- Home
-
Cindy Walsh for Mayor of Baltimore
- Mayoral Election violations
-
Questionnaires from Community
>
- Education Questionnaire
- Baltimore Housing Questionnaire
- Emerging Youth Questionnaire
- Health Care policy for Baltimore
- Environmental Questionnaires
- Livable Baltimore questionnaire
- Labor Questionnnaire
- Ending Food Deserts Questionnaire
- Maryland Out of School Time Network
- LBGTQ Questionnaire
- Citizen Artist Baltimore Mayoral Forum on Arts & Culture Questionnaire
- Baltimore Transit Choices Questionnaire
- Baltimore Activating Solidarity Economies (BASE)
- Downtown Partnership Questionnaire
- The Northeast Baltimore Communities Of BelAir Edison Community Association (BECCA )and Frankford Improvement Association, Inc. (FIA)
- Streets and Transportation/Neighbood Questionnaire
- African American Tourism and business questionnaire
- Baltimore Sun Questionnaire
- City Paper Mayoral Questionnaire
- Baltimore Technology Com Questionnaire
- Baltimore Biker's Questionnair
- Homewood Friends Meeting Questionnaire
- Baltimore Historical Collaboration---Anthem Project
- Tubman City News Mayoral Questionnaire
- Maryland Public Policy Institute Questionnaire
- AFRO questionnaire
- WBAL Candidate's Survey
- Blog
- Trans Pacific Pact (TPP)
- Progressive vs. Third Way Corporate Democrats
-
Financial Reform/Wall Street Fraud
- Federal Healthcare Reform
- Social Security and Entitlement Reform
- Federal Education Reform
- Government Schedules
-
State and Local Government
- Maryland Committee Actions
- Maryland and Baltimore Development Organizations
- Maryland State Department of Education
- Baltimore City School Board
-
Progressive Issues
-
Building Strong Media
-
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
>
- anotherangryvoice.blogspot.com
- "Talk About It" Radio - WFBR 1590AM Baltimore
- Promethius Radio Project
- Clearing the Fog
- Democracy Now
- Black Agenda Radio
- World Truth. TV Your Alternative News Network.
- Daily Censured
- Bill Moyers Journal
- Center for Public Integrity
- Public Radio International
- Baltimore Brew
- Free Press
- Far Left/Socialist Media
- Media with a Third Way Agenda >
-
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
>
-
Progressive Organizations
- Progressive Actions
- Maryland/Baltimore Voting Districts - your politicians and their votes
- Petitions, Complaints, and Freedom of Information Requests
- State of the Democratic Party
- Misc
- Misc 2
- Misc 3
- Misc 4
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Standard of Review
- Untitled
-
WALSH FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE INFORMATION AND PLATFORM
- Campaign Finance/Campaign donations
- Speaking Events
- Why Heather Mizeur is NOT a progressive
- Campaign responses to Community Organization Questionnaires
-
Cindy Walsh vs Maryland Board of Elections
>
- Leniency from court for self-representing plaintiffs
- Amended Complaint
- Plaintiff request for expedited trial date
- Response to Motion to Dismiss--Brown, Gansler, Mackie, and Lamone
- Injunction and Mandamus
-
DECISION/APPEAL TO SPECIAL COURT OF APPEALS---Baltimore City Circuit Court response to Cindy Walsh complaint
>
-
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
>
- Cover Page ---yellow
- Table of Contents
- Table of Authorities
- Leniency for Pro Se Representation
- Statement of Case
- Questions Presented
- Statement of Facts
- Argument
- Conclusion/Font and Type Size
- Record Extract
- Appendix
- Motion for Reconsideration
- Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss
- Motion to Reconsider Dismissal
-
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
>
- General Election fraud and recount complaints
-
Cindy Walsh goes to Federal Court for Maryland election violations
>
- Complaints filed with the FCC, the IRS, and the FBI
- Zapple Doctrine---Media Time for Major Party candidates
- Complaint filed with the US Justice Department for election fraud and court irregularities.
- US Attorney General, Maryland Attorney General, and Maryland Board of Elections are charged with enforcing election law
- Private media has a responsibility to allow access to all candidates in an election race. >
- Polling should not determine a candidate's viability especially if the polling is arbitrary
- Viability of a candidate
- Public media violates election law regarding do no damage to candidate's campaign
- 501c3 Organizations violate election law in doing no damage to a candidate in a race >
- Voter apathy increases when elections are not free and fair
- Maryland Board of Elections certifies election on July 10, 2014
- Maryland Elections ---2016
Conclusion
Voter turnout in Maryland is the lowest in the nation. Maryland’s primary elections embrace the most extreme interpretation of court rulings over a few decades regarding FCC and IRS election law. Media and major 501c3s have been given free rein to decide elections by unlimited exclusion. Even polling manipulations now are openly used to assure this selection stands. Cindy Walsh claims that the overwhelming numbers of court rulings regarding selective rights in elections events keep the original intent of these election laws intact. It is clear that media does not have to abide by equal time but it does have to allow all access and opportunity in coverage during the primary season and it most definitely cannot misrepresent the List of Candidates for the Democratic Primary for Governor of Maryland. Editorial lists are far different from what is presented throughout the primary. Bobbie Mack and Linda Lamone of the Maryland Board of Elections and Doug Gansler of the Maryland Attorney General’s office were able to understand these differences. They knew election irregularities were occurring and deliberately, willfully, and with malice ignored this and gave Cindy Walsh no relief upon her communicating these violations. Brown, Ganlser, and Mizeur knew when they engaged in behind door planning of election events of time, place, and media outlet that they were excluding Cindy Walsh from these activities. This was a direct 501c3 violation by their campaign committees. They aided and abetted the systemic abuse of election laws by participating in these events that excluded. If they did not participate---the events would have included or canceled. All of this damaged the campaign of Cindy Walsh and changed the results of the Democratic Primary for Governor. The Baltimore City Circuit Court judge erred with her ruling of Dismissal with no trial in a case that was legitimate and strong with merit.
The Maryland courts have the power to rule an election invalid. They have the power to demand a re-run of an election filled with election irregularities. The courts can award financial damages for a campaign wrongfully denied access to the election process. They can provide oversight in election reforms. Please remand this case back to the Baltimore City Circuit Court to trial giving the Appellant justice.
Font and Type Size------------New Times Roman 13, 14 pt
-20-
The Appellant thanks the Maryland Court of Appeals for hearing this appeal.
Thank you,
Cindy Walsh
Affidavit of Service for the Brief
The Brief was sent to all of the Appellees on March 13, 2015
1. Bobbie Mack, Chairman Maryland Board of Elections
151 West Street, Suite 200
Annapolis, MD 21401
2. Doug Gansler, Maryland Attorney General and candidate
200 St. Paul Place
Baltimore, MD 21202
3. Heather Mizeur- candidate
House Office Building, Room 429
6 Bladen St., Annapolis, MD 21401
4. Linda H. Lamone -State Election Administrator
151 West Street, Suite 200
Annapolis, MD 21401
5. Anthony Brown- candidate Cindy Walsh----Self-representing
%Amanda S. La Forge 2522 N. Calvert St
1025 Vermont Avenue, NW Suite 300 Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Washington DC 20005 443-825-7031
cwals99@yahoo.com
-21-
March 13, 2015
Motion for Relief from Brief Timeline
To: Chief Judge Peter B. Krauser
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
Robert C. Murphy Courts of Appeal Building
361 Rowe Boulevard – 2nd Floor
Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1698
From: Cindy Walsh
2522 N. Calvert St
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
RE: COSA September Term, 2015 No. 01664
Appeal from Baltimore City Circuit Court case # 24-C-14-004156
Honorable Chief Judge Krauser,
Cindy Walsh pro se is requesting relief from the missed deadline to filing brief. This deadline was March 13, 2015.
As an academic, I have listened to many 'the dog ate my homework' excuses from students with late papers so it is now my turn to plead for excuse. My briefs were all copied and correlated and off to the print shop to be bound on March 12 to be ready for delivery on March 13. The print shop erred badly in binding and created the need to repair these damages. Great time, effort, and expense went into the preparation to have this case dismissed for a delay of a few days.
The Maryland Rule 8-602 (a)(7) states the fact that the court MAY dismiss for this infraction. Cindy Walsh is asking the court to extend for just days the deadline as all the briefs are ready for delivery. A Pro Se Appellant should be one that receives leniency.
Rule 8-602. DISMISSAL BY COURT
(a) Grounds
On motion or on its own initiative, the Court may dismiss
an appeal for any of the following reasons
(7) a brief or record extract was not filed by the appellant
within the time prescribed by Rule 8-502
The Appellant will deliver these briefs any time within the 10 days the court has to officially dismiss this case for failure to meet the deadline of filing a brief.
Thank you for considering this,
Cindy Walsh Appellant/Pro Se
2522 N Calvert St
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
443-825-7031
cwals99@yahoo.com