No one should go to RICK STEVES for real information but a few good points are made in this video. First, Hitler like FDR suspended all of Germany's legislative legal structure to install what we call PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER.......FDR as HITLER created these same civilian work structures because as US, Germany was sacked and looted during ROBBER BARON ROARING 20s by global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS---KNIGHTS OF MALTA TRIBE OF JUDAH.
As this video states Hitler was backed by global corporations and global banking---HE WAS NOT LEFT SOCIALIST. The transition of Germany's labor unions to being that of WORLD BANK/WORLD WORKERS INTERNATIONAL took Germany's sovereign labor union structure and made it global banking 1% killing labor. That is what MOVED FORWARD here in US during Clinton/Bush/Obama----our US labor union leaders threw our 99% of labor union members under the bus----and became a tool of global banking 1%----
WORLD WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ----GERMAN LABOR FRONT is called MARXIST----this is what gave HITLER the cover of being pro-labor/a socialist when he was simply global banking 5% civil unrest civil war player.
THIS IS WHERE WE ARE TODAY IN US---WITH AFL-CIO TRUMPKA AND FEINGOLD PRETENDING MOVING FORWARD IS PRO-LABOR.
'The German Labor Front----World Workers International'
'Appeal to all Working Germans by the German Labor Front
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/appeal-to-all...
…The German Labor Front is the grouping of all working men without difference of economic or social status. It should include the worker and the employer, who will not be separated any longer by associations and leagues serving the interests of specific economic or social groups'.
REAL left social progressive academics have known all along how global banking 1% media and REVISIONIST HISTORY-----COMMONER CORE------kept using these terms SOCIALIST for political stance which was never left socialist. It is easy to see where Clinton global banking 1% neo-LIBERALS did the same---pretended to be left social progressive while being far-right wing global banking MARXIST as was OBAMA.
The Story of Fascism: Hitler’s "National Socialism"
FACEBOOK WATCH
Rick Steves
September 8 at 9:27 PM ·
Despite calling his party “National Socialist” (a.k.a. Nazi), Hitler abolished unions, privatized many industries, and was backed by corporations.
What were AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT I AM MAN left social progressive labor organizations in US and Europe were taken by WORLD BANK UNITED NATIONS back to being corporate tools for labor management working against the interest of labor---as was MARXISM.
How can an organization working for WORLD BANK be anti-capitalism? It is not. It promotes extreme wealth extreme poverty allowing the global 1% to be capitalist-----while 99% of citizens are kept enslaved and impoverished under far-right wing MARXISM. MAO/STALIN both working for global banking 1% and global corporations were those 5% freemason/Greek civil unrest/civil war players.
Please remember, our CULTURAL ARTS in all nations are largely controlled by global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS----so all these political groups that pop up calling themselves POPULIST are tied to same global banking and far-right wing.
Solidarity in POLAND as Italian fascists were all global banking 5% freemason/Greeks being far-right wing pretending to be left POPULISTS.
Bread and Roses 1912-2012
23 hrs ·
On Sept. 24, 1918, the Canadian government outlaws the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). The penalty for membership was set at five years in prison. The ban on the IWW was lifted after World War I ended.
We hope all those global banking 5% freemason/Greek players now being channeled into being ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT civil unrest civil war players will WAKE UP and be sick and tired of TWO STAGES OF MARXISM both of which is FAR-RIGHT WING....NO LEFT HAPPENING.
There is a reason the last article on Portugal and Spain returning to MARXISM uses the term NEO-----with its MARXISM. MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE is a FINAL SOLUTION for global banking 1%. They are eliminating the two stages of swinging from laissez faire to marxism -------and installing DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE permanent extreme wealth extreme poverty MARXISM where only the global banking 1% experience capitalism while 99% of WE THE PEOPLE are captured, killed, brutalized in permanent FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM. Remember, there is no need for a global banking 5% freemason/Greek in MOVING FORWARD----these structures will not exist in the FINAL SOLUTION.
This media outlet PRETENDS groups identified here are LEFTISTS----when they are all far-right wing civil unrest/civil war players.
We KNOW our global banking 5% players are getting tired of being PLAYED.
'Here are a few major (NPA) attacks documented by Standford University’s “Mapping Militants Project”:'
FAR-LEFT WATCH
Our mission and vision
Our mission is to investigate expose, and combat far-left extremists and the institutions that empower them.
Investigate
We monitor far-left extremists and collect
intelligence on their illegal activities
Expose
We publish detailed intelligence reports
exposing far-left extremist activity
Combat
We organize and execute action
plans to reduce their influence
Antifa is recruiting for a designated terrorist organization
The New People’s Army (NPA) is the military arm of the Communist Party of the Phillipines (CPP) and they were designated by the U.S. Department of State as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) in 2002. According to a U.S. Department of State report from 2016, this terrorist organization is responsible for the death of at least 158 innocent civilians:
Over the past few years, CPP/NPA has continued to carry out killings, raids, kidnappings, acts of extortion, and other forms of violence primarily directed against Philippine security forces. In May 2013, the Armed Forces of the Philippines reported that from 2011 through the first quarter of 2013, 383 people – including 158 civilians – were killed in encounters between CPP/NPA and government forces.
Here are a few major (NPA) attacks documented by Standford University’s “Mapping Militants Project”:
______________________________________________
If our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE attended a K-university teaching HISTORY being made simply a memorization of DATES and LEADERS-----if a discussion of political philosophy from last century focused only on MANIFESTOS----our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE would never have known REAL HISTORY. So, of all MARX'S books published THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO is the go-to book in educating about MARXIST COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM. No doubt KARL MARX filled this book with all kinds of populist myth-making---using all those COMRADE AND BOUSEQUOISE terms-----
When we educate broadly reading all of MARX'S writings we understand that MARXISM is far-right wing extreme wealth extreme poverty and and rebranding of slave labor societal structures. It is the MANIFESTOS our 99% often read -----that have nothing to do with goals of political philosophies being MOVED FORWARD.
THE RIGHT WING SHOUTS LOUDEST THAT COMMUNISM IS FAR-LEFT WING---OUR 99% OF US RIGHT WING REPUBLICANS ARE KILLED WITH THESE POLICIES AS WELL AS OUR US 99% OF LEFT WING CITIZENS.
'SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Section 2, Proletarians and...
www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/communist/section3/
The Manifesto then discusses the relationship of the Communists to the proletarians. ... In a Communist society, then, labor will exist for the sake of the laborer, not for ... Many dissenters maintain that no one will work if private property is abolished. ... religion, philosophy, or ideology "are not deserving of serious examination'.
We hope all those global banking 5% freemason/Greek players now being channeled into being ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT civil unrest civil war players will WAKE UP and be sick and tired of TWO STAGES OF MARXISM both of which is FAR-RIGHT WING....NO LEFT HAPPENING.
There is a reason the last article on Portugal and Spain returning to MARXISM uses the term NEO-----with its MARXISM. MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE is a FINAL SOLUTION for global banking 1%. They are eliminating the two stages of swinging from laissez faire to marxism -------and installing DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE permanent extreme wealth extreme poverty MARXISM where only the global banking 1% experience capitalism while 99% of WE THE PEOPLE are captured, killed, brutalized in permanent FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM. Remember, there is no need for a global banking 5% freemason/Greek in MOVING FORWARD----these structures will not exist in the FINAL SOLUTION.
Comics and graphic novels
Filth, fury, gags and vendettas: The Communist Manifesto as a graphic novel
Guardian cartoonist Martin Rowson explains why Marx would have loved his new graphic novel – which puts the fun back into his great political work
Martin Rowson
Tue 1 May 2018 11.53 EDT Last modified on Thu 3 May 2018 06.35 EDT
‘I was entranced by its playfulness – parts of it are very funny’ … illustrations from The Communist Manifesto: A Graphic Novel. Photograph: Martin Rowson/SelfMadeHero
Karl Marx and I go back a long way. Like a lot of children growing up in the 1960s, I was obsessed with the Soviet Union and its unreachable otherness. What’s more, my father had actually been there to attend scientific symposia. I have a clear memory, aged about six, of standing in our back garden and him saying to me: “What do you mean, you don’t know who Karl Marx is?” I replied, rather tearfully: “But I know who Lenin is.”
As I grew older, the obsession continued. At about 15, I finally read The Communist Manifesto and it made complete sense. I instantly got the Dialectic, the inexorable, tectonic grindings of All History Hitherto, the Class Conflict and all the stuff about the inevitability of the ultimate victory of the downtrodden over their oppressors. Moreover, in its compelling combination of reason and romanticism, I was entranced not only by the manifesto’s universal scope but also its playfulness. Parts of it are very funny.
Soon I’d devoured Edmund Wilson’s To the Finland Station, visited the Soviet Union and, aged 19, wrote a thankfully unpublished novel that hinges round a fictitious Marxist uprising. As a student, I joined the Communist party, although I only hung around for a week. After I graduated I sold a cartoon series to New Statesman titled Scenes from the Lives of the Great Socialists, based on hideously contrived puns on the defining dicta of Marxism. A typical example shows Friedrich Engels standing on a toilet seat peering into the flush mechanism and saying: “Hey Marx, there’s a couple of those antique Stradivarius fiddles in here!” To which Marx replies: “Clearly the violins inherited the cistern!”
When these cartoons came out as a book in 1983, there were calls for it to be banned from Collets, the old leftie bookshop in London. This was one reason why I hadn’t bothered making a fist of it in the CP: I’ve always subscribed to Orwell’s line about every joke being a tiny revolution, though a lot of people believe that None of This Is a Laughing Matter.
Obviously, as a professional satirist, I disagree. And I reckon Marx would have done so, too. Not nearly enough people struggling through Theories of Surplus Value give themselves a break by reading, for instance, Marx’s journalism from the 1850s for the New York Tribune, which matches Simon Hoggart, and occasionally even Jonathan Swift, in its scathing hilarity.
Anyway, Marx stuck with me in the following 30 years:
I illustrated a couple of books by the Australian Marxist Kevin Killane, and Marx himself made cameo appearances in my comic-book adaptations of TS Eliot’s The Waste Land and Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy. It was after that last book was reissued in 2010 by SelfMadeHero that the publisher commissioned me to adapt Francis Wheen’s wonderful 1999 biography of Marx.
I’m a hack at heart and, like Marx, I dice with deadlines. Marx, then aged 29, knocked off The Communist Manifesto over a weekend in Brussels at the end of January 1848 after he received an ultimatum from the Communist League in London, who had commissioned the work from him the previous autumn and were still waiting. It had also been my practice to eschew storyboards and make it up as I went along. But confronted by the Wheen book, I decided to pay my son to write the script. He did an excellent job, but it left me with nothing to do except draw to his direction. I got bored. I felt like nothing more than a machine. I was, in fact, alienated from my labour in a textbook Marxist way and, in line with pure Marxist theory, I rebelled. Having taken seven months to draw just five pages of finished artwork I gave up and returned my advance.
So now I had unfinished business with Marx, and occasionally images would flash into the back of my mind of great geological slabs of History grinding against massive clumps of the Dialectic. Then SelfMadeHero asked if I fancied adapting The Communist Manifesto as a comic book for Marx’s 200th birthday. The whole thing came instantly into my head. I clearly envisioned the manifesto as a kind of rolling tsunami, made up in equal parts of blood-and-iron industrialised steampunk, apocalyptic John Martin and mounting fury that builds up to a climax at the end of Section One: Bourgeois and Proletarians, before breaking on the beach of History and turning into straightforward standup comedy. It’s leavened throughout with private gags, personal score-settling and the kind of Rabelaisian filthiness Marx would have enjoyed, I hope that is what I’ve achieved.
The former Tory home secretary Kenneth Baker, with whom I (and Steve Bell) sit on the board of London’s Cartoon Museum, insists on calling me a hardline Marxist-Leninist. I’m not. If anything, I’m a kind of William Morris anarchist, all for equality and down with hierarchies so we can all have some fun. Stripped of the doctrinaire dogma, that’s how I read Marx, too. The most important part of The Communist Manifesto remains its analysis of how the amoral mechanics of capitalism commodify human beings and reduce them to meat machines existing solely to be milked to make the already rich even richer. Which by anyone’s reckoning is no fun at all. And 170 years after he wrote The Communist Manifesto when, by the latest count, 43 individuals possess as much wealth as half of the rest of humanity, I reckon Marx still has a lot to say, and I hope I’ve helped him say it yet again.
__________________________________________
Below we see 'cultural MARXISM advancing from GERMANY in early 1900s just as pre-Weimar Germany was sacking and looting German society during ROARING 20s.
'Cultural Marxism is a convenient way to describe Marxist Critical Theory, an idea that came out of the Frankfurt School in the 1920’s'.
Our Australian citizen tied to this YOU TUBE video------being a great big player ----pretending our US 1960s civil rights was MARXIST when of course both FDR NEW DEAL and 1960s CIVIL RIGHTS was LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE. It is true all of what was a real 99% WE THE PEOPLE populist movement was killed when REAGAN era killed LOCKEAN SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM and replaced it with two stage FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM.
What today's MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE SMART CITIES does not say is NEO----MARXISM------meaning a different kind of MARXISM for US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Our US right wing 99% having gone along with all this MOVING FORWARD these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA-----maybe liking all that bashing of heads and brutality of a billion people killed in WW3-----thinking at the end global banking 1% will POP right back into CAPITALISM as before------ARE GOING TO BE GREAT BIG LOSERS.
Myth: Hitler was a leftist.
Fact: Nearly all of Hitler's beliefs placed him on the far right.
Summary
Many conservatives accuse Hitler of being a leftist, on the grounds that his party was named "National Socialist." But socialism requires worker ownership and control of the means of production. In Nazi Germany, private capitalist individuals owned the means of production, and they in turn were frequently controlled by the Nazi party and state. True socialism does not advocate such economic dictatorship -- it can only be democratic. Hitler's other political beliefs place him almost always on the far right. He advocated racism over racial tolerance, eugenics over freedom of reproduction, merit over equality, competition over cooperation, power politics and militarism over pacifism, dictatorship over democracy, capitalism over Marxism, realism over idealism, nationalism over internationalism, exclusiveness over inclusiveness, common sense over theory or science, pragmatism over principle, and even held friendly relations with the Church, even though he was an atheist.
Our US right wing 99% having gone along with all this MOVING FORWARD these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA-----maybe liking all that bashing of heads and brutality of a billion people killed in WW3-----thinking at the end global banking 1% will POP right back into CAPITALISM as before------ARE GOING TO BE GREAT BIG LOSERS.
'Mattys Modern Life
Published on May 18, 2018'
.....Doesn't seem to want to give a real name----no wonder with all that myth-making and propaganda.
youtube.com
Is Cultural Marxism a "far-right" conspiracy theory? Responding to Three Arrows
Cultural Marxism is a convenient way to describe Marxist Critical Theory, an idea that came out of the Frankfurt…
___________________________________________
We posted an article calling PORTUGAL as MOVING FORWARD to a NEO-----Marxism. Remember, NEO----conservative Bush killed US right wing Republican conservatives by placing that NEO----in front. Conserving all wealth and power went from US right wing conservatives to GLOBAL 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. Now, global banking 1% want to CONSERVE all that money and wealth and our US 99% of right wing Republicans including all those 5% freemason/Greek players are going under the bus.
NEO------liberal was global banking 1% doing the same to our US left wing politics-----killing REAL left social progressive politics and installing the same global banking 1% FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM. This is why our Federal public trusts MEDICARE SOCIAL SECURITY were looted---why our Federal National Parks are privatized to global mining corporations to be stripped----it is why all our US Post Offices and public schools are being privatized into the hands of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS---that is MARXISM.
So, what is NEO--------MARXISM? As we state MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES AS SMART CITIES is creating a DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE for global factories as basically slave labor colonies. Where in the past MARXISM has been a two -- stage policy of capitalism morphing into laissez faire becoming MARXIST with public works and institutions-----there will be no BOUNCING BACK to capitalism ----the two-stages of MARXISM will remain ONE STAGE-----FINAL SOLUTION is MARXISM all the time.
This is the structure that makes ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE for only the global 1%----they will be the only ones still involved in capitalist economics--just as exists in China. Everyone else in US will be tied to far-right wing MARXISM---being made extremely impoverished with no freedom, liberty, justice, climbing the economic ladder.
Now, ARABIA as ASIA and AFRICA have been captured by these MARXIST economics throughout last century-------we all know nothing LEFT is happening in ARABIA
'Over time, under enough pressure, and through gradually subtle degrees of ideological divergence from fundamental principles, Real Leftists can successfully be indoctrinated into Fake Leftists if they don’t have the political will to resist the Establishment, which regrettably appears to be the trend in North America and the EU'.
OH, REALLY??????????
Chaosistan, Hybrid Wars, Iran, Iraq, Middle East, Syria, Turkey
“Neo-Marxism” And “The New Middle East”Written by Andrew KORYBKO on 24/01/2017
More in Chaosistan:
Syria And Turkey
Before going any further, the first thing that should be addressed is the “Neo-Marxism” label included in the article’s title. The author drew primarily upon the stated positions and manifesto of the Syrian PYD, which is leading the regional charge for undeclared Kurdish separatism, in making the decision to emphasize the ideology that’s driving the region’s anti-government Kurdish militias. The PYD is a political and ethnic extremist organization which attempts to channel Marxist thought in order to impose “democratic confederalism” in Syria, which essentially seeks to dissolve the state through its devolution into a complex quilt of identity-based cantons. The PYD is closely linked to the Turkish PKK, and both organizations claim to be inspired by the late American Marxist Murray Bookchin, who wrote extensively about what he called “decentralization”.
In practice, however, this is pretty much indistinguishable from the political end game that fundamentalist Marxists (“Secular Wahhabis”) aspire for, which is the elimination of the state and its replacement with community councils and other non-traditional governing structures. Whether or not this position truly represents conventional Marxism and more general Leftist thought is up to those communities themselves and their various polemicists to decide, but the labelling of the PYD and PKK as “Neo-Marxist” is due to their political positions in advocating what the public generally conflates (whether rightly or wrongly) with this ideology. Moreover, since they’re active in the 21st century and after the Soviet dissolution at the end of the Cold War, the prefix “Neo-“ is applied to differentiate these organizations and their ideological strands from the ‘classical’ Marxism that was associated (whether rightly or wrongly) with that period.
The point here isn’t to convince anyone that the PYD and PKK are ‘Marxist’, but rather to highlight that this is how they self-identity and to emphasize the ideological motivations behind their militant activity.
Iraq And Iran
Expanding past Syria and Turkey, one can see the influence of “Neo-Marxist” Kurdish militant groups in Iraq and Iran, too. The allied “Patriotic Union of Kurdistan” (PUK) and Gorran opposition parties in northern Iraq’s Kurdish Regional Government, both of which are leftist, are on friendly terms with the PKK. Barzani’s ruling “Kurdish Democratic Party” (KPD) is opposed to the PKK and Marxism, which is why it enjoys such considerable Turkish support even though it regularly threatens to pursue ‘independence’. Interestingly, Iran is aligned with PUK and Gorran in spite of their links to the PKK, which might be partially attributable to Tehran looking favorably upon these groups’ hesitancy to see an ‘independent’ “Iraqi Kurdistan” in the near future and could thus also signal that Iran is engaged in a soft proxy war with Turkey for influence (and pipelines) in the Kurdish Regional Government.
All of the Iraqi Kurdish groups and their affiliated militias are in support of “federalism” or separatism to varying degrees and can generally be described as friendly to the US (the KPD obviously much more in both cases than PUK and Gorran), but aren’t necessarily “Neo-Marxist” in the context that the article is defining it as. Therefore, they’ll largely be excluded from the rest of the analysis going forward, but were importantly mentioned in the first place order to show their loose connections to the troublesome Kurdish organizations in Syria and Turkey.
Amidst this complicated intra-Iraqi Kurd drama, however, the pro-‘Israeli’ and ‘socialist’ “Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran” (KDPI) terrorist group has recently found shelter in northern Iraq and begun to periodically launch cross-border attacks against the Iranian border forces. This organization is part of the “Congress of Nationalities for a Federal Iran” (CNFI), an umbrella group of various ethno-religious minorities fighting against Tehran in favor of the same broad sort of ‘political solution’ as the PYD and PKK, “federalism”. This end goal thus connects the KDPI to its Syrian and Turkish counterparts, and can even be said to give it something in common with all of their Iraqi brethren as well, despite some of the latter being reluctant to associate with them, whether openly or in general, due to Iran’s understandable sensitivities.
“Federalist” Failings And The MEK
In and of itself, there’s nothing inherently negative about federalism, nor does this political system have any origins in Marxist thought, but the “democratic confederalism” of the PYD and PKK and the “Identity Federalism” of the CNFI incorporate radical ideas inspired by this ideology and popularly described as “Cultural Marxism” (whether rightly or wrongly), which ultimately would be disastrous for the national unity of the diverse states threatened by these initiatives if they were ever implemented.
Separate from the Syrian-Turkish-Iranian nexus of Kurdish “Neo-Marxist” militant groups but fighting for similar ideological goals in Iran is the “People’s Mujahedeen of Iran” (MEK), a hard-core Marxist terrorist organization which was delisted a few years ago by the US State Department and is now recognized by Washington as a ‘legitimate opposition party’ (despite having killed Americans in the past).
This group and the aforementioned Syrian, Turkish, and Iranian ones don’t just share a common denominator in “Neo-Marxism”, but are also marked by the strong degree of support that they enjoy from the US, although it must be said that they don’t all coordinate with one another because the Kurds supposedly have a strong hate for the MEK after the latter allegedly fought against them under Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
The US And The PKK
Even though the US formally includes the PKK on its list of terrorist organizations, Turkey has accused it on many occasions of indirectly supporting this group through the provisioning of material and weapons assistance to the PYD, implying that Washington is using the Syrian Kurds as intermediaries for rendering support to their Turkish counterparts. This isn’t unrealistic to assert since the US is nowadays opposed to President Erdogan, and relations between Ankara and Washington have been very chilly ever since last summer’s failed pro-American coup attempt. While it might shock some people to even consider and will likely be met with intense skepticism in the usual alternative media corners, the US does in fact have a serious problem with nominal NATO-member Turkey due to Ankara’s involvement in the Russian-Iranian-Turkish Tripartite of Great Powers aimed at bringing a gradual end to the War on Syria, which explains why it would betray its “ally” by unleashing the unconventional weapon of Kurdish separatism against it via PYD-laundered weapons to the PKK.
The Wahhabi-“Neo-Marxist” Geopolitical Convergence
The Hybrid War drama surrounding the Kurds occupies considerably less media attention than Daesh, but it’s no less dangerous to the stability of the Mideast. In fact, while Daesh has been on a years-long killing spree trying to construct an “Islamic State” in the Mideast, the militant Kurdish organizations mentioned in this article have taken to doing something similar and to a much lesser degree in advance of their shared objective of creating a transnational “Kurdistan” political entity. This goal has lately manifested itself through the intended formation of a stateless (con)federation of Kurdish communities between Syria, Turkey, Iran, and Iraq, as per the “post-state” and “Neo-Marxist” ideology of relevant groups in the first three aforementioned states.
As for the Iraqi Kurds, although they’re not “Neo-Marxists”, they are in support of either “federalization” or outright separatism, and would naturally develop their own independent relations with their other Kurdish political counterparts if they succeed in their map-changing schemes. Even though linguistic and historical differences would likely prevent the creation of a unified Kurdish ‘superstate’, the tangible effect of the aforementioned could quickly lead both to the dissolution of the multiethnic states that this demographic is a part of and the de-facto rise of a “second geopolitical ‘Israel’” in part of this space, or in other words, a unipolar-supported polity carved out of the stolen territory of other countries. This eventuality would naturally destroy the incipient Tripartite of Great Powers and also symbolize the successful completion of ‘Israel’s’ 1982 Yinon Plan of manufactured state fragmentation all along its Muslim periphery, basically ensuring that Tel Aviv becomes the undisputed power in the Mideast.
The planned geopolitical redivision of the Mideast is nothing new for American strategists either, which is why Washington is so strongly in support of these organizations. Former US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice first spoke about the dawn of a “New Middle East” in July 2006 during ‘Israel’s’ embarrassingly failed War on Hezbollah and Lebanon, and just a month prior, retired lieutenant colonel Ralph Peters published his “Blood Borders” blueprint about “how a better Middle East would look”. The New York Times followed up with a scandalous map in September 2013 showing “How 5 Countries Could Become 14”, and Stratfor founder George Friedman just released his own map highlighting how 17 separate power centers have emerged across what are nominally 5 sovereign countries. While the process of transnational state dissolution was catalyzed by the theater-wide “Arab Spring” Color Revolution events and subsequent spread of Daesh, these two American-provoked events in turn created the conditions for the militant revival of “Neo-Marxist” regime change groups such as the MEK and geopolitical revisionist ones such as the PYD.
This means that Washington now has two powerful tools at its disposal for crafting the 21st-century Yinon Plan of the “New Middle East”; Wahhabis and “Neo-Marxists”, both of which are bitterly opposed to one another but nevertheless serve as complementary instruments of American foreign policy (whether as “useful idiots” or outright proxies). It’s been long documented by alternative media outlets how the US has wielded the weapon of Wahhabism for over the past three decades, but comparatively less has been said about how it misleads the world through its use of the Fake Left. In theory, Leftists are supposed to be in support of multipolar objectives and against the Western unipolar power structure, but that’s not necessarily the case when it comes to many well-known “Leftist” movements in North America, Europe, and now the Mideast.
The Atlantic-Arabian Virus
The Democratic Party and much of the scattering of other supposedly leftist-oriented organizations in the US have been co-opted by the very same establishment which they claim to oppose. The same can be said for just about any socialist organization in the EU. As for the Mideast, the most popular Kurdish parties have been compromised, and the CNFI and MEK are undoubtedly Western Hybrid War proxies. All of these aforementioned groups, and especially the ones linked to George Soros and his worldwide “protest” (riot/Color Revolution) movements, represent the Fake Left, which shout leftist economic slogans but have lost the leftist moral principle of geopolitical resistance to Western neo-imperialism. In a sad twist of fate and due to their own reprehensible choices, these very same groups have become the post-modern vanguard for the exact same world order which their Cold War spiritual predecessors fought so valiantly to avoid.
It’s not to say that every self-proclaimed Leftist organization in these three parts of the world is “fake” (after all, the Baath Party and Syrian Socialist National Party still embody the respectable principles associated with Cold War Leftism), but just that there are plenty of reasonable grounds to immediately be suspicious of supposedly left-wing groups operating in these regions nowadays. The entire US is being destabilized by the Clintonian Counter-Revolution and its Fake Left supporters, just like the EU is being thrown into chaos by the ‘Secular Wahhabis’ who have ‘opened the gates from within’ by aiding and abetting the US’ plan to unleash ‘Weapons of Mass Migration’ against the continent. Similarly, the Mideast is now facing the threat of regime change and geopolitical revisionism not from the failing forces of Daesh and other Wahhabi terrorist groups, but by the hand of reinvigorated “Neo-Marxist” ones such as the PYD, PKK, KDPI, CNFI, and MEK. All of these groups purport to represent the “Left” but are in reality part of the worldwide Fake Left in the service of American interests, whether wittingly or inadvertently.
The “Leftist Civil War”
The only way to fight back against this is for the Real Left and its sincere, genuine activists in North America, the EU, and Mideast to come out in vocal and unceasing opposition against these Fake Leftist tools of Western neo-imperialism in order to win back the respect of their ideology and free it from American hijacking. The US has taken over the mainstream “leftist” narrative and is turning it into a mouthpiece of neo-imperialist propaganda, relying on collaborators such Varoufakis, Sanders, and an army of ‘alternative media’ bloggers to ‘legitimize’ their ‘coup’. When faced with even the slightest opposition from their Real Leftist ‘comrades’ (to say nothing of average non-Leftist folks), they resort to maliciously trolling them as “racists”, “fascists”, and/or “white supremacists” in a desperate knee-jerk reaction designed to discredit them in the eyes of what they assume to be the ‘politically correct’ public. The whole point in doing this is to protect their narrative monopoly so that dissenting voices don’t have a chance at swaying public opinion against the policies of the Fake Leftist Establishment.
Pertaining to the examined topic of utilizing “Neo-Marxist” proxy armies to geopolitically reorganize the “New Middle East”, this typically takes the form of condemning Iran’s sovereign choice to become an Islamic Republic (the narrative promoted by MEK, KDPI, and CNFI) and guilting the global public into accepting an “independent” or “federalized” Kurdish state or states as a ‘reward’ for fighting Daesh. In both interconnected cases across the combined Syrian-Turkish-Iraqi-Iranian Hybrid War battlespace, misleading and oftentimes outright false or situationally irrelevant arguments about “social rights”, “economic equality”, and “democracy” are trotted out in order to trick unaware and/or immature well-intentioned Leftists into supporting these Fake Leftist geopolitical projects. Over time, under enough pressure, and through gradually subtle degrees of ideological divergence from fundamental principles, Real Leftists can successfully be indoctrinated into Fake Leftists if they don’t have the political will to resist the Establishment, which regrettably appears to be the trend in North America and the EU.
It’s also in these two regions where Fake Leftist support for Kurdish separatism and a “Green Revolution 2.0” are most pronounced, which are dangerously combining to form a very serious threat to the multipolar states of Syria and Iran. Even if Real Leftists find themselves in support of Kurdish separatism in Turkey and/or Iraq, and/or regime change in either of them – justifying their position on the belief that these states are of questionable loyalty to the emerging Multipolar World Order – they need to realize that such geopolitical viruses, by their very nature and obvious consequences, won’t be ‘contained’ to these two countries alone but would inevitably spread to Syria and Iran as well. Therefore, even if they find themselves sympathizing with some of the positions presently being promoted by their Fake Leftist peers, they must remain steadfast in opposing them out of geopolitical consistency in standing against the Western-led international system.
This could ultimately lead to a “Leftist Civil War” (ideologically speaking, not necessarily in physical terms) in order to liberate this ideology from its present status as one of the US’ premier bullhorns of neo-imperialism, provided, of course, that it’s not already too late to do so.
____________________________________________
Below we see the SAUDI ARABIAN royals coming out as MARXISTS----Wahhabis were the global banking 1% freemason group tied to GEORGE BUSH and the neo-cons who are indeed MARXISTS. CLINTON/BUSH taking US social progressive economics to far-right wing MARXISM.
In practice, however, this is pretty much indistinguishable from the political end game that fundamentalist Marxists (“Secular Wahhabis”) aspire for,
All nations overseas tied to FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES are without a coincidence MARXIST nations. Taking the US to FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE status will make US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----MARXIST. That is what global corporate campus SOCIALISM as OUR REVOLUTION for only the global 1% crowd call it. They place the word DEMOCRATIC in front of global corporate campus socialism to make it appear tied to our US and European history of being DEMOCRACIES........the only DEMOCRACY happening of course is the movement of POLITBURO MEMBERS ----chosen by the global 1%.
This is why today's US elections ---rigged and fraudulent throughout CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have 5% FREEMASON/GREEK PLAYERS running for office and not AMERICAN politicians.
This is how EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL ----went from all 99% of WE THE PEOPLE to being global banking 5% freemason/Greek players -----now MOVING FORWARD to those 5% going under the bus.
University of Toronto is raging global banking 1% neo-liberal just as University of Chicago...simply eliminating all reference to our last century's REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVISM
'Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto'.
Dissident Professor Explains Neo-Marxism; 'Women's Studies Should Be Defunded'
ByRobert Kraychik
May 28, 2017
Contemporary leftists have “performed a philosophical sleight of hand that transformed the class war into identity politics of war,” said Jordan Peterson during a lecture at Harvard University on April 10.
Marxism is a sociological paradigm in which human history is cast as a function of class struggle and warfare. All other forces shaping human events — environmental, geographical, religious, technological, political, cultural, et. al — are cast as derivatives of class struggle and warfare.
As communism fell out of fashion during the 1950's and 1960's, following wider exposure of life in the Soviet Union via publications such as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago, leftists adjusted their core axiom of class struggle and warfare to other frameworks of perceived group power struggles: race, sex, religion, ethnicity, and other dichotomies.
Peterson recalled that left-wing agitators seeking to shut down a speaking engagement of his at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, shouted slogans while carrying a “banner that had a hammer and sickle on it.”
Communism and its ideological progeny, said Peterson, were accepted and promoted across university campuses while Nazism was condemned:
"The reprehensible ideologies that are based in fundamental Marxism killed at least a hundred million people in the twentieth century, and there are still apologists. One in five scientists identifies as a Marxist.
...
What happened in the 1960s, as far as I can tell, and this happened most in France — which have probably produced the most reprehensible coterie of public intellectuals that any country has ever managed, is that in the late 1960s when all the student activists had decided that the real Marxist revolution wasn’t going to occur in the Western world, and had finally realized that apologizing for the Soviet system was just not gonna fly anymore given the tens of millions of bodies that had stacked up, that they performed what I would call a philosophical sleight of hand and transformed a class war into identity politics of war. And that became extraordinarily popular."
Neo-Marxism and post-modernism, said Peterson, appeal largely to “resentful people,” given the ideologies’ appeal to covetousness and jealousy.
Peterson called for the end of state funding for neo-Marxist faculties, programs and courses such as "women's studies" that operate under the guise of legitimate academic inquiry. He also spoke of neo-Marxism's ubiquity across universities and colleges:
"It's everywhere, it's not just in campus protests. The campuses are overrun in large part with disciplines that have, in my estimation, no valid reason to exist. I think disciplines like 'women's studies' should be defunded. Any of the activist disciplines whose primary role is the overthrow of 'the patriarchy,' which is about as ill-defined a concept as you could possibly formulate ... we've done enough public funding of that sort of thing.
We're providing full-time destructive employment for people who are doing nothing but causing trouble. ... what they promote has zero intellectual credibility. Their research methods don't qualify as research methods. Their publications — eighty percent of publications now garner zero citations."
The humanities have been largely "corrupted," said Peterson, with fraudulent peer-review processes for the publication of ostensibly academic journals. Ideological myopia via neo-Marxism, he added, is standard fare across many professors and academics in the humanities.
Dissident speakers seeking to avoid disruption from leftists at university and college campuses, said Peterson, should schedule morning events:
"One of the things I did when I was talking to the university administration was to suggest how they might deal with the possibility of protesters. So I said, "Well that's easy. I know how you can have absolutely zero protesters. Have it in the morning, they won't get out of bed before ten." So we had it at nine o'clock in the morning and there was one MPP [member of provincial parliament] who showed up to hand out some pamphlets, and not a single protester. If you want a controversial speaker on campus, just have it at seven in the morning. You won't get a protestor within fifty yards of it, because they'll still be sleeping off last night's alcohol-induced hangover."
Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto.
_____________________________________________
'In fact, to the extent that “right-wing” means authoritarian and moralistic, it’s clear that left is the new right in academia, in Silicon Valley and in many other places populated by university humanities and social science graduates'.
Global banking 1% have tried hard to MOVE all of our EQUAL PROTECTION 99% WE THE PEOPLE into this NEO-MARXISM-----whether women, civil rights for black and brown citizens, disabled, GBLT, if we notice that is all we see running as Clinton neo-liberals morphing into ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE----AKA-----NEO-MARXIST FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Of course all these population groups are the ones most oppressed in MOVING FORWARD. SMART CITIES will be DEEP, DEEP STATE GLOBAL FACTORY slave labor for both white collar professionals and manual labor. This takes all 99% of WE THE PEOPLE no matter if white, black, or brown.
NEO------MARXISM will see no bouncing back to LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM----no public works programs, no public anything. We are watching today as global banking 1% completely erases the term LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM---tied to AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT--I AM MAN------LOCKEAN CAPITALISM pretending all last century was simply MARXISM.
THE NEW LEFT is indeed far-right wing global banking 1% NEO-MARXISM---------not left.
NEO-MARXISM permanent GLOBAL MILITARY JUNTA-----oh, yeah---that is FAR-RIGHT WING extreme wealth extreme poverty-----no NEW LEFT to be found.
On “Postmodern Neo-Marxism”
May 5, 2018 admin Academic, Conservative, Cultural Politics, Identity Politics, Philosophy, Rightist
ContraPoints, whose real name is Natalie Parrott, is making a big impression with her YouTube videos lately. In this video she describes being an adjunct philosophy professor who found her ability to give a shit was tested by the kind of narrow specialist research one has to do as an academic. She also talks about the fact that academic leftists don’t get much practice at debating rightist arguments, because the academy has become almost exclusively leftist turf, and this makes things boring. She then describes her attempts to be an outsider intellectual, which involved working as an Uber driver and an Amazon copywriter, before she finally found her niche on YouTube.
More interesting than this familiar narrative of disaffection from academe is her recent video criticizing Jordan Peterson, in which she disavows her still perceptibly male persona in the earlier video, and displays her recidivist leftism and alcoholism all at once. She takes issue with Peterson’s phrase “postmodern neo-marxism” as a description of the contemporary left, saying that postmodernism and Marxism are incompatible, since one is skeptical of grand narratives and the other is a grand narrative.
This appeal to the pure forms of a particular school of thought when it suits you, is a tactic I often observe among leftists who are otherwise quite content to be genealogists celebrating the historical promiscuity of ideas. They think Peterson’s clunky phrase represents a failure to see the diversity of the contemporary left, when in fact it was coined in an attempt to find a shorthand term for both the unity and the manifest incoherence of today’s left. The new left, as it tends to be called in Britain, is indeed the bastard child of Marx and postmodernism, which have in common that they are antagonistic to class and conceptual hierarchies respectively. Therefore they have found it easy to see their destruction of the traditional intellectual and artistic canon as part of the class war that tenured radicals and middle class SJWs like to think they’re fighting.
Postmodernism is a many-splendoured thing, as ContraPoints points out, but that doesn’t mean we can’t speak about it as a thing. It has two main aspects, one deriving from the post-structuralist theory that today’s universities are suffused by and that generations of students have by now been influenced by. The other aspect is an effect of economic globalization, the mingling of cultures, and the deracination of human beings who are economic vectors before they are anything else. In this promiscuous world the economic center has been gravitating rightwards and social mores have been gravitating left, such that the economic right and the social center-left are now in alignment.
We see the effects of this when Silicon Valley becomes a champion of political correctness by firing James Damore for telling the truth about sex and gender; and when neoliberal universities start installing bias hotlines and safe spaces while making it unsafe to discuss biological sexual difference in the classroom. This situation, that Peterson refers to as “postmodern neo-marxism,” is one in which minorities are tyrannizing over the majority in pursuit of “social justice,” the traditional intellectual canon is being thrown out in favor of the democratic representation of various newly constructed identities in university syllabi regardless of whether they’ve produced anything worthy of inclusion, and in which conservative intellectuals are nowhere to be found on campus.
In fact, to the extent that “right-wing” means authoritarian and moralistic, it’s clear that left is the new right in academia, in Silicon Valley and in many other places populated by university humanities and social science graduates. Intellectual postmodernism always had a whiff of fascism about it, and the phrase “postmodern neo-marxism” is kind of accurate as a description of how former opposites have become indistinguishable in the past forty years. Ideologies are not bodies of doctrine, and people who treat them as such tend to be marginalised fairly quickly. Old school Marxist purists have disappeared for the most part from the academic intellectual scene, but Marx is still widely read and cited by people with green hair and bones in their noses who think they’re oppressed by manspreading and microaggressions.
Peterson may be pushing it when he compares them to Stalinists, but he’s right that they and Stalin are guided by some of the same collectivist ideas, and to the extent that they’re influencing social policy through their control of universities, people have a right to be somewhat worried. She implies that enforcing pronoun-use is a minor point of politeness but actually I think that trying to get the state to enforce such points, when they’re based on spurious ideas about the relationship between biology and gender that we’re not allowed to question, is more authoritarian than anything Peterson is guilty of with his suggested rules for life.
ContraPoints is smart and entertaining but I don’t see the force of her critique of Peterson. He may be a curmudgeonly conservative, but he’s not wrong about the postmodern neo-marxist character of the contemporary intellectual mainstream. The incoherence is theirs not his, as ContraPoints kind of acknowledges, but just because the left is consumed by hysterical infighting doesn’t mean it doesn’t exhibit a large degree of unity when it comes to excluding conservatives from the mainstream conversation. In this relationship to a common enemy it can therefore accurately be described as a fractured whole using Peterson’s phrase.
______________________________________________
While our US far-right wing global banking 5% freemason/Greek pols and players are waxing romantic over US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES looking just like Chinese MARXIST POLITBURO structures-----here we have global banking FAKE NEWS media in China creating as much myth-making and propaganda as our US national media.
China intends to end its pretense of being COMMUNIST----and simply return to being KINGS AND QUEENS. So, what was a Chinese national network of politburo members---much as today's ROBBER BARON global banking 5% freemason/Greek players is going to be DISBANDED. As much as global banking 1% want to PRETEND China will become a CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY------it will not. China will be that same 3000BC ---1000BC spice and silk trade OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS ----just as is MOVING FORWARD in US and Europe.
China's national politburo has always been simply China's global 1%.
ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES WOULD HAVE CHINA'S LOOKING JUST AS THOSE GLOBAL BANKING IS TRYING TO BUILD IN US. NO GOVERNMENT NEEDED IN SMART CITIES ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE----THE SUPER-DUPER BIG, DEAD HEAD STATE.
Sorry, global banking 5% freemason/Greek players ---no players needed for NEO-MARXISM.
Fugitive Billionaire Guo’s Claims Could Topple Politburo Standing Committee Member
October 5, 2017
Wanted Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui’s talk at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. revolved mainly around the Chinese Communist Party’s spy network in the United States, and less about CCP elite corruption, his usual topic on Twitter.
Guo claimed he had top secret documents from the CCP and when asked how he had obtained them, including those he shared at the event, Guo answered that he could obtain such documents at “any time” he wanted from CCP officials, including from officials in the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), the highest decision-making body in China.
Our take: Going by precedent, Xi Jinping could very possibly use Guo’s disclosure to purge Jiang Zemin faction members inside the PSC or weaken their influence over personnel matters. There are seven members in the present PSC, with three hailing from the Jiang faction.
In a July 5 Youtube video, Guo indicated that Chongqing Party secretary and Jiang faction member Sun Zhengcai was CCP General Secretary material. He described Sun as a “once-in-a-thousand-year saint” and a “political super genius.” Sun was abruptly removed from office on July 15, formally investigated on July 24, and expelled from the CCP on Sept. 9.
PSC allegiance:
Here’s a list of the current Politburo Standing Committee by rank and factional allegiance:
Xi Jinping
Li Keqiang (Xi ally)
Zhang Dejiang (Jiang faction)
Yu Zhengsheng (Xi ally)
Liu Yunshan (Jiang faction)
Wang Qishan (Xi ally)
Zhang Gaoli (Jiang faction)
The big picture: Guo Wengui, an elite Chinese businessman intertwined in CCP politics and business, began actively making sensational and largely unverifiable claims about CCP corruption on social media since January. Guo’s claims have received attention in part because of the upcoming 19th Party Congress, an important personnel reshuffle that will determine China’s policies for the next half a decade. The results of the 19th Congress will be a watershed moment in the factional struggle between Xi and Jiang. The losing side faces being completely purged from the Party and imprisonment.
See our Oct. 3 brief on Guo for more on his inconsistencies.
As this video states Hitler was backed by global corporations and global banking---HE WAS NOT LEFT SOCIALIST. The transition of Germany's labor unions to being that of WORLD BANK/WORLD WORKERS INTERNATIONAL took Germany's sovereign labor union structure and made it global banking 1% killing labor. That is what MOVED FORWARD here in US during Clinton/Bush/Obama----our US labor union leaders threw our 99% of labor union members under the bus----and became a tool of global banking 1%----
WORLD WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ----GERMAN LABOR FRONT is called MARXIST----this is what gave HITLER the cover of being pro-labor/a socialist when he was simply global banking 5% civil unrest civil war player.
THIS IS WHERE WE ARE TODAY IN US---WITH AFL-CIO TRUMPKA AND FEINGOLD PRETENDING MOVING FORWARD IS PRO-LABOR.
'The German Labor Front----World Workers International'
'Appeal to all Working Germans by the German Labor Front
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/appeal-to-all...
…The German Labor Front is the grouping of all working men without difference of economic or social status. It should include the worker and the employer, who will not be separated any longer by associations and leagues serving the interests of specific economic or social groups'.
REAL left social progressive academics have known all along how global banking 1% media and REVISIONIST HISTORY-----COMMONER CORE------kept using these terms SOCIALIST for political stance which was never left socialist. It is easy to see where Clinton global banking 1% neo-LIBERALS did the same---pretended to be left social progressive while being far-right wing global banking MARXIST as was OBAMA.
The Story of Fascism: Hitler’s "National Socialism"
FACEBOOK WATCH
Rick Steves
September 8 at 9:27 PM ·
Despite calling his party “National Socialist” (a.k.a. Nazi), Hitler abolished unions, privatized many industries, and was backed by corporations.
What were AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT I AM MAN left social progressive labor organizations in US and Europe were taken by WORLD BANK UNITED NATIONS back to being corporate tools for labor management working against the interest of labor---as was MARXISM.
How can an organization working for WORLD BANK be anti-capitalism? It is not. It promotes extreme wealth extreme poverty allowing the global 1% to be capitalist-----while 99% of citizens are kept enslaved and impoverished under far-right wing MARXISM. MAO/STALIN both working for global banking 1% and global corporations were those 5% freemason/Greek civil unrest/civil war players.
Please remember, our CULTURAL ARTS in all nations are largely controlled by global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS----so all these political groups that pop up calling themselves POPULIST are tied to same global banking and far-right wing.
Solidarity in POLAND as Italian fascists were all global banking 5% freemason/Greeks being far-right wing pretending to be left POPULISTS.
Bread and Roses 1912-2012
23 hrs ·
On Sept. 24, 1918, the Canadian government outlaws the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). The penalty for membership was set at five years in prison. The ban on the IWW was lifted after World War I ended.
We hope all those global banking 5% freemason/Greek players now being channeled into being ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT civil unrest civil war players will WAKE UP and be sick and tired of TWO STAGES OF MARXISM both of which is FAR-RIGHT WING....NO LEFT HAPPENING.
There is a reason the last article on Portugal and Spain returning to MARXISM uses the term NEO-----with its MARXISM. MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE is a FINAL SOLUTION for global banking 1%. They are eliminating the two stages of swinging from laissez faire to marxism -------and installing DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE permanent extreme wealth extreme poverty MARXISM where only the global banking 1% experience capitalism while 99% of WE THE PEOPLE are captured, killed, brutalized in permanent FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM. Remember, there is no need for a global banking 5% freemason/Greek in MOVING FORWARD----these structures will not exist in the FINAL SOLUTION.
This media outlet PRETENDS groups identified here are LEFTISTS----when they are all far-right wing civil unrest/civil war players.
We KNOW our global banking 5% players are getting tired of being PLAYED.
'Here are a few major (NPA) attacks documented by Standford University’s “Mapping Militants Project”:'
FAR-LEFT WATCH
Our mission and vision
Our mission is to investigate expose, and combat far-left extremists and the institutions that empower them.
Investigate
We monitor far-left extremists and collect
intelligence on their illegal activities
Expose
We publish detailed intelligence reports
exposing far-left extremist activity
Combat
We organize and execute action
plans to reduce their influence
Antifa is recruiting for a designated terrorist organization
- September 20, 2018
- Admin
- Extremist Groups
- Twitter is systematically silencing conservative voices but the official account for the designated terrorist organization, New People’s Army (NPA) is still active and they are using Twitter to disseminate terrorist propaganda and recruit more fighters. On top of that, multiple antifa groups have declared solidarity with this terrorist organization and are encouraging people to join.
The New People’s Army (NPA) is the military arm of the Communist Party of the Phillipines (CPP) and they were designated by the U.S. Department of State as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) in 2002. According to a U.S. Department of State report from 2016, this terrorist organization is responsible for the death of at least 158 innocent civilians:
Over the past few years, CPP/NPA has continued to carry out killings, raids, kidnappings, acts of extortion, and other forms of violence primarily directed against Philippine security forces. In May 2013, the Armed Forces of the Philippines reported that from 2011 through the first quarter of 2013, 383 people – including 158 civilians – were killed in encounters between CPP/NPA and government forces.
Here are a few major (NPA) attacks documented by Standford University’s “Mapping Militants Project”:
______________________________________________
If our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE attended a K-university teaching HISTORY being made simply a memorization of DATES and LEADERS-----if a discussion of political philosophy from last century focused only on MANIFESTOS----our US 99% WE THE PEOPLE would never have known REAL HISTORY. So, of all MARX'S books published THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO is the go-to book in educating about MARXIST COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM. No doubt KARL MARX filled this book with all kinds of populist myth-making---using all those COMRADE AND BOUSEQUOISE terms-----
When we educate broadly reading all of MARX'S writings we understand that MARXISM is far-right wing extreme wealth extreme poverty and and rebranding of slave labor societal structures. It is the MANIFESTOS our 99% often read -----that have nothing to do with goals of political philosophies being MOVED FORWARD.
THE RIGHT WING SHOUTS LOUDEST THAT COMMUNISM IS FAR-LEFT WING---OUR 99% OF US RIGHT WING REPUBLICANS ARE KILLED WITH THESE POLICIES AS WELL AS OUR US 99% OF LEFT WING CITIZENS.
'SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Section 2, Proletarians and...
www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/communist/section3/
The Manifesto then discusses the relationship of the Communists to the proletarians. ... In a Communist society, then, labor will exist for the sake of the laborer, not for ... Many dissenters maintain that no one will work if private property is abolished. ... religion, philosophy, or ideology "are not deserving of serious examination'.
We hope all those global banking 5% freemason/Greek players now being channeled into being ALT RIGHT ALT LEFT civil unrest civil war players will WAKE UP and be sick and tired of TWO STAGES OF MARXISM both of which is FAR-RIGHT WING....NO LEFT HAPPENING.
There is a reason the last article on Portugal and Spain returning to MARXISM uses the term NEO-----with its MARXISM. MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE is a FINAL SOLUTION for global banking 1%. They are eliminating the two stages of swinging from laissez faire to marxism -------and installing DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE permanent extreme wealth extreme poverty MARXISM where only the global banking 1% experience capitalism while 99% of WE THE PEOPLE are captured, killed, brutalized in permanent FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM. Remember, there is no need for a global banking 5% freemason/Greek in MOVING FORWARD----these structures will not exist in the FINAL SOLUTION.
Comics and graphic novels
Filth, fury, gags and vendettas: The Communist Manifesto as a graphic novel
Guardian cartoonist Martin Rowson explains why Marx would have loved his new graphic novel – which puts the fun back into his great political work
Martin Rowson
Tue 1 May 2018 11.53 EDT Last modified on Thu 3 May 2018 06.35 EDT
‘I was entranced by its playfulness – parts of it are very funny’ … illustrations from The Communist Manifesto: A Graphic Novel. Photograph: Martin Rowson/SelfMadeHero
Karl Marx and I go back a long way. Like a lot of children growing up in the 1960s, I was obsessed with the Soviet Union and its unreachable otherness. What’s more, my father had actually been there to attend scientific symposia. I have a clear memory, aged about six, of standing in our back garden and him saying to me: “What do you mean, you don’t know who Karl Marx is?” I replied, rather tearfully: “But I know who Lenin is.”
As I grew older, the obsession continued. At about 15, I finally read The Communist Manifesto and it made complete sense. I instantly got the Dialectic, the inexorable, tectonic grindings of All History Hitherto, the Class Conflict and all the stuff about the inevitability of the ultimate victory of the downtrodden over their oppressors. Moreover, in its compelling combination of reason and romanticism, I was entranced not only by the manifesto’s universal scope but also its playfulness. Parts of it are very funny.
Soon I’d devoured Edmund Wilson’s To the Finland Station, visited the Soviet Union and, aged 19, wrote a thankfully unpublished novel that hinges round a fictitious Marxist uprising. As a student, I joined the Communist party, although I only hung around for a week. After I graduated I sold a cartoon series to New Statesman titled Scenes from the Lives of the Great Socialists, based on hideously contrived puns on the defining dicta of Marxism. A typical example shows Friedrich Engels standing on a toilet seat peering into the flush mechanism and saying: “Hey Marx, there’s a couple of those antique Stradivarius fiddles in here!” To which Marx replies: “Clearly the violins inherited the cistern!”
When these cartoons came out as a book in 1983, there were calls for it to be banned from Collets, the old leftie bookshop in London. This was one reason why I hadn’t bothered making a fist of it in the CP: I’ve always subscribed to Orwell’s line about every joke being a tiny revolution, though a lot of people believe that None of This Is a Laughing Matter.
Obviously, as a professional satirist, I disagree. And I reckon Marx would have done so, too. Not nearly enough people struggling through Theories of Surplus Value give themselves a break by reading, for instance, Marx’s journalism from the 1850s for the New York Tribune, which matches Simon Hoggart, and occasionally even Jonathan Swift, in its scathing hilarity.
Anyway, Marx stuck with me in the following 30 years:
I illustrated a couple of books by the Australian Marxist Kevin Killane, and Marx himself made cameo appearances in my comic-book adaptations of TS Eliot’s The Waste Land and Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy. It was after that last book was reissued in 2010 by SelfMadeHero that the publisher commissioned me to adapt Francis Wheen’s wonderful 1999 biography of Marx.
I’m a hack at heart and, like Marx, I dice with deadlines. Marx, then aged 29, knocked off The Communist Manifesto over a weekend in Brussels at the end of January 1848 after he received an ultimatum from the Communist League in London, who had commissioned the work from him the previous autumn and were still waiting. It had also been my practice to eschew storyboards and make it up as I went along. But confronted by the Wheen book, I decided to pay my son to write the script. He did an excellent job, but it left me with nothing to do except draw to his direction. I got bored. I felt like nothing more than a machine. I was, in fact, alienated from my labour in a textbook Marxist way and, in line with pure Marxist theory, I rebelled. Having taken seven months to draw just five pages of finished artwork I gave up and returned my advance.
So now I had unfinished business with Marx, and occasionally images would flash into the back of my mind of great geological slabs of History grinding against massive clumps of the Dialectic. Then SelfMadeHero asked if I fancied adapting The Communist Manifesto as a comic book for Marx’s 200th birthday. The whole thing came instantly into my head. I clearly envisioned the manifesto as a kind of rolling tsunami, made up in equal parts of blood-and-iron industrialised steampunk, apocalyptic John Martin and mounting fury that builds up to a climax at the end of Section One: Bourgeois and Proletarians, before breaking on the beach of History and turning into straightforward standup comedy. It’s leavened throughout with private gags, personal score-settling and the kind of Rabelaisian filthiness Marx would have enjoyed, I hope that is what I’ve achieved.
The former Tory home secretary Kenneth Baker, with whom I (and Steve Bell) sit on the board of London’s Cartoon Museum, insists on calling me a hardline Marxist-Leninist. I’m not. If anything, I’m a kind of William Morris anarchist, all for equality and down with hierarchies so we can all have some fun. Stripped of the doctrinaire dogma, that’s how I read Marx, too. The most important part of The Communist Manifesto remains its analysis of how the amoral mechanics of capitalism commodify human beings and reduce them to meat machines existing solely to be milked to make the already rich even richer. Which by anyone’s reckoning is no fun at all. And 170 years after he wrote The Communist Manifesto when, by the latest count, 43 individuals possess as much wealth as half of the rest of humanity, I reckon Marx still has a lot to say, and I hope I’ve helped him say it yet again.
__________________________________________
Below we see 'cultural MARXISM advancing from GERMANY in early 1900s just as pre-Weimar Germany was sacking and looting German society during ROARING 20s.
'Cultural Marxism is a convenient way to describe Marxist Critical Theory, an idea that came out of the Frankfurt School in the 1920’s'.
Our Australian citizen tied to this YOU TUBE video------being a great big player ----pretending our US 1960s civil rights was MARXIST when of course both FDR NEW DEAL and 1960s CIVIL RIGHTS was LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE. It is true all of what was a real 99% WE THE PEOPLE populist movement was killed when REAGAN era killed LOCKEAN SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM and replaced it with two stage FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM.
What today's MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE SMART CITIES does not say is NEO----MARXISM------meaning a different kind of MARXISM for US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Our US right wing 99% having gone along with all this MOVING FORWARD these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA-----maybe liking all that bashing of heads and brutality of a billion people killed in WW3-----thinking at the end global banking 1% will POP right back into CAPITALISM as before------ARE GOING TO BE GREAT BIG LOSERS.
Myth: Hitler was a leftist.
Fact: Nearly all of Hitler's beliefs placed him on the far right.
Summary
Many conservatives accuse Hitler of being a leftist, on the grounds that his party was named "National Socialist." But socialism requires worker ownership and control of the means of production. In Nazi Germany, private capitalist individuals owned the means of production, and they in turn were frequently controlled by the Nazi party and state. True socialism does not advocate such economic dictatorship -- it can only be democratic. Hitler's other political beliefs place him almost always on the far right. He advocated racism over racial tolerance, eugenics over freedom of reproduction, merit over equality, competition over cooperation, power politics and militarism over pacifism, dictatorship over democracy, capitalism over Marxism, realism over idealism, nationalism over internationalism, exclusiveness over inclusiveness, common sense over theory or science, pragmatism over principle, and even held friendly relations with the Church, even though he was an atheist.
Our US right wing 99% having gone along with all this MOVING FORWARD these few decades of CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA-----maybe liking all that bashing of heads and brutality of a billion people killed in WW3-----thinking at the end global banking 1% will POP right back into CAPITALISM as before------ARE GOING TO BE GREAT BIG LOSERS.
'Mattys Modern Life
Published on May 18, 2018'
.....Doesn't seem to want to give a real name----no wonder with all that myth-making and propaganda.
youtube.com
Is Cultural Marxism a "far-right" conspiracy theory? Responding to Three Arrows
Cultural Marxism is a convenient way to describe Marxist Critical Theory, an idea that came out of the Frankfurt…
___________________________________________
We posted an article calling PORTUGAL as MOVING FORWARD to a NEO-----Marxism. Remember, NEO----conservative Bush killed US right wing Republican conservatives by placing that NEO----in front. Conserving all wealth and power went from US right wing conservatives to GLOBAL 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS. Now, global banking 1% want to CONSERVE all that money and wealth and our US 99% of right wing Republicans including all those 5% freemason/Greek players are going under the bus.
NEO------liberal was global banking 1% doing the same to our US left wing politics-----killing REAL left social progressive politics and installing the same global banking 1% FAR-RIGHT WING MARXISM. This is why our Federal public trusts MEDICARE SOCIAL SECURITY were looted---why our Federal National Parks are privatized to global mining corporations to be stripped----it is why all our US Post Offices and public schools are being privatized into the hands of global banking 1% OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS---that is MARXISM.
So, what is NEO--------MARXISM? As we state MOVING FORWARD ONE WORLD US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES AS SMART CITIES is creating a DEEP, DEEP, REALLY DEEP STATE for global factories as basically slave labor colonies. Where in the past MARXISM has been a two -- stage policy of capitalism morphing into laissez faire becoming MARXIST with public works and institutions-----there will be no BOUNCING BACK to capitalism ----the two-stages of MARXISM will remain ONE STAGE-----FINAL SOLUTION is MARXISM all the time.
This is the structure that makes ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE for only the global 1%----they will be the only ones still involved in capitalist economics--just as exists in China. Everyone else in US will be tied to far-right wing MARXISM---being made extremely impoverished with no freedom, liberty, justice, climbing the economic ladder.
Now, ARABIA as ASIA and AFRICA have been captured by these MARXIST economics throughout last century-------we all know nothing LEFT is happening in ARABIA
'Over time, under enough pressure, and through gradually subtle degrees of ideological divergence from fundamental principles, Real Leftists can successfully be indoctrinated into Fake Leftists if they don’t have the political will to resist the Establishment, which regrettably appears to be the trend in North America and the EU'.
OH, REALLY??????????
Chaosistan, Hybrid Wars, Iran, Iraq, Middle East, Syria, Turkey
“Neo-Marxism” And “The New Middle East”Written by Andrew KORYBKO on 24/01/2017
More in Chaosistan:
- Iran’s Anti-Terrorist Missile Strike In Iraq Sent Several Important Messages 25/09/2018
- Trump Exposed US & International Hypocrisy By Ending American Aid To Palestine 24/09/2018
- Western Demands On Syria 21/09/2018
Syria And Turkey
Before going any further, the first thing that should be addressed is the “Neo-Marxism” label included in the article’s title. The author drew primarily upon the stated positions and manifesto of the Syrian PYD, which is leading the regional charge for undeclared Kurdish separatism, in making the decision to emphasize the ideology that’s driving the region’s anti-government Kurdish militias. The PYD is a political and ethnic extremist organization which attempts to channel Marxist thought in order to impose “democratic confederalism” in Syria, which essentially seeks to dissolve the state through its devolution into a complex quilt of identity-based cantons. The PYD is closely linked to the Turkish PKK, and both organizations claim to be inspired by the late American Marxist Murray Bookchin, who wrote extensively about what he called “decentralization”.
In practice, however, this is pretty much indistinguishable from the political end game that fundamentalist Marxists (“Secular Wahhabis”) aspire for, which is the elimination of the state and its replacement with community councils and other non-traditional governing structures. Whether or not this position truly represents conventional Marxism and more general Leftist thought is up to those communities themselves and their various polemicists to decide, but the labelling of the PYD and PKK as “Neo-Marxist” is due to their political positions in advocating what the public generally conflates (whether rightly or wrongly) with this ideology. Moreover, since they’re active in the 21st century and after the Soviet dissolution at the end of the Cold War, the prefix “Neo-“ is applied to differentiate these organizations and their ideological strands from the ‘classical’ Marxism that was associated (whether rightly or wrongly) with that period.
The point here isn’t to convince anyone that the PYD and PKK are ‘Marxist’, but rather to highlight that this is how they self-identity and to emphasize the ideological motivations behind their militant activity.
Iraq And Iran
Expanding past Syria and Turkey, one can see the influence of “Neo-Marxist” Kurdish militant groups in Iraq and Iran, too. The allied “Patriotic Union of Kurdistan” (PUK) and Gorran opposition parties in northern Iraq’s Kurdish Regional Government, both of which are leftist, are on friendly terms with the PKK. Barzani’s ruling “Kurdish Democratic Party” (KPD) is opposed to the PKK and Marxism, which is why it enjoys such considerable Turkish support even though it regularly threatens to pursue ‘independence’. Interestingly, Iran is aligned with PUK and Gorran in spite of their links to the PKK, which might be partially attributable to Tehran looking favorably upon these groups’ hesitancy to see an ‘independent’ “Iraqi Kurdistan” in the near future and could thus also signal that Iran is engaged in a soft proxy war with Turkey for influence (and pipelines) in the Kurdish Regional Government.
All of the Iraqi Kurdish groups and their affiliated militias are in support of “federalism” or separatism to varying degrees and can generally be described as friendly to the US (the KPD obviously much more in both cases than PUK and Gorran), but aren’t necessarily “Neo-Marxist” in the context that the article is defining it as. Therefore, they’ll largely be excluded from the rest of the analysis going forward, but were importantly mentioned in the first place order to show their loose connections to the troublesome Kurdish organizations in Syria and Turkey.
Amidst this complicated intra-Iraqi Kurd drama, however, the pro-‘Israeli’ and ‘socialist’ “Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran” (KDPI) terrorist group has recently found shelter in northern Iraq and begun to periodically launch cross-border attacks against the Iranian border forces. This organization is part of the “Congress of Nationalities for a Federal Iran” (CNFI), an umbrella group of various ethno-religious minorities fighting against Tehran in favor of the same broad sort of ‘political solution’ as the PYD and PKK, “federalism”. This end goal thus connects the KDPI to its Syrian and Turkish counterparts, and can even be said to give it something in common with all of their Iraqi brethren as well, despite some of the latter being reluctant to associate with them, whether openly or in general, due to Iran’s understandable sensitivities.
“Federalist” Failings And The MEK
In and of itself, there’s nothing inherently negative about federalism, nor does this political system have any origins in Marxist thought, but the “democratic confederalism” of the PYD and PKK and the “Identity Federalism” of the CNFI incorporate radical ideas inspired by this ideology and popularly described as “Cultural Marxism” (whether rightly or wrongly), which ultimately would be disastrous for the national unity of the diverse states threatened by these initiatives if they were ever implemented.
Separate from the Syrian-Turkish-Iranian nexus of Kurdish “Neo-Marxist” militant groups but fighting for similar ideological goals in Iran is the “People’s Mujahedeen of Iran” (MEK), a hard-core Marxist terrorist organization which was delisted a few years ago by the US State Department and is now recognized by Washington as a ‘legitimate opposition party’ (despite having killed Americans in the past).
This group and the aforementioned Syrian, Turkish, and Iranian ones don’t just share a common denominator in “Neo-Marxism”, but are also marked by the strong degree of support that they enjoy from the US, although it must be said that they don’t all coordinate with one another because the Kurds supposedly have a strong hate for the MEK after the latter allegedly fought against them under Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
The US And The PKK
Even though the US formally includes the PKK on its list of terrorist organizations, Turkey has accused it on many occasions of indirectly supporting this group through the provisioning of material and weapons assistance to the PYD, implying that Washington is using the Syrian Kurds as intermediaries for rendering support to their Turkish counterparts. This isn’t unrealistic to assert since the US is nowadays opposed to President Erdogan, and relations between Ankara and Washington have been very chilly ever since last summer’s failed pro-American coup attempt. While it might shock some people to even consider and will likely be met with intense skepticism in the usual alternative media corners, the US does in fact have a serious problem with nominal NATO-member Turkey due to Ankara’s involvement in the Russian-Iranian-Turkish Tripartite of Great Powers aimed at bringing a gradual end to the War on Syria, which explains why it would betray its “ally” by unleashing the unconventional weapon of Kurdish separatism against it via PYD-laundered weapons to the PKK.
The Wahhabi-“Neo-Marxist” Geopolitical Convergence
The Hybrid War drama surrounding the Kurds occupies considerably less media attention than Daesh, but it’s no less dangerous to the stability of the Mideast. In fact, while Daesh has been on a years-long killing spree trying to construct an “Islamic State” in the Mideast, the militant Kurdish organizations mentioned in this article have taken to doing something similar and to a much lesser degree in advance of their shared objective of creating a transnational “Kurdistan” political entity. This goal has lately manifested itself through the intended formation of a stateless (con)federation of Kurdish communities between Syria, Turkey, Iran, and Iraq, as per the “post-state” and “Neo-Marxist” ideology of relevant groups in the first three aforementioned states.
As for the Iraqi Kurds, although they’re not “Neo-Marxists”, they are in support of either “federalization” or outright separatism, and would naturally develop their own independent relations with their other Kurdish political counterparts if they succeed in their map-changing schemes. Even though linguistic and historical differences would likely prevent the creation of a unified Kurdish ‘superstate’, the tangible effect of the aforementioned could quickly lead both to the dissolution of the multiethnic states that this demographic is a part of and the de-facto rise of a “second geopolitical ‘Israel’” in part of this space, or in other words, a unipolar-supported polity carved out of the stolen territory of other countries. This eventuality would naturally destroy the incipient Tripartite of Great Powers and also symbolize the successful completion of ‘Israel’s’ 1982 Yinon Plan of manufactured state fragmentation all along its Muslim periphery, basically ensuring that Tel Aviv becomes the undisputed power in the Mideast.
The planned geopolitical redivision of the Mideast is nothing new for American strategists either, which is why Washington is so strongly in support of these organizations. Former US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice first spoke about the dawn of a “New Middle East” in July 2006 during ‘Israel’s’ embarrassingly failed War on Hezbollah and Lebanon, and just a month prior, retired lieutenant colonel Ralph Peters published his “Blood Borders” blueprint about “how a better Middle East would look”. The New York Times followed up with a scandalous map in September 2013 showing “How 5 Countries Could Become 14”, and Stratfor founder George Friedman just released his own map highlighting how 17 separate power centers have emerged across what are nominally 5 sovereign countries. While the process of transnational state dissolution was catalyzed by the theater-wide “Arab Spring” Color Revolution events and subsequent spread of Daesh, these two American-provoked events in turn created the conditions for the militant revival of “Neo-Marxist” regime change groups such as the MEK and geopolitical revisionist ones such as the PYD.
This means that Washington now has two powerful tools at its disposal for crafting the 21st-century Yinon Plan of the “New Middle East”; Wahhabis and “Neo-Marxists”, both of which are bitterly opposed to one another but nevertheless serve as complementary instruments of American foreign policy (whether as “useful idiots” or outright proxies). It’s been long documented by alternative media outlets how the US has wielded the weapon of Wahhabism for over the past three decades, but comparatively less has been said about how it misleads the world through its use of the Fake Left. In theory, Leftists are supposed to be in support of multipolar objectives and against the Western unipolar power structure, but that’s not necessarily the case when it comes to many well-known “Leftist” movements in North America, Europe, and now the Mideast.
The Atlantic-Arabian Virus
The Democratic Party and much of the scattering of other supposedly leftist-oriented organizations in the US have been co-opted by the very same establishment which they claim to oppose. The same can be said for just about any socialist organization in the EU. As for the Mideast, the most popular Kurdish parties have been compromised, and the CNFI and MEK are undoubtedly Western Hybrid War proxies. All of these aforementioned groups, and especially the ones linked to George Soros and his worldwide “protest” (riot/Color Revolution) movements, represent the Fake Left, which shout leftist economic slogans but have lost the leftist moral principle of geopolitical resistance to Western neo-imperialism. In a sad twist of fate and due to their own reprehensible choices, these very same groups have become the post-modern vanguard for the exact same world order which their Cold War spiritual predecessors fought so valiantly to avoid.
It’s not to say that every self-proclaimed Leftist organization in these three parts of the world is “fake” (after all, the Baath Party and Syrian Socialist National Party still embody the respectable principles associated with Cold War Leftism), but just that there are plenty of reasonable grounds to immediately be suspicious of supposedly left-wing groups operating in these regions nowadays. The entire US is being destabilized by the Clintonian Counter-Revolution and its Fake Left supporters, just like the EU is being thrown into chaos by the ‘Secular Wahhabis’ who have ‘opened the gates from within’ by aiding and abetting the US’ plan to unleash ‘Weapons of Mass Migration’ against the continent. Similarly, the Mideast is now facing the threat of regime change and geopolitical revisionism not from the failing forces of Daesh and other Wahhabi terrorist groups, but by the hand of reinvigorated “Neo-Marxist” ones such as the PYD, PKK, KDPI, CNFI, and MEK. All of these groups purport to represent the “Left” but are in reality part of the worldwide Fake Left in the service of American interests, whether wittingly or inadvertently.
The “Leftist Civil War”
The only way to fight back against this is for the Real Left and its sincere, genuine activists in North America, the EU, and Mideast to come out in vocal and unceasing opposition against these Fake Leftist tools of Western neo-imperialism in order to win back the respect of their ideology and free it from American hijacking. The US has taken over the mainstream “leftist” narrative and is turning it into a mouthpiece of neo-imperialist propaganda, relying on collaborators such Varoufakis, Sanders, and an army of ‘alternative media’ bloggers to ‘legitimize’ their ‘coup’. When faced with even the slightest opposition from their Real Leftist ‘comrades’ (to say nothing of average non-Leftist folks), they resort to maliciously trolling them as “racists”, “fascists”, and/or “white supremacists” in a desperate knee-jerk reaction designed to discredit them in the eyes of what they assume to be the ‘politically correct’ public. The whole point in doing this is to protect their narrative monopoly so that dissenting voices don’t have a chance at swaying public opinion against the policies of the Fake Leftist Establishment.
Pertaining to the examined topic of utilizing “Neo-Marxist” proxy armies to geopolitically reorganize the “New Middle East”, this typically takes the form of condemning Iran’s sovereign choice to become an Islamic Republic (the narrative promoted by MEK, KDPI, and CNFI) and guilting the global public into accepting an “independent” or “federalized” Kurdish state or states as a ‘reward’ for fighting Daesh. In both interconnected cases across the combined Syrian-Turkish-Iraqi-Iranian Hybrid War battlespace, misleading and oftentimes outright false or situationally irrelevant arguments about “social rights”, “economic equality”, and “democracy” are trotted out in order to trick unaware and/or immature well-intentioned Leftists into supporting these Fake Leftist geopolitical projects. Over time, under enough pressure, and through gradually subtle degrees of ideological divergence from fundamental principles, Real Leftists can successfully be indoctrinated into Fake Leftists if they don’t have the political will to resist the Establishment, which regrettably appears to be the trend in North America and the EU.
It’s also in these two regions where Fake Leftist support for Kurdish separatism and a “Green Revolution 2.0” are most pronounced, which are dangerously combining to form a very serious threat to the multipolar states of Syria and Iran. Even if Real Leftists find themselves in support of Kurdish separatism in Turkey and/or Iraq, and/or regime change in either of them – justifying their position on the belief that these states are of questionable loyalty to the emerging Multipolar World Order – they need to realize that such geopolitical viruses, by their very nature and obvious consequences, won’t be ‘contained’ to these two countries alone but would inevitably spread to Syria and Iran as well. Therefore, even if they find themselves sympathizing with some of the positions presently being promoted by their Fake Leftist peers, they must remain steadfast in opposing them out of geopolitical consistency in standing against the Western-led international system.
This could ultimately lead to a “Leftist Civil War” (ideologically speaking, not necessarily in physical terms) in order to liberate this ideology from its present status as one of the US’ premier bullhorns of neo-imperialism, provided, of course, that it’s not already too late to do so.
____________________________________________
Below we see the SAUDI ARABIAN royals coming out as MARXISTS----Wahhabis were the global banking 1% freemason group tied to GEORGE BUSH and the neo-cons who are indeed MARXISTS. CLINTON/BUSH taking US social progressive economics to far-right wing MARXISM.
In practice, however, this is pretty much indistinguishable from the political end game that fundamentalist Marxists (“Secular Wahhabis”) aspire for,
All nations overseas tied to FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES are without a coincidence MARXIST nations. Taking the US to FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONE status will make US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES----MARXIST. That is what global corporate campus SOCIALISM as OUR REVOLUTION for only the global 1% crowd call it. They place the word DEMOCRATIC in front of global corporate campus socialism to make it appear tied to our US and European history of being DEMOCRACIES........the only DEMOCRACY happening of course is the movement of POLITBURO MEMBERS ----chosen by the global 1%.
This is why today's US elections ---rigged and fraudulent throughout CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA have 5% FREEMASON/GREEK PLAYERS running for office and not AMERICAN politicians.
This is how EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL ----went from all 99% of WE THE PEOPLE to being global banking 5% freemason/Greek players -----now MOVING FORWARD to those 5% going under the bus.
University of Toronto is raging global banking 1% neo-liberal just as University of Chicago...simply eliminating all reference to our last century's REAL LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVISM
'Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto'.
Dissident Professor Explains Neo-Marxism; 'Women's Studies Should Be Defunded'
ByRobert Kraychik
May 28, 2017
Contemporary leftists have “performed a philosophical sleight of hand that transformed the class war into identity politics of war,” said Jordan Peterson during a lecture at Harvard University on April 10.
Marxism is a sociological paradigm in which human history is cast as a function of class struggle and warfare. All other forces shaping human events — environmental, geographical, religious, technological, political, cultural, et. al — are cast as derivatives of class struggle and warfare.
As communism fell out of fashion during the 1950's and 1960's, following wider exposure of life in the Soviet Union via publications such as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago, leftists adjusted their core axiom of class struggle and warfare to other frameworks of perceived group power struggles: race, sex, religion, ethnicity, and other dichotomies.
Peterson recalled that left-wing agitators seeking to shut down a speaking engagement of his at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, shouted slogans while carrying a “banner that had a hammer and sickle on it.”
Communism and its ideological progeny, said Peterson, were accepted and promoted across university campuses while Nazism was condemned:
"The reprehensible ideologies that are based in fundamental Marxism killed at least a hundred million people in the twentieth century, and there are still apologists. One in five scientists identifies as a Marxist.
...
What happened in the 1960s, as far as I can tell, and this happened most in France — which have probably produced the most reprehensible coterie of public intellectuals that any country has ever managed, is that in the late 1960s when all the student activists had decided that the real Marxist revolution wasn’t going to occur in the Western world, and had finally realized that apologizing for the Soviet system was just not gonna fly anymore given the tens of millions of bodies that had stacked up, that they performed what I would call a philosophical sleight of hand and transformed a class war into identity politics of war. And that became extraordinarily popular."
Neo-Marxism and post-modernism, said Peterson, appeal largely to “resentful people,” given the ideologies’ appeal to covetousness and jealousy.
Peterson called for the end of state funding for neo-Marxist faculties, programs and courses such as "women's studies" that operate under the guise of legitimate academic inquiry. He also spoke of neo-Marxism's ubiquity across universities and colleges:
"It's everywhere, it's not just in campus protests. The campuses are overrun in large part with disciplines that have, in my estimation, no valid reason to exist. I think disciplines like 'women's studies' should be defunded. Any of the activist disciplines whose primary role is the overthrow of 'the patriarchy,' which is about as ill-defined a concept as you could possibly formulate ... we've done enough public funding of that sort of thing.
We're providing full-time destructive employment for people who are doing nothing but causing trouble. ... what they promote has zero intellectual credibility. Their research methods don't qualify as research methods. Their publications — eighty percent of publications now garner zero citations."
The humanities have been largely "corrupted," said Peterson, with fraudulent peer-review processes for the publication of ostensibly academic journals. Ideological myopia via neo-Marxism, he added, is standard fare across many professors and academics in the humanities.
Dissident speakers seeking to avoid disruption from leftists at university and college campuses, said Peterson, should schedule morning events:
"One of the things I did when I was talking to the university administration was to suggest how they might deal with the possibility of protesters. So I said, "Well that's easy. I know how you can have absolutely zero protesters. Have it in the morning, they won't get out of bed before ten." So we had it at nine o'clock in the morning and there was one MPP [member of provincial parliament] who showed up to hand out some pamphlets, and not a single protester. If you want a controversial speaker on campus, just have it at seven in the morning. You won't get a protestor within fifty yards of it, because they'll still be sleeping off last night's alcohol-induced hangover."
Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto.
_____________________________________________
'In fact, to the extent that “right-wing” means authoritarian and moralistic, it’s clear that left is the new right in academia, in Silicon Valley and in many other places populated by university humanities and social science graduates'.
Global banking 1% have tried hard to MOVE all of our EQUAL PROTECTION 99% WE THE PEOPLE into this NEO-MARXISM-----whether women, civil rights for black and brown citizens, disabled, GBLT, if we notice that is all we see running as Clinton neo-liberals morphing into ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE----AKA-----NEO-MARXIST FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES.
Of course all these population groups are the ones most oppressed in MOVING FORWARD. SMART CITIES will be DEEP, DEEP STATE GLOBAL FACTORY slave labor for both white collar professionals and manual labor. This takes all 99% of WE THE PEOPLE no matter if white, black, or brown.
NEO------MARXISM will see no bouncing back to LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM----no public works programs, no public anything. We are watching today as global banking 1% completely erases the term LEFT SOCIAL PROGRESSIVE CAPITALISM---tied to AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT--I AM MAN------LOCKEAN CAPITALISM pretending all last century was simply MARXISM.
THE NEW LEFT is indeed far-right wing global banking 1% NEO-MARXISM---------not left.
NEO-MARXISM permanent GLOBAL MILITARY JUNTA-----oh, yeah---that is FAR-RIGHT WING extreme wealth extreme poverty-----no NEW LEFT to be found.
On “Postmodern Neo-Marxism”
May 5, 2018 admin Academic, Conservative, Cultural Politics, Identity Politics, Philosophy, Rightist
ContraPoints, whose real name is Natalie Parrott, is making a big impression with her YouTube videos lately. In this video she describes being an adjunct philosophy professor who found her ability to give a shit was tested by the kind of narrow specialist research one has to do as an academic. She also talks about the fact that academic leftists don’t get much practice at debating rightist arguments, because the academy has become almost exclusively leftist turf, and this makes things boring. She then describes her attempts to be an outsider intellectual, which involved working as an Uber driver and an Amazon copywriter, before she finally found her niche on YouTube.
More interesting than this familiar narrative of disaffection from academe is her recent video criticizing Jordan Peterson, in which she disavows her still perceptibly male persona in the earlier video, and displays her recidivist leftism and alcoholism all at once. She takes issue with Peterson’s phrase “postmodern neo-marxism” as a description of the contemporary left, saying that postmodernism and Marxism are incompatible, since one is skeptical of grand narratives and the other is a grand narrative.
This appeal to the pure forms of a particular school of thought when it suits you, is a tactic I often observe among leftists who are otherwise quite content to be genealogists celebrating the historical promiscuity of ideas. They think Peterson’s clunky phrase represents a failure to see the diversity of the contemporary left, when in fact it was coined in an attempt to find a shorthand term for both the unity and the manifest incoherence of today’s left. The new left, as it tends to be called in Britain, is indeed the bastard child of Marx and postmodernism, which have in common that they are antagonistic to class and conceptual hierarchies respectively. Therefore they have found it easy to see their destruction of the traditional intellectual and artistic canon as part of the class war that tenured radicals and middle class SJWs like to think they’re fighting.
Postmodernism is a many-splendoured thing, as ContraPoints points out, but that doesn’t mean we can’t speak about it as a thing. It has two main aspects, one deriving from the post-structuralist theory that today’s universities are suffused by and that generations of students have by now been influenced by. The other aspect is an effect of economic globalization, the mingling of cultures, and the deracination of human beings who are economic vectors before they are anything else. In this promiscuous world the economic center has been gravitating rightwards and social mores have been gravitating left, such that the economic right and the social center-left are now in alignment.
We see the effects of this when Silicon Valley becomes a champion of political correctness by firing James Damore for telling the truth about sex and gender; and when neoliberal universities start installing bias hotlines and safe spaces while making it unsafe to discuss biological sexual difference in the classroom. This situation, that Peterson refers to as “postmodern neo-marxism,” is one in which minorities are tyrannizing over the majority in pursuit of “social justice,” the traditional intellectual canon is being thrown out in favor of the democratic representation of various newly constructed identities in university syllabi regardless of whether they’ve produced anything worthy of inclusion, and in which conservative intellectuals are nowhere to be found on campus.
In fact, to the extent that “right-wing” means authoritarian and moralistic, it’s clear that left is the new right in academia, in Silicon Valley and in many other places populated by university humanities and social science graduates. Intellectual postmodernism always had a whiff of fascism about it, and the phrase “postmodern neo-marxism” is kind of accurate as a description of how former opposites have become indistinguishable in the past forty years. Ideologies are not bodies of doctrine, and people who treat them as such tend to be marginalised fairly quickly. Old school Marxist purists have disappeared for the most part from the academic intellectual scene, but Marx is still widely read and cited by people with green hair and bones in their noses who think they’re oppressed by manspreading and microaggressions.
Peterson may be pushing it when he compares them to Stalinists, but he’s right that they and Stalin are guided by some of the same collectivist ideas, and to the extent that they’re influencing social policy through their control of universities, people have a right to be somewhat worried. She implies that enforcing pronoun-use is a minor point of politeness but actually I think that trying to get the state to enforce such points, when they’re based on spurious ideas about the relationship between biology and gender that we’re not allowed to question, is more authoritarian than anything Peterson is guilty of with his suggested rules for life.
ContraPoints is smart and entertaining but I don’t see the force of her critique of Peterson. He may be a curmudgeonly conservative, but he’s not wrong about the postmodern neo-marxist character of the contemporary intellectual mainstream. The incoherence is theirs not his, as ContraPoints kind of acknowledges, but just because the left is consumed by hysterical infighting doesn’t mean it doesn’t exhibit a large degree of unity when it comes to excluding conservatives from the mainstream conversation. In this relationship to a common enemy it can therefore accurately be described as a fractured whole using Peterson’s phrase.
______________________________________________
While our US far-right wing global banking 5% freemason/Greek pols and players are waxing romantic over US FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES looking just like Chinese MARXIST POLITBURO structures-----here we have global banking FAKE NEWS media in China creating as much myth-making and propaganda as our US national media.
China intends to end its pretense of being COMMUNIST----and simply return to being KINGS AND QUEENS. So, what was a Chinese national network of politburo members---much as today's ROBBER BARON global banking 5% freemason/Greek players is going to be DISBANDED. As much as global banking 1% want to PRETEND China will become a CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY------it will not. China will be that same 3000BC ---1000BC spice and silk trade OLD WORLD KINGS AND QUEENS ----just as is MOVING FORWARD in US and Europe.
China's national politburo has always been simply China's global 1%.
ONE WORLD ONE GOVERNANCE FOREIGN ECONOMIC ZONES WOULD HAVE CHINA'S LOOKING JUST AS THOSE GLOBAL BANKING IS TRYING TO BUILD IN US. NO GOVERNMENT NEEDED IN SMART CITIES ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE----THE SUPER-DUPER BIG, DEAD HEAD STATE.
Sorry, global banking 5% freemason/Greek players ---no players needed for NEO-MARXISM.
Fugitive Billionaire Guo’s Claims Could Topple Politburo Standing Committee Member
October 5, 2017
Wanted Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui’s talk at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. revolved mainly around the Chinese Communist Party’s spy network in the United States, and less about CCP elite corruption, his usual topic on Twitter.
Guo claimed he had top secret documents from the CCP and when asked how he had obtained them, including those he shared at the event, Guo answered that he could obtain such documents at “any time” he wanted from CCP officials, including from officials in the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), the highest decision-making body in China.
Our take: Going by precedent, Xi Jinping could very possibly use Guo’s disclosure to purge Jiang Zemin faction members inside the PSC or weaken their influence over personnel matters. There are seven members in the present PSC, with three hailing from the Jiang faction.
In a July 5 Youtube video, Guo indicated that Chongqing Party secretary and Jiang faction member Sun Zhengcai was CCP General Secretary material. He described Sun as a “once-in-a-thousand-year saint” and a “political super genius.” Sun was abruptly removed from office on July 15, formally investigated on July 24, and expelled from the CCP on Sept. 9.
PSC allegiance:
Here’s a list of the current Politburo Standing Committee by rank and factional allegiance:
Xi Jinping
Li Keqiang (Xi ally)
Zhang Dejiang (Jiang faction)
Yu Zhengsheng (Xi ally)
Liu Yunshan (Jiang faction)
Wang Qishan (Xi ally)
Zhang Gaoli (Jiang faction)
The big picture: Guo Wengui, an elite Chinese businessman intertwined in CCP politics and business, began actively making sensational and largely unverifiable claims about CCP corruption on social media since January. Guo’s claims have received attention in part because of the upcoming 19th Party Congress, an important personnel reshuffle that will determine China’s policies for the next half a decade. The results of the 19th Congress will be a watershed moment in the factional struggle between Xi and Jiang. The losing side faces being completely purged from the Party and imprisonment.
See our Oct. 3 brief on Guo for more on his inconsistencies.
RSS Feed
