- Home
-
Cindy Walsh for Mayor of Baltimore
- Mayoral Election violations
-
Questionnaires from Community
>
- Education Questionnaire
- Baltimore Housing Questionnaire
- Emerging Youth Questionnaire
- Health Care policy for Baltimore
- Environmental Questionnaires
- Livable Baltimore questionnaire
- Labor Questionnnaire
- Ending Food Deserts Questionnaire
- Maryland Out of School Time Network
- LBGTQ Questionnaire
- Citizen Artist Baltimore Mayoral Forum on Arts & Culture Questionnaire
- Baltimore Transit Choices Questionnaire
- Baltimore Activating Solidarity Economies (BASE)
- Downtown Partnership Questionnaire
- The Northeast Baltimore Communities Of BelAir Edison Community Association (BECCA )and Frankford Improvement Association, Inc. (FIA)
- Streets and Transportation/Neighbood Questionnaire
- African American Tourism and business questionnaire
- Baltimore Sun Questionnaire
- City Paper Mayoral Questionnaire
- Baltimore Technology Com Questionnaire
- Baltimore Biker's Questionnair
- Homewood Friends Meeting Questionnaire
- Baltimore Historical Collaboration---Anthem Project
- Tubman City News Mayoral Questionnaire
- Maryland Public Policy Institute Questionnaire
- AFRO questionnaire
- WBAL Candidate's Survey
- Blog
- Trans Pacific Pact (TPP)
- Progressive vs. Third Way Corporate Democrats
-
Financial Reform/Wall Street Fraud
- Federal Healthcare Reform
- Social Security and Entitlement Reform
- Federal Education Reform
- Government Schedules
-
State and Local Government
- Maryland Committee Actions
- Maryland and Baltimore Development Organizations
- Maryland State Department of Education
- Baltimore City School Board
-
Progressive Issues
-
Building Strong Media
-
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
>
- anotherangryvoice.blogspot.com
- "Talk About It" Radio - WFBR 1590AM Baltimore
- Promethius Radio Project
- Clearing the Fog
- Democracy Now
- Black Agenda Radio
- World Truth. TV Your Alternative News Network.
- Daily Censured
- Bill Moyers Journal
- Center for Public Integrity
- Public Radio International
- Baltimore Brew
- Free Press
- Far Left/Socialist Media
- Media with a Third Way Agenda >
-
Media with a Progressive Agenda (I'm still checking on that!)
>
-
Progressive Organizations
- Progressive Actions
- Maryland/Baltimore Voting Districts - your politicians and their votes
- Petitions, Complaints, and Freedom of Information Requests
- State of the Democratic Party
- Misc
- Misc 2
- Misc 3
- Misc 4
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Standard of Review
- Untitled
-
WALSH FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE INFORMATION AND PLATFORM
- Campaign Finance/Campaign donations
- Speaking Events
- Why Heather Mizeur is NOT a progressive
- Campaign responses to Community Organization Questionnaires
-
Cindy Walsh vs Maryland Board of Elections
>
- Leniency from court for self-representing plaintiffs
- Amended Complaint
- Plaintiff request for expedited trial date
- Response to Motion to Dismiss--Brown, Gansler, Mackie, and Lamone
- Injunction and Mandamus
-
DECISION/APPEAL TO SPECIAL COURT OF APPEALS---Baltimore City Circuit Court response to Cindy Walsh complaint
>
-
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
>
- Cover Page ---yellow
- Table of Contents
- Table of Authorities
- Leniency for Pro Se Representation
- Statement of Case
- Questions Presented
- Statement of Facts
- Argument
- Conclusion/Font and Type Size
- Record Extract
- Appendix
- Motion for Reconsideration
- Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss
- Motion to Reconsider Dismissal
-
Brief for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
>
- General Election fraud and recount complaints
-
Cindy Walsh goes to Federal Court for Maryland election violations
>
- Complaints filed with the FCC, the IRS, and the FBI
- Zapple Doctrine---Media Time for Major Party candidates
- Complaint filed with the US Justice Department for election fraud and court irregularities.
- US Attorney General, Maryland Attorney General, and Maryland Board of Elections are charged with enforcing election law
- Private media has a responsibility to allow access to all candidates in an election race. >
- Polling should not determine a candidate's viability especially if the polling is arbitrary
- Viability of a candidate
- Public media violates election law regarding do no damage to candidate's campaign
- 501c3 Organizations violate election law in doing no damage to a candidate in a race >
- Voter apathy increases when elections are not free and fair
- Maryland Board of Elections certifies election on July 10, 2014
- Maryland Elections ---2016
Table
of Authorities
Maryland Constitution, Statutes, and Rules Page
Rule 8-502 (a) (1)) ..........................................................................6, App. 13
§1–101 (d) (1); (l) (1); (m) (1)(i) ....................................................6, App. 13
§5–401 (b) (2) ..................................................................................6, App. 13
Title 47 Section 312 [47 U.S.C. §312] (a) (7) (f) (1) (2); Section 315 [47 U.S.C. §315] (a) (1) (2) (3) (4); Section 399 [47 U.S.C. §399] ; Section 73.1940 [47 CFR §73.1940] (a) (1) (2) (3) (b) (1) (2) (e) (1) (2) (f); Section 73.1941 [47 CFR §73.1941] (a) (1) (2) (3) (4) (b) (c) (d) (e); 1.501(c)(3)–1; Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(3)(i); Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(3)(iii); Rev. Rul. 66-256, 1966-2 C.B. 210;Rev. Rul. 74-574, 1974-2 C.B. 160; Rev. Rul. 78-248, 1978-1 C.B. 154; Rev. Rul. 80-282, 1980-2 C.B. 178; Rev. Rul. 86-95, 1986-2 C.B. 73
.............................................................................................................7, App. 26 - 51
§1–201 (1) (4) (7) (8) .........................................................................7, App. 13
§2–101 (d); §2–102 (a) (b) (1)……………………………………...10, App. 14
§2–103(a) (b) (4) (5) (c)…………………………………………….10, App. 14
§16–301 (a) (b) ……………………………………………………..10, App. 14
§16–901 (a) (1).....................................................................................8, 10, App. 14
18 U.S. Code § 1001 (a) (2) (3) .........................................................7, App. 14
Maryland Defamation per se ...........................................................7, App 15
Federal Defamation per se ..............................................................8, App. 15
Title 2 Subtitle 1 Section 2-102 - (a) (b) (1) (2) (3) ........................8, App. 15
ii
Chapter 612, Acts of 1976; Code Criminal Procedure Article, secs. 14-101 through 14-114; Sec. 6 (originally Article I, sec. 6, renumbered by Chapter 681, Acts of 1977, ratified Nov. 7, 1978).
.............................................................................................................9, App. 16
Title 12 Subtitle 2. Judicial Review of Elections Section 2-102 (a) (b) (1) (2) (3); Subtitle 2. 12-202 (a) (1) (2) (b) (2); 12-203 (a) (1) (2) (3) (b); 12-204 (a) 1) (2) (b) (1) (2) (c) (1) (2) (d) ..................................................................................................8,12, App. 17, 18
§ 20-801(1) (2) (3) .............................................................................10, App. 19
Maryland Rule 8-206 (a) (1) …........................................................12, App. 19
Chapter I: Federal Election Commission Subchapter A: General Part 110: Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and Prohibitions 110.13 - Candidate debates.
.......................................................................................................15, App. 19, 20
Citation of Cases
AETC vs Forbes .............................................................................................17, App. 11 - 12
Baker vs Carr, 369 US 186 (1962) reaffirming every citizens' right to vote free from impairment by arbitrary state action. Stephan J. Shapiro University of Baltimore Law School 42 USC Section 1983 liability for deprivation of rights secured by Constitution and laws with award of damages to a plaintiff whose constitutional rights have been violated.
…..................................................................................................9, 12, App. 21 – 26
iii
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 15 (1974) (quoting Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401U.S. 265, 272 (1971)) ………………………………………..............................................16
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957).................................................. 1
Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 806, 105 S.Ct. at 3453, 87 L.Ed.2d at 584 ..................................................................................................................15
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) ............................................................................................................18
Haines v. Kerner 92 Sct 594 .................................................................................................................1
Hall v. Bellmon 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991) .............................................................................................................1
Hulsey v. Ownes 63 F3d 354 (5th Cir 1995) ..............................................................................................................1
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free Sch. Dist., 508 U.S. ___, ___, 113 S.Ct. 2141, 2147, 124 L.Ed.2d 352, 362 (1993) (quoting Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 806, 105 S.Ct. At 3451) .............................................................................................................14
McBride v. People (126 Col. 277, 248 P.2d 725) .........................................19
McGlynn v NJ Public Broadcasting Authority ............................................17
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 376 U. S. 280 .........................19
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,376 U. S. 254. Pp. 401 U. S. 272-277........18
Perry, 460 U.S. at 46, 103 S.Ct. at 955, 74 L.Ed.2d at 805 .........................14
Perry Educ. Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460 U.S. 37, 46,
103 S.Ct. 948, 955, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) ...................................................15
iv
Power 914 F2d 1459 (11th Cir1990)..............................................................1
Puckett v. Cox(456 F2d 233 (1972 Sixth Circuit USCA).............................1
Richie vs Donelly, 324 Md. 344,597 A.2d 432 (1991); Clea vs City Council of Baltimore, 312 Md. 662,541 A.2d 1303 (1988)...........................................................................................10, 12, App. 25
Roth v.United States,354 U.S.476,484(1957) .............................................16
St. Amant v. Thompson,390 U. S. 731, 390 U. S. 731 (1968) .................... 19
W. Prosser, Law of Torts 771-772, 821 (4th ed.1971)...............................19
Whitney v.California,274 U.S.357,375(1927)(concurring opinion) ..........16
Williams v. I.B. Fischer Nev., 999 F.2d 445, 447 (9th Cir. 1993) (quoting Fed R. iv. P. 56(c)).....................................................................................................13
v
Maryland Constitution, Statutes, and Rules Page
Rule 8-502 (a) (1)) ..........................................................................6, App. 13
§1–101 (d) (1); (l) (1); (m) (1)(i) ....................................................6, App. 13
§5–401 (b) (2) ..................................................................................6, App. 13
Title 47 Section 312 [47 U.S.C. §312] (a) (7) (f) (1) (2); Section 315 [47 U.S.C. §315] (a) (1) (2) (3) (4); Section 399 [47 U.S.C. §399] ; Section 73.1940 [47 CFR §73.1940] (a) (1) (2) (3) (b) (1) (2) (e) (1) (2) (f); Section 73.1941 [47 CFR §73.1941] (a) (1) (2) (3) (4) (b) (c) (d) (e); 1.501(c)(3)–1; Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(3)(i); Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(3)(iii); Rev. Rul. 66-256, 1966-2 C.B. 210;Rev. Rul. 74-574, 1974-2 C.B. 160; Rev. Rul. 78-248, 1978-1 C.B. 154; Rev. Rul. 80-282, 1980-2 C.B. 178; Rev. Rul. 86-95, 1986-2 C.B. 73
.............................................................................................................7, App. 26 - 51
§1–201 (1) (4) (7) (8) .........................................................................7, App. 13
§2–101 (d); §2–102 (a) (b) (1)……………………………………...10, App. 14
§2–103(a) (b) (4) (5) (c)…………………………………………….10, App. 14
§16–301 (a) (b) ……………………………………………………..10, App. 14
§16–901 (a) (1).....................................................................................8, 10, App. 14
18 U.S. Code § 1001 (a) (2) (3) .........................................................7, App. 14
Maryland Defamation per se ...........................................................7, App 15
Federal Defamation per se ..............................................................8, App. 15
Title 2 Subtitle 1 Section 2-102 - (a) (b) (1) (2) (3) ........................8, App. 15
ii
Chapter 612, Acts of 1976; Code Criminal Procedure Article, secs. 14-101 through 14-114; Sec. 6 (originally Article I, sec. 6, renumbered by Chapter 681, Acts of 1977, ratified Nov. 7, 1978).
.............................................................................................................9, App. 16
Title 12 Subtitle 2. Judicial Review of Elections Section 2-102 (a) (b) (1) (2) (3); Subtitle 2. 12-202 (a) (1) (2) (b) (2); 12-203 (a) (1) (2) (3) (b); 12-204 (a) 1) (2) (b) (1) (2) (c) (1) (2) (d) ..................................................................................................8,12, App. 17, 18
§ 20-801(1) (2) (3) .............................................................................10, App. 19
Maryland Rule 8-206 (a) (1) …........................................................12, App. 19
Chapter I: Federal Election Commission Subchapter A: General Part 110: Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and Prohibitions 110.13 - Candidate debates.
.......................................................................................................15, App. 19, 20
Citation of Cases
AETC vs Forbes .............................................................................................17, App. 11 - 12
Baker vs Carr, 369 US 186 (1962) reaffirming every citizens' right to vote free from impairment by arbitrary state action. Stephan J. Shapiro University of Baltimore Law School 42 USC Section 1983 liability for deprivation of rights secured by Constitution and laws with award of damages to a plaintiff whose constitutional rights have been violated.
…..................................................................................................9, 12, App. 21 – 26
iii
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 15 (1974) (quoting Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401U.S. 265, 272 (1971)) ………………………………………..............................................16
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957).................................................. 1
Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 806, 105 S.Ct. at 3453, 87 L.Ed.2d at 584 ..................................................................................................................15
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) ............................................................................................................18
Haines v. Kerner 92 Sct 594 .................................................................................................................1
Hall v. Bellmon 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991) .............................................................................................................1
Hulsey v. Ownes 63 F3d 354 (5th Cir 1995) ..............................................................................................................1
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free Sch. Dist., 508 U.S. ___, ___, 113 S.Ct. 2141, 2147, 124 L.Ed.2d 352, 362 (1993) (quoting Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 806, 105 S.Ct. At 3451) .............................................................................................................14
McBride v. People (126 Col. 277, 248 P.2d 725) .........................................19
McGlynn v NJ Public Broadcasting Authority ............................................17
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 376 U. S. 280 .........................19
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,376 U. S. 254. Pp. 401 U. S. 272-277........18
Perry, 460 U.S. at 46, 103 S.Ct. at 955, 74 L.Ed.2d at 805 .........................14
Perry Educ. Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460 U.S. 37, 46,
103 S.Ct. 948, 955, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) ...................................................15
iv
Power 914 F2d 1459 (11th Cir1990)..............................................................1
Puckett v. Cox(456 F2d 233 (1972 Sixth Circuit USCA).............................1
Richie vs Donelly, 324 Md. 344,597 A.2d 432 (1991); Clea vs City Council of Baltimore, 312 Md. 662,541 A.2d 1303 (1988)...........................................................................................10, 12, App. 25
Roth v.United States,354 U.S.476,484(1957) .............................................16
St. Amant v. Thompson,390 U. S. 731, 390 U. S. 731 (1968) .................... 19
W. Prosser, Law of Torts 771-772, 821 (4th ed.1971)...............................19
Whitney v.California,274 U.S.357,375(1927)(concurring opinion) ..........16
Williams v. I.B. Fischer Nev., 999 F.2d 445, 447 (9th Cir. 1993) (quoting Fed R. iv. P. 56(c)).....................................................................................................13
v