Americans crossed from Siberia into Alaska around 13,000 years ago. Courtesy, U.S. National Park Service.
Ewen says that theory cemented into dogma and persists to this day, even in the face of new discoveries and technology that suggests Indians arrived much earlier and by different routes.
“In the first place, it’s simplistic,” said Ewen. “The people in this hemisphere were -- and are -- extremely diverse, more than any other place in the world.”
Chipping away at a theory
In the 1930s, scientists examined a pile of mammoth bones in Clovis, N.M., where they found distinctive spear points. Since then, tens of thousands of “Clovis points” have been found across North America and as far south as Venezuela. Scientists decided the Clovis people must have been America’s first peoples, arriving 13,000 years ago.
Excavations in the 1970s pushed the date even further back, to as much as 16,000 years ago. Archaeologist James Adovasio dated artifacts found at Pennsylvania’s Meadowcroft Rockshelter to be up to 16,000 years old, to harsh criticism.
The Meadowcroft Rockshelter in Washington County, Pa., where archaeologists found artifacts dating back 16,000 years.
Other branches of science have weighed in: In 1998, University of California-Berkeley linguist Johanna Nichols argued that it would have taken up to 50,000 years for a single language to diversify into the many languages spoken by modern Native American groups. That meant ancient Indians would have to have arrived 19,000 years ago.
Geologists have complicated matters by suggesting that the Bering Strait wasn’t passable until 10 or 12,000 years ago. This gave way to theories that early humans might have sailed down the Pacific coast into the New World.
Meanwhile, in 2015, Harvard University geneticist Pontus Skoglund discovered DNA links between Amazon Indians and the indigenous peoples in Australia and New Guinea.
An elderly member of Brazil's Surui Nation. Researchers found the Surui bear a genetic relationship to indigenous peoples of Australia and New Guinea.
In the past decade, Smithsonian Institution anthropologist Dennis Stanford met scathing criticism for suggesting Stone Age Europeans paddled across the Atlantic thousands of years before Columbus. In April of this year, researchers in California analyzed crushed mastodon bones they said were butchered by humans 130,000 years ago, a theory the bulk of scientists, including Adavasio, rejects – not because it’s not possible, he stipulates, but because the data isn’t conclusive.
Native American accounts
Should science consider the origin beliefs of tribes themselves?
Montana’s Blackfoot tradition holds that the first Indians lived on the other side of the ocean, but their creator decided to take them to a better place. “So he brought them over the ice to the far north,” the account reads.
The Hopi people of Arizona say their ancestors had to travel through three worlds, finally crossing the ocean eastward to a new and final new world. And Oklahoma’s Tuskagee people believe the “Great Spirit” chose them to be the first people to live on the earth.
File--This July 23, 2008, photo was taken from inside the Paisley Caves near Paisley, Ore., where archaeologists found stone tools and human DNA dating back more than 13,000 years, evidence humans settled North America earlier than previously thought.
Stories like these aren’t given much weight by science, said Joe Watkins, supervisory anthropologist at the National Park Service and a member of the Choctaw Nation.
“They are generally believed to be anecdotal,” he said. “The deep time depth and the possibility of multiple interpretations seem to make scientists uncomfortable.”
That isn’t to say Watkins believes every tribal tradition is “true.”
“But I do believe most of them carry within them kernels of truth of use to researchers. It seems imprudent to dismiss any possible line of evidence," he said.
___________________________________
While TRIBES OF JUDAH corrupt REAL JEWISH TORAH history with all this FAKE LOST TRIBES revisionist history-------so, too KNIGHTS OF MALTA CATHOLIC killing our CHRISTIAN/CATHOLIC BIBLICAL history as BOTH OLD WORLD KINGS --------push TRANSHUMANISM.
'What if you were seeking to subvert or deconstruct the current laws of the United States, our constitution, our way of life? Our way of life in total, even down to the most fundamental of all of our human governmental hierarchies, the family. How would you do it'?
TRUMP/PENCE are being sold by national FAKE NEWS media as THEOCRACY-----you know, raging global neo-liberal billionaires always seen as DEEPLY RELIGIOUS. TRUMP/PENCE as FAKE CHRISTIANS pushing TRANSHUMANISM AS RELIGION-------are fighting those TRANSHUMANIST LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
'“Our governing move is three things
— top down, bottom up, and inside out'.
This is how in Western/Eastern Europe as too THE AMERICAS is being taken to TRANSHUMANISM replacing our WESTERN RELIGIONS----Jewish/Catholic/Protestant/Muslim----and even our NATIVE AMERICAN nature religions.
THIS GROUPS IS NOT 99% POPULIST FROM THE RIGHT WING----THEY ARE THE SAME MOVING FORWARD CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA------
Deconstructing Western civil society for installing global corporate extreme wealth extreme poverty DEEP DEEP REALLY DEEP STATE------TOTALITARIAN MARXISM.
MARXISM is a global banking 1% political philosophy tied to SERFDOM------STONE AGE BARTERING as only monetary activity for 99% of US and global WE THE PEOPLE black, white, and brown citizens.
This group of black HEBREWS just happened to migrate from a hyper-NEO-LIBERAL CHICAGO ----------home of TRANSHUMANISM IN DIVINITY
'Moments in U.S. Diplomatic History
American-Israeli Tensions over the Black Hebrew Community
More Moments in U.S. Diplomatic History
Ben Ammi 2The African Hebrew Israelites of Jerusalem, often referred to as the Black Hebrew Community (BHC), is a religious group that claims to be Jewish descendants of one of the “Ten Lost Tribes” of Israel. According to the group, in 1966, their founder, Ben Ammi Ben-Israel (born Ben Carter, a Chicago metallurgist), had a vision calling for African Americans to return to the “Promised Land” (Israel) and establish the “Kingdom of God.”'
The Plan To Change Everything: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, Inside-Out
Michael O'Fallon
Posted on August 21, 2019, 11:52 am
What if you were seeking to subvert or deconstruct the current laws of the United States, our constitution, our way of life? Our way of life in total, even down to the most fundamental of all of our human governmental hierarchies, the family. How would you do it?
The term for undertaking such a massive societal shift can be summed up in a word that is becoming increasingly familiar in our normal day-to-day discussions: deconstruction.
The deconstruction of our societal hierarchies is a complex undertaking with the primary concern of fracturing the cohesiveness of a society, nation, or community with the intention of taking the useful rubble of the demolition and rebuilding a new, reformed hierarchy.
So what is it that is being done to deconstruct our nation?
Van Jones, the progressive political commentator and former Green Jobs Advisor to the Obama White House, stated the following at the NOW Campaign for America’s Future back in 2010:
“Our governing move is three things — top down, bottom up, and inside out.
We need to work on the middle and the bottom. Government will handle the top down but it’s also bottom-up and inside-out — so now you’re challenged as you leave here — your challenge is to take care of that bottom part and that inside-out part — the heart part.”
Van Jones gave a brief, truncated version of ‘what is going on.’ A more thorough understanding of the strategy for complete societal and social change is as follows:
- Top-Down: Political change through the election of – or placement of individuals into office as lawmakers or law enforcers dedicated to societal, hierarchical and economic structural change. While “top-down” strategies are effective for short periods of time, the necessity of a multi-strata push is required for lasting change.
- Bottom-Up: Grass roots (or more often astro-turf) mass reflexive movements that utilize fertile fallacies to gather large groups to demand immediate change – normally to appeal to the “top down” legislators for immediate change in law.
- Side-to-side: Change stemming from socio-technical disruption, characterised by systemic innovation changes. Think about changes in social media, the constraints on freedom of expression or speech. Many times this is combined with the fourth strata of civilizational change.
- Inside-Out: The middle. Change stemming from contemplative practices, seeking transformative changes to our ends as well as our means. The psychological, spiritual and cultural, national underpinnings of all the other forms of social change; often contemplative or reflective in spirit, targeted mostly at major nationally held assumptions, immunity to change, and refusal to accept progressive or globalist change. [1]
- If imposed and allowed to flourish, this particular strategic methodology has been nearly unbeatable in spurning bloodless revolutions in every society, nation, community and faith that it has been put into action.
Our societies, nations, and faith systems are under attack by this purposed, ‘malware-styled,’ morphing attack by those that desire to shatter what we love into bits and then mold it into their utopian future.
In this episode of The Causes of Things, we explore this map of systemic change and posit the necessary question: “what are we going to do about it?”
______________________________________
Here is another TRUMP PENCE TRANSHUMANIST group pretending to be POPULIST RIGHT WING CHRISTIAN -----when they are 5% freemason/Greek players pushing TRANSHUMANISM-----using terms like SOCIAL JUSTICE------FAKE ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT CIVIL UNREST CIVIL WAR------ is tied to advancing global corporate MARXISM----killing major religions while promoting TRANSHUMANIST RELIGION.
TRANSHUMANIST RELIGION even corrupts HINDI-BUDDHISM upon which it is modeled. HINDI-BUDDHIST with its ENLIGHTENMENT------SELF-ACTUALIZATION ------is KILLED with TRANSHUMANISM.
There is a TROJAN HORSE on the loose--------it is the graduation from hyper-neo-liberal DIVINITY SCHOOLS like University of Chicago-----Harvard----Yale people who are NOT RELIGIOUS pretending that TRANSHUMANISM is OK for CHRISTIANS/JEWS/MUSLIMS/HINDI-BUDDHISTS----and of course our NATIVE AMERICAN and NATURE/PAGAN religions.
SOVEREIGN NATIONS IS TRUMP PENCE BEING TRANSHUMANIST AGAINST CHRISTIAN FAITHS---WHILE LOST TRIBES WITH BLACK HEBREWS ARE TRANSHUMANISM AIMED AT KILLING JEWISH TORAH.
'youtube.com
Was the Nordic religion a "nature religion"?
In this video, I discuss the concept of "nature religion" and "nature worship"…'
When we shout EMPIRE ALICE doesn't care with those global banking 5% freemason/Greek players/pols saying THEY DON'T CARE------we are identifying those dastardly TRANSHUMANISTS.
Video Series:
Grievance Scholars Expose the Trojan Horse of Social Justice in Faith & Academics
by James Lindsay & Michael O'Fallon
Administrator
Posted on August 09, 2019, 4:43 pm
In this first of five interviews conducted in New York City, Sovereign Nations Founder Michael O’Fallon and the co-founders of New Discourses, Dr. Peter Boghossian and Dr. James Lindsay, discuss the current tools of societal and institutional deconstruction being introduced throughout civilization under the banner of “Social Justice.” These, they discuss, are presented in a manner not unlike the legendary Trojan Horse.
Dr. Peter Boghossian and Dr. James Lindsay are best known for their work in exposing the impact of “Grievance Studies” in the secular university system.
The Grievance Studies affair, also referred to as the “Sokal Squared” scandal (in reference to a similar 1996 hoax by Alan Sokal), was the fourteen-month investigative whistleblowing project of a team composed of these two authors, together with Helen Pluckrose.
Its mission was to create bogus academic papers and submit them to academic journals in the areas of cultural, queer, race, gender, fat, and sexuality studies. The authors’ intent was to expose problems in “grievance studies,” a term they apply to a particular approach to studying these academic topics that proceed from a radical political agenda using means adapted from postmodern cultural analysis. Their conclusion is that under that approach “a culture has developed in which only certain conclusions are allowed,” one that “put social grievances ahead of objective truth.”
The result of their inquiry has created a crisis of confidence around all academic disciplines that fall under the umbrella of cultural studies, particularly those within the “theoretical humanities.” This crisis arises because not only were the methods and ethics applied in their bogus papers intentionally insufficient, but also the methodology they used for them was consistent. It always began with a conclusion or approach that they believed would flatter the political biases of the reviewers and editors evaluating their submissions and then bent the existing literature to reach those conclusions. This is, in a word, sophistry, and it cannot be trusted.
Even worse, they were able to determine that the ultimate reason for their success was not a matter of luck or a failure of the peer review system, but instead of having learned to write consistently with what their reviewers consider exemplary scholarship in those fields. They have every reason to believe that the peer review system worked exactly as intended, and they credit their success to having gained legitimate expertise in the relevant fields of thought, mostly applied postmodern Critical Theory.
This effort gained significant international attention and has created awareness of a considerable vacuum of rigor and trustworthiness in the scholarship our academies produce on culturally important topics like sex, gender, race, sexuality, and other matters of identity. This vacuum, they contend, was created by the scholars and activists they sought to expose, who used the banner of Social Justice to bully more rigorous work out of the discussion and to establish their own hegemony of thought over all topics relevant to the study of identity and culture. In this sense, they have revealed a decades-long scandal that has in many ways prevented us from the kind of successful progress we should have been able to expect in the decades following the Civil Rights Movements.
This isn’t merely a problem within the secular university system, however. As many will be aware, it has gone forth from our halls of higher education and taken root in education, law, the corporate world, society at large, and even public policy. Not only that, it has also been making significant inroads into the Christian faith, even conservative Evangelical Protestant faith. In June of 2019, the largest Protestant denomination in the world, the Southern Baptist Convention, passed a resolution stating that Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality could effectively be used by Christians as “analytical tools” alongside but subordinate to Scripture. This is what Lindsay describes as “a very fine wooden horse sitting outside your gates.”
How do they know? Beyond their expertise in how postmodern Critical Theory works, they’ve lived it, and not only once. They’ve personally watched the rise of these tools in the settings of the secular university system, which it has effectively institutionalized according to Social Justice, and they watched it tear apart the “New Atheism” movement of the early 2000s and 2010s as it was introduced there to fill the ideological vacuum felt by many atheists in the movement. One by one, Boghossian tells us, every organization he has ever loved has been infected and taken over by this parasitic ideology.
This rise of the primary tools of deconstructionism is not uncommon among other Christian denominations, secular universities, STEM fields, knitting clubs, Boy Scouts, medical fields, and corporate organizations. Social Justice’s paradigm-shifting presence is nearly everywhere. Its trajectory is also predictable. It comes in as a type of analytical tool, offered with the intention of helping to better “the oppressed” in issues of race, sex, gender, sexuality, and other identities that haven’t always had a fair shake in life, and then it does exactly what it has always claimed to do: it makes the personal political. In fact, it makes everything political, and the only politics it is interested in are identity politics.
In this in-depth discussion, Lindsay, Boghossian and O’Fallon begin by reviewing the Southern Baptist Convention’s Resolution 9 and then compare and contrast the strategic use of Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality in nearly every facet of our society. Point by point, they explain how these “analytic tools” get put into application in practice and how they undermine communities. Their stated goal is not political or to take sides. It is to help anyone who is facing the decision to adopt tools like Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality to better understand what is really being offered and how it is likely to play out if accepted.
___________________________________
As this article shows----TRANSHUMANISTS are those MOVING FORWARD far-right wing, authoritarian, militaristic extreme wealth extreme poverty global corporate LIBERTARIAN MARXISTS.
NEO-LIBERALISM was as close to LIBERTARIAN as one can get----LIBERTARIAN is the right of global .00014% to do anything they want for power and wealth.
Remember, when we allow our US economy to be completely controlled by global corporations which are consolidating into just a few multi-national global corporations-----we have CORPORATE CEOs as TRANSHUMANISTS like ELON MUSK----and AMAZON'S BEZOS.
We can believe the below ZOLTAN ISTVAN is NOT REAL JEWISH------
TRASHING JEWS----Hmmmmm, that sounds like FAKE ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT civil unrest civil war GLOBAL BANKING 5% FREEMASON/GREEK PLAYER.
'Friday, April 28, 2017
- Zoltan Istvan - Another Psychopathic Jewish Transhumanist Loser Like these people here, this psychopathic Jewish loser named Zoltan Istvan knows about classified technology and is heavily associated with the Transhumanist movement. See here for the connections between Transhumanism and Judaism. See here for some introductory videos about Transhumanism. See here for the Transhumanist category on my blog...be sure to go through all of the articles.
Just like many other stalking pieces of trash Zionist Jews, he doesn't seem to think it matters when a bunch of people are getting tortured with microwave weapons and their brains are being beamed out live like a radio station. This is what is happening, it pretty much high-tech Jewish blood libel. They think they can get away with this. This is how these sick assholes get off, torturing people and watching it like a reality TVs how. They are complete psychopaths. Good thing this psycho loser was running for President under the "Transhumanist Party." To top it off --- he is actually a Transhumanist "Libertarian" --- or in other words, a Totalitarian Libertarian or a Eugenicist Libertarian. Makes perfect sense... kind of like this crazy bitch and her art.
You will often find that most of the people that are engaging in this activity, for the most part, but not always.... are Jews. Why? Well, one of the reasons is because it's literally a part of Homeland Security. See here for more about how fighting "GLOBAL anti-Semitism" is a part of American foreign policy. This is how sad countries like the United States and Canada have become, it is absolutely sickening and pathetic. This is the modern day Stasi Octopus, involving everyone from businessmen and women, real estate agents, mortgage brokers, government employees, trades personnel, (for example; like pest control or property management,) law enforcement, drug dealers, writers, doctors, lawyers, journalists, actors, sports figures, priests and religious leaders, addiction recovery groups, university professors, waiters and hotel personnel. This is exactly what it was like in East Germany. There isn't one group they didn't infiltrate. Now your society has become just as sad, our countries have turned into Stasi nightmares'.
If they are the only JOB-MAKERS then people wanting JOBS become GROUP SPEAK AND CHATTERS which is MOVING FORWARD TRANSHUMANISM----GLOBAL CORPORATE MARXISM.
THE STONE AGE BARTERING AS BANKING FOR 99% OF WE THE PEOPLE.
HUFFINGTON POST went from pretending to be a left social progressive media outlet---to pretending to be a right wing media outlet now morphing to TRANSHUMANIST media outlet.
Zoltan Istvan, Contributor
Libertarian Candidate for California Governor 2018;
Creator of Immortality Bus; Author of bestselling Philosophy novel The Transhumanist Wager
A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging
03/10/2014 02:43 pm ET Updated May 10, 2014
A new generation of transhumanists is emerging. You can feel it in handshakes at transhumanist meet-ups. You can see it when checking in to transhumanist groups in social media. You can read it in the hundreds of transhumanist-themed blogs. This is not the same bunch of older, mostly male academics that have slowly moved the movement forward during the last few decades. This is a dynamic group of younger people from varying backgrounds: Asians, Blacks, Middle Easterners, Caucasians, and Latinos. Many are females, some are LGBT, and others have disabilities. Many are atheist, while others are spiritual or even formally religious. Their politics run the gamut, from liberals to conservatives to anarchists. Their professions vary widely, from artists to physical laborers to programmers. Whatever their background, preferences, or professions, they have recently tripled the population of transhumanists in just the last 12 months.
“Three years ago, we had only around 400 members, but today we have over 10,000 members,” says Amanda Stoel, co-founder and chief administrator of Facebook group Singularity Network, one of the largest of hundreds of transhumanist-themed groups on the web.
Transhumanism is becoming so popular that even the comic strip Dilbert, which appears online and in 2000 newspapers, recently made jokes about it.
Despite its growing popularity, many people around the world still don’t know what “transhuman” means. Transhuman literally means beyond human. Transhumanists consist of life extensionists, techno-optimists, Singularitarians, biohackers, roboticists, AI proponents, and futurists who embrace radical science and technology to improve the human condition. The most important aim for many transhumanists is to overcome human mortality, a goal some believe is achievable by 2045.
Transhumanism has been around for nearly 30 years and was first heavily influenced by science fiction. Today, transhumanism is increasingly being influenced by actual science and technological innovation, much of it being created by people under the age of 40. It’s also become a very international movement, with many formal groups in dozens of countries.
Despite the movement’s growth, its potential is being challenged by some older transhumanists who snub the younger generation and their ideas. These old-school futurists dismiss activist philosophies and radicalism, and even prefer some younger writers and speakers not have their voices heard. Additionally, transhumanism’s Wikipedia page — the most viewed online document of the movement — is protected by a vigilant posse, deleting additions or changes that don’t support a bland academic view of transhumanism.
Inevitably, this Wikipedia page misses the vibrancy and happenings of the burgeoning movement. The real status and information of transhumanism and its philosophies can be found in public transhumanist gatherings and festivities, in popular student groups like the Stanford University Transhumanist Association, and in social media where tens of thousands of scientists and technologists hang out and discuss the transhuman future.
Jet-setting personality Maria Konovalenko, a 29-year-old Russian molecular biophysicist whose public demonstrations supporting radical life extension have made international news, is a prime example.
“We must do more for transhumanism and life extension,” says Konovalenko, who serves as vice president of Moscow-based Science for Life Extension Foundation. “This is our lives and our futures we’re talking about. To sit back and and just watch the 21st Century roll by will not accomplish our goals. We must take our message to the people in the streets and strive to make real change.”
Transhumanist celebrities like Konovalenko are changing the way the movement gets its message across to the public. Gauging by the rapidly increasing number of transhumanists, it’s working.
A primary goal of many transhumanists is to convince the public that embracing radical technology and science is in the species’ best interest. In a mostly religious world where much of society still believes in heavenly afterlives, some people are skeptical about whether significantly extending human lifespans is philosophically and morally correct. Transhumanists believe the more people that support transhumanism, the more private and government resources will end up in the hands of organizations and companies that aim to improve human lives and bring mortality to an end.
RSS Feed
