Conclusion

Voter turnout in Maryland is the lowest in the nation.  Maryland’s primary elections embrace the most extreme interpretation of court rulings over a few decades regarding FCC and IRS election law.  Media and major 501c3s have been given free rein to decide elections by unlimited exclusion.  Even polling manipulations now are openly used to assure this selection stands.  Cindy Walsh claims that the overwhelming numbers of court rulings regarding selective rights in elections events keep the original intent of these election laws intact.  It is clear that media does not have to abide by equal time but it does have to allow all access and opportunity in coverage during the primary season and it most definitely cannot misrepresent the List of Candidates for the Democratic Primary for Governor of Maryland.  Editorial lists are far different from what is presented throughout the primary.  Bobbie Mack and Linda Lamone of the Maryland Board of Elections and Doug Gansler of the Maryland Attorney General’s office were able to understand these differences.  They knew election irregularities were occurring and deliberately, willfully, and with malice ignored this and gave Cindy Walsh no relief upon her communicating these violations.  Brown, Ganlser, and Mizeur knew when they engaged in behind door planning of election events of time, place, and media outlet that they were excluding Cindy Walsh from these activities.  This was a direct 501c3 violation by their campaign committees.  They aided and abetted the systemic abuse of election laws by participating in these events that excluded.  If they did not participate---the events would have included or canceled.  All of this damaged the campaign of Cindy Walsh and changed the results of the Democratic Primary for Governor.  The Baltimore City Circuit Court judge erred with her ruling of Dismissal with no trial in a case that was legitimate and strong with merit.
The Maryland courts have the power to rule an election invalid.  They have the power to demand a re-run of an election filled with election irregularities.  The courts can award financial damages for a campaign wrongfully denied access to the election process. They can provide oversight in election reforms.  Please remand this case back to the Baltimore City Circuit Court to trial giving the Appellant justice.
Font and Type Size------------New Times Roman      13, 14 pt
-20-

The Appellant thanks the Maryland Court of Appeals for hearing this appeal.

Thank you,

Cindy Walsh

Affidavit of Service for the Brief
The Brief was sent to all of the Appellees on March 13, 2015


1.  Bobbie Mack, Chairman Maryland Board of Elections
151 West Street, Suite 200
Annapolis, MD 21401

2.  Doug Gansler, Maryland Attorney General and candidate
200 St. Paul Place
Baltimore, MD 21202

3.  Heather Mizeur- candidate
House Office Building, Room 429
6 Bladen St., Annapolis, MD 21401
4.  Linda H. Lamone -State Election Administrator   
151 West Street, Suite 200
Annapolis, MD 21401
 5.       Anthony Brown- candidate                 Cindy Walsh----Self-representing
%Amanda S. La Forge                                    2522 N. Calvert St
 1025 Vermont Avenue, NW Suite 300           Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Washington DC 20005                                  443-825-7031                   
                                                                        cwals99@yahoo.com  

                                                                 -21-

March 13, 2015

Motion for Relief from Brief Timeline

To: Chief Judge Peter B. Krauser

Maryland Court of Special Appeals

Robert C. Murphy Courts of Appeal Building

361 Rowe Boulevard – 2nd Floor

Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1698



From: Cindy Walsh

2522 N. Calvert St

Baltimore, Maryland 21218

RE: COSA September Term, 2015  No. 01664

Appeal from  Baltimore City Circuit Court case # 24-C-14-004156

Honorable Chief Judge Krauser,

Cindy Walsh pro se is requesting relief from the missed deadline to filing brief. This deadline was March 13, 2015.

As an academic, I have listened to many 'the dog ate my homework' excuses from students with late papers so it is now my turn to plead for excuse. My briefs were all copied and correlated and off to the print shop to be bound on March 12 to be ready for delivery on March 13. The print shop erred badly in binding and created the need to repair these damages. Great time, effort, and expense went into the preparation to have this case dismissed for a delay of a few days.

The Maryland Rule 8-602 (a)(7) states the fact that the court MAY dismiss for this infraction. Cindy Walsh is asking the court to extend for just days the deadline as all the briefs are ready for delivery. A Pro Se Appellant should be one that receives leniency.

Rule 8-602. DISMISSAL BY COURT

(a) Grounds

On motion or on its own initiative, the Court may dismiss

an appeal for any of the following reasons

(7) a brief or record extract was not filed by the appellant

within the time prescribed by Rule 8-502

The Appellant will deliver these briefs any time within the 10 days the court has to officially dismiss this case for failure to meet the deadline of filing a brief.


Thank you for considering this,


Cindy Walsh Appellant/Pro Se

2522 N Calvert St

Baltimore, Maryland 21218

443-825-7031

cwals99@yahoo.com