- Home
-
Cindy Walsh for Mayor of Baltimore
- Mayoral Election violations
-
Questionnaires from Community
>
- Education Questionnaire
- Baltimore Housing Questionnaire
- Emerging Youth Questionnaire
- Health Care policy for Baltimore
- Environmental Questionnaires
- Livable Baltimore questionnaire
- Labor Questionnnaire
- Ending Food Deserts Questionnaire
- Maryland Out of School Time Network
- LBGTQ Questionnaire
- Citizen Artist Baltimore Mayoral Forum on Arts & Culture Questionnaire
- Baltimore Transit Choices Questionnaire
- Baltimore Activating Solidarity Economies (BASE)
- Downtown Partnership Questionnaire
- The Northeast Baltimore Communities Of BelAir Edison Community Association (BECCA )and Frankford Improvement Association, Inc. (FIA)
- Streets and Transportation/Neighbood Questionnaire
- African American Tourism and business questionnaire
- Baltimore Sun Questionnaire
- City Paper Mayoral Questionnaire
- Baltimore Technology Com Questionnaire
- Baltimore Biker's Questionnair
- Homewood Friends Meeting Questionnaire
- Baltimore Historical Collaboration---Anthem Project
- Tubman City News Mayoral Questionnaire
- Maryland Public Policy Institute Questionnaire
- AFRO questionnaire
- WBAL Candidate's Survey
- Blog
- Trans Pacific Pact (TPP)
- Progressive vs. Third Way Corporate Democrats
-
Financial Reform/Wall Street Fraud
- Federal Healthcare Reform
- Social Security and Entitlement Reform
- Federal Education Reform
- Government Schedules
-
State and Local Government
- Maryland Committee Actions
- Maryland and Baltimore Development Organizations
- Maryland State Department of Education
- Baltimore City School Board
-
Progressive Issues
-
Building Strong Media
-
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
>
- anotherangryvoice.blogspot.com
- "Talk About It" Radio - WFBR 1590AM Baltimore
- Promethius Radio Project
- Clearing the Fog
- Democracy Now
- Black Agenda Radio
- World Truth. TV Your Alternative News Network.
- Daily Censured
- Bill Moyers Journal
- Center for Public Integrity
- Public Radio International
- Baltimore Brew
- Free Press
- Far Left/Socialist Media
- Media with a Third Way Agenda >
-
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
>
-
Progressive Organizations
- Progressive Actions
- Maryland/Baltimore Voting Districts - your politicians and their votes
- Petitions, Complaints, and Freedom of Information Requests
- State of the Democratic Party
- Misc
- Misc 2
- Misc 3
- Misc 4
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Standard of Review
- Untitled
-
WALSH FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE INFORMATION AND PLATFORM
- Campaign Finance/Campaign donations
- Speaking Events
- Why Heather Mizeur is NOT a progressive
- Campaign responses to Community Organization Questionnaires
-
Cindy Walsh vs Maryland Board of Elections
>
- Leniency from court for self-representing plaintiffs
- Amended Complaint
- Plaintiff request for expedited trial date
- Response to Motion to Dismiss--Brown, Gansler, Mackie, and Lamone
- Injunction and Mandamus
-
DECISION/APPEAL TO SPECIAL COURT OF APPEALS---Baltimore City Circuit Court response to Cindy Walsh complaint
>
-
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
>
- Cover Page ---yellow
- Table of Contents
- Table of Authorities
- Leniency for Pro Se Representation
- Statement of Case
- Questions Presented
- Statement of Facts
- Argument
- Conclusion/Font and Type Size
- Record Extract
- Appendix
- Motion for Reconsideration
- Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss
- Motion to Reconsider Dismissal
-
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
>
- General Election fraud and recount complaints
-
Cindy Walsh goes to Federal Court for Maryland election violations
>
- Complaints filed with the FCC, the IRS, and the FBI
- Zapple Doctrine---Media Time for Major Party candidates
- Complaint filed with the US Justice Department for election fraud and court irregularities.
- US Attorney General, Maryland Attorney General, and Maryland Board of Elections are charged with enforcing election law
- Private media has a responsibility to allow access to all candidates in an election race. >
- Polling should not determine a candidate's viability especially if the polling is arbitrary
- Viability of a candidate
- Public media violates election law regarding do no damage to candidate's campaign
- 501c3 Organizations violate election law in doing no damage to a candidate in a race >
- Voter apathy increases when elections are not free and fair
- Maryland Board of Elections certifies election on July 10, 2014
- Maryland Elections ---2016
State's Attorney Bernstein
Welcome to the Web site for the Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office.
You will see in the center of the home page an interactive map of Baltimore City. By clicking on the police district where you live, you can keep track of our work in your community.
Other features of the site include forms to submit online victim and community impact statements; a translation function for Spanish-speaking visitors; and a calendar of upcoming public safety events throughout the city.
If you ever have a question, comment, suggestion, or invitation for a prosecutor to attend an event, please do not hesitate to contact us at 410-396-4001 or mail@stattorney.org.
I am honored to work with you in our goal to make Baltimore a safer city.
Economic Crimes 410-396-4996
The Economic Crimes Division investigates and prosecutes a variety of economic crimes, including major theft, fraud, counterfeit, and white-collar matters. The division also prosecutes arson cases, including homicides caused by arson.
MY LETTER TO THE CITY PROSECUTOR IS THE SAME LETTER I FORWARDED TO CARL STOKES AND MARYPAT CLARKE WHO CHAIR COMMITTEES THAT OVERSEE THESE ISSUES. I ALSO SENT IT TO CIVIL JUSTICE, AN ORGANIZATION WHOSE MISSION IS TO ADVOCATE FOR THE PEOPLE.
States Attorney for Baltimore,
The primary driver of crime in the City of Baltimore is the lack of resources and employment opportunities in our underserved communities. All of this is predicated on where city financial resources are directed. We know that City and State legislators have historically fenced in revenues paid to the city/state so that the bulk of money paid by the wealthy stay in their communities. So goes the business tax credit system that dominates Baltimore's spending. We also know that the system is replete with fraud and that it is totally without oversight. Politicians and local media have said so publically. These two factors are what drive crime in Baltimore......laws protecting revenue and distribution of revenue to development corporations.
There was a city investigation by the Attorneys General office that discovered some infractions with then Mayor Dixson and developers, but it surprised everyone that the investigation failed to reveal the depths of the fraud and corruption in this business tax credit system for one. There is of course wide-spread problems with fraud in city and state government. The Center for Public Integrity gave Maryland a D- in State Corruption over a wide range of government agencies-----this is a direct reflection of the States Attorney General's Office and the City Prosecutor's Office.
One of the excuses for failure for oversight is funding; but these two areas of known fraud are the very source of the funding for investigations. The funding is available if the Justice Department does its job!
Below we see the Baltimore City Council's response to community concerns over corruption and fraud in the business tax program. A task force was formed and nearly all the members of this task force are recipients of these funds or politicians who decide who gets these funds, or groups associated with them.....a closed circle of operators. You saw my concerns over the education/development organizations all coming from the same sources....many being Johns Hopkins affiliates.
Look at the funding for city audits that even the Chair of the committee of Taxes and Finance, Carl Stokes, admits has been left dormant for decades. It's funding matches that of the tax credits given. The funding for audits includes all city functions...this funding for tax credits is just one request for the year. Budgets for legal administration is very low.
The point is this: if you know you have massive fraud in your system and you know that the citizens of the city want accountability....would you be leveraging the very source of much of the fraud, or leveraging the funds for oversight?
131 Audits
General Fund Appropriation $ 3,898,358
705 Loan and Guarantee Program
Loan and Guarantee Enterprise Fund Appropriation $ 3,313,772
Law
860 Administration - Law
General Fund Appropriation $ 567,623
861 Controversies
General Fund Appropriation $ 1,916,989
Special Fund Appropriation $ 11,903
862 Transactions
General Fund Appropriation $ 1,236,149
869 Minority and Women's Business Opportunity Office
General Fund Appropriation $ 444,025
Totalling about $4 million
BALTIMORE CITY'S TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT FINANCING EFFORTS
October 2011
SUMMARY
A Task Force comprised of business, philanthropic, institutional, and community leaders was convened
in January 2011 by Councilman Carl Stokes to review Baltimore’s process for awarding and then
monitoring tax increment financing (TIFs) and Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOTs). At this time of
national economic uncertainty and very limited availability of private capital for development these and
other public capital resources are even more valuable and necessary to support the economic and
neighborhood growth of Baltimore. The committee was also directed to explore whether TIFs and
PILOTs were being committed at the expense of neighborhood priorities.
Working with Baltimore’s Department of Finance, Housing and Community Development and Baltimore
Development Corporation the Task Force found that the city explores various means of supporting
economic development throughout the city and has a process for awarding public financing with stages
in the process for public engagement.
The Task Force concluded that the process could be improved and in this report makes several
recommendations which follow. Among them the city should:
• require a greater and consistent return for all economic concessions and investments;
• carefully and continually measure the economic results and social returns to the community
that are promised by developers and limit the time for developers to begin work;
• enhance the involvement of Planning in the pre‐legislative process to oversee that incentive
programs fit the needs identified in the city’s master plan;
• increase communication with communities and citizens during the process;
• evaluate other creative ways to provide tax incentives;
• implement ways to make transparent all considerations for TIFs and PILOTs;
• increase efforts to find ways to use PILOTS and TIFS for community revitalization, “public good”
projects, and building a larger middle class; and,
• research a way to adjust the formula used to calculate state aid to Baltimore City.
Other topics discussed by the Task Force included providing more or additional incentives to developers
working in “priority” areas in neighborhoods; forming policy to minimize the possibility of favoritism;
and devising a way for small businesses to benefit from similar incentives.
The Task Force realizes and appreciates the role of developers in the physical aspects of community and
economic development. The City’s role is to incentivize economic development goals in a manner which
addresses the priorities of the City.
Baltimore has great potential and the city needs to direct development efforts to fulfilling that potential,
which includes investment downtown and in neighborhoods. The Task Force was unanimous in the
belief there are many development opportunities that will benefit from aggressive market‐driven
public/private partnerships in all corners of the city and that Baltimore must seek out every source of
available capital.
TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP
The Task Force held its first meeting on January 11, 2011 with seven subsequent meetings held in
January, February, March, May, and June and one small workgroup meeting.
Co‐Chairs
Wendy Blair, W.L. Blair Development
Calman “Buddy” Zamoiski, Independent Distributors Incorporated
Members
Peter Angelos/Tom Marudas, Law Offices of Peter Angelos
Paul Bernard, Walker & Dunlop
Robert Embry, The Abell Foundation
Andy Frank, Johns Hopkins University
Ronald Kreitner, Westside Renaissance, Inc.
Jody Landers, formerly of the Greater Baltimore Board of Realtors
Linda Loubert, PhD, Morgan State University
Robert Manekin, Colliers International
Jonathan Melnick, Jonathan Melnick Auctioneers
Gary Rodwell, PhD, Coppin Heights Community Development Corporation
Mark Sissman, Healthy Neighborhoods
Mark Wasserman, University of Maryland Medical System
Maria Welch, Respira Medical
Council Staff
Councilman Carl Stokes
Kelley Ray, Legislative Analyst
City Representatives
Carolyn Blakeney, Office of the City Council President
M. Jay Brodie/Irene Van Sant, Baltimore Development Corporation
Paul Graziano, Department of Housing
Steve Kraus, Department of Finance
Tom Stosur, Department of Planning
Colin Tarbert, Office of the Mayor
_________________________________________________________________________
States Attorney for Baltimore,
The primary driver of crime in the City of Baltimore is the lack of resources and employment opportunities in our underserved communities. All of this is predicated on where city financial resources are directed. We know that City and State legislators have historically fenced in revenues paid to the city/state so that the bulk of money paid by the wealthy stay in their communities. So goes the business tax credit system that dominates Baltimore's spending. We also know that the system is replete with fraud and that it is totally without oversight. Politicians and local media have said so publically. These two factors are what drive crime in Baltimore......laws protecting revenue and distribution of revenue to development corporations.
There was a city investigation by the Attorneys General office that discovered some infractions with then Mayor Dixson and developers, but it surprised everyone that the investigation failed to reveal the depths of the fraud and corruption in this business tax credit system for one. There is of course wide-spread problems with fraud in city and state government. The Center for Public Integrity gave Maryland a D- in State Corruption over a wide range of government agencies-----this is a direct reflection of the States Attorney General's Office and the City Prosecutor's Office.
One of the excuses for failure for oversight is funding; but these two areas of known fraud are the very source of the funding for investigations. The funding is available if the Justice Department does its job!
Below we see the Baltimore City Council's response to community concerns over corruption and fraud in the business tax program. A task force was formed and nearly all the members of this task force are recipients of these funds or politicians who decide who gets these funds, or groups associated with them.....a closed circle of operators. You saw my concerns over the education/development organizations all coming from the same sources....many being Johns Hopkins affiliates.
Look at the funding for city audits that even the Chair of the committee of Taxes and Finance, Carl Stokes, admits has been left dormant for decades. It's funding matches that of the tax credits given. The funding for audits includes all city functions...this funding for tax credits is just one request for the year. Budgets for legal administration is very low.
The point is this: if you know you have massive fraud in your system and you know that the citizens of the city want accountability....would you be leveraging the very source of much of the fraud, or leveraging the funds for oversight?
131 Audits
General Fund Appropriation $ 3,898,358
705 Loan and Guarantee Program
Loan and Guarantee Enterprise Fund Appropriation $ 3,313,772
Law
860 Administration - Law
General Fund Appropriation $ 567,623
861 Controversies
General Fund Appropriation $ 1,916,989
Special Fund Appropriation $ 11,903
862 Transactions
General Fund Appropriation $ 1,236,149
869 Minority and Women's Business Opportunity Office
General Fund Appropriation $ 444,025
Totalling about $4 million
BALTIMORE CITY'S TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT FINANCING EFFORTS
October 2011
SUMMARY
A Task Force comprised of business, philanthropic, institutional, and community leaders was convened
in January 2011 by Councilman Carl Stokes to review Baltimore’s process for awarding and then
monitoring tax increment financing (TIFs) and Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOTs). At this time of
national economic uncertainty and very limited availability of private capital for development these and
other public capital resources are even more valuable and necessary to support the economic and
neighborhood growth of Baltimore. The committee was also directed to explore whether TIFs and
PILOTs were being committed at the expense of neighborhood priorities.
Working with Baltimore’s Department of Finance, Housing and Community Development and Baltimore
Development Corporation the Task Force found that the city explores various means of supporting
economic development throughout the city and has a process for awarding public financing with stages
in the process for public engagement.
The Task Force concluded that the process could be improved and in this report makes several
recommendations which follow. Among them the city should:
• require a greater and consistent return for all economic concessions and investments;
• carefully and continually measure the economic results and social returns to the community
that are promised by developers and limit the time for developers to begin work;
• enhance the involvement of Planning in the pre‐legislative process to oversee that incentive
programs fit the needs identified in the city’s master plan;
• increase communication with communities and citizens during the process;
• evaluate other creative ways to provide tax incentives;
• implement ways to make transparent all considerations for TIFs and PILOTs;
• increase efforts to find ways to use PILOTS and TIFS for community revitalization, “public good”
projects, and building a larger middle class; and,
• research a way to adjust the formula used to calculate state aid to Baltimore City.
Other topics discussed by the Task Force included providing more or additional incentives to developers
working in “priority” areas in neighborhoods; forming policy to minimize the possibility of favoritism;
and devising a way for small businesses to benefit from similar incentives.
The Task Force realizes and appreciates the role of developers in the physical aspects of community and
economic development. The City’s role is to incentivize economic development goals in a manner which
addresses the priorities of the City.
Baltimore has great potential and the city needs to direct development efforts to fulfilling that potential,
which includes investment downtown and in neighborhoods. The Task Force was unanimous in the
belief there are many development opportunities that will benefit from aggressive market‐driven
public/private partnerships in all corners of the city and that Baltimore must seek out every source of
available capital.
TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP
The Task Force held its first meeting on January 11, 2011 with seven subsequent meetings held in
January, February, March, May, and June and one small workgroup meeting.
Co‐Chairs
Wendy Blair, W.L. Blair Development
Calman “Buddy” Zamoiski, Independent Distributors Incorporated
Members
Peter Angelos/Tom Marudas, Law Offices of Peter Angelos
Paul Bernard, Walker & Dunlop
Robert Embry, The Abell Foundation
Andy Frank, Johns Hopkins University
Ronald Kreitner, Westside Renaissance, Inc.
Jody Landers, formerly of the Greater Baltimore Board of Realtors
Linda Loubert, PhD, Morgan State University
Robert Manekin, Colliers International
Jonathan Melnick, Jonathan Melnick Auctioneers
Gary Rodwell, PhD, Coppin Heights Community Development Corporation
Mark Sissman, Healthy Neighborhoods
Mark Wasserman, University of Maryland Medical System
Maria Welch, Respira Medical
Council Staff
Councilman Carl Stokes
Kelley Ray, Legislative Analyst
City Representatives
Carolyn Blakeney, Office of the City Council President
M. Jay Brodie/Irene Van Sant, Baltimore Development Corporation
Paul Graziano, Department of Housing
Steve Kraus, Department of Finance
Tom Stosur, Department of Planning
Colin Tarbert, Office of the Mayor
_________________________________________________________________________